Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Platinum-Group Minerals (PGM) from Othrys Chromitites (Greece) Using Superpanning Concentrates
Next Article in Special Issue
Dissolution and Sorption Processes on the Surface of Calcite in the Presence of High Co2+ Concentration
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Effect of Chloride Ions on the Activity of Cerussite Surfaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on the Dispersion and Flocculation Behaviors of Muscovite Particles

1
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
2
College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
3
Hubei Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of High Efficient Cleaning Utilization for Shale Vanadium Resource, Wuhan 430081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2016, 6(3), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/min6030093
Submission received: 20 May 2016 / Revised: 29 August 2016 / Accepted: 31 August 2016 / Published: 8 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mineral Surface Science and Nanogeoscience)

Abstract

:
The dispersion and flocculation behavior of muscovite suspensions in the presence of Ca2+ and Mg2+ are relevant for industrial processing of pre-concentrated muscovite from stone coal, a primary source of vanadium. In this study, the dispersion and flocculation behavior were investigated by means of sedimentation, zeta potential, and ion absorption experiments, as well as the force between particles and ion speciation calculations. The results indicated that the dispersion and flocculation behavior of muscovite particles without excess ions were in qualitative agreement with the classical DLVO theory. The muscovite particles aggregated mainly due to basal surface-edge interactions in acidic suspensions but were dispersed in alkaline suspension by electrostatic repulsion of the total particle surface. In acidic suspensions, the ability of muscovite to form dispersions of muscovite was increased with the decrease in the electrostatic attraction between the basal surface and the edge caused by the compression of the electric double layers withCa2+ and Mg2+. In alkaline suspension, the main adsorption form of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on muscovite surface was the ion-hydroxy complexes. The flocculation behavior of muscovite was affected by the static bridge effect of the ion-hydroxy complexes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Muscovite is the primary vanadium-bearing mineral in stone coal [1], which is an important resource of vanadium making up more than 87% of the domestic reserves of vanadium in China [2]. Hence, efficient processing methods of the vanadium-bearing stone coal has become increasingly important, and it has been confirmed that the pre-concentration of muscovite from the stone coal by roasting-flotation was an effective method [3]. Previous studies have found that the suspension produced by the roasted stone coal and water contain large quantities of metal ions and micro-fine particles. Metal ions and micro-fine particles can seriously reduce the separation efficiency of the pre-concentration of muscovite by flotation [3,4]. Hence, the removal of micro-fine particles has an important role in the pre-concentration steps of muscovite. Meanwhile, the effect of their removal depends on the dispersion and flocculation behavior of the specific minerals, so the study of the dispersion and flocculation behavior of muscovite is important.
The simplest framework to address the dispersion and flocculation behavior of minerals is the classical DLVO theory presented by Derjaguin, Landau, Verwey, and Overbeek [5]. The application of DLVO theory for fine particles and colloid has long been considered to be credible. This theory suggests that the total potential energy between charged interfaces is described as the sum of the Van der Waals attraction potential and the electrostatic potential. The strength of the Van der Waals attraction potential is related to the material itself and the distance between particles, but the roughness of the particle surface may also contribute [6,7]. The electrostatic potential is principally influenced by the surface charge density and the composition of ions in solution [8,9,10,11]. The surface charge determined the magnitude of this force, while multivalent metal ions may adsorb strongly to negatively charged interfaces, thereby reducing the magnitude of the potential [12,13,14].
Such interactions of metal ions adsorbed on the mineral surface have broad implications in mineral processing. The flotation of spodumene with fatty acid anionic collector can be implemented by adding Ca2+ and Fe3+ [15]. Ca2+ can render the positive charge of the surface of magnetite in the pH range from 3 to 10 and reduce the dispersion ability of silicates [16,17]. It was also evidenced that Ca2+ and Mg2+ can affect the surface properties of apatite, which can reduce the recovery of flotation [18,19]. Chlorite and lizardite, but also quartz, can be floated with xanthate in the pH range from 7 to 10 by adding Cu2+ and Ni2+ [20]. Cu2+ and Ca2+ can enhance the adsorption density of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) on the surface of chlorite [21]. It has been shown that Ca2+ and Mg2+ adsorbed on the surface of diaspore could cause the compression of the electric double layer, and result in the decrease of the repulsion force between diaspore particles [22,23]. Previous studies have found that the valence of cation plays a major role in the ability of dispersion of diaspore, kaolinite, illite, and pyrophyllite with sodium carbonate and sodium hexametaphosphate suspensions [24]. The mechanism of metal ion adsorption on the mineral surface has also been studied, relying mainly on a hydroxy complex hypothesis and surface precipitation theory. James and Hu et al. [25,26] suggest that the key form was the precipitate of metal hydroxide. Others studies have shown that the dominant species was the hydrolyzed metal ions. For high valence and small radius ions, like Fe3+, the dominant species would be in the form of hydroxide precipitate, i.e., Fe(OH)3. While for the low valence and large radius ions, like Ca2+, the effective species would mainly be hydroxy complexes of the metal ions, i.e., Ca(OH)+ [27].
Previous studies have been based on the effect of metal ions on the flotation behavior of minerals, but very few studies have focused on the actual dispersion and flocculation properties. In this study, the dispersion and flocculation behavior of muscovite influenced by Ca2+ and Mg2+ were investigated. The objective was to improve understanding of the dispersion and flocculation behavior of muscovite and thus improve the effect of pre-concentration of vanadium-bearing muscovite.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Natural pure muscovite was obtained from the town of Lingshou in Hebei province, China. The chemical composition of the sample is listed in Table 1, which is similar to the theoretical chemical composition of muscovite (SiO2 45.2%, Al2O3 38.5%, K2O 11.8%, H2O 4.5%). The sample was hand-picked and ground to −25 µm in an agitating mill with a zirconia ball. The particle size of the sample was measured by BT-9300H laser particle size analyzer (Bettersize instruments Ltd., Dandong, China), and the result is given in Figure 1. The D90 is 21.69 μm and the average particle diameter is 10.75 μm. One fraction of the sample was further ground to about −5 µm by an agate mortar for zeta potential measurements. The Ca2+ and Mg2+ solutions were obtained from analytical reagents of CaCl2 and MgSO4 purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). HCl and NaOH were used for the pH adjustment of the suspension. The pH of the suspension was monitored using a digital pH meter. All experiments were carried out at room temperature of 22 ± 2 °C with deionized water.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Sedimentation Test

