Next Article in Journal
Oncogenic Serine 45-Deleted β-Catenin Remains Susceptible to Wnt Stimulation and APC Regulation in Human Colonocytes
Next Article in Special Issue
Multiple Myeloma as a Bone Disease? The Tissue Disruption-Induced Cell Stochasticity (TiDiS) Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Epithelioid Sarcoma—From Genetics to Clinical Practice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Monoclonal Gammopathies of Renal Significance: Renal Biopsy and Beyond
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Multiple Myeloma Associated Bone Disease

Cancers 2020, 12(8), 2113; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082113
by Stine Rasch 1,2, Thomas Lund 1,3, Jon Thor Asmussen 4, Anne Lerberg Nielsen 5, Rikke Faebo Larsen 1, Mikkel Østerheden Andersen 6 and Niels Abildgaard 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Cancers 2020, 12(8), 2113; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082113
Submission received: 2 July 2020 / Revised: 27 July 2020 / Accepted: 27 July 2020 / Published: 30 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances on the Pathobiology and Treatment of Multiple Myeloma)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Rasch et al have described the current knowledge of myeloma bone disease in their manuscript entitled " Multiple Myeloma associated Bone Disease". The review manuscript is well organized, written in standard English and well summarizes the recent advances in myeloma bone disease research and treatment. One minor issue should be improved for publication.

(Minor comment)

1. In figure 1A, B, the authors should describe what each cell stands for.

Author Response

We have revised Figure 1A and B according to the reviewers suggestion.

Reviewer 2 Report

 

This is a through and well written review of multiple myeloma associated bone disease. Minor suggestions are listed below:

  1. I think that it looks like some mistake to describe the sentence. Please check the following sentence on last part of pathophysiology in Page 2: “some data even indicate that the involved mechanisms may differ between patients Please find more information in a through, recent review”
  1. On page 5, “Whole body MRI is recommended as the first choice in patients with suspected solitary plasmacytoma”. In fact, IMWG guideline recommends ‘FDG PET/CT for patients with extramedullary solitary plasmacytoma’. It would be better to describe it more accurately.  

Author Response

1) I think that it looks like some mistake to describe the sentence. Please check the following sentence on last part of pathophysiology in Page 2: “some data even indicate that the involved mechanisms may differ between patients Please find more information in a through, recent review”

Answer: We have changed the sentence on page 2 to: “..some data even indicate that the involved mechanisms may differ between patients as summarized in a thorough recent review”.

2) On page 5, “Whole body MRI is recommended as the first choice in patients with suspected solitary plasmacytoma”. In fact, IMWG guideline recommends ‘FDG PET/CT for patients with extramedullary solitary plasmacytoma’. It would be better to describe it more accurately.

Answer: In IMWG 2019 imaging guideline “International myeloma working group consensus recommendations on imaging in monoclonal plasma cell disorders” (Lancet Oncology 2019 Jun; 20(6): e302-312 (ref 28)) the following is stated concerning recommended imaging in solitary plasmacytoma: “We recommend MRI of the spine and pelvis (or whole body MRI, if available) in patients with newly diagnosed solitary bone plasmacytoma. We recommend whole body FDG PET-CT in patients with newly diagnosed solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma. If MRI is not available, WBCT or FDG PET-CT can be used an alternative in patients with newly diagnosed solitary bone plasmacytoma”.We have clarified this in text on page 6: “Whole-body MRI is recommended as the first choice in patients with suspected solitary bone plasmacytoma (whereas FDG-PET/CT is recommended in suspected solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma) [28]

Thus, MRI is recommended for solitary bone plasmacytoma whereas FDG-PET/CT is recommended for solitary extramedullary (non-bone) plasmacytoma.

We have clarified this in text on page 6: “Whole-body MRI is recommended as the first choice in patients with suspected solitary bone plasmacytoma (whereas FDG-PET/CT is recommended in suspected solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma) [28]

Back to TopTop