Next Article in Journal
Governing Sustainability Transitions: Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives and Regime Change in United States Agriculture
Next Article in Special Issue
Street-Level Bureaucrats at Work: A Municipality-Level Institutional Analysis of Community-Based Natural Resource Management Implementation Practice in the Pasture Sector of Kyrgyzstan
Previous Article in Journal
Risk Assessment, Partition and Economic Loss Estimation of Rice Production in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Institutionalization of Sustainable Development in Decision-Making and Everyday Life Practices: A Critical View on the Finnish Case
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2015, 7(1), 584-611; doi:10.3390/su7010584

Can the Concept of Integrative and Segregative Institutions Contribute to the Framing of Institutions of Sustainability?

Division of Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics; Workshop in Institutional Analysis of Social-Ecological Systems (WINS); Berlin Institute of Cooperative Studies, Humboldt University Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin 10099, Germany
Academic Editor: Volker Beckmann
Received: 18 February 2014 / Accepted: 21 November 2014 / Published: 7 January 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Institutional Change)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1393 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]   |  

Abstract

This paper begins with the question “What is special about those institutions that bring about sustainability”? In an attempt to answer this, I use the Institutions of Sustainability (IoS) framework, which structures sustainability analytically according to four main categories, namely: transactions, actors, institutions and governance structures. I then argue that sustainability has to do with balancing two sorts of costs an actor may face while being constrained by institutions. One is the costs from the integrative effects of institutions on his individual decision making. The other is the costs from the segregative effect of institutions. In this way, sustainability can be understood as societies’ compromise between institutions that integrate individual actors’ decisions in a wider system, holding them fully responsible for more or less all of the effects of their choices and those institutions that partly free individual decision makers from parts of such responsibilities. If a governance problem is characterized by a high degree of “decomposability”, segregative rules may be sufficient. The more a governance problem is characterized by complexity due to low modularity and high functional interdependencies, the more accurate integrative rules may be. The paper concludes by identifying “sustainability area of institutional embedding” as a regulative idea in understanding sustainability. View Full-Text
Keywords: institutional analysis; sustainability; transactions; interdependence; governance institutional analysis; sustainability; transactions; interdependence; governance
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hagedorn, K. Can the Concept of Integrative and Segregative Institutions Contribute to the Framing of Institutions of Sustainability? Sustainability 2015, 7, 584-611.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top