Noncontractible Investments and Reference Points
AbstractWe analyze noncontractible investments in a model with shading. A seller can make an investment that affects a buyer’s value. The parties have outside options that depend on asset ownership. When shading is not possible and there is no contract renegotiation, an optimum can be achieved by giving the seller the right to make a take-it-or-leave-it offer. However, with shading, such a contract creates deadweight losses. We show that an optimal contract will limit the seller’s offers, and possibly create ex post inefficiency. Asset ownership can improve matters even if revelation mechanisms are allowed.
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Hart, O. Noncontractible Investments and Reference Points. Games 2013, 4, 437-456.
Hart O. Noncontractible Investments and Reference Points. Games. 2013; 4(3):437-456.Chicago/Turabian Style
Hart, Oliver. 2013. "Noncontractible Investments and Reference Points." Games 4, no. 3: 437-456.