Next Article in Journal
An Investigation into the Effects of Temperature Gradient on the Soil Water–Salt Transfer with Evaporation
Previous Article in Journal
Seepage Piping Evolution Characteristics in Bimsoils -An Experimental Study
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2017, 9(7), 459; doi:10.3390/w9070459

An Assessment of Mean Areal Precipitation Methods on Simulated Stream Flow: A SWAT Model Performance Assessment

1
Department of Forestry, Water Resources Program, School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, 203-T ABNR Building, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
2
Davis College, Schools of Agriculture and Food, and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, 3109 Agricultural Sciences Building, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, USA
3
Institute of Water Security and Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 2 April 2017 / Revised: 17 June 2017 / Accepted: 21 June 2017 / Published: 24 June 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1779 KB, uploaded 26 June 2017]   |  

Abstract

Accurate mean areal precipitation (MAP) estimates are essential input forcings for hydrologic models. However, the selection of the most accurate method to estimate MAP can be daunting because there are numerous methods to choose from (e.g., proximate gauge, direct weighted average, surface-fitting, and remotely sensed methods). Multiple methods (n = 19) were used to estimate MAP with precipitation data from 11 distributed monitoring sites, and 4 remotely sensed data sets. Each method was validated against the hydrologic model simulated stream flow using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). SWAT was validated using a split-site method and the observed stream flow data from five nested-scale gauging sites in a mixed-land-use watershed of the central USA. Cross-validation results showed the error associated with surface-fitting and remotely sensed methods ranging from −4.5 to −5.1%, and −9.8 to −14.7%, respectively. Split-site validation results showed the percent bias (PBIAS) values that ranged from −4.5 to −160%. Second order polynomial functions especially overestimated precipitation and subsequent stream flow simulations (PBIAS = −160) in the headwaters. The results indicated that using an inverse-distance weighted, linear polynomial interpolation or multiquadric function method to estimate MAP may improve SWAT model simulations. Collectively, the results highlight the importance of spatially distributed observed hydroclimate data for precipitation and subsequent steam flow estimations. The MAP methods demonstrated in the current work can be used to reduce hydrologic model uncertainty caused by watershed physiographic differences. View Full-Text
Keywords: SWAT; PRISM; TRMM; CHIRPS; MAP; mixed-land-use hydrology; precipitation SWAT; PRISM; TRMM; CHIRPS; MAP; mixed-land-use hydrology; precipitation
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeiger, S.; Hubbart, J. An Assessment of Mean Areal Precipitation Methods on Simulated Stream Flow: A SWAT Model Performance Assessment. Water 2017, 9, 459.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top