Conservation Policy-Community Conflicts: A Case Study from Bogda Nature Reserve, China
AbstractBogda Nature Reserve is a World Heritage Site (WHS) in Xinjiang, China. Potential conflicts between community development and heritage conservation are important topics to study and may have an impact on the sustainable development of heritage sites. In this study, we conducted a survey with the community residents of the Bogda Nature Reserve to examine major potential conflicts arising from local residents’ perceptions regarding conservation policy and its interventions. The results indicated that the local community supports heritage conservation and development, but they expressed negative attitudes towards their present living conditions, especially due to policy-induced loss of benefits. Through the research, three major conflicts were identified: (1) a divergence in residents’ awareness of the WHS designation and the conservation policy (grazing restriction policy); (2) negative changes in living conditions compared to before the WHS designation; (3) the degradation of well-being caused by tourism. In addition, expectations from residents were combined to assess the implications for the present situation and advise on conservation plans to facilitate sustainable management in Bogda. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Liu, Q.; Yang, Z.; Wang, F. Conservation Policy-Community Conflicts: A Case Study from Bogda Nature Reserve, China. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1291.
Liu Q, Yang Z, Wang F. Conservation Policy-Community Conflicts: A Case Study from Bogda Nature Reserve, China. Sustainability. 2017; 9(8):1291.Chicago/Turabian Style
Liu, Qun; Yang, Zhaoping; Wang, Fang. 2017. "Conservation Policy-Community Conflicts: A Case Study from Bogda Nature Reserve, China." Sustainability 9, no. 8: 1291.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.