Next Article in Journal
Sources and Determinants of Vitamin D Intake in Danish Pregnant Women
Previous Article in Journal
Celiac Disease, Inflammation and Oxidative Damage: A Nutrigenetic Approach
This editorial is related to Nutrients 2011, 3(4), 491-504.

Nutrients 2012, 4(4), 258; doi:10.3390/nu4040258
Editorial

The Australian Paradox

Editor-in-Chief of Nutrients, Nutritional Physiology Research Centre, Sansom Institute for Health Research, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia
Received: 25 March 2012 / Published: 10 April 2012
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [98 KB, uploaded 10 April 2012]
Note: In lieu of an abstract, this is an excerpt from the first page.

Excerpt

Nutrients recently became the target of an unprecedented internet campaign by an individual who disagrees with the content and conclusions of a paper published in the journal last year, viz. “The Australian Paradox: A Substantial Decline in Sugars Intake over the Same Timeframe that Overweight and Obesity Have Increased” by Alan W. Barclay and Jennie Brand-Miller, Nutrients 2011, 3, 491–504. Regrettably, his criticism has extended to the journal and its peer review processes for permitting publication of the article. [...]
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Share & Cite This Article

Further Mendeley | CiteULike
Export to BibTeX |
EndNote
MDPI and ACS Style

Howe, P. The Australian Paradox. Nutrients 2012, 4, 258.

View more citation formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

For more information on the journal, click here

Comments

Cited By

[Return to top]
Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert