This article is
- freely available
Nutrients 2012, 4(4), 258; doi:10.3390/nu4040258
The Australian Paradox
Editor-in-Chief of Nutrients, Nutritional Physiology Research Centre, Sansom Institute for Health Research, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia
Received: 25 March 2012 / Published: 10 April 2012
Download PDF Full-Text [98 KB, uploaded 10 April 2012 16:52 CEST]
Abstract: Nutrients recently became the target of an unprecedented internet campaign by an individual who disagrees with the content and conclusions of a paper published in the journal last year, viz. “The Australian Paradox: A Substantial Decline in Sugars Intake over the Same Timeframe that Overweight and Obesity Have Increased” by Alan W. Barclay and Jennie Brand-Miller, Nutrients 2011, 3, 491–504. Regrettably, his criticism has extended to the journal and its peer review processes for permitting publication of the article. [...]
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
MDPI and ACS Style
Howe, P. The Australian Paradox. Nutrients 2012, 4, 258.AMA Style
Howe P. The Australian Paradox. Nutrients. 2012; 4(4):258.Chicago/Turabian Style
Howe, Peter. 2012. "The Australian Paradox." Nutrients 4, no. 4: 258.