Addressing Complexity in Environmental Management and Governance
AbstractGovernance for complex problem solving has been increasingly discussed in environmental sustainability research. Above all, researchers continuously observe that sustainability problems are complex or “wicked”, and suggest participatory models to address these problems in practice. In order to add to this debate, this study suggests a more differentiated theoretical approach to define governance for complex environmental problem solving than in previous studies. The approach consists of two vital steps: First, we operationalize complexity and define management strategies for solving environmental sustainability problems based on findings from psychology research. Second, we identify governance strategies that facilitate these management strategies. Linking those strategies suggests that the role of diverse institutions, actors, and interactions differs for five key dimensions of complexity: goals, variables, dynamics, interconnections, and informational uncertainty. The results strengthen systematic analyses of environmental sustainability problems in both theory and practice. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Kirschke, S.; Newig, J. Addressing Complexity in Environmental Management and Governance. Sustainability 2017, 9, 983.
Kirschke S, Newig J. Addressing Complexity in Environmental Management and Governance. Sustainability. 2017; 9(6):983.Chicago/Turabian Style
Kirschke, Sabrina; Newig, Jens. 2017. "Addressing Complexity in Environmental Management and Governance." Sustainability 9, no. 6: 983.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.