Next Article in Journal
The Complete Mitogenome of Pyrrhocoris tibialis (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae) and Phylogenetic Implications
Previous Article in Journal
Erratum: The MAPKKK CgMck1 Is Required for Cell Wall Integrity, Appressorium Development, and Pathogenicity in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Genes 2018, 9, 543)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/genes10100818
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphological Characterization of Flower Buds Development and Related Gene Expression Profiling at Bud Break Stage in Heterodichogamous Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) lljinskaja

by
Xiaoling Chen
,
Xia Mao
,
Peng Huang
and
Shengzuo Fang
*
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2019, 10(10), 818; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10100818
Submission received: 12 July 2019 / Revised: 10 October 2019 / Accepted: 15 October 2019 / Published: 17 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja, a unique species growing in southern China, is a multi-function tree species with medicinal, healthcare, material, and ornamental values. So far, sexual reproduction is the main method for extensive cultivation of C. paliurus plantations, but this is limited by low seed plumpness resulted from the character of heterodichogamy. Phenological observations have revealed the asynchronism of flower development in this species. However, its molecular mechanism remains largely unknown. To reveal molecular mechanism of heterodichogamy in C. paliurus, transcriptome of female (F) and male (M) buds from two mating types (protandry, PA; protogyny, PG) at bud break stage were sequenced using Illumina Hiseq 4000 platform. The expression patterns of both 32 genes related to flowering and 58 differentially expressed transcription factors (DETFs) selected from 6 families were divided four groups (PG-F, PG-M, PA-F, and PA-M) into two categories: first flowers (PG-F and PA-M) and later flowers (PA-F and PG-M). The results indicated that genes related to plant hormones (IAA, ABA, and GA) synthesis and response, glucose metabolism, and transcription factors (especially in MIKC family) played significant roles in regulating asynchronism of male and female flowers in the same mating type. The expression of DETFs showed two patterns. One contained DETFs up-regulated in first flowers in comparison to later flowers, and the other was the reverse. Nine genes related to flowering were selected for qRT-PCR to confirm the accuracy of RNA-seq, and generally, the RPKM values of these genes were consistent with the result of qRT-PCR. The results of this work could improve our understanding in asynchronism of floral development within one mating type in C. paliurus at transcriptional level, as well as lay a foundation for further study in heterodichogamous plants.

1. Introduction

Heterodichogamy, a transitional form in the evolution of plants from monoecism to dioecism, exists in hermaphrodite plants including two types of bisexual individuals, protandry (flowering male first) and protogyny (female first). When one type’s pollen is released, the stigma of the other is available; then they switch roles. It is one of the common strategies for plant to avoid inbreeding [1]. This kind of reproductive system is not common in flowering plants and has been found in only 21 genera from 13 families so far [2,3], such as Cyclocarya, Juglans in Juglandaceae, and Acer in Aceraceae.
Cyclocarya paliurus, known as Qing-Qian-Liu due to the resemblance of its fruit clusters to a string of old Chinese copper coins, is a sole species in this genus [4]. Because of its diverse functions, C. paliurus has attracted a lot of attention [5,6,7]. However, the natural forest resources are mainly distributed in the mountain areas that are hard to reach or some nature reserves [8]. In addition, as a typical heterodichogamous plant, C. paliurus was characterized by high setting percentage but low seed plumpness in nature and plantation forests [9,10], which brings big challenges for breeding. Phenological observation suggested that the flowering characters of heterodichogamy in C. paliurus were the main reason for low plump seed index [11,12]. Therefore, it is important to understand the mechanism of differentiation and development of flower in the process of breeding.
The process of flowering is a transition from vegetative growth to reproductive growth under the interaction and coordination of internal and external factors, forming a complex network system to regulate flower formation [13]. Currently, the comprehensive and mature studies on the flowering network of Arabidopsis thaliana include six pathways mainly. The seasonal changes of day length and temperature are associated with flowering controlled by the photoperiod and vernalization pathways. And the pathway of the ambient temperature would respond to the daily growth temperature. In addition, the impacts of age, automatic and gibberellin pathways are more independent of the environmental stimulation [14]. Meanwhile, many floral integrators and floral meristem genes in such network were identified, such as FT (flowering locus T), AGL (agamous-like) family, AP1 (apetala 1), and LFY (leafy) [15,16,17]. Although these studies mainly focused on model plants, more fragmentary information obtained from other species [18,19,20] reveals that both the developmental processes and the underlying regulatory networks are largely conserved [21]. They can pave the way for future studies in other unclear flowering plants, even in heterodichogamous plants. Nowadays, publications referring to flowering characteristics of heterodichogamy are limited to phenological observations [3,10,22,23], anatomical studies [11,12,24] and a few nutrients studies [25]. Overall, the detailed molecular mechanism or genetic elements on regulation of floral organ differentiation and development in C. paliurus remains elusive. With the identification of more and more bioactive compounds and physiological functions in C. paliurus [26,27,28,29], the market demand for the leaves is increasing. Apart from asexual reproduction with little progress, sexual reproduction is clearly irreplaceable in extensive cultivation and breeding excellent varieties, which are limited by the character of heterodichogamy. Genes expressed differently in two mating types may play important roles in floral development, and large numbers of genes may involve floral organ initiation in C. paliurus. Male and female flower buds from two mating types at bud break stage were analyzed by RNA-seq to make up the poorly understand in molecular mechanism of heterodichogamy. The aims of this study were to explore what factors or genes regulate synchronism of heterosexual flowers in different mating types and asynchronism of heterosexual flowers in the same mating type. The findings from this study could provide not only approach for further studies on the molecular mechanism of flower development in C. paliurus and other similar plants but also a theoretical basis for developing C. paliurus plantations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant for Sample Collection

Samples were collected from a provenance trial of 9-year-old C. paliurus located in Chuzhou, Anhui Province, China (32°21′N, 118°58′E), which consists of more than 800 individuals. Eighteen individuals, including 9 protogyny (PG) and 9 protandry (PA), were randomly selected and tagged for sampling.
Asynchronism in differentiation of male and female flower buds in two mating types is a typical characteristic in heterodichogamous plants. Based on the previous studies [10,25], flower bud differentiation and development were divided into five stages on the basis of the process of male differentiation in PA, which was the first sexual flower to start differentiation. Physiological differentiation stage (S0), which was invisible to the naked eye, initiated after fruit setting [30]. During S0, morphological differentiation of male buds in two types were rapidly completed, but female buds did not. Subsequently, floral buds entered a dormant period (S1) from September to early March of the following year. The next three stages were divided according to growth of inflorescences (shown in Figure 1): bud break stage (S2), inflorescence elongation stage (S3), and mature stage (S4).
In S2, morphological changes in male buds were observed first, indicating revival of plants. In addition, differential expression of genes involved floral bud development in S2 could elucidate the mechanism of heterodichogamy in C. paliurus. Thus, female floral buds (F) and male floral buds (M) were collected during S2 (March 15th, 2017) from two mating types and grouped into PG-F, PG-M, PA-F, and PA-M, respectively, with three replicates for each group. Each replicate was collected from three individuals. More than 15 male flower buds were collected for each replicate of PG-M and PA-M, while at least 45 female flower buds were sampled for PG-F and PA-F. All isolated floral buds were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately and stored at -80 °C.

2.2. RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis, and Sequencing

E.Z.N.A Plant RNA Kit (OMEGA, American) was used to extract and purify total RNA of each sample. The extracted RNA was divided into two parts, one for sequencing and the other for later verification. The concentration and quality of RNA were checked by NanoPhotometer® (IMPLEN, Los Angeles, CA, USA) and Qubit®3.0 Flurometer (Life Technologies, Boston, CA, USA). 2100 RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to detect the integrity of RNA. Beijing Annoroad Genome Co. Ltd. constructed the cDNA library, performed sequencing on an Illumina platform, and generated 150 bp paired-end reads.

2.3. Data Filtering, De Novo Assembly, and Functional Annotation

Raw Data was processed with Perl script to clean data by removing the adaptor-polluted reads containing more than 5 adaptor-polluted bases, the low-quality reads with percentage of low Q-value (<20) base higher than 15%, and reads with number of N bases more than 5%. Both reads would be filtered out if any read of the paired-end reads is unqualified. Then, clean reads were de novo assembled by software Trinity (http://trinityrnaseq.sourceforge.net/, Version number: trinityrnaseq, release-20140717) into unigenes [31].
TransDecoder identified candidate coding regions within transcript sequence. To understand function of unigenes and ORFs, assembled unigenes were annotated by Nr, Nt, SwissProt, PFAM, KOG, GO, and KEGG database using NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) with an E-value ≤ 10−5 [32].

2.4. Differentially Expressed Genes Between Female and Male Buds in Two Mating Types

The expression levels of unigenes were calculated by RPKM (Reads per kilobase million mapped), which could eliminate the effect of sequencing depth and gene length on gene expression levels, so that the data could be compared between each other directly. The levels of unigenes’ expression at different floral buds were calculated using DESeq method described by Anders and Huber [33].

2.5. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Verification

Unigenes related to flower bud differentiation were selected for qRT-PCR analysis. RNA left for verification was turned to cDNA according to the protocol of PrimeScript™ II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). Specific primers were designed by Primer Premier 5.0 software to ensure the length of amplified products are between 120bp and200bp. All reactions were performed using SYBR Green Realtime PCR Master Mix Kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) by StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The experimental reaction conditions including denaturation at 95 °C for 30s and 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 10 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 40 s. Relative gene expression was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method with 18S ribosomal RNA as an internal control gene [34].

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Characteristics of Floral Bud Development

C. paliurus is a typical heterodichogamous species, including two mating types (PG and PA). The process of floral bud differentiation and development was significantly different between two mating types. Obvious differences of floral bud development (S1–S4) in morphology of four groups were photographed (Figure 2). Generally, PG-F developed faster than PA-F, while PA-M developed faster than PG-M (Figure 1, Figure 2), in accord with the flowering rhythm of heterodichogamy. In both PG and PA, male buds had completed morphological differentiation but female buds had not, then they entered dormant stage (S1). During S2, inflorescences of PA-M and PG-M elongated at slightly different speeds (Figure 1); in the meantime, few inflorescences of PG-F protruded from surrounded leaf buds (Figure 2B), yet the female buds in PA were still invisible (Figure 2E). S3 was the elongating stage of inflorescences, at which elongation of PG-F and PA-M completed and rapid elongation of PG-M and PA-F occurred (Figure 1, Figure 2C,F,J,N). In the early period of S4, PG-F and PA-M matured and began to mate with each other, while, PG-M and PA-F were just finishing inflorescences elongation (Figure 1, Figure 2G,K), while the maturation of PG-M and PA-F was observed in the later period of S4 (Figure 2P,Q).

3.2. Sequencing, Assembly, and Annotation

High throughput RNA sequencing was obtained over 10 Gb clean data from each bud sample with Q30 all higher than 93.30%. All data are available from the NCBI Short Read Archive (SRA) with an accession number PRJNA553355. Assembly of the high-quality reads generated a total of 63,533 unigenes, with a N50 of 1586 bp and the average length of 1132.95 bp. The length distribution of unigenes and trinities was showed in Figure 3. Thirty-nine thousand, eight hundred and eighty-six unigenes were longer than 600 bp, and 9237 unigenes longer than 2000 bp. Unigenes between 400–600 bp were of the largest proportion.
A total of 46,009 unigenes were annotated by BLAST in 12 public databases (BLASTP, BLASTX, GO, COG, KO, NR, NT, PFAM, Prot, SignalP, TmHMM, and eggNOG), leaving approximately 27.6% unigenes without annotation. Unigenes up to 37375 (58.83%), 31330 (49.31%), and 26158 (41.17%) displayed high homology (1e < 10−50) to known sequences in NR, Prot, and BLASTX databases, respectively (Table 1).
Twenty-five thousand, one hundred and sixty-seven unigenes were divided into three categories (“metabolic process”, “cellular process”, and “catalytic activity”) and 66 functional groups based on GO classification (Table 1, SM1). Eleven thousand, three hundred and ninety-four unigenes annotated by COG classification were divided into 24 classes, and “general function prediction only” was defined the largest group with 1666 unigenes, followed serially by “Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (1597)” and “Post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperones (1233)”. However, groups of “Nuclear structure” only contained 2 unigenes (SM2).

3.3. Expression of Major Genes Related to Flower Differentiation

Thirty-two homologous genes in C. paliurus were detected to associate with flowering. According to RPKM, four groups were divided into two categories, first flowering type (PG-F, PA-M) and later flowering type (PG-M, PA-F) (Figure 4), by clustering analysis of 32 genes. Meanwhile, these homologous genes were divided into 4 expression levels marked with I, II, III, and IV from low to high. Level I meant the genes with low expression at S2, such as GA20-oxidase (CpGA20ox) and GA3-oxidase (CpGA3ox) related to synthesis of GA [35], CpNCED (9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase) related to the synthesis of ABA [36], and transcriptional repressor VRN1 (CpVRN1) involve in vernalization [37]. Level II mainly contained genes associated with IAA (auxin-responsive protein IAA (CpIAA), SAUR family protein (CpSAUR)) [38] and other plant hormone (two-component response regulator ARR12 (CpARR12) [39], jasmonic acid-amino synthetase (CpJAR) [40], regulatory protein NPR1 (CpNPR1)) [41] signal transduction. Most genes associated with photoperiod pathway (cryptochrome circadian regulator 2 (CpCRY2) [40], early flowering (CpELF), timing of CAB expression 1 (CpTOC1)) [42] and vernalization pathway (flower lucos C (CpFLC) and flower lucos D (CpFLD)) [43] were assigned to level III. Level IV, the highest expression contained 2 genes (hexokinase (CpHXK) [44] and pyruvate kinase (CpPK)) [45] belonging to metabolism of glucose, 3 genes responding to GA (CpDELLA) [46], CK (cyclin D3 (CpCYCD3)) [47], and IAA (auxin responsive GH3 gene family (CpGH3)) [38], respectively. Particularly, the expression of CpDEFICIENS [48] in later flowering type was much higher than that in first flowering type. In addition, CpARF6 (auxin response factor 6) [49] showed an obviously opposite expression pattern in two categories.

3.4. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes

Four pair-wise comparisons (PG-F vs PG-M, PG-F vs PA-F, PA-F vs PA-M, PG-M vs PA-M) were established among four groups (PG-F, PG-M, PA-F, PA-M) according to RPKM (Figure 5). DEGs were identified by |log2FoldChange| ≥1 and q ≤ 0.05. The greatest number of DEGs (2553) was detected in PG-F vs PA-F, with 1620 up-regulated and 933 down-regulated unigenes, and followed by PA-F vs PA-M (1649) with 1026 down-regulated unigenes and 623 up-regulated unigenes. In PG-F vs PG-M, 802 unigenes were down-regulated and 443 unigenes were up-regulated. The least number of DEGs was found in PG-M vs PA-M with 745 up-regulated and 373 down-regulated unigenes.

3.5. KEGG Pathway Annotation of Differentially Expressed Genes

A total of 609 DEGs were annotated in 101 KEGG pathways, which were divided into 5 branches and 18 sub-branches (Figure 6). Four hundred and eight DEGs were associated with “metabolism”, and “global and overview maps (151)” was the greatest sub-branch in this item, followed by “carbohydrate metabolism (62)”. “Environmental adaptation” and “signal transduction” owned 61 and 38 DEGs, respectively. It is well known that “carbohydrate metabolism”, “signal transduction”, and “environmental adaptation” play significant roles in flower differentiation and development.

3.6. Major Differentially Expressed Transcription Factors

One thousand two hundred and fifty-three TFs belonging to 55 families were identified through differentially expressed analysis among the four comparisons (Figure 7). The bHLH family occupied the largest portion, while up to 26.9% of TFs were involved in regulating flower development, including 6 families of MADS-box (MIKC), MYB, SBP, bZIP, and B3 (ARF and RAV plus) family.
Fifty-eight DETFs related to flowering were detected by intersecting DETFs in the four pair-wise comparisons. DETFs with similar expression trends were clustered together, and the majority of genes in the same family were clustered together (Figure 8 and SM3). The expression of 58 DETFs displayed 2 patterns, one expressed with high level in first flowers (PG-F and PA-M) but with low level in later flower (PG-M and PA-F), and the other displayed an opposite pattern. DETFs from 6 TF families showed both patterns, with the exception that 2 sub-families (ARF and RAV) belonging to B3 family were of only one pattern (higher expression in first flower). Generally, the majority of DETFs showed slight differences at a low expression level, while, some genes from MIKC family showed very distinct differences, especially for CpMIKC7D and CpMIKC13D.

3.7. Validation of RNA-Seq Result by qRT-PCR

To confirm the accuracy of RNA-seq results, 9 candidate genes involved in flowering process were selected for qRT-PCR analysis (Figure 9). Among them, 2 genes (6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (Cp6PGDH)-c34561_g4, glucose 6-phosphatedehydrogenase (CpG6PDH)-c41263_g2) were related to pathways of starch and sucrose metabolism [50,51], 2 genes (phytochrome interacting factors 3 (CpPIF3) [52]-c31958_g1, CpNPR-c34174_g1) involved plant hormone signal transduction, 1 gene (CpFLC-c40321_g2) was regulated by vernalization, and the other 3 genes (CpELF -c36049_g1, CpLFY-c25961_g3, mother of FT (CpMFT) [52]-c26300_g1) involved flowering process.
The expression patterns of 9 genes in different samples obtained by qRT-PCR generally were consistent with RPKM values from RNA-seq (Figure 9), indicating the expression profiles of our transcriptome results were reliable.

4. Discussion

Multi-sex strategy is an important approach to plant evolution. There are two or more mating types in some plant groups. The differences of sex morphology and flowering phenology lead to non-random mating. Disassortative mating is often considered to be necessary in the evolution of sexual diversity [53], while heterodichogamy is an important type of disassortative mating. Angiosperm evolution of dioecy (separate male and female plants) from monoecism (presence of male and female in the same flower) resulted either through the successive differentiation of male and female flowers, or through the monoecious flowers showing dioecious type of mating system [54]. Usually, mating take place between the plants rather than within the plant. Therefore, heterodichogamy is considered to be a transitional form in the evolution of plants from monoecism to dioecism [55].
Although heterodichogamy plays an important role in plant evolution and cultivation of woody economic plants, more researches have only focused on descriptions of flowering phenology [3,10,22,23] and anatomical observations [11,12,24]. However, intrinsic mechanism controlling heterodichogamy are still unknown. As an important medicinal and typically heterodichogamous plant, C. paliurus has attracted more interests. Besides publications on functions and accumulations of various secondary metabolites [26,27,28,29], many researches on C. paliurus mentioned above, laid the foundation for further understanding the heterodichogamy on molecular level. Differences in both morphology and physiology (nutrients and hormones) were monitored throughout whole developmental process of male/female flowers in two mating types of C. paliurus [25]. Of five stages of flower differentiation and development, physiological differentiation stage (S0) and bud break stage (S2) are two key stages affecting further asynchrony. Compared to invisibility of buds at S0, transcriptome analysis of various sexual flower buds in two mating types of C. paliurus (PA-M, PG-F, PA-F, and PG-M) at S2 could explain the changes in visible morphology.

4.1. Expression Pattern of Major Genes in Different Pathways of Forming Flowers

According to Tair (https://www.arabidopsis.org/) and flowering network from other plants, 32 genes in C. paliurus directly or indirectly took part in different pathways of forming flowers, including glycometabolism, autonomous pathway, photoperiod pathway, and GA pathway (Figure 5). Genes in autonomous pathway (RNA-binding protein FCA (CpFCA)) [56] and photoperiod pathway (CpCRY2, CpTOC1) showed almost no difference in male and female flower buds, which manifested that these genes respond similarily at S2 (Figure 5). In the vernalization pathway, not CpFLC itself but the inhibitor of CpFLC–CpVRN highly expressed in later flowers (PG-M and PA-F), showing the degree of inhibiting CpFLC by vernalization was different in two categories. CpDEFICIENS, a transcription factor involving in genetic control of flower development that acts in conjunction with floral homeotic protein GLOBOSA (GLO), showed a much higher expression in later flowers, and CpAGAMOUS displayed a similar expression pattern. These genes could have contributed to the early flower differentiation, which can be verified by subsequent studies.
Glycometabolism is the basis of plant growth and development for providing energy and materials [57], especially in the process of flower bud development. Except for Cp6PGDH, other genes associated with glycometabolism showed high expression, especially CpPK as a key rate-limiting enzyme in the final step of glycolysis. Nicotiana tabacum with PKc deficient grew weaker under weak light, additionally, differentiation of flower bud and flowering in the mutant were significantly delayed compared to wild type [45]. Although with high expression, these genes did not show significant differential expression between the first flowers (PG-F and PA-M) and the later flowers. The expression patterns of these genes in flower buds also support the results of Huang et al. [25], who revealed that soluble sugar for flower development derived from surrounding branches rather than itself in C. paliurus. It could be inferred that these expression pattern in two mating types might be independent of activity of glycometabolism in flower buds themselves, but be related to the amount of soluble sugar transported by surrounding branches. And, the high expression of these genes in flower buds might be for the next developmental stage (inflorescence elongation stage, S3).
In addition, hormones play an equally important role in flower bud differentiation and development. Generally, the initiation and termination of dormancy are regulated by hormones, and environmental factors also affect dormancy by regulating hormone synthesis and transport. The pathway of plant hormone signal transduction was significantly enriched through KEGG enrichment analysis. Combined with expression of genes in such pathway, genes responding to IAA (CpIAA, CpARF6, CpGH) and JA (CpJAR) had higher expression in first flowers. It is consistent with previous results that the average content of IAA in first flowers (7.474 ng/gFW in PG-F and 5.824 ng/gFW in PA-M) was higher than that in later flowers (NC in both PG-M and PA-F) [58]. This suggests that IAA might help flower buds to break dormancy and promote inflorescence elongation. Genes responding to CK (CpARR12) and ABA (protein phosphatase 2C (CpPP2C) [59]) showed the opposite expression level (CpARR12 with the highest level and CpPP2C with the lowest level) in PA-F (Figure 5), indicating that they could play the completely different roles in dormancy releasing of flower buds. However, the lowest content of ABA was found in PG-F (20.016 ng/gFW), compared with PG-M (134.478 ng/g FW), PA-F (52.893 ng/g FW), and PA-M (95.381 ng/g FW) [58]. Many researches have showed that ABA acted as a floral repressor, and the mechanism of inhibiting flowering involved interaction with other proteins (DELLA) or transcription factors (FLC) [60,61]. The inconsistency between responsive protein (CpPP2C) and content of ABA might be that CpPP2C is not the sole receptor of ABA, and more detailed studies are required to illustrate the relationship between ABA and flowering.
One of major pathways controlling the time of flowering is GA pathway, and GA had important effects on breaking dormancy of flower buds [62,63,64]. For instance, Zhuang et al. [65] found that flower buds of Japanese apricot treated with GA4 released dormancy 30 days earlier. In C. paliurus at S2 stage, low expression level for genes related to GA synthesis (CpGA3ox and CpGA20ox) was found in all groups; whereas CpDELLA, one of gibberellin responses, showed high expression level in four groups, and relative lower in PA-F, which demonstrated that the synthesis of GA was mainly on the eve of buds breaking. Alternatively, GA synthesis might happen in other tissues then be transported to flower buds [66].

4.2. Expression Pattern of TFs Related to Flowering from DEGs

Heterodichogamous plants display the asynchronism of flower developmental process rather than in morphology under similar environmental conditions, suggesting that the regulatory regions of genes controlling the development of flowering should get more attention in further work. TFs could interact directly with chromatin factors and promote its recruitment to the related genes to determine appropriate timing of floral organ patterning [67,68]. And many TFs were proved to associate with flowering in some plants, including MIKC-type proteins, MYB, bZIP, Zinc-finger transcription factor, and so on [69,70,71,72,73].
TFs involving flowering were selected from DEGs in this study. According to the differences of expression patterns, DETFs were divided into two categories. One contains DETFs up-regulated in first flowers in comparison to later flowers, and the other is the reverse (Figure 8). Besides, the majority of DETFs with lower expression level showed slight differences between first flowers and later flowers. Many TFs belonging to same family showed similar expression pattern, especially those in B3 family (including ARF and RAV). The ARF family consists of auxin response factors, and they work by binding auxin and auxin responsive protein (Aux/IAA) responding to auxin signaling to regulate the early expression of auxin response genes [74]. All 4 TFs (CpARF1U-auxin-responsive protein IAA7, CpARF2U- caffeoyl-CoA acyltransferase-like, CpARF3U- auxin response factor 4-like, CpARF4U- auxin response factor 6-like) in ARF selected in our study showed higher expression in first flowers, in accord with their rapid developmental process. MYB and MIKC family showed irregular expression patterns in the first and later flowers, inferring they might have a wide range of functions.
Even the same TF, distinct expression levels were monitored between first and later flowers. It is worth noting that several DETFs with the most differences are from MIKC family. Most of the genes in the "ABC" model of flower development in A. thaliana belong to the MIKC family [75]. MIKC-type proteins, belonging to MADS-domain transcription factors, play the crucial roles in controlling floral organogenesis and flowering time in plants [69]. MIKC-type consists of MIKC* and MIKCC. MIKCC type proteins contain 13 clades, among which 12 clades were found in A. thaliana, such as AG, AGL2, and AGL6 [76]. Of DETFs in C. paliurus, 13 DETFs (CpMIKC1-13) were annotated as SVP2, AGL24, AGL42, AGL11, AGL42, AGAMOUS, DEFICIENS, AGL15, AGL9, AGL6, AP1, AGL2 and floral homeotic protein PMADS 2-like, respectively. The functions of many TFs in MIKC have been confirmed to be associated with flowering. For example, high expression of AGL15 resulted in a decrease in the amount of active GA in transgenic A. thaliana, leading to late flowering [77]. This is consistent with our results that the expression of AGL15 (CpMIKC8D) in later flower was higher than in early ones. CpMIKC6D, annotated as AGAMOUS, a key regulator of flower organ development in A. thaliana, determines the formation of reproductive organs and gender differentiation and fruiting [78].
Recent studies have demonstrated that MADS family also involved bud dormancy and germination, like DAM (dormancy-associated MADS-box), which is an important gene to study the relationship between MADS-box and bud dormancy. The expression of DAM increased before breaking dormancy, and decreased after breaking dormancy [79,80,81]. Furthermore, in Cerasus avium, the expression of AGAMOUS up-regulated along with increase of GA3 concentration [82], indicating that it could be the synergistic effect with gibberellin on breaking dormancy. The expression pattern of CpAGAMOUS in first flowers and later flowers seems to support above speculation (Figure 8). Floral homeotic protein PMADS 2-like (CpMIKC13D), DEFICIENS (CpMIKC7D), AP1 (CpMIKC11D), and AGL2 (CpMIKC12D) showed the most significant difference between the two categories, and all of them shared the same expression pattern with CpAGAMOUS, suggesting they could also play a role in regulating flower development through the gibberellin pathway. They are good clues for further study to reveal TFs functions on the molecular mechanism of heterodichogamy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.C. and S.F.; methodology, X.C. and S.F.; software, X.C.; validation, X.C., X.M. and P.H.; formal analysis, X.C.; investigation, X.M., and P.H,; resources, X.C. and X.M.; writing—original draft preparation, X.C.; writing—review and editing, X.C. and S.F.; project administration, S.F.; funding acquisition, S.F.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31470637) and Priority Academic Programme Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, PAPD. It also supported by the Doctorate Fellowship Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University.

Acknowledgments

We thank Xiangxiang Fu for revisions on this paper; Ge Han, and Yinquan Qu for help with fieldwork; and anonymous referees and the editor for valuable comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kikuchi, S.; Shibata, M.; Tanaka, H.; Yoshimaru, H.; Niiyama, K. Analysis of the disassortative mating pattern in a heterodichogamous plant, Acer mono Maxim. using microsatellite markers. Plant Ecol. 2009, 204, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, J.J.; Mao, X.; Li, X.C. Molecular mechanism of controlling flower formation by photoperiod inducement in plants. J. Nanjing For. Univ. 2016, 40, 147–154. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fukuhara, T.; Tokumaru, S.I. Inflorescence dimorphism, heterodichogamy and thrips pollination in Platycarya strobilacea (Juglandaceae). Ann. Bot. 2014, 113, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yin, Z.P.; Shangguan, X.C.; Chen, J.G.; Zhao, Q.; Li, D.M. Growth and triterpenic acid accumulation of Cyclocarya paliurus cell suspension cultures. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2013, 18, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, H.M.; Yin, Z.Q.; Zhao, M.G.; Jiang, C.H.; Zhang, J.; Pan, K. Pentacyclic triterpenoids from Cyclocarya paliurus and their antioxidant activities in FFA-induced HepG2 steatosis cells. Phytochemistry 2018, 151, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ning, Z.W.; Zhai, L.X.; Huang, T.; Peng, J.; Hu, D.; Xiao, H.T.; Wen, B.; Lin, C.Y.; Zhao, L.; Bian, Z.X. Identification of α-glucosidase inhibitors from: Cyclocarya paliurus tea leaves using UF-UPLC-Q/TOF-MS/MS and molecular docking. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 1893–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xie, J.H.; Wang, W.J.; Dong, C.J.; Huang, L.X.; Wang, H.; Li, C.; Nie, S.; Xie, M.Y. Protective effect of flavonoids from Cyclocarya paliurus leaves against carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 119, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, X.C.; Fu, X.X.; Shang, X.L.; Yang, W.X.; Fang, S.Z. Natural population structure and genetic differentiation for heterodicogamous plant: Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja (Juglandaceae). Tree Genet. Genomes 2017, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mao, X.; Liu, J.J.; Li, X.C.; Qin, J.; Fu, X.X. Flowering biological characteristics and mating system in immature plantations of heterodichogamous Cyclocarya paliurus. J. Nanjing For. Univ. 2016, 40, 47–55. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mao, X.; Fu, X.X.; Huang, P.; Chen, X.L.; Qu, Y.Q. Heterodichogamy, pollen viability, and seed set in a population of polyploidy Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal) Iljinskaja (Juglandaceae). Forests 2019, 10, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fu, X.X.; Feng, L.; Fang, S.Z.; Mao, J. Observation on flowering habits and anatomy of stamen development in Cyclocarya paliurus. J. Nanjing For. Univ. 2010, 34, 67–71. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fu, X.X.; Feng, L.; Shang, X.L.; Yang, W.X.; Fang, S.Z. Observation of morphological and anatomical characters on staminate and pistillate flower differentiation in Cyclocarya paliurus. J. Nanjing For. Univ. 2011, 35, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sun, Y.Y.; Wang, G.D.; Li, Y.X.; Jiang, L.; Yang, Y.X.; Guan, S.X. De novo transcriptome sequencing and comparative analysis to discover genes related to floral development in Cymbidium faberi Rolfe. SpringerPlus 2016, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fornara, F.; De Montaigu, A.; Coupland, G. SnapShot: Control of Flowering in Arabidopsis. Cell 2010, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. King, R.W.; Moritz, T.; Evans, L.T.; Martin, J.; Andersen, C.H.; Blundell, C.; Kardailsky, I.; Chandler, P.M. Regulation of flowering in the long-day grass Lolium temulentum by gibberellins and the FLOWERING LOCUS T gene. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 498–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, H.Z.; Hu, B.; Chen, G.P.; Shi, N.N.; Zhao, Y.; Yin, Q.C.; Liu, J.J. Application of Arabidopsis AGAMOUS second intron for the engineered ablation of flower development in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, M.Z.; Ye, D.; Wang, L.L.; Pang, J.L.; Zhang, Y.H.; Zheng, K.; Bian, H.W.; Han, N.; Pan, J.W.; Wang, J.H.; et al. Overexpression of the cucumber LEAFY homolog CFL and hormone treatments alter flower development in gloxinia (Sinningia speciosa). Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 67, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marsch-Martínez, N.; De Folter, S. Hormonal control of the development of the gynoecium. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 29, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bowman, J.L.; Smyth, D.R.; Meyerowitz, E.M. The ABC model of flower development: Then and now. Development 2012, 139, 4095–4098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gomez, J.F.; Talle, B.; Wilson, Z.A. Anther and pollen development: A conserved developmental pathway. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2015, 57, 876–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Pajoro, A.; Biewers, S.; Dougali, E.; Valentim, F.L.; Mendes, M.A.; Porri, A.; Coupland, G.; Van De Peer, Y.; Van Dijk, A.D.J.; Colombo, L.; et al. The (r)evolution of gene regulatory networks controlling Arabidopsis plant reproduction: A two decades history. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4731–4745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vito, S.P.; Naiyan, L. Pistillate flower differentiation in English walnut (Juglans regia L.): A development basis for heterodichogamy. Scientia Horticulturae 1985, 26, 333–338. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bai, W.N.; Zeng, Y.F.; Zhang, D.Y. Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a heterodichogamous tree, Juglans mandshurica (Juglandaceae). New Phytol. 2007, 176, 699–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Polito, V.S.; Pinney, K. The relationship between phenology of pistillate flower organogenesis and mode of heterodichogamy in Juglans regia L. (Juglandaceae). Sex. Plant Reprod. 1997, 10, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, P.; Mao, X.; Han, G.; Chen, X.L.; Fu, X.X. Dynamic changes of nutrients during flora development in heterodichogamous Cyclocarya paliurus. J. Nanjing For. Univ. 2018, 42, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, X.-X.; Jiang, C.-H.; Liu, Y.; Lou, D.-X.; Huang, Y.-P.; Gao, M.; Zhang, J.; Yin, Z.-Q.; Pan, K. Cyclocarya paliurus triterpenic acids fraction attenuates kidney injury via AMPK-mTOR-regulated autophagy pathway in diabetic rats. Phytomedicine 2019, 64, 153060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Ouyang, K.; Wang, W. Effects of Cyclocarya paliurus polysaccharide on lipid metabolism-related genes DNA methylation in rats. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 123, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xuan, T.Y.; Tan, J.; Sun, H.H.; Yang, C.; Lv, W.Y.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, K.Q.; Nie, Z.Q.; Ye, Z.J.; He, X.A.; et al. Cyclocarioside O-Q, three novel seco-dammarane triterpenoid glycosides from the leaves of Cyclocarya paliurus. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, M.; Lin, Y.; Fang, S.; Liu, Y.; Shang, X. Phytochemical content and antioxidant activity in aqueous extracts of Cyclocarya paliurus leaves collected from different populations. PeerJ 2019, 2019, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Z.; Li, Y. A study on the developmental characteristics of walnut buds. Acta Hortic. Sin. 1965, 4, 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  31. Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q.D.; et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schäffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Anders, S.; Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liu, Y.; Fang, S.; Yang, W.; Shang, X.; Fu, X. Light quality affects flavonoid production and related gene expression in Cyclocarya paliurus. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2018, 179, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. He, H.H.; Liang, G.P.; Lu, S.X.; Wang, P.P.; Liu, T.; Ma, Z.H.; Zuo, C.W.; Sun, X.M.; Chen, B.H.; Mao, J. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of GA2ox, GA3ox, and GA20ox Are Related to Gibberellin Oxidase Genes in Grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Genes 2019, 10, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Xie, N.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, F.; Xiang, Z.; Wang, R.; Wang, F.; Gao, Q.; Tian, L.; et al. OsNCED5, a 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene, regulates salt and water stress tolerance and leaf senescence in rice. Plant Sci. 2019, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pidal, B.; Yan, L.; Fu, D.; Zhang, F.; Tranquilli, G.; Dubcovsky, J. The CArG-box located upstream from the transcriptional start of wheat vernalization gene VRN1 is not necessary for the vernalization response. J. Hered. 2009, 100, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, D.; Qanmber, G.; Lu, L.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Yang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, Q.; Mendu, V.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of cotton GH3 subfamily II reveals functional divergence in fiber development, hormone response and plant architecture. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cortleven, A.; Schmülling, T. Regulation of chloroplast development and function by cytokinin. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 4999–5013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Chen, H.J.; Fu, T.Y.; Yang, S.L.; Hsieh, H.L. FIN219/JAR1 and cryptochrome1 antagonize each other to modulate photomorphogenesis under blue light in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pokotylo, I.; Kravets, V.; Ruelland, E. Salicylic Acid Binding Proteins (SABPs): The Hidden Forefront of Salicylic Acid Signalling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hung, F.Y.; Chen, F.F.; Li, C.; Chen, C.; Chen, J.H.; Cui, Y.; Wu, K. The LDL1/2-HDA6 histone modification complex interacts with TOC1 and regulates the core circadian clock components in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Golicz, A.A. Analysis of the quinoa genome reveals conservation and divergence of the flowering pathways. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2019, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Granot, D.; Kelly, G.; Stein, O.; David-Schwartz, R. Substantial roles of hexokinase and fructokinase in the effects of sugars on plant physiology and development. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sung, S.S.; Xu, D.P.; Galloway, C.M.; Black, C.C. A reassessment of glycolysis and gluconeogenesis in higher plants. Physiol. Plant. 1988, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Arro, J.; Yang, Y.; Song, G.Q.; Zhong, G.Y. RNA-Seq reveals new della targets and regulation in transgenic GA-insensitive grapevines. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Garza-Aguilar, S.M.; Lara-Núñez, A.; García-Ramírez, E.; Vázquez-Ramos, J.M. Modulation of CycD3;1-CDK complexes by phytohormones and sucrose during maize germination. Physiol. Plant 2017, 160, 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Manchado-Rojo, M.; Delgado-Benarroch, L.; Roca, M.J.; Weiss, J.; Egea-Cortines, M. Quantitative levels of Deficiens and Globosa during late petal development show a complex transcriptional network topology of B function. Plant J. 2012, 72, 294–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wen, J.; Guo, P.; Ke, Y.; Liu, M.; Li, P.; Wu, Y.; Ran, F.; Wang, M.; Li, J.; Du, H. The auxin response factor gene family in allopolyploid Brassica napus. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kruger, N.J.; Schaewen, A. Von The oxidative pentose phosphate pathway: Structure and organization. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Singh, S.; Srivastava, P.K. Purification and Characterization of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase from Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan) Seeds. Adv. Enzym. Res. 2014, 2, 134–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dong, J.; Sun, N.; Yang, J.; Deng, Z.; Lan, J.; Qin, G.; He, H.; Deng, X.W.; Irish, V.F.; Chen, H.; et al. The transcription factors tcp4 and pif3 antagonistically regulate organ-specific light induction of saur genes to modulate cotyledon opening during de-etiolation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 1155–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Field, D.L.; Barrett, S.C.H. Disassortative mating and the maintenance of sexual polymorphism in painted maple. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Barrett, S.C.H. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gleiser, G.; Verdú, M.; Segarra-Moragues, J.G.; González-Martínez, S.C.; Pannell, J.R. Disassortative mating, sexual specialization, and the evolution of gender dimorphism in heterodichogamous Acer opalus. Evolution 2008, 62, 1676–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jung, J.H.; Seo, P.J.; Ahn, J.H.; Park, C.M. Arabidopsis RNA-binding Protein FCA regulates microRNA172 processing in thermosensory flowering. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 16007–16016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Angeles-Núñez, J.G.; Tiessen, A. Arabidopsis sucrose synthase 2 and 3 modulate metabolic homeostasis and direct carbon towards starch synthesis in developing seeds. Planta 2010, 232, 701–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Han, G. Studies of hormonal regulation on flower bud differentiation and development in heterodichogamous Cyclocarya paliurus. Nanjing For. Univ. 2018. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  59. Baek, W.; Lim, C.W.; Luan, S.; Lee, S.C. The RING finger E3 ligases PIR1 and PIR2 mediate PP2CA degradation to enhance abscisic acid response in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Martinez-Zapater, J.M.; Coupland, G.; Dean, C.; Koornneef, M. The Transition to Flowering in Arabidopsis; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Long Island, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 403–433. [Google Scholar]
  61. Achard, P.; Cheng, H.; De Grauwe, L.; Decat, J.; Schoutteten, H.; Moritz, T.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Peng, J.; Harberd, N.P. Integration of plant responses to environmentally activated phytohormonal signals. Science 2006, 311, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Schrader, J.; Moyle, R.; Bhalerao, R.; Hertzberg, M.; Lundeberg, J.; Nilsson, P.; Bhalerao, R.P. Cambial meristem dormancy in trees involves extensive remodelling of the transcriptome. Plant J. 2004, 40, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Looney, N.E. Hormones and horticulture. Hortscience 1997, 32, 1014–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Saure, M.C. Dormancy release in deciduous fruit trees. Hortic. Rev. 2011, 7, 239–299. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhuang, W.B.; Gao, Z.H.; Wang, L.J.; Zhong, W.J.; Ni, Z.J.; Zhang, Z. Comparative proteomic and transcriptomic approaches to address the active role of GA4 in Japanese apricot flower bud dormancy release. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4953–4966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Binenbaum, J.; Weinstain, R.; Shani, E. Gibberellin localization and transport in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 410–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Vachon, G.; Engelhorn, J.; Carles, C.C. Interactions between transcription factors and chromatin regulators in the control of flower development. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 2461–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, C.; Xi, W.Y.; Shen, L.S.; Tan, C.P.; Yu, H. Regulation of floral patterning by flowering time genes. Dev. Cell 2009, 16, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, J.; Fu, X.; Dong, Y.; Lu, J.; Ren, M.; Zhou, N.; Wang, C. MIKC C-type MADS-box genes in Rosa chinensis: The remarkable expansion of ABCDE model genes and their roles in floral organogenesis. Hortic. Res. 2018, 5, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tian, S.B.; Guo, C.X.; Zheng, C.S. Molecular mechanism of controlling flower formation by photoperiod inducement in plants. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2010, 37, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wigge, P.A.; Kim, M.C.; Jaeger, K.E.; Busch, W.; Schmid, M.; Lohmann, J.U.; Weigel, D. Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science 2005, 312, 1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Takatsuji, H.; Mori, M.; Benfey, P.N.; Ren, L.; Chua, N.H. Characterization of a zinc finger DNA-binding protein expressed specifically in Petunia petals and seedlings. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Takatsuji, H.; Nakamura, N.; Katsumoto, Y. A new family of zinc finger proteins in petunia: Structure, DNA sequence recognition, and floral organ-specific expression. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 947–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chapman, E.J.; Estelle, M. Mechanism of auxin-regulated gene expression in plants. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43, 265–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Immink, R.G.H.; Kaufmann, K.; Angenent, G.C. The “ABC” of MADS domain protein behaviour and interactions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010, 21, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Becker, A.; Theißen, G. The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 29, 464–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, H.; Caruso, L.V.; Downie, A.B.; Perry, S.E. The embryo MADS domain protein Agamous-like 15 directly regulates expression of a gene encoding an enzyme involved in gibberellin metabolism. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1206–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhou, K.Y.; Xu, S.Y.; Wu, Q.T.; Shi, Y.; Wu, Q.J. The research progress of AGAMOUS-like orthologous genes in woody plants. For. Sci. Technol. 2018, 43, 26–30. [Google Scholar]
  79. Yamane, H.; Ooka, T.; Jotatsu, H.; Hosaka, Y.; Sasaki, R.; Tao, R. Expressional regulation of PpDAM5 and PpDAM6, peach (Prunus persica) dormancy-associated MADS-box genes, by low temperature and dormancy-breaking reagent treatment. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 3481–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liu, S.; Xia, X.Y.; Li, B. Cloning and expression analysis of MADS-box gene VcDAM1 related to blueberry flower bud dormancy. Plant Physiol. J. 2017, 53, 1728–1734. [Google Scholar]
  81. Kitamura, Y.; Takeuchi, T.; Yamane, H.; Tao, R. Simultaneous down-regulation of DORMANCY-ASSOCIATED MADS-box6 and SOC1 during dormancy release in Japanese apricot (Prunus mume) flower buds. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 91, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lin, M.M.; Chen, J.Y.; Gu, H.; Qi, X.J.; Zhang, W.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, J.B. Isolation of a sweet cherry AGAMOUS-like gene and its expression under gibberellin treatment. Mol. Plant Breed 2014, 12, 1181–1186. [Google Scholar]
Genes 10 00818 g001 550
Figure 1. The elongation growth process of male and female inflorescence in two mating types of Cyclocarya paliurus [25]. PG = protogyny; PA = protandry.
Figure 1. The elongation growth process of male and female inflorescence in two mating types of Cyclocarya paliurus [25]. PG = protogyny; PA = protandry.
Genes 10 00818 g001
Genes 10 00818 g002 550
Figure 2. Morphological changes of flower development in C. paliurus. The bar is 0.2 cm (B); 0.5 cm (A, E, H, L); 1 cm (B, J, M);2 cm (C, F, G, I, J, M, N); 3 cm (D, K, O, P, Q). In S1, morphological characteristics of female buds was no difference with leaf buds (A, E); male buds clearly differentiated (H, L). In S2, all flower buds began to protrude, except PA-F (B, I, M). In S3, feathery stigma formed in PG-F (C), while it was not observed in PA-F (F); PA-M turned from turquoise to yellow-green with anther dehiscence (N); PG-M still remained turquoise (J). In S4, the feathery stigma of PG-F opened (D) and the mature pollen of PA-M was released from the dehiscent anther (O); the stigma of PA-F was not fully formed (G), and the anther of PG-M was not dehiscent (K). (P) Maturation of PA-F; (Q) maturation of PG-M.
Figure 2. Morphological changes of flower development in C. paliurus. The bar is 0.2 cm (B); 0.5 cm (A, E, H, L); 1 cm (B, J, M);2 cm (C, F, G, I, J, M, N); 3 cm (D, K, O, P, Q). In S1, morphological characteristics of female buds was no difference with leaf buds (A, E); male buds clearly differentiated (H, L). In S2, all flower buds began to protrude, except PA-F (B, I, M). In S3, feathery stigma formed in PG-F (C), while it was not observed in PA-F (F); PA-M turned from turquoise to yellow-green with anther dehiscence (N); PG-M still remained turquoise (J). In S4, the feathery stigma of PG-F opened (D) and the mature pollen of PA-M was released from the dehiscent anther (O); the stigma of PA-F was not fully formed (G), and the anther of PG-M was not dehiscent (K). (P) Maturation of PA-F; (Q) maturation of PG-M.
Genes 10 00818 g002
Genes 10 00818 g003 550
Figure 3. Pattern of length distribution of assembled trinities and unigenes.
Figure 3. Pattern of length distribution of assembled trinities and unigenes.
Genes 10 00818 g003
Genes 10 00818 g004 550
Figure 4. Heat map diagram of relative expression levels and classification based on the expression patterns of the related genes in flowering.
Figure 4. Heat map diagram of relative expression levels and classification based on the expression patterns of the related genes in flowering.
Genes 10 00818 g004
Genes 10 00818 g005 550
Figure 5. Numbers of differentially expressed genes in different floral buds of two mating types at bud break stage (S2).
Figure 5. Numbers of differentially expressed genes in different floral buds of two mating types at bud break stage (S2).
Genes 10 00818 g005
Genes 10 00818 g006 550
Figure 6. KEGG pathway annotation of differentially expressed genes (DEGs).
Figure 6. KEGG pathway annotation of differentially expressed genes (DEGs).
Genes 10 00818 g006
Genes 10 00818 g007 550
Figure 7. Differentially expressed transcription factors in floral buds of two mating types at bud break stage (S2).
Figure 7. Differentially expressed transcription factors in floral buds of two mating types at bud break stage (S2).
Genes 10 00818 g007
Genes 10 00818 g008 550
Figure 8. Heat map diagram of relative expression levels and classification based on the expression patterns of differentially-expressed transcription factors (DETFs) related with flowering. The name of each gene is suffixed with “U” or “D”. “U” represented up-regulated in the first flowers, “D” represented down-regulated; the circle size represented the level of expression, while red represented high expression, and blue represented low expression.
Figure 8. Heat map diagram of relative expression levels and classification based on the expression patterns of differentially-expressed transcription factors (DETFs) related with flowering. The name of each gene is suffixed with “U” or “D”. “U” represented up-regulated in the first flowers, “D” represented down-regulated; the circle size represented the level of expression, while red represented high expression, and blue represented low expression.
Genes 10 00818 g008
Genes 10 00818 g009 550
Figure 9. Comparison of expression levels of 9 genes obtained by qRT-PCR analysis and RNA-seq (RPKM (Reads per kilobase million mapped) values). The error bar is SD (standard deviation) for the three replicates.
Figure 9. Comparison of expression levels of 9 genes obtained by qRT-PCR analysis and RNA-seq (RPKM (Reads per kilobase million mapped) values). The error bar is SD (standard deviation) for the three replicates.
Genes 10 00818 g009
Table
Table 1. Summary of unigenes annotation.
Table 1. Summary of unigenes annotation.
DatabaseCountPercentage (%)
BLASTP22,56335.51
BLASTX26,15841.17
GO25,16739.61
KO11,02717.36
NR37,37558.83
NT21,77734.28
PFAM23,46436.93
Prot31,33049.31
SignalP21543.39
COG11,39417.93
TmHMM648810.21
eggNOG13,47621.21
Total annotation46,00972.42
Total unigenes63,533100

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, X.; Mao, X.; Huang, P.; Fang, S. Morphological Characterization of Flower Buds Development and Related Gene Expression Profiling at Bud Break Stage in Heterodichogamous Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) lljinskaja. Genes 2019, 10, 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10100818

AMA Style

Chen X, Mao X, Huang P, Fang S. Morphological Characterization of Flower Buds Development and Related Gene Expression Profiling at Bud Break Stage in Heterodichogamous Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) lljinskaja. Genes. 2019; 10(10):818. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10100818

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Xiaoling, Xia Mao, Peng Huang, and Shengzuo Fang. 2019. "Morphological Characterization of Flower Buds Development and Related Gene Expression Profiling at Bud Break Stage in Heterodichogamous Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) lljinskaja" Genes 10, no. 10: 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10100818

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop