Water 2011, 3(4), 1174-1196; doi:10.3390/w3041174
Article

Explaining Non-Take-up of Water Subsidy

1,* email and 2email
1 School of Public Policy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel 2 Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 79 John F. Kennedy Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 March 2011; in revised form: 9 July 2011 / Accepted: 9 December 2011 / Published: 16 December 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Policy)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [443 KB, uploaded 16 December 2011 11:22 CET]
Abstract: We use two separate quasi-natural experiments to explore the relative importance of information and administrative costs in explaining non-take-up of water subsidy. The first “experiment” shows that the take-up rate of a household with lower administrative costs is not significantly different from otherwise identical households. In contrast, using the same program, the second “experiment” reveals that the take-up rate of a household that is more likely to be informed is substantially higher compared to otherwise identical households. These findings support the idea that information plays a major role in explaining non-take-up of water subsidy.
Keywords: water subsidy; take-up; information costs; administrative costs

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Dahan, M.; Nisan, U. Explaining Non-Take-up of Water Subsidy. Water 2011, 3, 1174-1196.

AMA Style

Dahan M, Nisan U. Explaining Non-Take-up of Water Subsidy. Water. 2011; 3(4):1174-1196.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dahan, Momi; Nisan, Udi. 2011. "Explaining Non-Take-up of Water Subsidy." Water 3, no. 4: 1174-1196.

Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert