Sustainability 2013, 5(4), 1680-1699; doi:10.3390/su5041680
Article

Indoor Thermal Comfort: The Behavioral Component

Climate Change Research Network, Vanderbilt Institute for Energy & Environment, Vanderbilt University, PMB 407702, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN 37240, USA
Received: 25 February 2013; in revised form: 2 April 2013 / Accepted: 3 April 2013 / Published: 22 April 2013
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [926 KB, uploaded 22 April 2013 12:00 CEST]
Abstract: This is a study of how indoor temperature settings have changed over time in the United States based on data from the Energy Information Administration’s, Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS). It is shown that Americans have moderately raised indoor temperature settings during the heating season over the past thirty years. It is also shown that most Americans keep their homes relatively cool in the summertime and are generally averse to implementing temperature setbacks. It is revealed that occupants in lower-income homes tend to set their thermostats higher in winter than other income groups, but that the most intense cooling tends to take place in both low-income and high-income homes. As expected, renters tend to heat and cool more intensively than homeowners. Getting Americans to change their temperature settings in order to save energy is not easy even though it comes with the promise of financial savings. The use of programmable thermostats thus far has proved unsuccessful. Greater utilization of social marketing to achieve energy savings is suggested, as well as a renewed effort on the part of electricity suppliers to work more closely with homeowners as part of the rollout of the “smart grid”.
Keywords: space conditioning; space warming; air conditioning; thermostats; indoor temperatures; energy behavior policy; temperature setbacks

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Barkenbus, J. Indoor Thermal Comfort: The Behavioral Component. Sustainability 2013, 5, 1680-1699.

AMA Style

Barkenbus J. Indoor Thermal Comfort: The Behavioral Component. Sustainability. 2013; 5(4):1680-1699.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barkenbus, Jack. 2013. "Indoor Thermal Comfort: The Behavioral Component." Sustainability 5, no. 4: 1680-1699.

Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert