Next Article in Journal
“In Space” or “As Space”?: A New Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Mechanisms of Survival Strategies in Extreme Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Flexible Enantioselectivity of Tryptophanase Attributable to Benzene Ring in Heterocyclic Moiety of D-Tryptophan

Life 2012, 2(3), 229-242; doi:10.3390/life2030229

Review
Survival of the Fittest: Overcoming Oxidative Stress at the Extremes of Acid, Heat and Metal
Yukari Maezato and Paul Blum *
Beadle Center for Genetics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588-0666, USA; E-Mail: yukarimaezato@hotmail.com
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: pblum1@unl.edu; Tel.: +1-402-472-8969.
Received: 4 July 2012; in revised form: 14 August 2012 / Accepted: 17 August 2012 /
Published: 23 August 2012

Abstract

: The habitat of metal respiring acidothermophilic lithoautotrophs is perhaps the most oxidizing environment yet identified. Geothermal heat, sulfuric acid and transition metals contribute both individually and synergistically under aerobic conditions to create this niche. Sulfuric acid and metals originating from sulfidic ores catalyze oxidative reactions attacking microbial cell surfaces including lipids, proteins and glycosyl groups. Sulfuric acid also promotes hydrocarbon dehydration contributing to the formation of black “burnt” carbon. Oxidative reactions leading to abstraction of electrons is further impacted by heat through an increase in the proportion of reactant molecules with sufficient energy to react. Collectively these factors and particularly those related to metals must be overcome by thermoacidophilic lithoautotrophs in order for them to survive and proliferate. The necessary mechanisms to achieve this goal are largely unknown however mechanistics insights have been gained through genomic studies. This review focuses on the specific role of metals in this extreme environment with an emphasis on resistance mechanisms in Archaea.
Keywords:
archaea; ecology; oxidative stress; metals; natural habitats

1. Introduction

The presence of heavy metals in extreme microbial habitats is common. This juxtaposition offers an important opportunity to investigate resistance and toxicity of diverse heavy metals towards natural communities and individual taxa. Heavy metal resistance in bacteria has been widely reviewed [1,2,3,4]. For bacteria, the ecology, chemistry and biologic mechanisms of resistance associated with arsenic, selenium and copper have also been described [3,5]. Heavy metals promote highly oxidative environments which lead to a differential level of toxicity of the metal [6,7]. The response to toxic elements involves diverse strategies including: redox-based metal transformation [8]; trafficking within the cytoplasm mediated by metal chaperones [9,10]; protein sequestration [11,12]; metal efflux [8]; and by metal-phosphate symport [13,14]. Horizontal gene transfer also plays a crucial part in the evolution of heavy metal resistance within bacterial communities [15]. Archaea also occupy diverse extreme habitats including those that are metal rich. Examples include acidic and sulfidic geothermal pools and soils, marine hydrothermal vents emanating from metal rich ores, and hypersaline pools and soil crusts saturated with metals and other elements. In some of these habitats particularly ore heaps, thermophilic archaea proliferate because of the intrinsic heat generated by chemical and biological oxidation that also promotes solubilization of metal sulfide complexes. However, though archaea flourish in such environments, much less is understood about their mechanisms of survival. Analysis of extant archaeal genomes identifies many genes involved with defenses againts toxic metals while studies using model archaeal taxa have begun to yield mechanistic details underlying metal resistance. Therefore, this review examines the literature related to metal biology of archaea.

2. Ecological Considerations of Archaea in Metal Rich Environments

Many toxic metals including copper (Cu) cadmium (Cd), zinc (Zn), uranium (U) and arsenic (As) are commonly called heavy metals but are also assigned to the category of “soft metals” because of their physical properties and their large ratio of ionic charge to ionic radius [16]. In contrast, alkali metals and alkali earth metals such as potassium (K) and calcium (Ca) are placed in the category of “hard metals”. The stronger interaction of soft metals with proteins compared to the weaker ionic interaction with hard metals, is one factor underlying their toxicity [16] and is a reflection of the tendency of soft acids and bases to interact [17]. Despite this effect, soft metals are also important at low concentrations in diverse biological processes [18] such as those required between enzymes and their co-factors. To balance the critical need for trace metals against their potential toxicity, archaea have evolved multiple regulatory mechanisms to control metal exposure in their environments.

Archaea, representing one of the three domains of life, have been found in diverse environments [19]. The discovery and isolation of numerous archaeal species from environments with high concentrations of heavy metals which also contributes to the highly oxidative environment such as mining sites, salterns, and metal contaminated soils, has accelerated interest in studying metal resistance in these organisms. Importantly, archaea as a fraction of total cells are abundant in many habitats from benign to extreme (Table 1). The apparent abundance of archaeal cells implicates them as agents capable of mediating metal transformations. The best characterized archaeal biotypes provide an important context for much of the information that is available linking heavy metals with these organisms. While these biotypes are generalizations that have been expanded through culture-independent studies on archaeal biodiversity, they continue as physiologic paradigms providing a basis for mechanistic information.

Table Table 1. Relative abundance of archaea in the environment.

Click here to display table

Table 1. Relative abundance of archaea in the environment.
HabitatAbundance(Maximum)Dominant archaeal typeMethod of determinationCitation
Aquatic
Marine 24%–34% of total prokaryotic rRNACrenarchaeotaMeasuring of amplification of group specific ribosomal RNA [20]
Shallow water hydrothermal vent12% of total prokaryotic rRNA sampledEuryarchaeota (i.e., Thermococcus, Pyrococcus,Pyrobaculum, methanococcus)Ribosomal RNA hybridization, Fluorescent in situ Hybridization (FISH)[21]
Deep-sea Sulfide Chimney 33%–60%Marine group I Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota (i.e., Thermococcales)Fluorescent in situ Hybridization (FISH), 16SrRNA analysis, and RFLP anlaysis[22]
Holo-oligomictic Lake47% Catalyzed Reporter Deposition- Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (CARD-FISH) analysis[23]
Terrestrial
Geothermal, solfatara70%Crenarchaeota (i.e., Sulfolobales)Fluorescent in situ Hybridization (FISH) analysis[24]
Solar (Saltern) pond80%–86% of total prokaryotic rRNAEuryarchaeaota (i.e., Haloarchaea)DAPI counts and Fluorescent in situ Hybridization (FISH) analysis[25]
Soil~2% of total sampled 16S rRNA Thaumarchaeota16S rRNA analysis and barcoded pyrosequencing analysis[26,27]
Metal Rich environment
Acid mine drainage (AMD)/Mining sitesUp to 80% of sampled 16S rRNAEuryarchaea (i.e., Ferroplasma)16S rRNA library sequencing and Fluorescent in situ Hybridization (FISH) analysis[28,29,30]

2.1. Haloarchaea

Halophilic archaea, including the obligate and extremely halophilic taxa, belong to the phylum Euryarchaeota. They occur in areas with high concentrations of salt (>2 M), such as the Dead Sea, salt lakes, inland seas, and evaporating ponds of seawater. These hypersaline habitats are also rich in heavy metals [31,32], and many extreme halophiles have developed strategies to overcome metal toxicity [33]. For example, Halobacterium strain NRC-1 has multiple mechanisms for responding to arsenic. In the presence of arsenite (As (III)), these organisms oxidize the metal and then export it via metal specific translocators. Alternatively they alkylate (methylate) this metal as an alternative means of detoxification [32]. High level arsenic resistance in Halobacterium strain NRC-1 is mediated by the plasmid encoded ars operons (arsADRC, and M), rather than the chromosome encoded arsB gene [32].

2.2. Methanoarchaea

Methanogenic archaea produce methane and also are classified as members of the Euryarchaeota. Methanoarchaea are found in diverse environments such as deep sea sediments [34], polar caps [20], agricultural soils, and sewage sludge [35]. However, the molecular mechanisms of heavy metal resistance in methanogens are not well characterized. Bioinformatic surveys of various genomes reveal the presence of gene homologs involved with heavy metal resistance. These include arsenic resistance genes (arsA, C, D, R and M) and copper resistance genes (copA, R). One molecular genetic study of copper resistance in Methanobacterium bryantii suggests involvement of the copper inducible protein Crx (copper response extracellular protein) [36]. A cadmium and copper resistant novel species, Methanocalculus pumilus, has also been described [37] though the responsible mechanisms are not yet characterized. Methanogens are important facilitators of geochemical cycling of various heavy metals through their ability to form methylated forms of heavy metals in the environment [38]. Methylation of heavy metals is probably accomplished enzymatically through the action of putative methytransferases such as ArsM [39].

2.3. Hyperthermophilic Archaea

In general, hyperthemophilic archaea and bacteria grow at or above 80 °C. Hyperthermophilic archaea inhabit high temperature habitats such as deep sea hydrothermal vents, geothermal springs and solfataras (sulfur rich volcanic pond) as well as various metal mining sites [40,41,42,43]. Many of the thermophilic and hyperthermophilic archaea are also extremely acidophilic and tolerate pH values less than one [44]. The occurrence of heavy metals (e.g., Cu, Hg, Cd, and As) in hydrothermal and geothermal habitats is well known [45,46,47,48], and the microbes residing in such niches are faced with the constant challenge of coping with toxic metals. For example Metallosphaera prunae an extremely thermoacidophilic species belonging to the phylum Crenarchaeota, was isolated from a uranium mining site [42]. Uranium (U) occurs primarily in two redox states, U+4 is insoluble while U+6 is soluble and may have implications for metal resistance mechanisms. The mesophilic acidophile, Ferroplasma acidarmanus, exhibits bacterial-like arsenite (As(III)) resistance mechanisms involving arsA (ATPase), arsB (efflux pump for As (III)), arsD (chaperone) and arsR (transcriptional regulator). However, resistance to arsenate (As(V)) is likely to involve a novel mechanism because the F. acidarmanus genome lacks an apparent arsenate reductase (arsC) necessary to overcome high intracellular levels of oxidized metal [49] perhaps an example of a divergent but related activity.

