Nutrients 2012, 4(4), 258; doi:10.3390/nu4040258
Editorial

The Australian Paradox

Editor-in-Chief of Nutrients, Nutritional Physiology Research Centre, Sansom Institute for Health Research, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia
Received: 25 March 2012; Published: 10 April 2012
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [98 KB, uploaded 10 April 2012 16:52 CEST]
Abstract: Nutrients recently became the target of an unprecedented internet campaign by an individual who disagrees with the content and conclusions of a paper published in the journal last year, viz. “The Australian Paradox: A Substantial Decline in Sugars Intake over the Same Timeframe that Overweight and Obesity Have Increased” by Alan W. Barclay and Jennie Brand-Miller, Nutrients 2011, 3, 491–504. Regrettably, his criticism has extended to the journal and its peer review processes for permitting publication of the article. [...]

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Howe, P. The Australian Paradox. Nutrients 2012, 4, 258.

AMA Style

Howe P. The Australian Paradox. Nutrients. 2012; 4(4):258.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Howe, Peter. 2012. "The Australian Paradox." Nutrients 4, no. 4: 258.

Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert