Next Article in Journal
Development and Initial Assessment of a Patient Education Video about Pharmacogenetics
Previous Article in Journal
Methods for the In Vitro Characterization of Nanomedicines—Biological Component Interaction
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
J. Pers. Med. 2017, 7(2), 3;

Accuracy in Wrist-Worn, Sensor-Based Measurements of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure in a Diverse Cohort

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Åstrand Laboratory of Work Physiology, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm 114 33, Sweden
Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Department of Biomedical Data Science, Falk Cardiovascular Research Building, Stanford University, 870 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Stephen B. Liggett
Received: 27 February 2017 / Revised: 24 April 2017 / Accepted: 4 May 2017 / Published: 24 May 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1095 KB, uploaded 9 June 2017]   |  


The ability to measure physical activity through wrist-worn devices provides an opportunity for cardiovascular medicine. However, the accuracy of commercial devices is largely unknown. The aim of this work is to assess the accuracy of seven commercially available wrist-worn devices in estimating heart rate (HR) and energy expenditure (EE) and to propose a wearable sensor evaluation framework. We evaluated the Apple Watch, Basis Peak, Fitbit Surge, Microsoft Band, Mio Alpha 2, PulseOn, and Samsung Gear S2. Participants wore devices while being simultaneously assessed with continuous telemetry and indirect calorimetry while sitting, walking, running, and cycling. Sixty volunteers (29 male, 31 female, age 38 ± 11 years) of diverse age, height, weight, skin tone, and fitness level were selected. Error in HR and EE was computed for each subject/device/activity combination. Devices reported the lowest error for cycling and the highest for walking. Device error was higher for males, greater body mass index, darker skin tone, and walking. Six of the devices achieved a median error for HR below 5% during cycling. No device achieved an error in EE below 20 percent. The Apple Watch achieved the lowest overall error in both HR and EE, while the Samsung Gear S2 reported the highest. In conclusion, most wrist-worn devices adequately measure HR in laboratory-based activities, but poorly estimate EE, suggesting caution in the use of EE measurements as part of health improvement programs. We propose reference standards for the validation of consumer health devices ( View Full-Text
Keywords: mobile health; heart rate; energy expenditure; validation; fitness trackers; activity monitors mobile health; heart rate; energy expenditure; validation; fitness trackers; activity monitors

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Shcherbina, A.; Mattsson, C.M.; Waggott, D.; Salisbury, H.; Christle, J.W.; Hastie, T.; Wheeler, M.T.; Ashley, E.A. Accuracy in Wrist-Worn, Sensor-Based Measurements of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure in a Diverse Cohort. J. Pers. Med. 2017, 7, 3.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
J. Pers. Med. EISSN 2075-4426 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top