Next Article in Journal
Introduction of Behavioral Parameterization in the EPC Calculation Method and Assessment of Five Typical Urban Houses in Wallonia, Belgium
Previous Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Drivers of Farmland Changes in Panxi Mountainous Region, China
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2016, 8(11), 1206; doi:10.3390/su8111206

Capturing Agroecosystem Vulnerability and Resilience

1
Farming Systems Ecology Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 430, Wageningen 6700 AK, The Netherlands
2
Graduate Program in Animal Science, Chapingo University, Km. 38.5 Carretera, México-Texcoco, Texcoco C.P. 56230, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Hossein Azadi
Received: 25 October 2016 / Revised: 14 November 2016 / Accepted: 16 November 2016 / Published: 22 November 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Agriculture, Food and Wildlife)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [777 KB, uploaded 22 November 2016]   |  

Abstract

Vulnerability and resilience are two crucial attributes of social-ecological systems that are used for analyzing the response to disturbances. We assess these properties in relation to agroecosystem buffer capacity and adaptive capacity, which depend on the ‘window of opportunities’ of possible changes in terms of selected performance indicators, i.e., the solution space. The vulnerability of the system was quantified as the distance of performance indicators between original and disturbed systems. The buffer capacity was derived from the size of the solution space that could be obtained after reconfiguration of farm components (crops, animals, fertilizers, etc.) that were present on the original farm, whereas the assessment of adaptive capacity was derived in a similar way, but after allowing innovation by introducing new components to the farm. To illustrate the approach, we applied these concepts to two dairy farms in Northwest Michoacán, Mexico. After a disturbance resulting in a fodder maize yield decline, both economic profitability and soil organic matter inputs were reduced. The scope for recovery was different between the farms, but the projected improvements in profitability and organic matter inputs would require considerable changes in the farm configurations, and thus flexibility in farm management. High resilience requires a farmer with the managerial ability to make the required changes to move through the proposed solution space. The approach we present here offers a generic quantitative assessment of vulnerability and resilience concepts, based on a combined assessment of the social and ecological dimensions of agroecosystems. View Full-Text
Keywords: multi-objective optimization; buffer capacity; adaptive capacity; solution space multi-objective optimization; buffer capacity; adaptive capacity; solution space
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Groot, J.C.J.; Cortez-Arriola, J.; Rossing, W.A.H.; Améndola Massiotti, R.D.; Tittonell, P. Capturing Agroecosystem Vulnerability and Resilience. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1206.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top