This article is
- freely available
Understanding and Ameliorating Non-Linear Phase and Amplitude Responses in AMCW Lidar
School of Engineering, The University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 November 2011; in revised form: 9 December 2011 / Accepted: 16 December 2011 / Published: 23 December 2011
Abstract: Amplitude modulated continuous wave (AMCW) lidar systems commonly suffer from non-linear phase and amplitude responses due to a number of known factors such as aliasing and multipath inteference. In order to produce useful range and intensity information it is necessary to remove these perturbations from the measurements. We review the known causes of non-linearity, namely aliasing, temporal variation in correlation waveform shape and mixed pixels/multipath inteference. We also introduce other sources of non-linearity, including crosstalk, modulation waveform envelope decay and non-circularly symmetric noise statistics, that have been ignored in the literature. An experimental study is conducted to evaluate techniques for mitigation of non-linearity, and it is found that harmonic cancellation provides a significant improvement in phase and amplitude linearity.
Keywords: phase linearity; AMCW; Lidar; harmonic cancelation; heterodyning; irregular phase steps; crosstalk; multipath; non-circularly-symmetric noise
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Godbaz, J.P.; Cree, M.J.; Dorrington, A.A. Understanding and Ameliorating Non-Linear Phase and Amplitude Responses in AMCW Lidar. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 21-42.
Godbaz JP, Cree MJ, Dorrington AA. Understanding and Ameliorating Non-Linear Phase and Amplitude Responses in AMCW Lidar. Remote Sensing. 2012; 4(1):21-42.
Godbaz, John P.; Cree, Michael J.; Dorrington, Adrian A. 2012. "Understanding and Ameliorating Non-Linear Phase and Amplitude Responses in AMCW Lidar." Remote Sens. 4, no. 1: 21-42.