Is It Possible to Maintain the Quantity and Quality of Winter Wheat Grain by Replacing Part of the Mineral Nitrogen Dose by Growth Activators and Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)?
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The concept and hypothesis of this study were quite simple. The presentation of data could be improved. It was very hard to check all the tables. The style of the text is too much schematic. The study provides practical information.
Can the results of this study be transferred to other countries ? Please discuss this topic
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Dear Authors
Your topic is exciting for me, but you need to improve your article. Please use the new method analysis for your data and result. Please expand your result too. Your result too short. You can improve your discussion too. Please add other references except for your articles. Please recheck the plagiarism too. It is a few high.
please check with these problems
Line 27 removes an area….
Line 32 change the word in accordance with to by….
Line 44 the use of….
Line 47 by a change to with …
Line 165 use the an not a…
Line 240 in comparison change to compared…
Line 258 the Positive …
Line 280 alleviating stress
Line 302 With the wheat cultivation area
after that, send back your article to review again
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
line Observation
2-5 Title have some words capitalize that isn't correct
10-22 Abstract must be about 200 words maximum
14 Azoter = Azote
18 Nmin in the soil = ?
69 (0–30 and 30–60 cm) = (0–30 cm and 30–60 cm)
72-74 Why some chemical elements are named and some are only with abbreviation?
77-82 Ask a native English how is correct "11.86–84.25 and 6.90–74.48 mg kg‐1"
or "11.86–84.25 mg kg‐1 and 6.90–74.48 mg kg‐1" for all the content of this paper
88 Correct from "in 2018 197‐419 mm, and in 2019 ‐ 265" to "in 2018 was 197‐419 mm, and in 2019 was 265 mm"
130 It's very confuse what is "(variant No" - missing explication
157 cm‐3 I think is a type mismatch error
173-185 At the end use ";" not "," for example "1. Grain yield at moisture 14%, t ha‐1," must be "1. Grain yield at moisture 14%, t ha‐1;"
194-195 "variants no. 1 and 2 compared to object no. 0 (Table 3)." is treatment?
also is better to use "variant number 1" and not "variant no." Try to explain what you mean with "variant no.1" and "object no. 0". Why don't use (Treatment 0, treatment 1 and treatment 2) or (Treatment no. 0, treatment no. 1 and treatment no. 2) but with explain.
204 "Variant no.1" the same observation like lines 194-195
208 "variant No.1" the same observation like lines 194-195
209 "Variant no. 2" the same observation like lines 194-195
213 "combination no. 0" the same observation like lines 194-195
214 "Variant no. 2" the same observation like lines 194-195
216 "variant no. 1." the same observation like lines 194-195
217 "variants no. 1 and no. 2" the same observation like lines 194-195
218 "variant no. 0." the same observation like lines 194-195
219 "effect of treatment (variant)" before line 194 if you want to use the expression "variant" but without "no." for example, you can use "variant 1" or "variant number 1"
220 "(202016/17–2018/2019)" I don't understand "202016/17"
225 In table 4 "Environ-m
ent" - move the "m" down or put some space after "-"
228 In my pdf the line is in new page. Must be in the same page with figure (line 227)
233 Table 6? Correct in "Table 5"
238 "No." or "no." try to use same notation.
240 "control treatment 0" ? is variant no. 0?
298 At conclusion you can put more text/explication and some graphics from your table for example some comparation between from result of three difference treatments.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
The Authors addressed all observations and improved substantially the text and presentation of results
Author Response
Thank you for your valuable comments.
Reviewer 2 Report
Dear Authors
I accept a new version of your article.
it is very clear.
good luck
Author Response
Thank you for your valuable comments.