Other acidophilic archaea notably the hyperthermoacidophile, Sulfolobus solfataricus, occur in metal rich habitats such as Coso Hot Springs (CSH) an abandoned mercury mining area at the edge of the Mojave desert in southeastern California, USA. This natural geothermal environment contains high concentrations of Hg ranging from 2.0 mg/li of pool water to nearly 1 g/kg sediment derived from cinnabar (mercuric sulfide) the primary ore of mercury [24]. Mercury is a toxic metal for all three domains of life with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) ranging from micromolar to millimolar concentrations depending on the domain. The mechanism of toxicity of Hg(II)) towards S. solfataricus arises from the inactivation of TFIIB one of the core archaeal generalized transcription factors required for gene transcription [50]. This mechanism is identical to that observed in eukaryotes and unlike that observed in bacteria. Unlike all eukaryotes however, S. solfataricus also encodes genes that detoxify this metal. A mercury resistance operon including merR (regulator), merH (TRASH domain, metal chaperone), and merA (metal reductase) was characterized using directed recombination to generate gene knockouts [51]. These studies demonstrated that merA was required for metal resistance and that the transcription of these genes was responsive to Hg(II) exposure [51,52].

3. Levels of Resistance Towards Heavy Metals

Archaeal taxa especially acidophiles, exhibit relatively high tolerance to many heavy metals. For example, the highly arsenic resistant Ferroplasma acidarmanus can tolerate ~130 mM As in its environment (Table 2). Hyperthermophilic archaea also exhibit higher resistance towards various metals such as Zn, Cu and Cd. Interestingly, the MIC of As in haloarchaea strain NRC1 is relatively high. This may arise from the presence of multiple As resistance mechanisms including the plasmid and chromosome encoded As efflux system and the As methylation detoxification system (ArsM). Although an ArsM like protein is also evident in hyperthermophilic archaeal genomes, ArsC homologs are lacking suggesting there are either divergent orthologs or an alternative resistance mechanism.

Table Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concentration of metals.

Click here to display table

Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concentration of metals.
MicroorganismMIC (mM)Citation
Zn (II)Cu (II)Ag (I)Hg (II)As (III)U (VI)Cd (II)
Haloarchaea
Halobacterium sp.0.51–2.50.50.01~20NAa≤2.5[53]
Halocula sp.0.052.50.050.0110NA0.05[53]
Hyperthermophilic archaea
Sulfolobus solfataricus501~50.0080.002NANA10[54,55]
Sulfolobus metallicus300160.090.051.30.40.9[56]
Metallosphaera sedula1501000.090.0510.41[43]
Methanoarchaea
Methanocalculus pumilusNA1NANANANA1[37]
Methanobacterium bryantiiNA~1.8NANANANANA[57]
Acidophilic archaea
Ferroplasma acidarmanus Fer1NA312NANA133NA1[49,54,58,59]
Bacteria
Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans750~8000.90.51.30.40.09[43,49]
E. coli ASU7101~3~>10.013125[7,60,61,62]

Extremely thermoacidophilic members of Metallosphaera exhibit among the higher levels of resistance towards copper of all prokaryotes (Table 2). This distinguishing trait is of interest because of its importance to the mining industry (see below). In the case of copper resistance, copA (efflux pump) knockout mutants in M. sedula show reduced levels of resistance to cupric ion (Cu (II)), however such mutants retain considerable levels of metal resistance [63]. As is the case for As resistance in Haloarchaea, perhaps there are multiple mechanisms orchestrating copper resistance in M. sedula.

In contrast to copper resistance in M. sedula where the trait correlates with environmental metal abundance, this is not the case with Hg and the related S. solfataricus. Since Hg levels are elevated in the Coso Hot Springs habitat, it was likely that S. solfataricus could elaborate high levels of mercury resistance. Unexpectedly, endogenous isolates of this organism were not unusually metal resistant (0.3–2 μM) and instead were comparable to other mercury resistant bacterial species [24,64,65]. These findings indicate that other mechanisms perhaps dependent on solute transport or internal redox homeostasis must be operative that spare endogenous archaea from metal toxicity.

4. Strategies of Heavy Metal Resistance of the Archaea

Prolonged ecologic and biotechnologic interests in the archaea promote ongoing studies of metal resistance in these organisms. Development of bioremediation strategies have also motivated detailed studies of archaeal metal resistance and the biodiversity of archaeal taxa resident in heavy metal mining sites and metal contaminated habitats [28,42,43,66,67]. The occurrence of thermophilic taxa in some of these habitats particularly ore heaps arises from the intrinsic heat generated by chemical and biological oxidation. This creates a variable environment which develops into one containing high concentrations of solubilized metals dissociated from metal sulfide complexes.

