Next Article in Journal
Design of a Compact Quad-Channel Microstrip Diplexer for L and S Band Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Simulated Electrical Properties of a Proposed Implanted-Epi Silicon 3D-Spherical Electrode Detector
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design and Analysis of Lithium–Niobate-Based Laterally Excited Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator with Pentagon Spiral Electrodes

1
The Institute of Technological Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
2
Hubei Yangtze Memory Laboratories, Wuhan 430205, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2023, 14(3), 552; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14030552
Submission received: 6 February 2023 / Revised: 23 February 2023 / Accepted: 24 February 2023 / Published: 26 February 2023

Abstract

:
In this paper, we present a comprehensive study on the propagation and dispersion characteristics of A1 mode propagating in Z-cut LiNbO3 membrane. The A1 mode resonators with pentagon spiral electrodes utilizing Z-cut lithium niobate (LiNbO3) thin film are designed and fabricated. The proposed structure excites the A1 mode waves in both x- and y-direction by utilizing both the piezoelectric constants e24 and e15 due to applying voltage along both the x- and y-direction by arranging pentagon spiral electrode. The fabricated resonator operates at 5.43 GHz with no spurious mode and effective electromechanical coupling coefficient ( K e f f 2 ) of 21.3%, when the width of electrode is 1 µm and the pitch is 5 µm. Moreover, we present a comprehensive study of the effect of different structure parameters on resonance frequency and K e f f 2 of XBAR. The K e f f 2 keeps a constant with varied thickness of LiNbO3 thin film and different electrode rotation angles, while it declines with the increase of p from 5 to 20 µm. The proposed XBAR with pentagon spiral electrodes realize high frequency response with no spurious mode and tunable K e f f 2 , which shows promising prospects to satisfy the needs of various 5 G high-band application.

1. Introduction

In recent years, with the explosion of mobile data from video streaming, virtual reality, and wireless communication, the needs for high frequency and large bandwidth of radio-frequency (RF) components have increased dramatically [1,2,3]. Nowadays, the surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonator and the thin film bulk acoustic wave resonators (FBARs) have dominated the market due to the excellent performances. However, there are obstacles for them to be used to high-frequency and large-bandwidth RF front-end devices. On the one hand, the effective electromechanical coupling coefficient ( K e f f 2 ) of both SAW and FBAR are limited to 6–13% with aluminium nitride (AlN) thin film, not satisfying the demand of the relative bandwidth of filter above 6%, such as band N77 and N79. On the other hand, the SAW resonators and FBARs are difficult to operate above 5 GHz. The frequency of SAW hardly amounts to 3.5 GHz due to the limitation of acoustic velocity and the lithography technology. For FBAR, the thinner the piezoelectric film, the higher the frequency. However, the thinner thickness of piezoelectric film may cause the degradation of film crystal quality, which eventually influences the performance of devices [4,5,6].
In recent years, the laterally excited bulk acoustic resonator (XBAR) devices based on lithium niobate (LiNbO3) thin film have been extensively studied as promising candidates for the application in fifth generation mobile communication [7,8,9,10,11]. XBARs can achieve a high frequency of more than 5 GHz, and a large K e f f 2 of more than 20%, exceeding the traditional FBARs and SAW resonators due to the larger piezoelectric coefficients e15 and e24 of LiNbO3. In 2019, V. Plessky et al. first presented a 4.8 GHz XBAR based on Z-cut LiNbO3 thin film with a K e f f 2 of 25%, showing the possibility of its application to filters in the 3–6 GHz range [12]. In 2020, Ruochen Lu presented XBAR in 128° Y-cut LiNbO3 thin films with the K e f f 2 of 46.4%, which obtained the highest value of K e f f 2 [13]. In 2021, Bohua Peng designed and fabricated a solid-mounted-type XBAR on ZY- LiNbO3, operating at 5 GHz, to improve heat dissipation and temperature coefficient of frequency (TCF) [14].
The K e f f 2 of resonator has a significant influence on the bandwidth of filters, and it can be adjusted by structural optimization and tuning piezoelectric coefficients. For example, Gianluca Piazza investigated the influence of the electrical boundary conditions of Lamb wave resonator imposed by the excitation electrodes on the K e f f 2 , and determined that K e f f 2 can be tuned with a varying range from 3% to 7% [15]. Jie Zou investigated the impact of Euler angle of LiNbO3 film on the K e f f 2 of the resonator. The K e f f 2 varies largely due to the prominent anisotropy of the piezoelectric matrix, so the optimal cut angle can be chosen so as to optimize the K e f f 2 [16]. Compared with Lamb wave resonator, the research on the structure and vibrate modes of XBAR is relatively immature, and there is almost no systematical analysis of the effect of XBAR structure parameters on the K e f f 2 .
In this paper, we present a comprehensive study on the propagation characteristics of the plate modes propagating in Z-cut LiNbO3 membrane. Then, we propose new pentagon spiral electrode structure to excite the A1 mode in the LiNbO3 thin film. The dependance of K e f f 2 with the electrode rotation angle and the pitch of electrodes are investigated. A series of XBARs with pentagon spiral electrodes with different electrode pitches are fabricated. The resonance frequency of fabricated device is around 5.4 GHz, and the K e f f 2 of the fabricated devices varied with the electrode pitch, corresponding to the results of simulations. The resonator with pentagon spiral electrodes operates at 5.4 GHz with tunable K e f f 2 , showing promising prospect for application in super high-frequency RF front-end filters.

2. Design and Simulation

A.
Propagation characteristics of plate mode
The plate waves propagating in the LiNbO3 thin film include either the symmetric and antisymmetric Lamb wave (S0, S1, A0 and A1) or the plate shear wave (SH0 and SH1). XBAR consists of a suspended LiNbO3 thin film with interdigital electrodes (IDEs) on top. When applying a voltage, with the generated lateral electric field in the electrode arrangement direction, shear antisymmetric A1 mode is generated. To more accurately capture the A1 mode propagation characteristics in Z-cut LiNbO3 thin film, the three-dimensional eigenfrequency simulation is set up to calculate the open phase velocity ( v p ) and the coupling coefficient ( k 2 ) dispersion of the plate waves propagating in the piezoelectric membrane [17,18,19]. The v p characteristics are the open-surface phase velocity and are calculated by Formula (1), and k 2 characteristics are calculated by Formula (2):
v p = f × λ ,
k 2 = v p 2 v m 2 v p 2 ,
where f is the eigenfrequency of the acoustic mode obtained by the FEM simulation, λ is the length of the acoustic mode, and the vm is the short-surface phase velocity calculated by FEM approach. In the simulation, the model is a 3D building block of the LiNbO3 plate with period boundary conditions on both x- and y-directions. The IDTs are assumed to be infinitely thin with no material assigned, which means the mechanical loading is ignored and only electrical boundary conditions considered herein.
Figure 1 depicts the mode shapes of the six plate modes. The displacement profile or the mechanical vibration of the Lamb wave modes is in the propagation xz-plane, and for the SH plate modes in the sagittal yz-plane. The v p and k 2 dispersion characteristics of six plate waves propagating in the Z-cut LiNbO3 membrane are shown in Figure 2, where the h LiNbO 3 is the thickness of LiNbO3 membrane and λ represents the length of acoustic wave. Obviously, higher plate wave modes exhibit large v p with strong dispersion especially when the h LiNbO 3 / λ is small, and high v p is generally favored for high frequency applications. As shown in Figure 2b, the frequencies of higher plate modes stop scaling with β, rather depending solely on the plate thickness. This indicates that for the A1 mode at low h LiNbO 3 / λ , the frequency is not pitch-controlled any more but thickness-controlled, which breaks the limit of lithography technology to frequency. High v p beyond 40,000 m/s and large k 2 of higher than 30% can be obtained as h LiNbO 3 / λ < 0.1, making the feasibility of wideband operating in 6G bands using A1 mode resonators in Z-cut LiNbO3.
