Next Article in Journal
Previous Article in Journal
Nutrients 2012, 4(4), 258; doi:10.3390/nu4040258
Editorial

The Australian Paradox

Received: 25 March 2012; Published: 10 April 2012
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [98 KB, uploaded 10 April 2012]
Note: In lieu of an abstract, this is an excerpt from the first page.

Excerpt: Nutrients recently became the target of an unprecedented internet campaign by an individual who disagrees with the content and conclusions of a paper published in the journal last year, viz. “The Australian Paradox: A Substantial Decline in Sugars Intake over the Same Timeframe that Overweight and Obesity Have Increased” by Alan W. Barclay and Jennie Brand-Miller, Nutrients 2011, 3, 491–504. Regrettably, his criticism has extended to the journal and its peer review processes for permitting publication of the article. [...]
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Howe, P. The Australian Paradox. Nutrients 2012, 4, 258.

AMA Style

Howe P. The Australian Paradox. Nutrients. 2012; 4(4):258.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Howe, Peter. 2012. "The Australian Paradox." Nutrients 4, no. 4: 258.


Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert