Performance Evaluations of Three Silt Fence Practices Using a Full-Scale Testing Apparatus
AbstractErosion and sediment controls on construction sites minimize environmental impacts from sediment-laden stormwater runoff. Silt fence, a widely specified perimeter control practice on construction projects used to retain sediment on-site, has limited performance-based testing data. Silt fence failures and resultant sediment losses are often the result of structural failure. To better understand silt fence performance, researchers at the Auburn University-Erosion and Sediment Control Testing Facility (AU-ESCTF) have evaluated three silt fence options to determine possible shortcomings using standardized full-scale testing methods. These methods subject silt fence practices to simulated, in-field conditions typically experienced on-site without the variability of field testing or the limited application of small-scale testing. Three different silt fence practices were tested to evaluate performance, which included: (1) Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) Trenched Silt Fence, (2) ALDOT Sliced Silt Fence, and (3) Alabama Soil and Water Conservation Committee (AL-SWCC) Trenched Silt Fence. This study indicates that the structural performance of a silt fence perimeter control is the most important performance factor in retaining sediment. The sediment retention performance of these silt fence practices was 82.7%, 66.9% and 90.5%, respectively. When exposed to large impoundment conditions, both ALDOT Trench and Sliced Silt Fence practices failed structurally, while the AL-SWCC Trenched Silt Fence did not experience structural failure. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Bugg, R.A.; Donald, W.; Zech, W.; Perez, M. Performance Evaluations of Three Silt Fence Practices Using a Full-Scale Testing Apparatus. Water 2017, 9, 502.
Bugg RA, Donald W, Zech W, Perez M. Performance Evaluations of Three Silt Fence Practices Using a Full-Scale Testing Apparatus. Water. 2017; 9(7):502.Chicago/Turabian Style
Bugg, R. A.; Donald, Wesley; Zech, Wesley; Perez, Michael. 2017. "Performance Evaluations of Three Silt Fence Practices Using a Full-Scale Testing Apparatus." Water 9, no. 7: 502.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.