Next Article in Journal
Effects of Rainfall Intensity and Slope Gradient on Runoff and Soil Moisture Content on Different Growing Stages of Spring Maize
Previous Article in Journal
Comments on Uncertainty in Groundwater Governance in the Volcanic Canary Islands, Spain
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2015, 7(6), 2971-2989;

Using Pressure and Alteration Indicators to Assess River Morphological Quality: Case Study of the Prahova River (Romania)

Department of Meteorology and Hydrology, Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1 Bulevardul Nicolae Bălcescu, Bucharest 010041, Romania
Department of Hydrology and Hydrogeology, Experimental Hydrology Section, National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, 97 Şoseaua Bucureşti-Ploieşti, Bucharest 013686, Romania
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt
Received: 13 April 2015 / Revised: 22 May 2015 / Accepted: 2 June 2015 / Published: 17 June 2015
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2151 KB, uploaded 17 June 2015]   |  


River morphological quality assessment, derived from quantification of human pressures as well as river channel alteration, is a demand of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) in terms of integrating hydromorphological elements in defining ecological status. Our study’s aim is to contribute to the hydromorphological evaluation by proposing indicators and separating classes, based on a revisited Morphological Quality Index (rMQI) protocol. The rMQI is based on 12 indicators of human pressures, 10 indicators of channel form adjustments, and 11 indicators of functionality. The rMQI scoring system allows for the quantification of changes when compared to reference conditions, be they undisturbed or nearly undisturbed by human interventions, with absent channel adjustments and a functioning natural river style. We used the lower, meandering sector of the Prahova River to demonstrate our assessment methodology. The Lower Prahova River suffers from a minor local intervention and a diminishing intensity of fluvial processes specific to a meandering style. Meanders geometry was affected by significant changes that included a decrease in the radius of curvature, width and width–to–mean–depth ratio. We concluded that the Lower Prahova River has a good morphological quality, which is rated as second class on a scale of five levels, from natural to severely modified. We recommend an improvement in the hydromorphological evaluation protocol in Romania by additional indicators for morphological alterations specific to each channel pattern. View Full-Text
Keywords: morphological quality index; hydromorphology; water framework directive; meanders morphological quality index; hydromorphology; water framework directive; meanders

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ioana-Toroimac, G.; Zaharia, L.; Minea, G. Using Pressure and Alteration Indicators to Assess River Morphological Quality: Case Study of the Prahova River (Romania). Water 2015, 7, 2971-2989.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top