Whether in ore heaps or saline ponds, changes in heavy metal concentration elicit differential gene regulation in archaea. Comparisons of global gene expression patterns arising from heavy metal challenges in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 have been demonstrated [33]. In some case, identical genes are up-regulated by different metals such as yvgX in the presence of Cu and Zn, and pstC1 in the presence of cobalt (Co) and nickle (Ni). On the other hand, some genes are uniquely up-regulated in the presence of only certain metals such as potA1 and hemeV2 in the presence of manganese (Mn) [33]. This suggests that the cellular perception of metal involves complex signal transduction mechanisms. Multiple mechanisms of Cu resistance also have been identified based on gene expression analysis in the hyperthermophilic acidophile S. solfataricus. These include a copper efflux system by copA and B (P-type ATPase), copR (regulator), and copT (chaperone) [68,69,70], and an inorganic polyphosphate transport system in the related S. metallicus [13]. The distribution of copper resistance genes among archaea is broad. Many archaeal genomes encode copA (P-type ATPase) homologs. However, while many bacterial taxa have metal resistance genes encoded on both plasmids and the genome, there are no CopA homologs annotated as being encoded on archaeal plasmids with the exception of Haloarcula marismortui ATCC 43049 mega plasmid pNG600. In this partcular case, five CopA homologs are apparent on this plasmid.

Hexavalant chromium (Cr(VI)) is another example of a heavy metal with environmental relevance. Like mercury, chromium is not an essential trace metal. Various studies have reported that many taxa have the ability to reduce the soluble toxic form of chromium (Cr(VI)) to the less toxic and insoluble form (Cr (III)) [71,72,73]. This transformation is mediated by a reductase, ChrR, or when Cr(VI) is used as an electron acceptor [74,75]. Once Cr (VI) is reduced to Cr (III), it can be exported by the transmembrane efflux pump ChrA [76]. ChrR is a member of the NAD(P)H dependent FMN-reductase family that has a wide substrate specificity [74]. ChrR appears to be widely distributed among archaea (Figure 1). Interestingly, only a few archaeal species contain chrA (efflux transporter), suggesting that archaea may use different strategies to detoxify this metal, such as by activation of oxidative stress mechanisms, or via novel efflux pumps. Studies on the determinants controlling the activity of ChrR show reduction of uranium species could be accomplished by this protein [77]. The potential benefit of a single pathway that can reduce the action of multiple toxic metals could facilitate bioremediation efforts of heavy metal contaminated soils.

Uranium is a radioactive metal of growing interest as a carbon net-negative energy source, for defense-related weapons, and for general ecological considerations. However, in archaeal genomes there are as yet no uranium specific reductases or efflux transporters that can be identified. A recent study describes the formation of insoluble uranium precpitates using cultures of the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeote, Pyrobaculum islandicus [78] perhaps reminiscent of the well characterized reduction of this metal by bacterial taxa belonging to Geobacter and Shewanella spp. [79,80,81,82,83].

Life 02 00229 g001 1024
Figure 1. Protein phylogenetic tree of archaeal ChrR. The tree was constructed using MEGA 4.0. The bootstrap values were based on 1000 replicates, and E. coli ChrA was used as an outgroup. Bootstrap value greater than 50% are shown.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. Protein phylogenetic tree of archaeal ChrR. The tree was constructed using MEGA 4.0. The bootstrap values were based on 1000 replicates, and E. coli ChrA was used as an outgroup. Bootstrap value greater than 50% are shown.
Life 02 00229 g001 1024

5. Environmental Applications Using Metal Resistant Archaea

There are increasing efforts underway to mitigate acid mine drainage (AMD) from active and abandoned mines. Similarly, there are ever increasing demands for metal commodities to meet the needs of growing societies. For this reason the relationship between metals and archaeal taxa is of great interest. A number of archaeal taxa have been isolated from such sites and their analysis has fostered a better understanding of the microbial community dynamics that occur in such environments using culture independent methods [84].

The role of thermoacidophilic archaea in biomining (bioleaching) of sulfidic metals is another area of growing interest [85]. Hyperthermophilic archaea have the capacity to immobilize metals, such as uranium [78] suggesting uses for bioremedation of contaminated sites. In addition to these benefits, genetic engineering tools for some archaea are established [86] and may lead to biological systems with metal-leaching specificity and with increased rates of metal solubilization.

6. Concluding Remarks

Archaea are globally distributed microorganisms inhabiting extreme environments as well as environments rich in heavy metals. These features foster interest in their genomics. The abundance of archaeal taxa in established environments rich in heavy metals has important ecologic and environmental implications. Elevated temperatures arising from mining in the deep subsurface promise to enhance availability of new thermophilic and hyperthermophilic species with novel metal metabolisms. There are several outstanding questions that remain to be answered in this field. What is the overlap between the unique cell biology of archaea and metal resistance? What is the ancient and modern day role of archaea in biogeochemical process? What unexplored biodiversity remains to be discovered in these extreme environments. Future studies integrating the use of genetic systems with model organisms will be critical to establish cause and effect relationships about metal biology and the archaea.

Acknowledgements

Funding for this study was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy (DEPS0208ERO812; DEFG3608GO88055), Department of Defense (HDTRA1-90030) and National Institutes of Health (1R01GM090209).

References

  1. Bruins, M.R.; Kapil, S.; Oehme, F.W. Microbial resistance to metals in the environment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2000, 45, 198–207. [Google Scholar]
  2. Haferburg, G.; Kothe, E. Microbes and metals: Interactions in the environment. J. Basic Microbiol. 2007, 47, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rensing, C.; Grass, G. Escherichia coli mechanisms of copper homeostasis in a changing environment. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Silver, S.; Phung, L.T. Bacterial heavy metal resistance: New surprises. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1996, 50, 753–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Stolz, J.F.; Basu, P.; Santini, J.M.; Oremland, R.S. Arsenic and selenium in microbial metabolism. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 60, 107–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hallas, L.E.; Thayer, J.S.; Cooney, J.J. Factors affecting the toxic effect of tin on estuarine microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982, 44, 193–197. [Google Scholar]
  7. Spain, A. Implications of microbial heavy metal tolerance in the environment. Rev. Undergrad. Res. 2003, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nies, D.H. Efflux-mediated heavy metal resistance in prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 313–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Morin, I.; Cuillel, M.; Lowe, J.; Crouzy, S.; Guillain, F.; Mintz, E. Cd2+- or Hg2+-binding proteins can replace the Cu+-chaperone Atx1 in delivering Cu+ to the secretory pathway in yeast. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 1117–1123. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tottey, S.; Harvie, D.R.; Robinson, N.J. Understanding how cells allocate metals using metal sensors and metallochaperones. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 775–783. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tanaka, Y.; Tsumoto, K.; Nakanishi, T.; Yasutake, Y.; Sakai, N.; Yao, M.; Tanaka, I.; Kumagai, I. Structural implications for heavy metal-induced reversible assembly and aggregation of a protein: The case of Pyrococcus horikoshii CutA. FEBS Lett. 2004, 556, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yang, J.; Li, Q.; Yang, H.; Yan, L.; Yang, L.; Yu, L. Overexpression of human CUTA isoform2 enhances the cytotoxicity of copper to HeLa cells. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2008, 55, 411–415. [Google Scholar]
  13. Remonsellez, F.; Orell, A.; Jerez, C.A. Copper tolerance of the thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus metallicus: Possible role of polyphosphate metabolism. Microbiology 2006, 152, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  14. Seufferheld, M.J.; Alvarez, H.M.; Farias, M.E. Role of polyphosphates in microbial adaptation to extreme environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 5867–5874. [Google Scholar]
  15. Nemergut, D.R.; Martin, A.P.; Schmidt, S.K. Integron diversity in heavy-metal-contaminated mine tailings and inferences about integron evolution. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 1160–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ghosh, M.; Rosen, B. Microbial Resistance Mechanisms for Heavy Metals and Metalloids. In Heavy Metals in the Environment; Sakar, B., Ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 531–548. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pearson, R.G. Hard and soft acids and bases. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 3533–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wackett, L.P.; Dodge, A.G.; Ellis, L.B. Microbial genomics and the periodic table. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pikuta, E.V.; Hoover, R.B.; Tang, J. Microbial extremophiles at the limits of life. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 33, 183–209. [Google Scholar]
  20. DeLong, E.F.; Wu, K.Y.; Prezelin, B.B.; Jovine, R.V. High abundance of Archaea in Antarctic marine picoplankton. Nature 1994, 371, 695–697. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sievert, S.M.; Ziebis, W.; Kuever, J.; Sahm, K. Relative abundance of Archaea and Bacteria along a thermal gradient of a shallow-water hydrothermal vent quantified by rRNA slot-blot hybridization. Microbiology 2000, 146, 1287–1293. [Google Scholar]
