Next Article in Journal
Basin Flood Risk Management: A Territorial Data-Driven Approach to Support Decision-Making
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution of Water Supply, Sanitation, Wastewater, and Stormwater Technologies Globally
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReply
Water 2015, 7(2), 464-479; doi:10.3390/w7020464

Karst Aquifer Recharge: A Case History of over Simplification from the Uley South Basin, South Australia

South Australian Water Corporation, 250 Victoria Square, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
Academic Editor: Miklas Scholz
Received: 22 December 2014 / Revised: 19 January 2015 / Accepted: 22 January 2015 / Published: 4 February 2015
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [4155 KB, uploaded 9 June 2015]   |  

Abstract

The article “Karst aquifer recharge: Comments on ‘Characteristics of Point Recharge in Karst Aquifers’, by Adrian D. Werner, 2014, Water 6, doi:10.3390/w6123727” provides misrepresentation in some parts of Somaratne [1]. The description of Uley South Quaternary Limestone (QL) as unconsolidated or poorly consolidated aeolianite sediments with the presence of well-mixed groundwater in Uley South [2] appears unsubstantiated. Examination of 98 lithological descriptions with corresponding drillers’ logs show only two wells containing bands of unconsolidated sediments. In Uley South basin, about 70% of salinity profiles obtained by electrical conductivity (EC) logging from monitoring wells show stratification. The central and north central areas of the basin receive leakage from the Tertiary Sand (TS) aquifer thereby influencing QL groundwater characteristics, such as chemistry, age and isotope composition. The presence of conduit pathways is evident in salinity profiles taken away from TS water affected areas. Pumping tests derived aquifer parameters show strong heterogeneity, a typical characteristic of karst aquifers. Uley South QL aquifer recharge is derived from three sources; diffuse recharge, point recharge from sinkholes and continuous leakage of TS water. This limits application of recharge estimation methods, such as the conventional chloride mass balance (CMB) as the basic premise of the CMB is violated. The conventional CMB is not suitable for accounting chloride mass balance in groundwater systems displaying extreme range of chloride concentrations and complex mixing [3]. Over simplification of karst aquifer systems to suit application of the conventional CMB or 1-D unsaturated modelling as described in Werner [2], is not suitable use of these recharge estimation methods. View Full-Text
Keywords: karst aquifers; point recharge; sinkholes; recharge in semi-arid; Australia karst aquifers; point recharge; sinkholes; recharge in semi-arid; Australia
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Somaratne, N. Karst Aquifer Recharge: A Case History of over Simplification from the Uley South Basin, South Australia. Water 2015, 7, 464-479.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top