Next Article in Journal
Knee Angle and Stride Length in Association with Ball Speed in Youth Baseball Pitchers
Next Article in Special Issue
Regional Differences in Women’s Basketball: A Comparison among Continental Championships
Previous Article in Journal
Perceptions and Determinants of Eating for Health and Performance in High-Level Male Adolescent Rugby Union Players
Previous Article in Special Issue
Monitoring and Managing Fatigue in Basketball
Article Menu
Issue 2 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sports 2018, 6(2), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6020050

Scoring Strategies Differentiating between Winning and Losing Teams during FIBA EuroBasket Women 2017

Institute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, 44221 Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 April 2018 / Revised: 23 May 2018 / Accepted: 25 May 2018 / Published: 29 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improving Practice and Performance in Basketball)
Full-Text   |   PDF [370 KB, uploaded 29 May 2018]   |  

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the scoring strategies differentiating between winning and losing teams during FIBA EuroBasket Women 2017 in relation to different game scores. Data were gathered for all games of FIBA EuroBasket Women 2017 from the official website. The investigated scoring strategies were fast break points (FBP); points in the paint (PP); points from turnover (PT); second chance points (SCP); and points from the bench (PB). Games were classified with cluster analysis based on their score difference as close, balanced, and unbalanced and the differences in the scoring strategies between winning and losing teams were assessed using magnitude-based statistics. Results revealed no substantial differences in FBP in any investigated cluster. Furthermore, winning teams showed a substantially higher number of PP and PT (in close and unbalanced games) and SCP (in balanced and unbalanced games) compared to losing teams. Finally, winning teams scored substantially lower and higher number of BPs in close games and unbalanced games, respectively, compared to losing teams. In conclusion, all the investigated scoring strategies discriminate between winning and losing teams in elite women’s basketball except for FBP. These results provide useful information for basketball coaches to optimize their training sessions and game strategies. View Full-Text
Keywords: game-related statistics; performance analysis; basketball performance; team sports; basketball tactics game-related statistics; performance analysis; basketball performance; team sports; basketball tactics
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Conte, D.; Lukonaitiene, I. Scoring Strategies Differentiating between Winning and Losing Teams during FIBA EuroBasket Women 2017. Sports 2018, 6, 50.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sports EISSN 2075-4663 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top