Next Article in Journal
Next Article in Special Issue
Previous Article in Journal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genes 2014, 5(2), 460-476; doi:10.3390/genes5020460
Article

GWAS to Sequencing: Divergence in Study Design and Analysis

1
 and 2,*
Received: 27 December 2013; in revised form: 13 May 2014 / Accepted: 15 May 2014 / Published: 28 May 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Grand Celebration: 10th Anniversary of the Human Genome Project)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [766 KB, uploaded 28 May 2014]
Abstract: The success of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in uncovering genetic risk factors for complex traits has generated great promise for the complete data generated by sequencing. The bumpy transition from GWAS to whole-exome or whole-genome association studies (WGAS) based on sequencing investigations has highlighted important differences in analysis and interpretation. We show how the loss in power due to the allele frequency spectrum targeted by sequencing is difficult to compensate for with realistic effect sizes and point to study designs that may help. We discuss several issues in interpreting the results, including a special case of the winner’s curse. Extrapolation and prediction using rare SNPs is complex, because of the selective ascertainment of SNPs in case-control studies and the low amount of information at each SNP, and naive procedures are biased under the alternative. We also discuss the challenges in tuning gene-based tests and accounting for multiple testing when genes have very different sets of SNPs. The examples we emphasize in this paper highlight the difficult road we must travel for a two-letter switch.
Keywords: sequencing; GWAS; prediction; power of genetic association sequencing; GWAS; prediction; power of genetic association
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

King, C.R.; Nicolae, D.L. GWAS to Sequencing: Divergence in Study Design and Analysis. Genes 2014, 5, 460-476.

AMA Style

King CR, Nicolae DL. GWAS to Sequencing: Divergence in Study Design and Analysis. Genes. 2014; 5(2):460-476.

Chicago/Turabian Style

King, Christopher R.; Nicolae, Dan L. 2014. "GWAS to Sequencing: Divergence in Study Design and Analysis." Genes 5, no. 2: 460-476.



Genes EISSN 2073-4425 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert