Next Article in Journal
Multivariate Spatial Data Fusion for Very Large Remote Sensing Datasets
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Potential Volcanic Risk from Mt. Baekdu by DInSAR Time Series Analysis and Atmospheric Correction
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Remote Sens. 2017, 9(2), 141;

The Estimation of the North American Great Lakes Turbulent Fluxes Using Satellite Remote Sensing and MERRA Reanalysis Data

Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (GISTDA) 120, The Government Complex Building B, Chaeng Wattana Road, Lak Si Bangkok 10210, Thailand
Department of Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0260, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Zhaoliang Li and Prasad S. Thenkabail
Received: 17 October 2016 / Revised: 14 January 2017 / Accepted: 4 February 2017 / Published: 8 February 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [4205 KB, uploaded 8 February 2017]   |  


This study provides the first technique to investigate the turbulent fluxes over the Great Lakes from July 2001 to December 2014 using a combination of data from satellite remote sensing, reanalysis data sets, and direct measurements. Turbulent fluxes including latent heat flux (QE) and sensible heat flux (QH) were estimated using the bulk aerodynamic approach, then compared with the direct eddy covariance measurements from the rooftop of three lighthouses—Stannard Rock Lighthouse (SR) in Lake Superior, White Shoal Lighthouse (WS) in Lake Michigan, and Spectacle Reef Lighthouse (SP) in Lake Huron. The relationship between modeled and measured QE and QH were in a good statistical agreement, for QE, R2 varied from 0.41 (WS), 0.74 (SR), and 0.87 (SP) with RMSE of 5.68, 6.93, and 4.67 W·m−2, respectively, while QH, R2 ranged from 0.002 (WS), 0.8030 (SP) and 0.94 (SR) with RMSE of 6.97, 4.39 and 4.90 W·m−2 respectively. Both monthly mean QE and QH were highest in January for all lakes except Lake Ontario, which was highest in early December. The turbulent fluxes then sharply drop in March and are negligible during June and July. The evaporation processes continue again in August. View Full-Text
Keywords: evaporation; the Great Lakes; remote sensing; reanalysis evaporation; the Great Lakes; remote sensing; reanalysis

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Moukomla, S.; Blanken, P.D. The Estimation of the North American Great Lakes Turbulent Fluxes Using Satellite Remote Sensing and MERRA Reanalysis Data. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 141.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top