Next Article in Journal
Physical Routes to Primitive Cells: An Experimental Model Based on the Spontaneous Entrapment of Enzymes inside Micrometer-Sized Liposomes
Next Article in Special Issue
The Heptameric SmAP1 and SmAP2 Proteins of the Crenarchaeon Sulfolobus Solfataricus Bind to Common and Distinct RNA Targets
Previous Article in Journal
Highly Iterated Palindromic Sequences (HIPs) and Their Relationship to DNA Methyltransferases
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Active Site Residues in ATP Binding and Catalysis in the Methanosarcina thermophila Acetate Kinase
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Life 2015, 5(1), 949-968; doi:10.3390/life5010949

Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Archaea: A Comparison of the Whole-Genome-Based CVTree Approach with 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis

1
Life Research Center and Department of Physics, Fudan University, 220 Handan Road, Shanghai 200433, China
2
Thermo Fisher Scientific, 200 Oyster Point Blvd, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 9 December 2014 / Revised: 6 March 2015 / Accepted: 9 March 2015 / Published: 17 March 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Archaea: Evolution, Physiology, and Molecular Biology)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1019 KB, uploaded 17 March 2015]   |  

Abstract

A tripartite comparison of Archaea phylogeny and taxonomy at and above the rank order is reported: (1) the whole-genome-based and alignment-free CVTree using 179 genomes; (2) the 16S rRNA analysis exemplified by the All-Species Living Tree with 366 archaeal sequences; and (3) the Second Edition of Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology complemented by some current literature. A high degree of agreement is reached at these ranks. From the newly proposed archaeal phyla, Korarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota, Nanoarchaeota and Aigarchaeota, to the recent suggestion to divide the class Halobacteria into three orders, all gain substantial support from CVTree. In addition, the CVTree helped to determine the taxonomic position of some newly sequenced genomes without proper lineage information. A few discrepancies between the CVTree and the 16S rRNA approaches call for further investigation. View Full-Text
Keywords: Archaea; phylogeny and taxonomy; 16S rRNA analysis; whole-genome comparison; alignment free; CVTree Archaea; phylogeny and taxonomy; 16S rRNA analysis; whole-genome comparison; alignment free; CVTree
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Review Report

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zuo, G.; Xu, Z.; Hao, B. Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Archaea: A Comparison of the Whole-Genome-Based CVTree Approach with 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis. Life 2015, 5, 949-968.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Life EISSN 2075-1729 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top