Next Article in Journal
Water Governance, Stakeholder Engagement, and Sustainable Water Resources Management
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Meta-Heuristic Techniques in Rainfall-Runoff Modelling
Article Menu
Issue 3 (March) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2017, 9(3), 187; doi:10.3390/w9030187

Multiobjective Automatic Parameter Calibration of a Hydrological Model

Research Center for Disaster Prevention Science and Technology, Korea University, Seoul 136-713, Korea
School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-713, Korea
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Marco Franchini
Received: 17 October 2016 / Revised: 24 February 2017 / Accepted: 1 March 2017 / Published: 6 March 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [4249 KB, uploaded 7 March 2017]   |  


This study proposes variable balancing approaches for the exploration (diversification) and exploitation (intensification) of the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) with simulated binary crossover (SBX) and polynomial mutation (PM) in the multiobjective automatic parameter calibration of a lumped hydrological model, the HYMOD model. Two objectives—minimizing the percent bias and minimizing three peak flow differences—are considered in the calibration of the six parameters of the model. The proposed balancing approaches, which migrate the focus between exploration and exploitation over generations by varying the crossover and mutation distribution indices of SBX and PM, respectively, are compared with traditional static balancing approaches (the two dices value is fixed during optimization) in a benchmark hydrological calibration problem for the Leaf River (1950 km2) near Collins, Mississippi. Three performance metrics—solution quality, spacing, and convergence—are used to quantify and compare the quality of the Pareto solutions obtained by the two different balancing approaches. The variable balancing approaches that migrate the focus of exploration and exploitation differently for SBX and PM outperformed other methods. View Full-Text
Keywords: automatic parameter calibration; multiobjective optimization; NSGA-II; balance between exploration and exploitation; HYMOD model automatic parameter calibration; multiobjective optimization; NSGA-II; balance between exploration and exploitation; HYMOD model

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Jung, D.; Choi, Y.H.; Kim, J.H. Multiobjective Automatic Parameter Calibration of a Hydrological Model. Water 2017, 9, 187.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top