To evaluate the dispersion properties, 2 g of muscovite was placed into a beaker with 50 mL of deionized water, agitated for 10 min in UP500HE ultrasonic oscillators (Leijunda Ultrasonic Electronic Equipment Ltd., Nanjing, China), and transferred into a 100-mL glass measuring cylinder. Metal ions and HCl or NaOH were added into the measuring cylinder with water up to 100 mL. The cylinder was turned upside down three times and was set aside for 10 min. The upper part, approximately 50% of the total volume, was siphoned out to a beaker for pH measurement. The sediment and the upper part were collected, dried, and weighed. The degree of dispersion (D) was calculated as
D = m s e d / ( m s u s p + m s e d ) × 100 % ,
where msusp is the mass of the upper part, and msed is the mass of the sediment.

2.2.2. Zeta Potentials Measurement

The zeta potentials of the sample in the different suspension were measured by Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern Instrument Co., Malvern, UK). The sample (2 mg) was placed in 100 mL of deionized water, and the suspension was conditioned with Ca2+ or Mg2+ ions over the pH range from 2 to 12. An average zeta potential value of at least six individual measurements was recorded.

2.2.3. Calculation of Interfacial Energy between Particles

Based on the classical DLVO theory, the total potential energy is described as the sum of the Vander Waals attraction potential and the electrostatic potential [22].
V T = V W + V S ,
where VW is the Van der Waals attraction potential and VS is the electrostatic potential.
The DLVO theory can be used to model perfectly smooth surfaces of certain geometries (i.e., flat surfaces spheres, or cylinders). Here, the muscovite was assumed as spherical particle.
The Van der Waals attraction potential was calculated as
V W = A 131 6 H × R 1 R 2 R 1 + R 2 ,
where A131 is the Hamaker constant, H is the distance between the particles, and R is the particle radius.
Meanwhile, the electrostatic potential was calculated as
V S = π ε R 1 R 2 R 1 + R 2 ( ϕ 01 2 + ϕ 02 2 ) ( 2 ϕ 01 ϕ 02 ϕ 01 2 + ϕ 02 2 p + q ) ;
p = ln [ 1 + exp ( κ H ) 1 exp ( κ H ) ] ;  and
q = ln [ 1 exp ( 2 κ H ) ] ,
where ϕ0 is approximatively replaced the measured value of zeta potential, R is the particle radius, and the Debye length κ−1 represents the thickness of the double layer. ε is the dielectric constant [28,29].

2.2.4. Adsorption Capacity Measurement

The concentration of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions was measured by a Prodigy 7 inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer (Leeman Labs Inc., Hudson, NH, USA). Again, 2 g of muscovite was mixed with Ca2+ or Mg2+ ions (1 × 10−3 mol/L) in a suspension of 100 mL in a glass measuring cylinder, and HCl and NaOH were used for pH adjustment. The cylinder was turned upside down three times and set aside for 10 min. The solid particles were separated by centrifugation for 12 min with 2000 r/min, and the concentration of the Ca2+ or Mg2+ ions in the supernatant was measured. The amount adsorbed was calculated as
Γ = ( C 0 C e q . ) m V ,
where Γ is the unit mass mineral adsorption quantity, C0 is the initial concentration of the ions, Ceq. is the ion concentration in the supernatant, V is volume (100mL), and m is the quality of muscovite.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Sedimentation Behavior of Muscovite

The sedimentation behavior of muscovite in deionized water, with and without the Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions, were investigated at different pH levels.
It can be seen from Figure 2 and Figure 3 that, in the absence of excess Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions, the sedimentation yield of the sample decreased with increasing pH, within a range from 1 to 6, after the yield was around 50% in a pH range from 6 to 12, indicating that the muscovite particles aggregated in an acidic solution and dispersed in alkaline suspension.
In the presence of Ca2+ (Figure 2), the sedimentation yield decreased with increasing pH to a certain point and then increased again, with an inflexion point near pH = 4. The sedimentation yield decreased in pH range from 2 to 4 compared with no ions, which indicated that the flocculation behavior of muscovite was hindered by Ca2+. With pH being > 4, sedimentation yield increased as a function of pH, indicating that the flocculation of muscovite particles was caused by the addition of Ca2+. Increasing the concentration of Ca2+, the sedimentation yield basically remained unchanged in acidic suspension, but increased in alkaline suspension. With the presence of Mg2+ (Figure 3), the trend of sedimentation was basically similar to that with Ca2+. The difference was that the sedimentation yield increased first and decreased later at around pH = 9 with 1 × 10−3 mol/L Mg2+ and at around pH = 10 with 5 × 10−3 mol/L Mg2+.

3.2. Zeta Potential Analysis

Changes in the pH of suspensions can influence the surface properties of minerals [30]. Zeta potentials of muscovite as a function of pH in deionized water with and without Ca2+ and Mg2+ is presented in Figure 4. It can be seen that the zeta potentials of muscovite were negative over a wide range of pH from 2 to 14 and decreased with the increase in pH, which is consistent with previous studies [31,32,33]. The trend of the decreasing zeta potential with an increase in pH is similar to the presence of Ca2+ and Mg2+, but the absolute value of the potential was lower and found to decrease with increasing ion concentration. Surprisingly, in high alkaline suspension containing Mg2+, namely, when the pH range from 10 to 12, the negatively charged surface became positively charged.

3.3. Calculation of Surface Energy of Particles Using Classic DLVO Theory

Assuming spherical particle geometry, the interaction energy values of the particles in the presence or absence of Ca2+ and Mg2+ was calculated according to the classical DLVO theory, with the results from the zeta potential measurements, and the Hamaker constant of A131 = 2.2 × 10−20 J, the dielectric constant of ε = 6.95 × 10−10 C2·J−1·m−1, κ = 0.104 nm−1 [28,29], and R1 = R2 = 10.75/2 μm. As can be seen from the results in Figure 5, the energy barrier increased with increasing pH, so the ability to from a dispersion was improved with increasing pH, which was found to be consistent with the settling experiments. However, the presence of Ca2+ and Mg2+ can reduce the surface potential and thus reduce the interaction energy values of the particles. This should increase flocculation, but it is in contrast to the experimental results presented earlier.
Muscovite is a kind of layered crystal structure of mineral, which is formed from an octahedral layer sandwiched between two identical tetrahedral (SiO4) layers. So particle–particle flocculation may occur through three types of structural interaction: basal surface (001)—basal surface, basal surface-edge, and edge-edge. In general, the measurement of zeta potential can represent the mineral surface electrical property; however, considering the crystal anisotropy of muscovite, the zeta potential of muscovite is the overall electrical properties of the basal surface and the edge. The basal surface of muscovite has a negative charge, which is not affected by pH [31]. As a result, its value can be approximated to the zeta potential when the pH value of the suspension is equal to the point of zero charge of the edge (PZCedge). When the net charge of the surface is zero, the PZC is defined as a point on the pH-scale, and the PZCedge of muscovite in theory is 6.84 [34]. The potential computation formula of the edge is as follows: φ e d g e = 0.059 ( PZC e d g e - pH ) . Considering the smaller edge area compared to the basal surface area, the Redge was assumed to be one tenth of the Rbasal·surface(10.75/2 μm). The interaction energy values of the particles were re-calculated, and the results are shown in Figure 6. The results show that the interaction energies of the form of basal surface-edge were negative at pH values of 3 and 6, which means that the particles can undergo flocculation, consistent with the experimental phenomenon, testifying that the particles were aggregated in acidic suspension mainly by the form of the basal surface-edge. Adding the 1 × 10−3 mol/L Ca2+ and Mg2+, the surface potential was reduced, and the electrostatic attraction between the basal surface and the edge was then also reduced, so the dispersion increased, which was also consistent with the experimental phenomenon.

