Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Manufacturing and Design: Concepts, Practices and Needs
Previous Article in Journal
Ecotourism versus Mass Tourism. A Comparison of Environmental Impacts Based on Ecological Footprint Analysis
Sustainability 2012, 4(1), 141-153; doi:10.3390/su4010141
Article

Sustainable and Integrated Development—A Critical Analysis

*  and
Received: 12 September 2011; in revised form: 2 January 2012 / Accepted: 3 January 2012 / Published: 12 January 2012
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [430 KB, uploaded 12 January 2012]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: The words “Sustainable Development” are frequently used by very lightly, to the extent that they have lost their meaning. There is a presumption that for any perspective analysis or any development proposal, these two words are the most appropriate. Sustainability has been incorporated in the objectives of many studies. The historical model of industrialized societies in the 19th and 20th centuries served as the central notion of what constitutes development in both the cost-effectiveness and equity perspectives. According to some analysts, this path represents the model for global prosperity. However, a number of growing parallel literatures recognize the importance of diverse development pathways in achieving an environmentally and socio-economically better world. The term sustainable development does not bring forward all aspects of development. A new term that incorporates the wellbeing of all citizens through economic development and the preservation of the environment is needed. A “Worth-living Integrated Development” could be a term that combines economic development, social development and environmental protection. A Worth-living Integrated Development may be achieved only when human societies decide to create necessary presuppositions—at the educational, research, economic, social, political, technical/technological and environmental levels—for a better world, based on the human values of peace, justice, solidarity, political, economic and social democracy and ethics, respect for nature and for the variety of cultures of all human beings.
Keywords: sustainable development; worth-living integrated development; integrated development sustainable development; worth-living integrated development; integrated development
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Koroneos, C.J.; Rokos, D. Sustainable and Integrated Development—A Critical Analysis. Sustainability 2012, 4, 141-153.

AMA Style

Koroneos CJ, Rokos D. Sustainable and Integrated Development—A Critical Analysis. Sustainability. 2012; 4(1):141-153.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koroneos, Christopher J.; Rokos, Dimitri. 2012. "Sustainable and Integrated Development—A Critical Analysis." Sustainability 4, no. 1: 141-153.


Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert