On the Difference of River Resistance Computation between the
Model and the Mixing Length Model
College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing 210098, China
National Engineering Research Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Engineering Safety, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 22 May 2018 / Revised: 21 June 2018 / Accepted: 27 June 2018 / Published: 29 June 2018
River resistance characteristics, which can be reflected by the resistance factor, have an impact on flow and sediment transport. In the classical theory, Prandtl proposed the mixing length model for the simulation of the turbulence, and von Kármán established the logarithmic formula of the flow velocity distribution. Based on that, the expression of the resistance factor can be derived. With the development of the numerical technology, the
model has been widely applied in the channels computation. However, for the different closure ways of the Reynolds stress in turbulence equations, the outcomes of the
model and the Prandtl mixing length model are not exactly identical. In this paper, both qualitative and quantitative studies are carried out on the difference between these two models, with respect to the resistance factor. This difference is evaluated by the ratio of the resistance factor computed with the two models. The result shows that with the increment of the relative flow depth, the ratio first increases and then decreases. Moreover, it is also affected by the bed slope. Therefore, the difference should be taken into account when a comparison is made between the simulation results of the
model and the classical theory of river mechanics.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
Share & Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Dai, W.; Ding, M.; Zhang, H. On the Difference of River Resistance Computation between the
Model and the Mixing Length Model. Water 2018, 10, 870.
Dai W, Ding M, Zhang H. On the Difference of River Resistance Computation between the
Model and the Mixing Length Model. Water. 2018; 10(7):870.
Dai, Wenhong; Ding, Mengjiao; Zhang, Haitong. 2018. "On the Difference of River Resistance Computation between the
Model and the Mixing Length Model." Water 10, no. 7: 870.
Show more citation formats
Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
[Return to top]
For more information on the journal statistics, click here
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.