B.
Resonator design
The proposed XBAR with pentagon spiral shape electrode is illustrated in Figure 3a. The pentagon spiral electrodes are arranged alternatively on the top of Z-cut LiNbO3 thin film, with two thin anchors connecting to the Ground–Signal–Ground (GSG) pads. The electrical potentials are alternatingly applied to adjacent electrodes, as illustrated by “+” and “−” signs indicated in Figure 3, creating electric fields along both the x-direction and y-direction. The A-A’ cross-section view of the resonator is shown in Figure 3b, and an air cavity is formed underneath the LiNbO3 thin film via backside release silicon substrate and silicon dioxide (SiO2).
The finite element simulation is carried out to further analyze the performance of the resonator with pentagon spiral electrodes. The thickness of the Z-cut LiNbO3 thin film (hp) and electrode (he) is set to 330 nm and 200 nm, respectively, to achieve a 5.4 GHz resonant frequency (fs), as shown in Figure 4a. The width of electrodes (w) is defined as 1 µm and the pitch (p) equals to 5 µm. Figure 4b shows the horizontal displacement distribution at resonance frequency along the A-A’ cross-section of the resonator with pentagon spiral electrodes and shows the horizontal displacement deformation in the B-B’ cross-section. The horizontal displacement is antisymmetric with the centre plane of the wave excited in the piezoelectric layer, which corresponds to the standard A1 mode acoustic wave [20,21]. The proposed pentagon spiral-shaped electrodes applying alternating voltage can excite the electrical fields along both the x-direction and y-direction, thus exciting A1 mode shear wave along both x- and y-directions, utilizing both the e24 and e15 piezoelectric constants [19]. However, the K e f f 2 of structure with pentagon spiral-shaped electrodes is not improved relative to that of IDTs structure, which may be owing to the piezoelectric coefficient being e24 equal to e15, and no superposition effect occurs. Furthermore, we investigate the influence of the electrode rotation angle in respect to x-direction and the influence of p on the K e f f 2 .
First, we investigate the effect of electrode rotation angle in respect to x-direction with Z-cut LiNbO3 plate on K e f f 2 . The K e f f 2 of XBAR can be obtained by the approximated Formulas (2) and (3) [22,23,24]. It can be concluded that the K e f f 2 is positive to piezoelectric coefficient e15 of Z-cut LiNbO3 thin film. The simulated K e f f 2 vs. different rotation angle is depicted in Figure 5. The K e f f 2 of the XBAR is maintained around 23.5% as the rotation angle of electrodes increases from 0° to 180°, which may contribute to the equality of the e24 and e15 of Z-cut LiNbO3.
K e f f 2 = K 2 1 + K 2 = π 2 4 × ( f p f s ) f p ,
K 2 = e 15 2 ε r ε 0 C 44 ,
where the f s and f p are the resonance and anti-resonance frequency of the resonator, e15 is the piezoelectric coefficient of the LiNbO3 thin film, ε r and ε 0 are the relative permittivity and vacuum permittivity, and C 44 is the elastic constant of the LiNbO3 thin film.
By simplifying the classic dispersion equation for anti-symmetric A1 mode and using h p / p as a small parameter, we can obtain the approximate dispersion Equation (5) [25]. More precisely, for practical design of XBARs, it is advised to use the empirical Formula (6) [26].
Δ ω ω s = ( h p p ) 2 × { 1 2 + 8 π × V T V L × 1 tan ( π h p λ L ) } ,
Δ ω ω s = C 1 × h p p + C 2 × ( h p p ) 2 .