3.4. Metal Species in Different Solution

In the solution with different pH values, the species and the content of the species in the presence of 1 × 10−3 mol/L Ca2+ or Mg2+ ions were analyzed and calculated using the stability constants for hydroxide formation, and the results are shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively. When pH < 12, the dissociative Ca2+ and Ca(OH)+ are the key species in the solution. Ca2+ and Ca(OH)+ lowered the absolute value of zeta potential of muscovite by compressing electric double layer [22,23], which was consistent with the zeta potential analysis. Mg2+ and Mg(OH)+ are the key species in the solution at pH < 9.92, and they had a similar effect to that of Ca2+ and Ca(OH)+. However, Mg(OH)2(s) is the main species at pH > 9.92. At a pH range from 10 to 12, the zeta potential was zero, caused by Mg(OH)2(s), and this phenomenon agrees with the results researched by Krishnan and Iwasaki [35].
The adsorption capacity of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on muscovite is shown in Figure 9. When pH < 4, there was less adsorption capacity of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions on muscovite. When pH > 4, the adsorption capacity of calcium and magnesium ions began to increase, which was consistent with the sedimentation experiment, namely, the agglomeration increased when pH > 4. Combined with Figure 7 and Figure 8, it can be found that the ion and the hydroxyl complexes were the key species in the solution; the concentration of the hydroxyl compounds and the adsorption quantity all increased with the increase in the pH. Thus, it was confirmed that the hydroxy complex was the key form adsorbed on the muscovite, which may make the partial surface of muscovite with a positive charge. The flocculation of muscovite was caused by a bridging effect of the hydroxy complex, as shown in Figure 10. With the increase of pH and the concentration of Ca2+ and Mg2+, the hydroxy complex increased, and the bridging effect increased, so the sedimentation rate increased. Mg(OH)2(s) was the main form when pH > 9.92, which led to the changing property of the suspension system, thus making the anomalous changes of sedimentation rate when the pH neared 9.92.

4. Conclusions

The conclusions from this research can be summarized as follows:
  • The dispersion and flocculation behavior of muscovite in the absence of excess Ca2+ and Mg2+ agree with the classic DLVO theory based on the crystal anisotropy. The muscovite particles were aggregated in acidic suspension mainly by the form of basal surface-edge.
  • The hydroxy complex of Ca2+ and Mg2+ was the main adsorption form on the mineral surface. The flocculation of muscovite was caused by a bridging effect of the hydroxy complex, which destroyed the excellent dispersion stability in alkaline suspension.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Science-Technology Support Programs of China (No. 2015BAB03B05) and the National Science Foundation of China (No. 51404177).

Author Contributions

Jiayan Tang conceived and designed the experiments, Jiayan Tang performed the experiments; Jiayan Tang analyzed the data; Yimin Zhang contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools; Jiayan Tang and Shenxu Bao wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.M.; Hu, Y.J.; Bao, S.X. Vanadium emission during roasting of vanadium-bearing stone coal in chlorine. Miner. Eng. 2012, 30, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhu, X.B.; Zhang, Y.M.; Huang, J.; Liu, T.; Wang, Y. A kinetics study of multi-stage counter-current circulation acid leaching of vanadium from stone coal. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2012, 114–117, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhao, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.M.; Liu, T.; Chen, T.J.; Bian, Y.; Bao, S.X. Pre-concentration of vanadium from stone coal by gravity separation. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2013, 121, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.M.; Song, S.X.; Chen, T.J.; Bao, S.X. Behaviors of impurity elements Ca and Fe in vanadium-bearing stone coal during roasting and its control measure. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 148, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Valmacco, V.; Elzbieciak-Wodka, M.; Herman, D.; Trefalt, G.; Maroni, P.; Borkovec, M. Forces between silica particles in the presence of multivalent cations. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 472, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ackler, H.D.; French, R.H.; Chiang, Y.M. Comparisons of Hamaker constants for ceramic systems with intervening vacuum or water: From force laws and physical properties. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 179, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elzbieciak-Wodka, M.; Popescu, M.N.; Ruiz-Cabello, F.J.M.; Trefalt, G.; Maroni, P.; Borkovec, M. Measurements of dispersion forces between colloidal latex particles with the atomic force microscope and comparison with Lifshitz theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 104906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Morag, J.; Dishon, M.; Sivan, U. The governing role of surface hydration in ion specific adsorption to silica: An AFM-based account of the Hofmeister universality and its reversal. Langmuir 2013, 29, 6317–6322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Popa, I.; Sinha, P.; Finessi, M.; Maroni, P.; Papastavrou, G.; Borkovec, M. Importance of charge regulation in attractive double-layer forces between dissimilar surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 228301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Trefalt, G.; Behrens, S.H.; Borkovec, M. Charge Regulation in the Electrical Double Layer: Ion Adsorption and Surface Interactions. Langmuir 2015, 32, 380–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dishon, M.; Zohar, O.; Sivan, U. From repulsion to attraction and back to repulsion: The effect of NaCl, KCl, and CsCl on the force between silica surfaces in aqueous solution. Langmuir 2009, 25, 2831–2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pashley, R.M.; Israelachvili, J.N. DLVO and hydration forces between mica surfaces in Mg2+, Ca2+, Sr2+, and Ba2+ chloride solutions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1984, 97, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ruiz-Cabello, F.J.M.; Trefalt, G.; Csendes, Z.; Sinha, P.; Oncsik, T.; Szilagyi, I.; Maroni, P.; Borkovec, M. Predicting aggregation rates of colloidal particles from direct force measurements. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 11853–11862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zohar, O.; Leizerson, I.; Sivan, U. Short range attraction between two similarly charged silica surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 177802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yu, F.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xie, Z. Investigation on different behavior and mechanism of Ca(II) and Fe(III) adsorption on spodumene surface. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. 2014, 50, 535–550. [Google Scholar]
  16. Potapova, E.; Grahn, M.; Holmgren, A.; Hedlund, J. The effect of calcium ions and sodium silicate on the adsorption of a model anionic flotation collector on magnetite studied by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 345, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Potapova, E.; Yang, X.; Grahn, M.; Holmgren, A.; Forsmo, S.P.E.; Fredriksson, A.; Hedlund, J. The effect of calcium ions, sodium silicate and surfactant on charge and wettability of magnetite. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2011, 386, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dos Santos, M.A.; Santana, R.C.; Capponi, F.; Ataíde, C.H.; Barrozo, M.A. Effect of ionic species on the performance of apatite flotation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 76, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dos Santos, M.A.; Santana, R.C.; Capponi, F.; Ataíde, C.H.; Barrozo, M.A. Influence of the water composition on the selectivity of apatite flotation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 47, 606–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fornasiero, D.; Ralston, J. Cu(II) and Ni(II) activation in the flotation of quartz, lizardite and chlorite. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2005, 76, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Feng, Q.M.; Feng, B.; Lu, Y.P. Influence of copper ions and calcium ions on adsorption of CMC on chlorite. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 2013, 23, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, Y.L.; Hu, Y.H.; Wang, Y.H. Effect of metallic ions on dispersibility of fine diaspore. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 2011, 21, 1166–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, Y.L.; Wang, Y.H.; Hu, Y.H.; Sun, D.X.; Yu, M.J. Influence of metal ions on floatability of diaspore and kaolinite. J. Cent. South Univ. 2009, 40, 268–274. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang, Y.H.; Chen, X.H.; Zhou, Y.L. Effect of metal ions on dispersity of fine aluminum silicate minerals. Met. Mine 2007, 5, 38–43. [Google Scholar]
  25. James, R.O.; Healy, T.W. Adsorption of hydrolyzable metal ions at the oxide—Water interface. III. A thermodynamic model of adsorption. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1972, 40, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hu, Y.H.; Wang, D.Z. Mechanism of adsorption and activation flotation of metallic ion on oxide mineral-water interface. J. Cent. South Inst. Min. Metall. 1987, 5, 501–508. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yu, F.S.; Wang, Y.H.; Wang, J.M.; Xie, Z.F.; Zhang, L. First-principle investigation on mechanism of Ca ion activating flotation of spodumene. Rare Met. 2014, 33, 358–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Luo, Z.J.; Hu, Y.H.; Wang, Y.H.; Qiu, G.Z. Mechanism of dispersion and aggregation in reverse flotation for bauxite. Chin. J. Nonferr. Met. 2001, 11, 683–686. [Google Scholar]
  29. Qiu, G.Z.; Hu, Y.H.; Wang, D.Z. Interactions between Particles and Flotation of Fine Particles; Central South University: Changsha, China, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fuerstenau, D.W. Zeta potentials in the flotation of oxide and silicate minerals. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 114, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Nishimura, S.; Tateyama, H.; Tsunematsu, K.; Jinnai, K. Zeta potential measurement of muscovite mica basal plane-aqueous solution interface by means of plane interface technique. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1992, 152, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nosrati, A.; Addai-Mensah, J.; Skinner, W. Muscovite clay mineral particle interactions in aqueous media. Powder Technol. 2012, 219, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, L.; Wu, H.; Dong, F.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Xiao, J. Flotation and adsorption of mixed cationic/anionic collectors on muscovite mica. Miner. Eng. 2013, 41, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, X.W. Crystal Structure and Surface Property of Diaspore and Phyllosilicate Minerals. Ph.D. Thesis, Central South University, Changsha, China, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  35. Krishnan, S.V.; Iwasaki, I. Floc formation in quartz—Mg(OH)2 system. Colloids Surf. 1985, 15, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Particle size of the sample.
Figure 1. Particle size of the sample.
Minerals 06 00093 g001
Figure 2. The effect of pH value on dispersion and flocculation of mineral with the presence of Ca2+.
Figure 2. The effect of pH value on dispersion and flocculation of mineral with the presence of Ca2+.
Minerals 06 00093 g002
Figure 3. Effect of pH value on dispersion and flocculation of mineral with the presence of Mg2+.
Figure 3. Effect of pH value on dispersion and flocculation of mineral with the presence of Mg2+.
Minerals 06 00093 g003
Figure 4. Zeta potentials of muscovite as a function of pH in deionized water with Ca2+ and Mg2+.
Figure 4. Zeta potentials of muscovite as a function of pH in deionized water with Ca2+ and Mg2+.
Minerals 06 00093 g004
Figure 5. Total interaction energy of particles at different pH values without and with Ca2+, Mg2+.
Figure 5. Total interaction energy of particles at different pH values without and with Ca2+, Mg2+.
Minerals 06 00093 g005
Figure 6. Total interaction energy of three kinds of form at different pH values.
Figure 6. Total interaction energy of three kinds of form at different pH values.
Minerals 06 00093 g006
Figure 7. Calculated concentration of calcium species in solution with 1 × 10−3 mol/L Ca2+.
Figure 7. Calculated concentration of calcium species in solution with 1 × 10−3 mol/L Ca2+.
Minerals 06 00093 g007
Figure 8. Calculated concentration of magnesium species in solution with 1 × 10−3 mol/L Mg2+.
Figure 8. Calculated concentration of magnesium species in solution with 1 × 10−3 mol/L Mg2+.
Minerals 06 00093 g008
Figure 9. Adsorption capacity of Ca2+ and Mg2+ at different pH levels.
Figure 9. Adsorption capacity of Ca2+ and Mg2+ at different pH levels.
Minerals 06 00093 g009
Figure 10. Bridging effect of hydroxy complex.
Figure 10. Bridging effect of hydroxy complex.
Minerals 06 00093 g010
Table 1. Chemical composition of pure minerals (wt %).
Table 1. Chemical composition of pure minerals (wt %).
Chemical CompositionNa2OMgOAl2O3SiO2K2OFe2O3
Content0.500.9230.6446.9510.575.12

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Bao, S. The Effect of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on the Dispersion and Flocculation Behaviors of Muscovite Particles. Minerals 2016, 6, 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/min6030093

AMA Style

Tang J, Zhang Y, Bao S. The Effect of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on the Dispersion and Flocculation Behaviors of Muscovite Particles. Minerals. 2016; 6(3):93. https://doi.org/10.3390/min6030093

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Jiayan, Yimin Zhang, and Shenxu Bao. 2016. "The Effect of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on the Dispersion and Flocculation Behaviors of Muscovite Particles" Minerals 6, no. 3: 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/min6030093

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop