Next Article in Journal
Managing Local Coastal Stressors to Reduce the Ecological Effects of Ocean Acidification and Warming
Previous Article in Journal
Shield or not to Shield: Effects of Solar Radiation on Water Temperature Sensor Accuracy
Water 2013, 5(4), 1638-1652; doi:10.3390/w5041638
Article

Measuring the Willingness to Pay for Tap Water Quality Improvements: Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey in Pusan

1
, 2,*  and 3
Received: 31 July 2013; in revised form: 25 September 2013 / Accepted: 25 September 2013 / Published: 10 October 2013
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [233 KB, uploaded 10 October 2013]
Abstract: With increasing concern regarding health, people have developed an interest in the safety of drinking water. In this study, we attempt to measure the economic benefits of tap water quality improvement through a case study on Pusan, the second largest city in Korea. To this end, we use a scenario that the government plans to implement a new project of improving water quality and apply the contingent valuation (CV) method. A one-and-one-half bounded dichotomous choice question (OOHBDC) format is employed to reduce the potential for response bias in multiple-bound formats such as the double-bound model, while maintaining much of the efficiency. Moreover, we employ the spike model to deal with zero willingness to pay (WTP) responses from the OOHBDC CV survey. The CV survey of 400 randomly selected households was rigorously designed to comply with the guidelines for best-practice CV studies using person-to-person interviews. From the spike OOHBDC CV model, the mean WTP for the improvement was estimated to be KRW 2,124 (USD 2.2), on average, per household, per month. The value amounts to 36.6% of monthly water bill and 20.2% of production costs of water. The conventional OOHBDC model produces statistically insignificant mean WTP estimate and even negative value, but the OOHBDC spike model gives us statistically significant mean WTP estimate and fitted our data well. The WTP value to Pusan residents can be computed to be KRW 31.2 billion (USD 32.1 million) per year.
Keywords: tap water quality improvement; contingent valuation; willingness to pay; one-and-one-half bounded; spike model tap water quality improvement; contingent valuation; willingness to pay; one-and-one-half bounded; spike model
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Kwak, S.-Y.; Yoo, S.-H.; Kim, C.-S. Measuring the Willingness to Pay for Tap Water Quality Improvements: Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey in Pusan. Water 2013, 5, 1638-1652.

AMA Style

Kwak S-Y, Yoo S-H, Kim C-S. Measuring the Willingness to Pay for Tap Water Quality Improvements: Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey in Pusan. Water. 2013; 5(4):1638-1652.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kwak, So-Yoon; Yoo, Seung-Hoon; Kim, Chang-Seob. 2013. "Measuring the Willingness to Pay for Tap Water Quality Improvements: Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey in Pusan." Water 5, no. 4: 1638-1652.


Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert