This article is
- freely available
Explaining Non-Take-up of Water Subsidy
School of Public Policy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel
Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 79 John F. Kennedy Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 March 2011; in revised form: 9 July 2011 / Accepted: 9 December 2011 / Published: 16 December 2011
Abstract: We use two separate quasi-natural experiments to explore the relative importance of information and administrative costs in explaining non-take-up of water subsidy. The first “experiment” shows that the take-up rate of a household with lower administrative costs is not significantly different from otherwise identical households. In contrast, using the same program, the second “experiment” reveals that the take-up rate of a household that is more likely to be informed is substantially higher compared to otherwise identical households. These findings support the idea that information plays a major role in explaining non-take-up of water subsidy.
Keywords: water subsidy; take-up; information costs; administrative costs
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Dahan, M.; Nisan, U. Explaining Non-Take-up of Water Subsidy. Water 2011, 3, 1174-1196.
Dahan M, Nisan U. Explaining Non-Take-up of Water Subsidy. Water. 2011; 3(4):1174-1196.
Dahan, Momi; Nisan, Udi. 2011. "Explaining Non-Take-up of Water Subsidy." Water 3, no. 4: 1174-1196.