Next Article in Journal
Demographic Changes and Real Estate Values. A Quantitative Model for Analyzing the Urban-Rural Linkages
Next Article in Special Issue
The Economic Benefits of the Dokdo Seals Restoration Project in Korea: A Contingent Valuation Study
Previous Article in Journal
Agroecology, Public Policies and Labor-Driven Intensification: Alternative Development Trajectories in the Brazilian Semi-Arid Region
Previous Article in Special Issue
Relationships between Tourism and Hospitality Sector Electricity Consumption in Spanish Provinces (1999–2013)
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(4), 531; doi:10.3390/su9040531

Rural Second Homes and Their Impacts on Rural Development: A Case Study in East Iran

1
Imam Khomeini Higher Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj ‎3177777411, Iran
2
Islamic Azad University, Birjand 9717411111, Iran
3
LISER, Belval 4366, Luxembourg
4
Department of Geography, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium
5
Department of Geography, University of Tartu, Tartu 21014, Estonia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Kelly S. Bricker
Received: 18 January 2017 / Revised: 10 March 2017 / Accepted: 27 March 2017 / Published: 31 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environment, Tourism and Sustainable Development)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [921 KB, uploaded 31 March 2017]   |  

Abstract

Previously, rural tourism has developed due to population growth, urbanization, development of transportation, and communication routes. In this context, rural second homes (RSHs) are considered as one of the main instruments of permanent and temporary residency tourism. This study intended to evaluate the impacts that “rural second homes” have on rural development in the Khorashad village in the South Khorasan province of Iran. Data were collected through a questionnaire. Using a random sampling method, 146 permanent rural residents were selected. Results showed that in the view of the respondents, the most important positive and negative impacts of RSHs were, respectively, the physical-environment and socio-cultural aspects of the area. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between job type, gender, and purchase/construction year of the RSHs and people’s perceptions toward the impacts of RSHs. The study concluded that the most important strategies to reduce negative impacts and increase positive impacts of the RSHs are to, respectively, improve public policies and design geographical distribution patterns in order to develop RSHs. View Full-Text
Keywords: rural tourism; rural development; recreational area; landscape planning rural tourism; rural development; recreational area; landscape planning
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hajimirrahimi, S.D.; Esfahani, E.; Van Acker, V.; Witlox, F. Rural Second Homes and Their Impacts on Rural Development: A Case Study in East Iran. Sustainability 2017, 9, 531.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top