Here, ω s = 2 π f s is the angular frequency of resonator. The first term “1/2” in brackets corresponds to simple “shear wave in rectangular resonator” model, while the second term shows that longitudinal component of Lamb wave does matter. The λ L is the wavelength of longitudinal bulk wave dependent on frequency. C 1 and C 2 are constants for linear and quadratic coefficients. According to the empirical Formula (4), we describe the relationship between Δ ω / ω s and hp/p. It can be deduced from Formula (5) and Figure 6 that Δ ω / ω s is negatively correlated with p, which indicates that the decrease of K e f f 2 with the increase of p as h p is the same.

3. Fabrication and Results

A series of XBARs, utilizing pentagon spiral electrodes with varied p and utilizing IDEs, have been fabricated. The fabrication process of resonator is shown in Figure 6a. The substrate wafer consisted of 330 nm-thick Z-cut LiNbO3 thin film, 2 µm-thick SiO2 and Si substrate, which is provided by NanoLN. Inc. First, 200 nm Mo thin film is deposited on the surface of LiNbO3 thin film and patterned as pentagon spiral shape or IDEs by lithography and reactive ion etching technology. Then, 300 nm-thick SiO2 is deposited on the surface of LiNbO3 and Mo thin film by Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD) as protective layer. Subsequently, LiNbO3 thin film release is performed with backside Si deep reactive-ion etch (DRIE) process, followed by a wet etch with hydrofluoric acid solution to remove the buried SiO2 layer underneath the piezoelectric membrane. By exactly controlling the release time, the resonators with suspended working area only are realized. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the fabricated devices with pentagon spiral shape and IDEs are shown in Figure 6b,c.
The scattering (S) parameter measurements are carried out using Keysight Network Analyzer (N5222B) connecting to a Cascade Microtech’s GSG probe station. Prior to the measurement, the setup is properly calibrated to remove the contribution of the probes and the cabling and only measure the ensemble of pads plus resonators. Figure 7 shows the experimentally obtained impedance curves vs. frequency of resonators with IDEs and pentagon spiral electrodes. The parameters of both resonators with IDEs and pentagon spiral electrodes are the same. The thickness of the Z-cut LiNbO3 thin film (hp) and electrode (he) is set to 330 nm and 200 nm, respectively. The width of electrodes (w) is defined as 1 µm and the pitch (p) equals to 5 µm. The resonance frequency of XBAR with IDTs and pentagon spiral electrodes is 5.38 and 5.43 GHz, and K e f f 2 is 22.5% and 21.3%, respectively. The K e f f 2 of the resonator with pentagon spiral electrodes is almost equal to that of IDTs, which demonstrates that the electrode rotation angle has no impact on K e f f 2 of XBAR on Z-cut LiNbO3 thin film. Furthermore, it is also worth mentioning that the spurious modes in the impedance curve of XBAR with pentagon spiral electrodes are obviously suppressed, while the curve of resonator with IDEs structure is disturbed by spurious modes. In XBAR with IDE structure, the transverse waves are reflected at the edge of the electrode and form standing waves, thus causing spurious modes. However, in XBAR with pentagon spiral structure, due to the non-parallelism of electrode edges, the transverse waves have different reflection path at each point on the electrode edge, and the propagation path becomes longer, as shown in Figure 7b. When the transverse wave propagates through a long path, the energy of the standing wave is attenuated very low; therefore, the amplitude of spurious modes on the impedance curve are greatly reduced. It can also be noticed that the quality factor of XBAR with pentagon spiral electrodes is lower than that of XBAR with IDEs. The length of pentagon spiral electrodes is much larger than that of IDEs, which will increase the resistant of electrodes and eventually increase the electrical loss of electrodes.
Figure 8a shows the measured impedance curves of XBARs with different p of the top pentagon spiral electrodes. The resonance frequency is 5.433 GHz, 5.432 GHz and 5.230 GHz, respectively, when the p of electrodes is 5, 10 and 20 µm. The measured resonance frequency of the resonator with p = 20 µm is lower than that of p = 5 and 10 µm, which may due to the in-plane thickness inhomogeneity of LiNbO3 thin film, where the standing A1 modes are thickness-dependent when h p p . As p increases from 5 µm to 20 µm, the measured K e f f 2 decreases from 21.3% to 15.8% gradually as shown in Figure 8b. To better understand the variation of the K e f f 2 with different p, we adopt Berlincour’s Formulations (7) and (8) for electromechanical coupling calculation, which can be expressed as [27,28,29]
K 2 = U m 2 U e U d ,
U m     ( E . d . T )   d V ,
where K2 is the electromechanical coupling, Um, Ud, and Ue are the mutual energy, electrical energy, and elastic energy. E, d, T and V are the electric field, the piezoelectric coefficient, stress, and volume of the piezoelectric material, respectively. Equation (7) signifies the importance of the overlap between the applied electric field and the stress distribution of the resonant mode inside the piezoelectric material in the thickness direction. Figure 9 and Figure 10 show the stress distribution and total displacement distribution of A1 mode in the thickness direction of the LiNbO3 thin film, as the p = 5, 8, 10, 16 and 20 µm, respectively. The stress distribution and total displacement distribution declines with the increase of p, indicating the decrease in mutual energy and finally causing the diminution of K e f f 2 .

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we design and fabricate XBARs with pentagon spiral shape electrodes based on Z-cut LiNbO3 thin films. The proposed structure realized an A1 mode shear wave at 5.433 GHz along with K e f f 2 of 21.3%. The thickness of LiNbO3 thin film and the rotation angle of electrodes have no impact on the K e f f 2 of the proposed resonator. However, the K e f f 2 of XBAR is affected by the p of electrodes, decreasing from 21.3% to 15.8% with the increasement of p from 5 to 20 µm. Finally, a XBAR operates at 5.43 GHz with K e f f 2 of 21.5%, and little spurious mode is obtained when w = 1 µm and p = 5 µm. The almost no spurious mode resonator has great potential for 50 Ω impedance match within a miniature size applied in super high-frequency RF front-end filters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.X.; methodology, Y.X.; investigation, Y.X.; resources, Z.W.; data curation, T.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.X.; writ-ing—review and editing, W.L. and Y.C.; visualization, Y.C.; supervision, C.S.; project administration, Y.L.; funding acquisi-tion, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2020YFB2008803) and the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62201405).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ruppel, C.C.W. Acoustic Wave Filter Technology–A Review. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2017, 64, 1390–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Popovski, P.; Trillingsgaard, K.F.; Simeone, O.; Durisi, G. 5G Wireless Network Slicing for eMBB, URLLC, and mMTC: A Communication-Theoretic View. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 55765–55779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lee, J.; Tejedor, E.; Ranta-aho, K.; Wang, H.; Lee, K.T.; Semaan, E.; Mohyeldin, E.; Song, J.; Bergljung, C.; Jung, S. Spectrum for 5G: Global Status, Challenges, and Enabling Technologies. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Takai, T.; Iwamoto, H.; Takamine, Y.; Fuyutsume, T.; Nakao, T.; Hiramoto, M.; Toi, T.; Koshino, M.I.H.P. SAW technology and its application to microacoustic components (Invited). In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Washington, DC, USA, 6–9 September 2017; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aigner, R.; Fattinger, G.; Schaefer, M.; Karnati, K.; Rothemund, R.; Dumont, F. BAW Filters for 5G Bands. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 1–5 December 2018; pp. 14.15.11–14.15.14. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, Y.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tovstopyat, A.; Liu, S.; Sun, C. Materials, Design, and Characteristics of Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator: A Review. Micromachines 2020, 11, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Koskela, J.; Plessky, V.P.; Willemsen, B.A.; Turner, P.J.; Garcia, B.; Hammond, R.B.; Fenzi, N.O. Fast GPU-Assisted FEM Simulations of 3D Periodic TCSAW, IHP, and XBAR Devices. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Glasgow, UK, 6–9 October 2019; pp. 181–184. [Google Scholar]