  22. Schrenk, M.O.; Kelley, D.S.; Delaney, J.R.; Baross, J.A. Incidence and diversity of microorganisms within the walls of an active deep-sea sulfide chimney. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 3580–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Callieri, C.; Corno, G.; Caravati, E.; Rasconi, S.; Contesini, M.; Bertoni, R. Bacteria, archaea, and crenarchaeota in the epilimnion and hypolimnion of a deep holo-oligomictic lake. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7298–7300. [Google Scholar]
  24. Simbahan, J.; Kurth, E.; Schelert, J.; Dillman, A.; Moriyama, E.; Jovanovich, S.; Blum, P. Community analysis of a mercury hot spring supports occurrence of domain-specific forms of mercuric reductase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 8836–8845. [Google Scholar]
  25. Eilmus, S.; Rosch, C.; Bothe, H. Prokaryotic life in a potash-polluted marsh with emphasis on N-metabolizing microorganisms. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 146, 478–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Borneman, J.; Triplett, E.W. Molecular microbial diversity in soils from eastern Amazonia: Evidence for unusual microorganisms and microbial population shifts associated with deforestation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 2647–2653. [Google Scholar]
  27. Buckley, D.H.; Graber, J.R.; Schmidt, T.M. Phylogenetic analysis of nonthermophilic members of the kingdom crenarchaeota and their diversity and abundance in soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 4333–4339. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bruneel, O.; Pascault, N.; Egal, M.; Bancon-Montigny, C.; Goni-Urriza, M.S.; Elbaz-Poulichet, F.; Personne, J.C.; Duran, R. Archaeal diversity in a Fe-As rich acid mine drainage at Carnoules (France). Extremophiles 2008, 12, 563–571. [Google Scholar]
  29. Edwards, K.J.; Bond, P.L.; Gihring, T.M.; Banfield, J.F. An archaeal iron-oxidizing extreme acidophile important in acid mine drainage. Science 2000, 287, 1796–1799. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sandaa, R.A.; Enger, O.; Torsvik, V. Abundance and diversity of Archaea in heavy-metal-contaminated soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 3293–3297. [Google Scholar]
  31. Stiller, M.; Sigg, L. Heavy Metals in the Dead Sea and thier coprecipitation with halite. Hydrobiologia 1990, 197, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, G.; Kennedy, S.P.; Fasiludeen, S.; Rensing, C.; DasSarma, S. Arsenic resistance in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 examined by using an improved gene knockout system. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 3187–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kaur, A.; Pan, M.; Meislin, M.; Facciotti, M.T.; El-Gewely, R.; Baliga, N.S. A systems view of haloarchaeal strategies to withstand stress from transition metals. Genome Res. 2006, 16, 841–854. [Google Scholar]
  34. Biddle, J.F.; Fitz-Gibbon, S.; Schuster, S.C.; Brenchley, J.E.; House, C.H. Metagenomic signatures of the Peru Margin subseafloor biosphere show a genetically distinct environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10583–10588. [Google Scholar]
  35. Michalke, K.; Wickenheiser, E.B.; Mehring, M.; Hirner, A.V.; Hensel, R. Production of volatile derivatives of metal(loid)s by microflora involved in anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 2791–2796. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, B.K.; Pihl, T.D.; Reeve, J.N.; Daniels, L. Purification of the copper response extracellular proteins secreted by the copper-resistant methanogen Methanobacterium bryantii BKYH and cloning, sequencing, and transcription of the gene encoding these proteins. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 7178–7185. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mori, K.; Hatsu, M.; Kimura, R.; Takamizawa, K. Effect of heavy metals on the growth of a methanogen in pure culture and coculture with a sulfate-reducing bacterium. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2000, 90, 260–265. [Google Scholar]
  38. Meyer, J.; Michalke, K.; Kouril, T.; Hensel, R. Volatilisation of metals and metalloids: An inherent feature of methanoarchaea? Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 31, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qin, J.; Rosen, B.P.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, G.; Franke, S.; Rensing, C. Arsenic detoxification and evolution of trimethylarsine gas by a microbial arsenite S-adenosylmethionine methyltransferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 2075–2080. [Google Scholar]
  40. Amo, T.; Paje, M.L.; Inagaki, A.; Ezaki, S.; Atomi, H.; Imanaka, T. Pyrobaculum calidifontis sp. nov., a novel hyperthermophilic archaeon that grows in atmospheric air. Archaea 2002, 1, 113–421. [Google Scholar]
  41. Brock, T.D.; Brock, K.M.; Belly, R.T.; Weiss, R.L. Sulfolobus: A new genus of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria living at low pH and high temperature. Arch. Mikrobiol. 1972, 84, 54–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fuchs, T.; Huber, H.; Teiner, K.; Burggraf, S.; Stetter, K.O. Metallosphaera prunae, sp. nov., a novel metal-mobilizing, thermoacidophilic archaeum, isolated from a uranium mine in Germany. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1995, 18, 560–566. [Google Scholar]
  43. Huber, G.; Spinnler, C.; Gambacorta, A.; Stetter, K.O. Metallosphaera sedula gen. and sp. nov. epresents a new genus of aerobic, metal-mobilizing thermoacidophilic archaebacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1989, 12, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Schleper, C.; Puehler, G.; Holz, I.; Gambacorta, A.; Janekovic, D.; Santarius, U.; Klenk, H.P.; Zillig, W. Picrophilus gen. nov., fam. nov.: a novel aerobic, heterotrophic, thermoacidophilic genus and family comprising archaea capable of growth around pH 0. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 7050–7059. [Google Scholar]
  45. Arnorsson, A. The distribution of some trace elements in thermal waters in Iceland. Geothermics 1970, 2, 542–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Edgcomb, V.P.; Molyneaux, S.J.; Saito, M.A.; Lloyd, K.; Boer, S.; Wirsen, C.O.; Atkins, M.S.; Teske, A. Sulfide ameliorates metal toxicity for deep-sea hydrothermal vent archaea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 2551–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Spear, J.R.; Walker, J.J.; McCollom, T.M.; Pace, N.R. Hydrogen and bioenergetics in the Yellowstone geothermal ecosystem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 2555–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Weissberg, W.G. Gold-silver ore-grade precipitates from New Zealand thermal waters. Econ. Geology 1969, 64, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Baker-Austin, C.; Dopson, M.; Wexler, M.; Sawers, R.G.; Bond, P.L. Molecular insight into extreme copper resistance in the extremophilic archaeon 'Ferroplasma acidarmanus' Fer1. Microbiology 2005, 151, 2637–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dixit, V.; Bini, E.; Drozda, M.; Blum, P. Mercury inactivates transcription and the generalized transcription factor TFB in the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1993–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Schelert, J.; Dixit, V.; Hoang, V.; Simbahan, J.; Drozda, M.; Blum, P. Occurrence and characterization of mercury resistance in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus by use of gene disruption. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Schelert, J.; Drozda, M.; Dixit, V.; Dillman, A.; Blum, P. Regulation of mercury resistance in the crenarchaeote Sulfolobus solfataricus. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 7141–7150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nieto, J.J.; Ventosa, A.; Ruiz-Berraquero, F. Susceptibility of halobacteria to heavy metals. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987, 53, 1199–1202. [Google Scholar]
  54. Dopson, M.; Baker-Austin, C.; Koppineedi, P.R.; Bond, P.L. Growth in sulfidic mineral environments: Metal resistance mechanisms in acidophilic micro-organisms. Microbiology 2003, 149, 1959–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Grogan, D.W. Phenotypic characterization of the archaebacterial genus Sulfolobus: Comparison of five wild-type strains. J. Bacteriol. 1989, 171, 6710–6719. [Google Scholar]
  56. Huber, G.; Stetter, K.O. Sulfolobus metallicus, sp. nov., a novel strictly chemolithoautotrophic thermophilic archaeal species of metal-mobilizer. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1991, 14, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kim, B.K.; de Macario, E.C.; Nolling, J.; Daniels, L. Isolation and characterization of a copper-resistant methanogen from a copper-mining soil sample. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 2629–2635. [Google Scholar]
  58. Baker-Austin, C.; Dopson, M.; Wexler, M.; Sawers, R.G.; Stemmler, A.; Rosen, B.P.; Bond, P.L. Extreme arsenic resistance by the acidophilic archaeon 'Ferroplasma acidarmanus' Fer1. Extremophiles 2007, 11, 425–434. [Google Scholar]
  59. Dopson, M.; Baker-Austin, C.; Hind, A.; Bowman, J.P.; Bond, P.L. Characterization of Ferroplasma isolates and Ferroplasma acidarmanus sp. nov., extreme acidophiles from acid mine drainage and industrial bioleaching environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 2079–2088. [Google Scholar]
  60. Abskharon, R.N.; Hassan, S.H.; Gad El-Rab, S.M.; Shoreit, A.A. Heavy metal resistant of E. coli isolated from wastewater sites in Assiut City, Egypt. Bull. Environ Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 81, 309–315. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kaur, S.; Kamli, M.R.; Ali, A. Diversity of arsenate reductase genes (arsC Genes) from arsenic-resistant environmental isolates of E. coli. Curr. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, X.Z.; Nikaido, H.; Williams, K.E. Silver-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli display active efflux of Ag+ and are deficient in porins. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 6127–6132. [Google Scholar]
  63. Maezato, Y.; Blum, P. Unpublished work, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA, 2012.
  64. Chatziefthimiou, A.D.; Crespo-Medina, M.; Wang, Y.; Vetriani, C.; Barkay, T. The isolation and initial characterization of mercury resistant chemolithotrophic thermophilic bacteria from mercury rich geothermal springs. Extremophiles 2007, 11, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vetriani, C.; Chew, Y.S.; Miller, S.M.; Yagi, J.; Coombs, J.; Lutz, R.A.; Barkay, T. Mercury adaptation among bacteria from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Almeida, W.I.; Vieira, R.P.; Cardoso, A.M.; Silveira, C.B.; Costa, R.G.; Gonzalez, A.M.; Paranhos, R.; Medeiros, J.A.; Freitas, F.A.; Albano, R.M.; Martins, O.B. Archaeal and bacterial communities of heavy metal contaminated acidic waters from zinc mine residues in Sepetiba Bay. Extremophiles 2009, 13, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xie, X.; Xiao, S.; He, Z.; Liu, J.; Qiu, G. Microbial populations in acid mineral bioleaching systems of Tong Shankou Copper Mine, China. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 103, 1227–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Deigweiher, K.; Drell, T.L.T.; Prutsch, A.; Scheidig, A.J.; Lubben, M. Expression, isolation, and crystallization of the catalytic domain of CopB, a putative copper transporting ATPase from the thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2004, 36, 151–159. [Google Scholar]
  69. Ettema, T.J.; Brinkman, A.B.; Lamers, P.P.; Kornet, N.G.; de Vos, W.M.; van der Oost, J. Molecular characterization of a conserved archaeal copper resistance (cop) gene cluster and its copper-responsive regulator in Sulfolobus solfataricus P2. Microbiology 2006, 152, 1969–1979. [Google Scholar]
  70. Villafane, A.A.; Voskoboynik, Y.; Cuebas, M.; Ruhl, I.; Bini, E. Response to excess copper in the hyperthermophile Sulfolobus solfataricus strain 98/2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 385, 67–71. [Google Scholar]
  71. Daulton, T.L.; Little, B.J.; Lowe, K.; Jones-Meehan, J. In Situ Environmental Cell-Transmission Electron Microscopy Study of Microbial Reduction of Chromium(VI) Using Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy. Microsc. Microanal. 2001, 7, 470–485. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kamaludeen, S.P.; Arunkumar, K.R.; Avudainayagam, S.; Ramasamy, K. Bioremediation of chromium contaminated environments. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2003, 41, 972–985. [Google Scholar]
  73. Opperman, D.J.; van Heerden, E. Aerobic Cr(VI) reduction by Thermus scotoductus strain SA-01. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 103, 1907–1913. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ramirez-Diaz, M.I.; Diaz-Perez, C.; Vargas, E.; Riveros-Rosas, H.; Campos-Garcia, J.; Cervantes, C. Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to chromium compounds. Biometals 2008, 21, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tandukar, M.; Huber, S.J.; Onodera, T.; Pavlostathis, S.G. Biological chromium(VI) reduction in the cathode of a microbial fuel cell. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 8159–8165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cervantes, C.; Campos-Garcia, J.; Devars, S.; Gutierrez-Corona, F.; Loza-Tavera, H.; Torres-Guzman, J.C.; Moreno-Sanchez, R. Interactions of chromium with microorganisms and plants. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 25, 335–347. [Google Scholar]
  77. Barak, Y.; Ackerley, D.F.; Dodge, C.J.; Banwari, L.; Alex, C.; Francis, A.J.; Matin, A. Analysis of novel soluble chromate and uranyl reductases and generation of an improved enzyme by directed evolution. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 7074–7082. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kashefi, K.; Moskowitz, B.M.; Lovley, D.R. Characterization of extracellular minerals produced during dissimilatory Fe(III) and U(VI) reduction at 100 degrees C by Pyrobaculum islandicum. Geobiology 2008, 6, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Finneran, K.T.; Housewright, M.E.; Lovley, D.R. Multiple influences of nitrate on uranium solubility during bioremediation of uranium-contaminated subsurface sediments. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 4, 510–516. [Google Scholar]
  80. Lovley, D.R.; Phillips, E.J.P.; Gorby, Y.A.; Landa, E.R. Microbial reduction of uranium. Nature 1991, 350, 413–415. [Google Scholar]
  81. Lovley, D.R.; Holmes, D.E.; Nevin, K.P. Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 2004, 49, 219–286. [Google Scholar]
  82. Wall, J.D.; Krumholz, L.R. Uranium reduction. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 60, 149–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wilkins, M.J.; Verberkmoes, N.C.; Williams, K.H.; Callister, S.J.; Mouser, P.J.; Elifantz, H.; N'Guessan, A,L.; Thomas, B.C.; Nicora, C.D.; Shah, M.B.; et al. Proteogenomic monitoring of Geobacter physiology during stimulated uranium bioremediation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 6591–6599. [Google Scholar]
  84. Baker, B.J.; Tyson, G.W.; Webb, R.I.; Flanagan, J.; Hugenholtz, P.; Allen, E.E.; Banfield, J.F. Lineages of acidophilic archaea revealed by community genomic analysis. Science 2006, 314, 1933–1935. [Google Scholar]
  85. Rawlings, D.E. Heavy metal mining using microbes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2002, 56, 65–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sowers, K.R.; Blum, P.H.; DasSarma, S. Gene Transfer in Archaea. In Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology, 3rd ed.; Reddy, C.A., Beveridge, T.J., Breznak, J.A., Marzluf, G.A., Schmidt, T.M., Eds.; American Society for Microbiology: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2007; pp. 800–824. [Google Scholar]
Life EISSN 2075-1729 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert