Nutrients 2010, 2(9), 929-949; doi:10.3390/nu2090929
Article

Reexamination of a Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Antioxidant Supplementation on Mortality and Health in Randomized Trials

1 Department of Biological Chemistry and Nutritional Science, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstrasse 28, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany 2 Department of Nutritional Toxicology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Strasse 24, D-07743 Jena, Germany 3 Department of Epidemiology, Baden-Wuerttemberg State Health Office, Nordbahnhofstr. 135, D-70191 Stuttgart, Germany 4 Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 July 2010; in revised form: 17 August 2010 / Accepted: 26 August 2010 / Published: 30 August 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Antioxidants)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [267 KB, uploaded 14 September 2010 08:53 CEST]
Abstract: A recent meta-analysis of selected randomized clinical trials (RCTs), in which population groups of differing ages and health status were supplemented with various doses of b-carotene, vitamin A, and/or vitamin E, found that these interventions increased all-cause mortality. However, this meta-analysis did not consider the rationale of the constituent RCTs for antioxidant supplementation, none of which included mortality as a primary outcome. As the rationale for these trials was to test the hypothesis of a potential benefit of antioxidant supplementation, an alternative approach to a systematic evaluation of these RCTs would be to evaluate this outcome relative to the putative risk of greater total mortality. Thus, we examined these data based on the primary outcome of the 66 RCTs included in the meta-analysis via a decision analysis to identify whether the results provided a positive (i.e., benefit), null or negative (i.e., harm) outcome. Our evaluation indicated that of these RCTs, 24 had a positive outcome, 39 had a null outcome, and 3 had a negative outcome. We further categorized these interventions as primary (risk reduction in healthy populations) or secondary (slowing pathogenesis or preventing recurrent events and/or cause-specific mortality) prevention or therapeutic (treatment to improve quality of life, limit complications, and/or provide rehabilitation) studies, and determined positive outcomes in 8 of 20 primary prevention studies, 10 of 34 secondary prevention studies, and 6 out of 16 therapeutic studies. Seven of the eight RCTs with a positive outcome in primary prevention included participants in a population where malnutrition is frequently described. These results suggest that analyses of potential risks from antioxidant supplementation should be placed in the context of a benefit/risk ratio.
Keywords: antioxidants; supplementation; mortality; benefit/risk; meta-analysis

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Biesalski, H.K.; Grune, T.; Tinz, J.; Zöllner, I.; Blumberg, J.B. Reexamination of a Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Antioxidant Supplementation on Mortality and Health in Randomized Trials. Nutrients 2010, 2, 929-949.

AMA Style

Biesalski HK, Grune T, Tinz J, Zöllner I, Blumberg JB. Reexamination of a Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Antioxidant Supplementation on Mortality and Health in Randomized Trials. Nutrients. 2010; 2(9):929-949.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Biesalski, Hans K.; Grune, Tilman; Tinz, Jana; Zöllner, Iris; Blumberg, Jeffrey B. 2010. "Reexamination of a Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Antioxidant Supplementation on Mortality and Health in Randomized Trials." Nutrients 2, no. 9: 929-949.

Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert