Next Article in Journal
Labor Market Determinants of Migration Flows in Europe
Next Article in Special Issue
Vertically Differentiating Environmental Standards: The Case of the Marine Stewardship Council
Previous Article in Journal
Can the Concept of Integrative and Segregative Institutions Contribute to the Framing of Institutions of Sustainability?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Governing GMOs: The (Counter) Movement for Mandatory and Voluntary Non-GMO Labels
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2015, 7(1), 612-633; doi:10.3390/su7010612

Governing Sustainability Transitions: Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives and Regime Change in United States Agriculture

Department of Sociology, Sam Houston State University, 1901 Avenue I, CHSS Building, Suite 270, Huntsville, TX 77341, USA
Academic Editors: Douglas H. Constance and Maki Hatanaka
Received: 10 October 2014 / Accepted: 30 December 2014 / Published: 7 January 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Agricultural Governance)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [701 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]


Using a case study of US agriculture, this paper examines how governance affects sustainability transitions in socio-technical systems. The multi-level perspective (MLP) has become a leading framework for theorizing sustainability transitions in socio-technical systems. It posits that transitions to more sustainable socio-technical systems are an outcome of external pressure at the landscape level and internal pressure emanating from niches. While the MLP is a robust analytical framework, it under-theorizes the role that governance plays in sustainability transitions. This paper addresses this research gap through examining three multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) that have developed sustainability metrics and standards for US agriculture: Field to Market; LEO-4000; and the Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops. Applying a governance analytical framework, membership selection, decision-making procedures, and access to resources are found to affect the kinds of sustainability metrics developed, as well as their likely implementation. Specifically, the governance processes functioned to channel sustainability metrics towards ones that were congruent with the existing agrifood regime, and marginalize metrics that had the potential to disrupt regime processes. Thus, this article proposes that governance is a key component of sustainability transitions, and that current usage of MSIs in much of environmental governance may function to moderate sustainability transitions. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainability transitions; governance; food and agriculture; standards and metrics sustainability transitions; governance; food and agriculture; standards and metrics
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Konefal, J. Governing Sustainability Transitions: Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives and Regime Change in United States Agriculture. Sustainability 2015, 7, 612-633.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top