Next Article in Journal
The Potential for the Treatment of Antimony-Containing Wastewater by Iron-Based Adsorbents
Previous Article in Journal
Parametric Modelling of Potential Evapotranspiration: A Global Survey
Article Menu
Issue 10 (October) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2017, 9(10), 793; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100793

Hydrological Appraisal of Climate Change Impacts on the Water Resources of the Xijiang Basin, South China

1
School of Hydrometeorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
2
Technology Centre, Hydraulic and Hydropower Project, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510635, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 17 August 2017 / Revised: 27 September 2017 / Accepted: 11 October 2017 / Published: 16 October 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [7638 KB, uploaded 16 October 2017]   |  

Abstract

Assessing the impact of climate change on streamflow is critical to understanding the changes to water resources and to improve water resource management. The use of hydrological models is a common practice to quantify and assess water resources in such situations. In this study, two hydrological models with different structures, e.g., a physically-based distributed model Liuxihe (LXH) and a lumped conceptual model Xinanjiang (XAJ) are employed to simulate the daily runoff in the Xijiang basin in South China, under historical (1964–2013) and future (2014–2099) climate conditions. The future climate series are downscaled from a global climate model (Beijing Climate Centre-Climate System Model, BCC-CSM version 1.1) by a high-resolution regional climate model under two representative concentration pathways—RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. The hydrological responses to climate change via the two rainfall–runoff models with different mathematical structures are compared, in relation to the uncertainties in hydrology and meteorology. It is found that the two rainfall–runoff models successfully simulate the historical runoff for the Xijiang basin, with a daily runoff Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency of 0.80 for the LXH model and 0.89 for the XAJ model. The characteristics of high flow in the future are also analysed including their frequency (magnitude–return-period relationship). It shows that the distributed model could produce more streamflow and peak flow than the lumped model under the climate change scenarios. However the difference of the impact from the two climate scenarios is marginal on median monthly streamflow. The flood frequency analysis under climate change suggests that flood magnitudes in the future will be more severe than the historical floods with the same return period. Overall, the study reveals how uncertain it can be to quantify water resources with two different but well calibrated hydrological models. View Full-Text
Keywords: climate change; regional climate model; RCP scenarios; Liuxihe model; Xinanjiang model; Xijiang basin; China climate change; regional climate model; RCP scenarios; Liuxihe model; Xinanjiang model; Xijiang basin; China
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, D.; Das, S.; Ren, Q. Hydrological Appraisal of Climate Change Impacts on the Water Resources of the Xijiang Basin, South China. Water 2017, 9, 793.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top