Next Article in Journal
Gluten Contamination in Naturally or Labeled Gluten-Free Products Marketed in Italy
Next Article in Special Issue
Iterative Development of an Online Dietary Recall Tool: INTAKE24
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Magnesium on the Phosphate Toxicity in Chronic Kidney Disease: Time for Intervention Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lessons from Studies to Evaluate an Online 24-Hour Recall for Use with Children and Adults in Canada
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Nutrients 2017, 9(2), 114; doi:10.3390/nu9020114

Image-Based Dietary Assessment Ability of Dietetics Students and Interns

1
College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Nutrition, Oregon State University, 101 Milam Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331-3303, USA
2
Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
3
School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 19 December 2016 / Revised: 18 January 2017 / Accepted: 26 January 2017 / Published: 7 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Technology Based Approaches to Dietary Intake Assessment)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [552 KB, uploaded 7 February 2017]   |  

Abstract

Image-based dietary assessment (IBDA) may improve the accuracy of dietary assessments, but no formalized training currently exists for skills relating to IBDA. This study investigated nutrition and dietetics students’ and interns’ IBDA abilities, the training and experience factors that may contribute to food identification and quantification accuracy, and the perceived challenges to performing IBDA. An online survey containing images of known foods and serving sizes representing common American foods was used to assess the ability to identify foods and serving sizes. Nutrition and dietetics students and interns from the United States and Australia (n = 114) accurately identified foods 79.5% of the time. Quantification accuracy was lower, with only 38% of estimates within ±10% of the actual weight. Foods of amorphous shape or higher energy density had the highest percent error. Students expressed general difficulty with perceiving serving sizes, making IBDA food quantification more difficult. Experience cooking at home from a recipe, frequent measuring of portions, and having a food preparation or cooking laboratory class were associated with enhanced accuracy in IBDA. Future training of dietetics students should incorporate more food-based serving size training to improve quantification accuracy while performing IBDA, while advances in IBDA technology are also needed. View Full-Text
Keywords: dietary assessment; image-based dietary records; dietetics education; serving-size estimation dietary assessment; image-based dietary records; dietetics education; serving-size estimation
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Howes, E.; Boushey, C.J.; Kerr, D.A.; Tomayko, E.J.; Cluskey, M. Image-Based Dietary Assessment Ability of Dietetics Students and Interns. Nutrients 2017, 9, 114.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top