  8. Koulakis, J.; Koskela, J.; Yang, W.; Myers, L.; Dyer, G.; Garcia, B. XBAR physics and next generation filter design. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Virtual Symposium, 11–16 September 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  9. Faizan, M.; Pastina, A.D.; Yandrapalli, S.; Turner, P.J.; Hammond, R.B.; Plessky, V.; Villanueva, L.G. Fabrication Of Lithium Niobate Bulk Acoustic Resonator For 5G Filters. In Proceedings of the 2019 20th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems & Eurosensors XXXIII (TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS XXXIII), Berlin, Germany, 23–27 June 2019; pp. 1752–1755. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yang, Y.; Gao, A.; Lu, R.; Gong, S. 5 Ghz lithium niobate MEMS resonators with high FoM of 153. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 30th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 22–26 January 2017; pp. 942–945. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gong, S.; Piazza, G. Laterally vibrating lithium niobate MEMS resonators with high electromechanical coupling and Quality factor. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Dresden, Germany, 7–10 October 2012; pp. 1051–1054. [Google Scholar]
  12. Plessky, V.; Yandrapalli, S.; Turner, P.J.; Villanueva, L.G.; Koskela, J.; Faizan, M.; Pastina, A.D.; Garcia, B.; Costa, J.; Hammond, R.B. Laterally excited bulk wave resonators (XBARs) based on thin Lithium Niobate platelet for 5GHz and 13 GHz filters. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2–7 June 2019; pp. 512–515. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lu, R.; Yang, Y.; Link, S.; Gong, S. A1 Resonators in 128° Y-cut Lithium Niobate with Electromechanical Coupling of 46.4%. J. Microelectromechan. Syst. 2020, 29, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Peng, B.; Hu, N.; Jia, B.; Wang, H. A novel N79 filter using solid-mounted A1-mode resonator for 5G applications. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Virtual Symposium, 11–16 September 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gong, S.; Piazza, G. Large frequency tuning of Lithium Niobate laterally vibrating MEMS resonators via electric boundary reconfiguration. In Proceedings of the 2013 Transducers & Eurosensors XXVII: The 17th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS XXVII), Barcelona, Spain, 16–20 June 2013; pp. 2465–2468. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zou, J.; Yantchev, V.; Iliev, F.; Plessky, V.; Samadian, S.; Hammond, R.B.; Turner, P.J. Ultra-Large-Coupling and Spurious-Free SH0 Plate Acoustic Wave Resonators Based on Thin LiNbO3. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2020, 67, 374–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Adler, E.L. Electromechanical coupling to Lamb and shear-horizontal modes in piezoelectric plates. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 1989, 36, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kuypers, J.H.; Pisano, A.P. Green’s function analysis of Lamb wave resonators. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Beijing, China, 2–5 November 2008; pp. 1548–1551. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zou, J.; Iliev, F.; Hammond, R.B.; Samadian, S.; Thorvaldsson, T.; Turner, P.J.; Yantchev, V.; Fenzi, N.O.; Plessky, V. Design of Ultra-Large-Coupling SH0 Plate Wave Resonators on LiNbO3 with Clean Spectrum. In Proceedings of the 2019 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium and European Frequency and Time Forum (EFTF/IFC), Orlando, FL, USA, 14–18 April 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lu, R.; Li, M.H.; Yang, Y.; Manzaneque, T.; Gong, S. Accurate Extraction of Large Electromechanical Coupling in Piezoelectric MEMS Resonators. J. Microelectromechan. Syst. 2019, 28, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zou, Y.; Nian, L.; Cai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tovstopyat, A.; Liu, W.; Sun, C. Dual-mode thin film bulk acoustic wave resonator and filter. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128, 194503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Plessky, V.; Küçük, S.; Yandrapalli, S.; Villanueva, L.G. A formula for the admittance of laterally excited bulk wave resonators (XBARs). Electron. Lett. 2021, 57, 773–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, Y.; Lu, R.; Manzaneque, T.; Gong, S. Toward Ka Band Acoustics: Lithium Niobate Asymmetrical Mode Piezoelectric MEMS Resonators. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (IFCS), Olympic Valley, CA, USA, 21–24 May 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yandrapalli, S.; Eroglu, S.E.K.; Plessky, V.; Atakan, H.B.; Villanueva, L.G. Study of Thin Film LiNbO3 Laterally Excited Bulk Acoustic Resonators. J. Microelectromechan. Syst. 2022, 31, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Barnett, D.M.; Lothe, J. Dislocations and line charges in anisotropic piezoelectric insulators. Phys. Status Solidi (b) 1975, 67, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Plessky, V.; Yandrapalli, S.; Küçük, S.; Villanueva, L.G. Resonance Frequency Dependence Of A1 Lamb Mode On The Pitch Of The Electrode Structure. In Proceedings of the 2021 Joint Conference of the European Frequency and Time Forum and IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFCS), Virtual Symposium, 7–17 July 2021; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hassanien, A.E.; Gong, S. An Acoustic Resonator with Electromechanical Coupling of 16% and Low TCF at 5.4 GHz. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Virtual Symposium, 11–16 September 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hassanien, A.E.; Lu, R.; Gong, S. A Near Zero TCF Acoustic Resonator with High Electromechanical Coupling of 13.5% at 3.5 GHz. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 7–25 June 2021; pp. 218–221. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hassanien, A.E.; Lu, R.; Gong, S. Near-Zero Drift and High Electromechanical Coupling Acoustic Resonators at &gt; 3.5 GHz. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2021, 69, 3706–3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the mode shapes of the first six plate modes (Lamb modes: A0, S0, A1, S1, and SH plate modes: SH0 and SH1) propagating in the Z-cut LiNbO3 membrane when h LiNbO 3 / λ = 0.1 .
Figure 1. Schematic of the mode shapes of the first six plate modes (Lamb modes: A0, S0, A1, S1, and SH plate modes: SH0 and SH1) propagating in the Z-cut LiNbO3 membrane when h LiNbO 3 / λ = 0.1 .
Micromachines 14 00552 g001
Figure 2. Calculated (a) dispersive phase velocities, (b) f-β dispersion curve, and (c) dispersive coupling coefficients of the first six plate modes in the Z-cut LiNbO3 membrane.
Figure 2. Calculated (a) dispersive phase velocities, (b) f-β dispersion curve, and (c) dispersive coupling coefficients of the first six plate modes in the Z-cut LiNbO3 membrane.
Micromachines 14 00552 g002
Figure 3. (a) Schematic drawing of XBAR with pentagon spiral shape electrode. (b) The A-A’ cross-section view of the resonator.
Figure 3. (a) Schematic drawing of XBAR with pentagon spiral shape electrode. (b) The A-A’ cross-section view of the resonator.
Micromachines 14 00552 g003
Figure 4. (a) The simulated impedance curve of resonator with pentagon spiral electrodes. (b) The simulated horizontal displacement mode shape at resonance frequency of A1 mode along the A-A’ cross section and the horizontal displacement deformation in the B-B’ cross section.
Figure 4. (a) The simulated impedance curve of resonator with pentagon spiral electrodes. (b) The simulated horizontal displacement mode shape at resonance frequency of A1 mode along the A-A’ cross section and the horizontal displacement deformation in the B-B’ cross section.
Micromachines 14 00552 g004
Figure 5. Calculated electromechanical coupling efficient of the A1 mode acoustic wave in a Z-cut LiNbO3 thin film vs. the rotation angle of electrodes.
Figure 5. Calculated electromechanical coupling efficient of the A1 mode acoustic wave in a Z-cut LiNbO3 thin film vs. the rotation angle of electrodes.
Micromachines 14 00552 g005
Figure 6. (a) Fabrication process flow for our resonator. I. Cross-section view of the LNOI wafer. II. Mo electrode pattern on the surface of LiNbO3. III. Backside Si deep reactive-ion etch. IV. Wet etch of buried SiO2 layer. (b) SEM image of the fabricated device with pentagon spiral electrodes. (c) SEM image of the fabricated device with IDEs.
Figure 6. (a) Fabrication process flow for our resonator. I. Cross-section view of the LNOI wafer. II. Mo electrode pattern on the surface of LiNbO3. III. Backside Si deep reactive-ion etch. IV. Wet etch of buried SiO2 layer. (b) SEM image of the fabricated device with pentagon spiral electrodes. (c) SEM image of the fabricated device with IDEs.
Micromachines 14 00552 g006
Figure 7. (a) The measured impedance curve of XBARs with IDTs structure (black) and pentagon spiral electrodes (red) vs. frequency, respectively. (b) Schematic diagram of acoustic wave propagation path in a pentagonal electrode.
Figure 7. (a) The measured impedance curve of XBARs with IDTs structure (black) and pentagon spiral electrodes (red) vs. frequency, respectively. (b) Schematic diagram of acoustic wave propagation path in a pentagonal electrode.
Micromachines 14 00552 g007
Figure 8. The measured impedance curve and K e f f 2 with different pitch (p). (a) The measured impedance curve of resonator with different pitch (p). (b) The measured K e f f 2 vs. different pitch (p).
Figure 8. The measured impedance curve and K e f f 2 with different pitch (p). (a) The measured impedance curve of resonator with different pitch (p). (b) The measured K e f f 2 vs. different pitch (p).
Micromachines 14 00552 g008
Figure 9. The simulated stress distribution at resonance as (a) p = 5 µm, (b) p = 8 µm, (c) p = 10 µm, (d) p = 16 µm and (e) p = 20 µm, while the width of electrode is maintained at 1 µm.
Figure 9. The simulated stress distribution at resonance as (a) p = 5 µm, (b) p = 8 µm, (c) p = 10 µm, (d) p = 16 µm and (e) p = 20 µm, while the width of electrode is maintained at 1 µm.
Micromachines 14 00552 g009
Figure 10. The simulated displacement distribution at resonance as (a) p = 5 µm, (b) p = 8 µm, (c) p = 10 µm, (d) p = 16 µm and (e) p = 20 µm, while the width of electrode is maintained at 1 µm.
Figure 10. The simulated displacement distribution at resonance as (a) p = 5 µm, (b) p = 8 µm, (c) p = 10 µm, (d) p = 16 µm and (e) p = 20 µm, while the width of electrode is maintained at 1 µm.
Micromachines 14 00552 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, Y.; Liu, W.; Cai, Y.; Wen, Z.; Luo, T.; Liu, Y.; Sun, C. Design and Analysis of Lithium–Niobate-Based Laterally Excited Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator with Pentagon Spiral Electrodes. Micromachines 2023, 14, 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14030552

AMA Style

Xie Y, Liu W, Cai Y, Wen Z, Luo T, Liu Y, Sun C. Design and Analysis of Lithium–Niobate-Based Laterally Excited Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator with Pentagon Spiral Electrodes. Micromachines. 2023; 14(3):552. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14030552

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Ying, Wenjuan Liu, Yao Cai, Zhiwei Wen, Tiancheng Luo, Yan Liu, and Chengliang Sun. 2023. "Design and Analysis of Lithium–Niobate-Based Laterally Excited Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator with Pentagon Spiral Electrodes" Micromachines 14, no. 3: 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14030552

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop