Next Article in Journal
Analyzing Urban Residents’ Appraisal of Ridepooling Service Attributes with Conjoint Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Nodal Farmers’ Motivations for Exchanging Sorghum Seeds in Northwestern Ethiopia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Generating Future-Oriented Energy Policies and Technologies from the Multidisciplinary Group Discussions by Text-Mining-Based Identification of Topics and Experts

Department of Management Information Systems, BERI, Gyeongsang National University, 501 Jinjudae-ro Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do 52828, Korea
Sustainability 2018, 10(10), 3709; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103709
Submission received: 28 September 2018 / Revised: 12 October 2018 / Accepted: 14 October 2018 / Published: 16 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)

Abstract

:
With increasing problems and challenging issues for sustainability under climate change, energy research has gained a lot of global attention from citizens, business and government on an important mission to make energy available in sustainable and clean ways. Moreover, as the bigger energy issues get, the more closely they are related to humans, so the multidisciplinary approach in energy research by integrating human sciences in energy domain has been called for and recognized to be of immense importance. However, so far most of the energy research has focused on one side such as economics and technology innovation. In addition, there have been limits to policymakers’ taking multidisciplinary perspectives for agenda-setting and policy-making on energy issues for future society under climate change. In this context, this paper proposes a systematic approach for agenda-setting and policy-making in future-oriented and multidisciplinary perspectives. In particular, it applies text-mining techniques to designing multidisciplinary group discussions and generates energy policies and technologies (EP&Ts) for the future society from the multidisciplinary perspectives. The proposed method was applied to South Korea. To sum up, the core energy-specific future trends in South Korea were identified and subsequently the top-priority future-oriented EP&Ts were generated for South Korea as follows: (i) real-time plan for electricity usage; (ii) purchase system, specialized for green energy products; (iii) cooperation association for sustainability; (iv) donating self-produced energy; (v) social media-based energy policy portal; and (vi) expert system designing the eco-friendly and low-energy indoor and outdoor designs. Thus, this paper has its novelty as the first trial that combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches for building up future-oriented strategies from the balanced and multidisciplinary perspectives. Eventually, it will help deal with bigger problems and grand challenges that our future energy society should overcome to sustain under climate change.

1. Introduction

1.1. Climate Change and Challenging Issues in Energy Research for Sustainability

Without doubt, climate change in the Earth has become a serious and urgent issue as the change is far more rapid and dangerous than thought earlier. The negative effect of climate change has been more evident nowadays through endless natural disasters and loss of lives, as well as the disposal of ecological environment, for example, changing weather patterns, reduced water availability, deforestation, melting icecaps [1]. The significant impact of climate change on humans makes it obvious that climate change is the most critical driver for sustainability.
For sustainability under climate change, governments are carrying out strategies to develop and promote green industries, for example, renewable energy and at the same time they’re establishing regulations to decrease carbon emissions. On the business side, firms are adopting corporate responsibility agendas and reviewing their carbon emissions and supply chains in order to minimize their own footprints on the environments and communities which they work in. However, while climate change is happening now and it will accelerate in the future, a clear blueprint for current and future solutions to avert the climate change crisis and create opportunities is not available. Moreover, policymakers’ shaping the future itself entails uncertainties as well. It is only clear that humans require constant supplies of energy, which should be affordable, made, delivered and consumed in sustainable, clean ways [2].
Thus, it is a matter of importance to generate energy policies and technologies (hereinafter, EP&Ts) in preparation for the future society under climate change. To deal with it, there are challenging issues and problems to be resolved and they can be grouped into three as follows:
First, national strategies on EP&Ts for sustainability under climate change should be developed with future-oriented and multidisciplinary perspectives. Frequent changes, driven by not a future-oriented viewpoint but the short-sightedness, make it difficult to practice the EP&Ts that are planned in a long-term period. In addition, the one-sided view may result in future-oriented strategies’ lost balance between different disciplines. Because the entire academic knowledge of human sciences may be relevant and helpful to energy research for climate change, multidisciplinary viewpoints by the integration of human sciences in energy research for climate change are worth being taken into account.
Second, a data-driven systematic approach is needed to establish the future-oriented and multidisciplinary group discussions, which identify future-oriented topics and experts, collect opinions on the topics from the multidisciplinary viewpoints and discover new ideas based on understandings on people and society. However, in reality, it is a nontrivial task to establish the multidisciplinary group discussions. Particularly, government officials in charge are incapable of identifying such topics and experts for multidisciplinary group discussions, as are most of the experts, as they have only specific discipline knowledge and at most they are cross-disciplinary. In this situation, data such as research papers may provide an opportunity to address the difficulties.
Third, considering both the importance of information technology, that is, data-driven and the value of traditional approach, that is, group discussions, the integration of the traditional group discussion with the recent data analysis is unavoidable. However, according to the literature review of this paper, there has not been made such a work so far, while most of the previous works are one-sided, that is, either data-driven or discussion-driven. In fact, most of them have focused on data analysis, neglecting the merit of physical interactions among experts.

1.2. Human Sciences and Multidisciplinary Energy Research

Though there are more than 30 disciplines of energy researches reported in Reference [2], so far energy issues have been studied quite one-sidedly, that is, technical and economic researches that emphasize the supply side of energy markets [3]. However, grand societal energy issues for climate change, for example, the transition to decentralized sustainable energy systems, require research that also pays attention socio-technical, behavioral, institutional, governance, policy and demand side related aspects [2]. Such aspects can be considered by integrating the broad spectrum of human sciences into energy research, which is described as social sciences, economics, humanities and the academic disciplines of arts, including such as archaeology and linguistics. This study uses the term, multidisciplinary energy research, to represent its inclusion of human sciences in energy research.
In principle, the entire academic knowledge of human sciences may be relevant to energy and climate change research. Hence, disciplinary fragmentation and barriers to the exchange of information and insight needs to be minimized for multidisciplinary energy research [4]. In addition, the success of multidisciplinary endeavor can be guaranteed by providing new questions rather than just providing answers to disciplinary questions. So, specific forms of organizing, such as multidisciplinary research, are needed to achieve it [5]. Also in practice, policymakers have made repeated demands for the integration of human and natural sciences in the field of climate change as they are in need of valid and reliable information that supports evidence-based decisions in policy-making on energy issues. However, the integration of human sciences in energy research is at a standstill. For example, the recent analysis of the IPCC Assessment Reports (http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/) indicates that such integration is still skewed towards a particular dimension of human sciences, that is, economics.

1.3. Two Main Streams of Energy Research: Policy Studies and Technology Innovation

Without policy intervention, low-carbon technologies, for example, technologies for renewable energy, will not progress and will not diffuse at a rate and scale necessary for a radical energy transition, that is, a de-carbonization of the energy system. In this respect, energy researches have been made mainly in two streams: policy studies and technology innovations.
First, energy policy can be defined in various ways, but, in sum, energy policy concerns the set of policy instruments, which are used to make sure reliable, affordable, clean energy provision and spur economic development [2]. In addition, it should be able to meet the needs from social and demand side related aspects of energy markets and solving energy problems [6]. Based on the stage of policy process, the energy policy can be classified into four groups: agenda-setting, policy-making, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. In previous energy policy studies, phases of the policy process mostly addressed in the articles were concerned with the policy-making and the implementation phases, whereas relatively little attention was awarded to agenda-setting [2]. In a more comprehensive way, the concept of energy mix works as a tool for analyzing and innovating energy policy, including elements, processes, dimensions and overarching characteristics. To avoid multiple failures in place, energy policy requires not just single policy instruments but rather a policy mix to address them [7]. In regard to the above taxonomies, this study is related to agenda-setting and policy-making and it considers all components of energy mix when coming up with energy policy.
Second, energy technology innovation consists of processes to produce new or better energy technologies, which can supplement energy resources, enhance the energy service quality and decrease the economic/environmental/political costs of energy supply and use. Though energy technology innovation has largely contributed to improving the human condition over the last century, there are three greatest energy challenges are still to be resolved: (i) decreasing reliance on oil; (ii) radically improving the energy services offered to the poor people of the world; and (iii) giving the energy required to increase and maintain prosperity everywhere without destroying the global climate with the carbon emissions [8,9]. However, there exist social-economic and political barriers even though innovative energy technology was developed [10,11]. Hence, policy studies recently have increasingly focused on the implementation of energy innovation and the diffusion of promising energy technologies, for example, smart grids and near energy-zero housing. To make sure the diffusion processes prosper, the pre-conditions need to be set, for example, demand creation, social acceptance, governance mechanisms and fine-tuning of energy innovation policies.
In general, policy studies can help to cause energy technology innovation in accordance with the policy process: (i) policy-making to offer the societal and institutional requirements that take into account more innovation and diffusion; (ii) assisting with management and operational issues concerning the conduct of policy to help innovation and diffusion; (iii) monitoring and evaluation of policy to help innovation and diffusion [2]. Moreover, rising technologies, for example, renewable energy technologies, are not only affected by a policy mix but carefully are influenced and shaped by an entire system, that is, technological innovation system. Scholars on technology innovation systems study the evolution of such technologies as the result of complex interaction processes among actors, institutions and physical artifacts. This contains the analysis of the structure of the innovation system as well as its functioning. In doing so, system failures or systemic problems are recognized and recommendations for specific policy interferences are obtained based on these [7].
Thus, considering tight linkages between policy and technology innovation, multidisciplinary energy researches should also consider both policy and technology innovation. Once combined, the boundary between energy policy and energy technology should be removed not to limit thinking for the future society under climate change. However, there are few considered both policy and technology innovation for multidisciplinary energy researches and this study aims to deal with such a research gap by identifying and selecting both energy policy and energy technology from the multidisciplinary perspectives in order to challenge for human’s sustainability under climate change.

1.4. Future-Oriented Methods for Energy Research

To achieve a sustainable future under the complex climate change, decisions on EP&T innovations should be taken in a structured, transparent and reliable way [12]. Hence, focusing on future energy issues [13,14], previous energy researches have adopted various methods, for example, case study [15,16], simulation [17,18,19], survey/statistics [20,21,22], comparative study [23,24], exploring of meanings, for example, discourses [25], framing [26], stakeholder analysis [27,28], scenario analysis [29,30,31], literature review [32,33,34], monitoring/assessment [35,36,37,38], modelling [39,40] and big data analytics [41,42]. However, their methods can broadly be classified into three groups: qualitative, quantitative and their combined approaches. Details are as follows:
First, simply put, the qualitative approach of energy research is not dependent on statistical/mathematical tools. In particular, long-term scenarios play a leading role in future-oriented studies on global environmental change. The climate change and energy research group is creating new scenarios that integrate future changes in climate and society to explore not only climate influences but also alternatives for mitigation and adaptation, for example, the qualitative explanations of future changes in demographics, human development, economy and lifestyle, policies and institutions, technology and environment and natural resources [29].
Second, the quantitative approach of energy research is relevant to statistical/mathematical tools. Commonly, it has been based on economics, so it is based on cross-country data, uses panel econometric models to explore the causes of sustainable and renewable energy, in which it is used as a dependent variable [43]. In addition, the literature review has been used widely to analyze or visualize the trends of different energy research approaches, for example, policy studies [44], technology innovation system [45,46], urban studies [32], multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) [34,47].
Last, the combined approach uses both types of methods to provide better support for policymakers given the increasing on robust evidence for policy [48]. Particularly, its role has recognized more important for multidisciplinary energy research because economics, to which the current energy research is biased, focuses on quantitative approach while the other disciplines, which should be considered to include human sciences, depend on qualitative approach commonly [2]. For example, Geels, Berkhout and van Vuuren [14] distinguished three types of analytical approach for evaluating future-oriented pathways for energy policy, that is, quantitative systems modeling, socio-technical analysis (qualitative) and initiative-based learning (qualitative). They suggested bridging, based on the serial and collaborative formulation of different approaches, may produce a more thorough and useful chain of judgments to help policy formation and action for low-carbon transitions. Moreover, as for energy technology innovation perspective, the combined approach has become more common amongst future-oriented technology analysis (FTA) scholars and practitioners [48]. In particular, the participatory method is useful for multidisciplinary energy research where the consequence demands the active collaboration of different types of stakeholders [13]. The combined approach based on the participatory method can decrease uncertainty in energy development, in which various stakeholders participate in the decision-making process, taking into account a wide range of social, economic, environmental and technical criteria, for example, combining scenario planning and participatory multi-criteria assessment (MCA) [49].
Thus, for multidisciplinary energy research, combining both approaches, that is, qualitative and quantitative, is recognized inevitable. Therefore, aiming to include multidisciplinary perspectives, this study adopts the combined approach in the following four ways: it uses scenario analysis and brainstorming (qualitative); it applies text-mining techniques to identifying topics and related experts for preparing multidisciplinary group discussions (quantitative); it hosts multidisciplinary group discussions (combined approach); and multi-criteria decision-making is finally used to evaluate (quantitative approach).

1.5. Purpose and Organization of This Paper

To resolve the above-mentioned problems and challenging issues, this paper proposes a systematic approach, which enables to establish future-oriented and multidisciplinary group discussions and generates the EP&Ts for the future society’s sustainability under climate change by hosting the future-oriented and multidisciplinary group discussions.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 outlines the proposed methodology and explains it in detail. Section 3 presents the results of applying the suggested methodology to South Korea and Section 4 compares this study to the previous energy research works and provides guidelines for the real-world application, limitations and future works to overcome the limitations. Finally, Section 5 presents the conclusions with a reflection on the contributions of the paper and the meaning of the findings.

2. Materials and Methods

To resolve problems and challenging issues, which are described in Introduction, this paper suggests a methodology to elicit EP&Ts from the multidisciplinary perspectives, that is, the human sciences. The proposed methodology is composed of four steps, as described in Figure 1 and the following subsections explain details of Figure 1. By default, each step is executed by a project’s researchers, who prepare and host a series of multidisciplinary group discussions.

2.1. Investigate Future Issues and Future Technologies That Are Relevant to Energy

Figure 2 shows the initial step of the proposed methodology. In detail, first, general future trends and general future technologies are investigated as input data from the previous environmental scanning studies. For each of general future trends, problems and challenging issues in terms of energy are brainstormed and defined as energy-related future issues, as shown in Reference [50]. Then, among the general future technologies, the subset of general future technologies is linked to each of energy-related future issues. That is, the general future technologies that are relevant to energy-related future issues are identified and they are defined as the energy-related future technologies. In the end, the keywords for both energy-related future trends and energy-related future technologies are defined.

2.2. Identify Topics for Multidisciplinary Group Discussions Using Text-Mining Techniques

In this paper, four disciplines are considered to integrate the human sciences within the energy domain, that is, Disciplines = {di|social sciences, economics, humanities, arts}. Based on this definition, Figure 3 describes how to identify topics and decide a keynote topic for the multidisciplinary group discussion of the target ith discipline, namely, di. By repeating the same processes for the other disciplines, multidisciplinary group discussions are planned for all disciplines.
To explain Figure 3, first, research papers are searched and collected from the category of the target discipline, di, by using the keywords of energy-related future issues and energy-related future technologies. This is possible because most of the digital libraries classify research papers into different disciplines, for example, MDPI (https://www.mdpi.com), SpringerLink (https://www.springer.com), Sage Journals (http://journals.sagepub.com) and ScienceDirect (https://www.sciencedirect.com). Then, the collected research papers, namely, Papersi, are represented by their keywords, which are integrated from three sources: (i) the keywords of energy-related future issues; (ii) the keywords of energy-related future technologies; and (iii) the keywords that are provided by their authors. Next, they are grouped as the clusters of Papersi by using a clustering algorithm.
These clusters are defined as the energy-specific future trends of di, that is, EnergyFutureTrendsi = {eij| the energy-specific future trends of target discipline di}. The eij is labelled with its keywords, which are manually selected by reviewing the keywords of its research articles, that is, Keywordsij = {wijk|1 ≤ km when the m is the number keywords used to represent eij}. Here, m is set as five for this study by referring to the previous studies [51]. Subsequently, eij is evaluated by
trendscoreij = ni/T,
where ni is the number of research articles, published in the recent years T and searched by the m keywords of eij. Then, the eij with the highest trendscoreij, namely, ei*, is selected as the keynote topic for the target discipline, di.

2.3. Identify and Invite Experts to Multidisciplinary Group Discussions by Visualizing Strategic Maps

Once the keynote topics for all disciplines in Disciplines are found and decided, experts to be invited to a multidisciplinary group discussion are identified for each discipline, di, in two types: (i) a keynote speaker, who is an expert from di and suggests a presentation on the keynote topic of di; and (ii) cross-disciplinary experts, who come from the other disciplines, that is, Disciplines(dji) and debate on the keynote topic of di from the perspectives of their disciplines. Figure 4 illustrates the steps of identifying the two types of experts to be invited, which are repeated for all disciplines in Disciplines. It details can be explained as follows:
First, given a target discipline, di, the authors of the research papers in Papersi are collected as the candidates of experts to be invited, namely, Authorsi = {aij}. The candidates are evaluated by
expertscore ij = n p i j × n r i j .
In Equation (2), npij is the normalized value of pij that is the number of research papers, published by aij over the T years, given by
n p i j = p i j max j ( p i j ) ,
where pij is the number of the research papers, published by aij over the T years. And nrij is the normalized value of rij that is the most recent publication year of the research papers, published by aij, defined as
n r i j = max j ( r i j ) r i j T ,
where rij is the most recent publication year of the research papers, published by aij.
Then, the strategic map is constructed to visualize the position of aij according to npij and nrij with expertscoreij and his/her relevance to the keynote topic of di. In the strategic map, the authors that are related to the keynote topic of di, namely, TopicAuthorsi, are asked to be a keynote speaker on the keynote topic with the highest score order until the keynote speaker, namely, ai*, is decided. For example, the strategic map in Figure 5 shows that: ai3, ai6 and ai7 are the authors in Authors(ei*); the order of invitations for a keynote speaker is ‘ai7 ⟶ ai3 ⟶ ai6’ according to expertscoreij; and ai3 is decided as the keynote speaker for d1.
Subsequently, after the keynote speaker of the target discipline di is decided, the authors of di except the determined keynote speaker are asked individually to participate as a cross-disciplinary expert for the multidisciplinary group discussion of the other discipline dji. For example, if i is set to 1 in Figure 5, the authors except the keynote speakers, that is, a1j≠3, are asked to participate as cross-disciplinary experts for the multidisciplinary group discussions of the other disciplines, that is, d2, d3 and d4. And this may result in that a1,2 is selected as a cross-disciplinary expert, who discuss about the issue of the discipline d2 from the perspective of the discipline d1. Similarly, a1,4 for the discipline d3 and a1,1 for the discipline d4.

2.4. Elicit Future-Oriented EP&Ts by Hosting a Series of Multidisciplinary Group Discussions

In this step, as shown in Figure 6, the multidisciplinary group discussion for each discipline, di, is hosted with the keynote topic and experts, identified in the previous Section 2.3, in order to extract more meaningful implications from the multidisciplinary perspectives. Before the multidisciplinary group discussion of di takes place, experts are provided with the outputs of the previous three subsections: (i) general future trends, general future technologies, energy-related future issues and energy-related future technologies from the Section 2.1; (ii) the energy-specific future trends and keynote topic of di from the Section 2.2 and (iii) the experts of di from the Section 2.3.
To manage a multidisciplinary group discussion more effectively, the keynote presentation slides, which are prepared by a keynote speaker, are shared among experts before the multidisciplinary group discussion occurs. Then, each cross-disciplinary expert is guided to prepare their information and opinions, which are related to the keynote topic, from his/her cross-disciplinary perspectives. Such comments are also shared among experts before the multidisciplinary group discussion day. This preparation in advance helps experts to discuss more actively on the day of the multidisciplinary group discussion.
Next, when the multidisciplinary group discussion takes place, the keynote presentation about the keynote topic is made and subsequently the invited experts share their questions and directions about energy-specific future trends, eij, particularly focused on the keynote topic, ei*. Then, they discuss to elicit EP&Ts as countermeasures for the questions and directions, that is, fijFutureEnergyP&Ti. In the end, by repeating the above steps for all disciplines, the future-oriented EP&Ts are obtained for all disciplines in Disciplines.

2.5. Evaluating the Priorities among Future-Oriented EP&Ts

Figure 7 illustrates steps to obtain the top priority EP&T for each discipline. To explain, first, for the target discipline, di, an energy-specific future trend with the most number of related future-oriented EP&Ts is selected and defined as a core energy-specific future trend, namely, eicore. Defining the core energy-specific future trend for di makes it possible for us to identify and focus on more important energy-specific future trend. Subsequently, the three feature values of the future-oriented EP&Ts for di, fij, are measured by
l i j = { 1   if   one   of   energy-specific   future   trends ,   to   which   f i j   linked ,   is   selected   as   e i core , 0   otherwise . } ,
n q i j = q i j q i max ,
n c i j = c i j c i max ,
where qij is the number of related questions to the energy-specific future trends, eij, linked to fij, qimax is the maximum value of qij, cij is the number of related conclusions to the energy-specific future trends, eij, linked to fij and cimax is the maximum value of cij. Then, the priority value of the future-oriented EP&T, fij, is measured by
p r i o r i t y i j = w 1 × l i j + w 2 × n q i j + w 3 × n c i j ,
where weights are adjustable by experts but w i = 1 . In the end, the top-priority future-oriented EP&T for di is selected based on the measured priority values, that is, fi*. The above process is repeated for all disciplines in Disciplines and the repetitions lead to the top-priority future-oriented EP&T for each of the disciplines.

3. Results

Under climate change, like many other countries, South Korea has also tried to make strategies on EP&Ts for global and national sustainability. As mentioned in Section 1. Introduction, the policy and R&D for energy has been limited, one-dimensional, also in South Korea. Therefore, the proposed methodology was applied to get future-oriented EP&Ts from the multidisciplinary perspectives for South Korea to survive under climate change. This Section 3 illustrates how the proposed methodology was used to generate future-oriented EP&Ts from the multidisciplinary group discussions by using text-mining for South Korean to sustain under climate change. The four subsections in Section 2 to apply the proposed methodology to South Korea were performed as follows:
Regarding Section 2.1, 35 general future trends and 15 general future technologies were initially collected from five domestic/international outlook reports on future society. Each future outlook data contains future trends derived from existing internal and external data collection, research, expert discussion, self-study and keyword analysis based on news articles. Table A1 and Table A2 of the Appendix A list up the general future trends and general future technologies. Next, as shown in Table A3 of the Appendix A, 27 energy-related future issues were generated by referring to the general future trends and their keywords were defined manually by three researchers in futures studies. Then, for each energy-related future issue, their related general future trends were listed and their related general future technologies were defined as energy-related future technologies.
Next, related to Section 2.2, 14 energy-specific future trends were identified by grouping the 101 research articles searched from DBpia (http://www.dbpia.co.kr) when the time T in this paper was set as the 10 years from 2007 to 2017 and they are listed in as shown in Table 1. Here, for the clustering algorithm, this study used k-means with the number of clusters, provided by the statistical package, NbCluster (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/NbClust) and the keywords of each cluster were selected manually from the keywords of the cluster’s research articles. In addition, the topic, which was selected for the multidisciplinary group discussion of each discipline, is highlighted in Table 1.
Subsequently, regarding the Section 2.3, Figure 8 shows the constructed strategic map for inviting a keynote speaker and cross-disciplinary experts for each discipline. Using the strategic maps, experts to be invited initially were identified and invited. If the expert informed that they could not attend the multidisciplinary group discussion, they were asked to recommend the other expert as a suitable alternative, who was able to attend the multidisciplinary group discussion.
In addition, related to Section 2.4, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 list up the three types of outputs, resulted by hosting a series of four multidisciplinary group discussions: 50 questions, 33 directions and 28 future-oriented EP&Ts. Table 5 shows the relationships between future-oriented EP&Ts and energy-specific future trends, obtained by referring to Table 2 and Table 4.
Finally, regarding Section 2.5, Table 6 shows the four core energy-specific future trends, selected among the energy-specific future trends in terms of the number of their related future-oriented EP&Ts and they are as: (i) promotion of new energy industry, e1,3, for the economics discipline, d1; (ii) transition to sustainable civil society, e2,2, for the humanities discipline, d2; (iii) increasing importance of procedural democracy in the formulation and enforcement of energy policy, e3,1, for the social sciences discipline, d3; and (iv) expansion of eco-friendly and low-energy indoor and outdoor design, e4,1, for the arts discipline, d4.
Moreover, as shown in Table 7, future-oriented EP&Ts that related to each energy-specific future trend, eij, were identified as fij. Table 7 also illustrates the priorities among the future-oriented EP&Ts within each discipline. The top-priority future-oriented EP&T for each discipline is as follows: (i) real-time plan for electricity usage, f1,5 and purchase system, specialized for green energy products, f1,6, for d1; (ii) cooperation association for sustainability, f2,4 and donating self-produced energy, f2,6, for d2; (iii) social media-based energy policy portal, f3,1, for d3; and (iv) expert system designing environment-friendly and low-energy indoor and outdoor design, f4,1, for d4.

4. Discussion

As mentioned in Section 1, there is a research gap that the multidisciplinary energy research that integrates human sciences is at a standstill and few previous works have considered both energy policy and energy technology from the multidisciplinary perspectives. This study contributes to filling the research gap.
In detail, Table 8 shows the comparisons of this study to the previous energy research works and it highlights that this study fills the research gap by proposing a systematic approach, which has novelty in four ways: it is future-oriented; it takes into account multidisciplinary perspectives; it presents a balanced view of both focuses, that is, energy policy and energy technology; and it combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches that are recognized inevitable for the multidisciplinary energy research.
Moreover, for implementing the proposed methodology in a real-world environment, here are guidelines, which were learned from the application of this paper’s methodology to South Korea in Section 3. In other words, while text-mining techniques were used to identify topics and experts for planning a series of multidisciplinary group discussions over the four disciplines, it was found that there were more to consider in practicing such plans in a real-world environment and they can be summarized as follows:
First, occasionally an expert, who agreed to attend a multidisciplinary group discussion, informed that he/she could not attend the multidisciplinary group discussion just a couple of days before hosting the multidisciplinary group discussion. In this case, the recommendations for a suitable alternative were requested to the expert and the recommended experts were taken into account for additional invitations with the other candidates, who were identified at first but not yet invited.
Second, to increase the possibility of an expert’s accepting an invitation to a multidisciplinary group discussion, his/her research papers that can be presented or discussed about the identified topic were attached to the invitation email. Eventually, they were used as a sort of guidelines on how the expert prepare the discussion.
Third, experts were less hesitant to accept the invitations when they were contacted simultaneously through various communication channels, for example, an e-mail, phone call, short message service (SMS) and social media like Facebook and Twitter.
Fourth, to activate discussions among the experts, who agreed to attend to a multidisciplinary group discussion, the outputs from Section 2.1, Section 2.2 and Section 2.3 were shared with the experts before the multidisciplinary group discussion and the experts were requested to share two or three sentences with the others before the multidisciplinary group discussion. This helped make the invited experts get more prepared for and more involved in discussions.
Also, this study has some limitations and future works can be made to overcome those limitations. Details are as follows:
First, the topics and experts in this paper were identified from the searched research articles but future works may additionally use more various data sources to identify the topics and experts, for example, news articles and blogs. In particular, the outcomes from a one-time execution may be biased to the opinions of experts, participated in the multidisciplinary group discussions. Hence, the process can be executed repeatedly with including different experts so it can reflect as various expert opinions as possible. However, as the duration of a repetition may take a long time, it is required to develop an automatic system of the proposed methodology, which can help lead to more objectivity and specificity in results.
Second, this paper suggested the two types of measures to choose the keynote topics among the clusters of the collected research articles but there can be more useful measures. Similarly, in evaluating experts, the three types of measures were used but there might exist the other indexes, more effective for finding out the proper experts.
Third, to share and spread the results of multidisciplinary and future-oriented EP&Ts, it is necessary to let the different kinds of people, for example, student, housewife and agricultural worker, participate in the process. Thus, the web-based or mobile-based system can be researched and developed to make the proposed methodology more available to the various stakeholders, who want to join in the multidisciplinary group discussions to generate future-oriented EP&Ts.
Fourth, to make the proposed methodology bring about a change in the real world, helpful in achieving the goal of sustainability, the application of the proposed methodology needs to be performed periodically as a filter. By doing so, the current energy policy and technological development can have a future-oriented direction and reflect the multidisciplinary perspectives. However, no software is available for the beneficiary of the proposed methodology. Hence, to ease the periodical applications, the system development should be planned and made as follow-up work.
Moreover, for the real-world applications, the detailed plans with actionable items should be worked out after finishing all steps of the proposed methodology because the resulted future-oriented EP&Ts are highly generalized without actionable items. In making such detailed plans, experts who participated in the multidisciplinary group discussions also need to be invited as advisors so the multidisciplinary perspectives are not diluted but kept through follow-up discussions. Moreover, the proposed methodology can be improved by including more steps, which make experts do more detailed group studies and consider bias-related concerns. Then, it will help lead to specific actionable outcomes without just repeating the phase of the multidisciplinary group discussions.
Lastly, the proposed methodology in this paper is applicable to the other countries, for example, USA, China and Japan, as well as to the other areas, for example, generating future-oriented policies and technologies from the multidisciplinary group discussions about the artificial intelligence or robot.

5. Conclusions

This paper aimed to propose a multidisciplinary approach for energy research, which systematically integrates human sciences in energy domain, in order to resolve the limits to policymakers’ taking multidisciplinary perspectives for agenda-setting and policy-making on future-oriented energy issues under climate change. In particular, the suggested methodology applied text-mining techniques to designing multidisciplinary group discussions for different disciplines by identifying topics and experts and it generated future-oriented EP&Ts from the hosted multidisciplinary group discussions.
By doing so, in this paper contributes to the literature as follows: First, to our best knowledge, this paper is the first trial for building up future-oriented strategies from the balanced and multidisciplinary perspectives. Second, it adopted the text-mining techniques and visualization approach to find out topics and related experts for planning the multidisciplinary group discussions. This helps to design and develop an information system, which automates the proposed methodology. Third, this study dealt with the challenging issue that the integration of the traditional group discussion with the recent big data analytics needs to be tried, while most of the previous works are not considering both data-driven and discussion-driven sides for generating ideas to solve current issues.
By the application of the proposed methodology to South Korea, 28 future-oriented EP&Ts were generated from the multidisciplinary perspectives of the experts (See Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4) and four core energy-specific future trends were chosen among them (See Table 5 and Table 6). Subsequently, by focusing on the future-oriented EP&Ts, linked to the four core energy-specific future trends, the top-priority future-oriented EP&T was selected for each discipline. This led to generating six future-oriented EP&Ts in total (See Table 7) and they should be put first when the government of South Korean hopes to practice energy policy and develop energy technologies, valuable from future-oriented and multidisciplinary perspectives. Hence, if they are practiced preferentially with detailed plans by South Korea, that will eventually help South Korean to prepare the future society and manage to be sustainable under climate change. Such application results can also be used as a reference for the other countries.

Funding

This study was partly supported by the fund of research promotion program, Gyeongsang National University, 2017 and the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant (NRF-2017R1C1B1010065), funded by the Korean Government.

Acknowledgments

This study was initiated by an 8-month project, which was supported by Korean Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning and the Ministry of Industry and Commerce. I am grateful to the staff members of the project, who helped me prepare and host a series of multidisciplinary group discussions and many experts, who attended to the multidisciplinary group discussions and gave valuable discussions. I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that helped revise the original version of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. The list of general future trends, surveyed from the previous works.
Table A1. The list of general future trends, surveyed from the previous works.
No.General Future TrendKeywords in Korea (English)Type of Discipline 1References 2
d1d2d3d4r1r2r3r4r5
1Hyper-connected society초연결 (hyper-connected), 사회 (society)
2Low growth and shift in growth strategies저성장 (low growth), 불황 (recession)
3Digital economy디지털 (digital), 경제 (economy)
4Job insecurity직업 (job), 고용 (employment), 불안 (insecurity)
5Manufacturing revolution제조업 (manufacturing), 혁명 (revolution), 혁신 (innovation)
6Bipolarized industrial structure산업 (industry), 양극화 (bipolarization)
7Financial crisis재정 (finance), 유동성 (liquidity), 위기 (crisis)
8Technology for human need and happiness인간중심 (human-centered), 행복 (happiness), 필요 (need)
9The extension of donation and share기부 (donation), 공유 (sharing)
10The emphasis on creativity based on the humanities인문학 (the humanities), 창의성 (creativity), 협력 (cooperation)
11The emphasis on sympathy and unification among different classes계층 (class), 통합 (integration), 세대 (generation), 공감 (sympathy)
12Low fertility and super-aging society저출산 (low fertility), 고령화 (aging)
13Population growth인구증가 (population growth)
14Social inequality소득양극화 (income bipolarization), 불공정 (unfair), 갈등 (conflict)
15Unstable life of future generations미래세대 (future generation), 일자리 (job), 주거 (housing), 불안정 (insecurity), 갈등 (conflict), 좌절 (frustration)
16The emphasis on the quality of life일과 삶 균형 (work-life balance), 여가활동 (leisure), 삶의 질 (the quality of life), 웰빙 (well-being)
17Multiculturalism다문화 (multiple cultures), 이민자 (immigrant), 외국인 (foreigner), 종교 (religion)
18Change in traditional family system1인가구 (single-person household), 결혼 (marriage), 부양 (support), 양육 (nurture), 독거노인 (single-elderly household)
19Credentialism and excessive competition in education 학력 중심 (credentialism), 경쟁적 교육 (competitive education), 입시위주 (focusing only on college entrance)
20Aggravating gender inequality남녀 불평등 (gender inequality)
21Fight against incurable diseases in the homo-hundred era난치병 (incurable disease), 인공장기 (artificial organ), 유전자 조작 (gene manipulation), 의료 (medical treatment)
22Cyber crime사이버 범죄 (cyber crime), 피싱 (phishing), 저작권 침해 (infringement of copyright), 개인정보 유출 (data spill), 명예훼손 (defamation), 사기 (fraud)
23Securing the right to leisure여가 (leisure), 향유 (enjoyment), 노령층 (elderly people)
24Reinforcement for persons and groups with social network service개인 (person), 집단 (group), 스마트 몹 (smart mob), 소셜미디어 (social media), 소셜네트워크서비스 (social network service, SNS)
25Food and energy security음식 (food), 에너지 (energy), 안보 (security)
26Geopolitical conflict with neighboring countries지정학적 (geopolitical), 갈등 (conflict), 주변국가 (neighboring countries)
27National security국가 (nation), 안보 (security)
28e-Democracy전자 (electronic), 인터넷 (internet), 민주주의 (democracy), 정부 (government)
29Global governance경제 블록 (economic bloc), 국제질서 (international order), 다극화 (multipolarization), 상호의존 (interdependence), 파트너쉽 (partnership)
30Terrorism테러 (terrorism), 공격 (attack), 정치 (politics), 사회 (society), 종교 (religion), 민족주의 (nationalism)
31Disaster risk재난 (disaster), 위험 (danger), 전염병 (infectious disease), 사고 (accident)
32Energy shortage and resource depletion에너지 (energy), 자원 (resource), 고갈 (depletion), 가격 상승 (price rise)
33Climate change and natural disaster기후 변화 (climate change), 자연재해 (natural disaster)
34Growing cross-border environmental impact국가간 환경영향 (cross-country environmental effect), 대기오염 (air pollution), 미세먼지 (fine dust), 해양 오염 (marine pollution), 유류유출 (oil spill)
35Nuclear safety원자력 (nuclear energy), 안전 (safety)
Notes: 1 The economics (d1), the humanities (d2), the social sciences (d3) and the arts (d4) 2 References that provided future trends for this study are as follows: future issue report: South Korea after 10 years (r1), published by Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP), Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP) and Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) in 2015, available at http://www.kistep.re.kr/c3/sub2_2.jsp?brdType=R&bbIdx=9888; ECOsight 3.0: forecasts on future technologies (r2), published by Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) in 2015, available at http://www.kati.or.kr/news/news04.php?ptype=view&idx=127211; Long-term trend analysis and forecasts on cultural and artistic trends (r3), published by Korea Culture & Tourism Institute (KCTI) in 2014 available at http://www.kcti.re.kr/03_1.dmw?method=view&reportId=100&isSearch=false&reportCategory=-1&reportTitle=false&userName=false&reportContent=false&reportSeq=1033&pageNum=2&groupNum=1; The 15 megatrends of Korean society (r4), published by National Information society Agency (NIA) in 2010 and available at http://www.nipa.kr/know/trandInformationView.it?identifier=02-004-110406-000001&menuNo=26&page=30; and 2015 Trend Code (r5), published by Korea Institute of Design Promotion (KIDP) available at http://www.designdb.com/?menuno=785&bbsno=18831&act=view&ztag=rO0ABXQANDxjYWxsIHR5cGU9ImJvYXJkIiBubz0iNTg3IiBza2luPSJwaG90b19iYnMiPjwvY2FsbD4%3D.
Table A2. General future technologies, surveyed by the previous work r1 of Table A1.
Table A2. General future technologies, surveyed by the previous work r1 of Table A1.
No.General Future TechnologyDescription 1Keywords in Korean (English)
1Internet of thingsThe network of physical devices, vehicles, home appliances and other items embedded with electronics, software, sensors, actuators and connectivity which enables these objects to connect and exchange data사물인터넷 (Internet of things)
2Big data analyticsThe use of advanced analytic techniques against big data, that is, very large, diverse data sets that include different types such as structured/unstructured and streaming/batch and different sizes빅데이터 (big data), 분석 (analytics)
3Artificial intelligenceThe simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially computer systems인공지능 (artificial intelligence)
4Virtual realityA computer-generated scenario that simulates a realistic experience가상현실 (virtual reality)
5Wearable deviceSmart electronic devices (electronic device with micro-controllers) that can be worn on the body as implants or accessories웨어러블 (wearable), 기기 (device), 컴퓨터 (computer)
6Stem cellUndifferentiated biological cells that can differentiate into specialized cells and can divide (through mitosis) to produce more stem cells줄기세포 (stem cell)
7Genetic engineering and molecular biologyThe direct manipulation of an organism’s genes using biotechnology; and a branch of biochemistry which concerns the molecular basis of biological activity between biomolecules in the various systems of a cell, including the interactions between DNA, RNA and proteins and their biosynthesis, as well as the regulation of these interactions유전공학 (genetic engineer), 분자생물학 (molecular biology)
8Molecular imagingA type of medical imaging that provides the detailed pictures of what is happening inside the body at the molecular and cellular level분자영상 (molecular imaging), 세포 (cell), 영상 (image)
9NanomaterialThe materials of which a single unit is sized (in at least one dimension) between 1 to 1000 nanometers (10−9 m) but usually is 1 to 100 nm (the usual definition of nanoscale)나노 (nano), 소재 (material)
103D printerProcesses in which material is joined or solidified under computer control to create a three-dimensional object, with material being added together (such as liquid molecules or powder grains being fused together)3D 프린터 (3D printer)
11New renewable energyEnergy that is collected from renewable resources, which are naturally replenished on a human timescale, such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides, waves and geothermal heat재생에너지 (renewable energy), 대체에너지 (alternative energy)
12Greenhouse gas reductionProcesses to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gas, for example, CO2 and CH4, or to capture the greenhouse gas in Earth’s atmosphere온실가스 (greenhouse gas), 감축 (reduction)
13Energy resource recycleThe energy recovery process of utilizing energy that would normally be wasted, usually by converting it into electricity or thermal energy에너지 재활용 (energy recycle), 자원 재활용 (resource recycle)
14Space explorationThe ongoing discovery and exploration of celestial structures in outer space by means of continuously evolving and growing space technology우주개발 (space development)
15Nuclear energyThe use of nuclear reactions that release nuclear energy to generate heat, which most frequently is then used in steam turbines to produce electricity in a nuclear power plant원자력 (nuclear energy)
Notes: 1 Descriptions are referred to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org).
Table A3. Future issues and future technologies that are energy-related.
Table A3. Future issues and future technologies that are energy-related.
No.Energy-Related Future IssueKeywords in Korean (English)Related General Future TrendsRelated General Future Technologies
1What kind of strategies is necessary in supplying energy (electric power) to drive the platform that makes up hyper-connected society in a stable manner?초연결 사회 (hyper-connected society), 플랫폼 (platform), 에너지 공급 (energy supply), 전략 (strategy)Hyper-connected societyInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Wearable device, Nuclear energy
2What are the energy policy and technology to overcome low growth?저성장 (low growth)Low growth and shift in growth strategiesNanomaterial, Greenhouse gas reduction, New renewable energy, Space exploration
3How will energy supply and consumption patterns change with the advent of the sharing economy era? And what is the relevant technology for this?에너지 공급 (energy supply), 에너지 소비 (energy consumption), 행태 변화 (pattern change), 공유 경제 (sharing economy)Digital economyInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Wearable device
4What is possible as a start-up to improve the bipolarized energy industry structure?스타트업 (start-up), 양극화 (bipolarization), 에너지 산업구조 (energy industry structure)Bipolarized industrial structureInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Wearable device, Nanomaterial, Greenhouse gas reduction, New renewable energy
5What are the ways to secure financial resources and liquidity by using energy resources?재정 (finance), 유동성 (liquidity), 확보 (securement), 에너지 자원 (energy resource)Financial crisisNew renewable energy
6What are the energy technologies and methods, which can contribute to human society?인간중심 (human-centered), 행복 (happiness), 에너지 기술 (energy technology, 정책 (policy), 방법 (method)Technology for human need and happinessInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Wearable device, Nanomaterial, Greenhouse gas reduction, New renewable energy
7What is the method for donating or sharing energy?에너지 기부 (energy donation), 에너지 공유 (energy sharing)The extension of donation and shareNew renewable energy
8What is the future energy technology with creativity based on the humanities?인문학 (the humanities), 창의성 (creativity), 미래 (future), 에너지 기술 (energy technology)The emphasis on creativity based on the humanitiesInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Wearable device, Genetic engineering and molecular biology, Nanomaterial, New renewable energy, Nuclear energy, Space exploration
9What is the energy policy and technology for future generations?미래세대 (future generation)Unstable life of future generationsGenetic engineering and molecular biology, Nanomaterial, New renewable energy, Nuclear energy, Space exploration
10What are the ways that each employer can use energy policy to recognize the importance of personal quality of life?개인 (person), 삶의 질 (the quality of life)The emphasis on the quality of lifeInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Wearable device
11How should energy policy be implemented to protect international immigrants from energy deprivation?다문화 (multiple cultures), 국제적인 (international), 이민자 (immigrant)Multiculturalism-
12What is an efficient energy source and heating system, which is suitable for single-person households?1인가구 (single-person household), 냉방 (air-conditioning), 난방 (heating)Change in traditional family systemInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Wearable device, Nanomaterial, New renewable energy, Nuclear energy
13What is an effective energy supply technology for the operation of equipment for intractable disease management?난치병 (incurable disease), 관리 (management), 기기 (device), 에너지 공급 (energy supply)Fight against incurable diseases in the homo-hundred eraInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Wearable device, Nanomaterial
14What are the ways to safeguard public and private energy facilities from cyber crime?사이버 범죄 (cyber crime), 에너지 설비 (energy facilities)Cyber crimeInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence
15How can energy production and leisure activities be connected?에너지 생산 (energy production), 여가활동 (leisure activity)Securing the right to leisureInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Wearable device, New renewable energy
16How can SNS be used to effectively communicate energy issues and policies to the public?정보 전달 (information delivery), 소셜네트워크서비스 (social network service, SNS)Reinforcement for a person and groups with social network serviceInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence
17What is the strategy for energy security?에너지 (energy), 안보 (security)Food and energy security-
18What is the strategy to resolve conflicts with the neighboring countries that are related to the submarine energy resource interests?주변국 (neighboring countries), 해저 에너지 자원 (submarine energy resource), 이권 갈등 (conflicts for privileges)Geopolitical conflict with neighboring countries-
19How should South Korea cooperate with North Korean to develop the North Korea’s energy source? What kind of energy technology is necessary for South Korea to prepare for the sudden increase in energy demand in unification with North Korea?북한 (North Korea), 에너지 자원 (energy resource), 개발 (development), 통일 (unification), 협력 (cooperation), 에너지 수요 (energy demands), 에너지 궁핍 (energy poverty)National securityInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Wearable device, 3D printer, New renewable energy, Greenhouse gas reduction, New renewable energy, Space exploration
20Is it realistic for each citizen to take part directly in deciding energy policy through e-Democracy? At what level is it feasible?전자 민주주의 (e-Democracy), 직접 참여 (direct participation), 에너지 정책 결정(deciding energy policy)e-DemocracyBig data analytics, Artificial intelligence
21What is the international situation surrounding energy? What is our strategy for survival?국제적 상황 (international situation), 생존 전략 (strategy for survival)Global governance-
22What technologies are needed to protect major national energy facilities from massive terrorist attacks and to minimize the impact of large-scale terrorist attacks?테러 (terrorism), 공격 (attack), 예방 (prevention), 보호 (protection), 피해 최소화 (minimizing losses)TerrorismInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, New renewable energy, Space exploration
23What is the way to get energy continuously in the event of a disaster?재난 (disaster), 에너지 공급 (energy supply)Disaster riskInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Wearable device, Nanomaterial, New renewable energy
24What are the current status of alternative energies? What is the best among the alternative energies in terms of economy?대체 에너지 (alternative energy), 신 에너지 (new energy), 경제성 (economic feasibility)Energy shortage and resource depletionBig data analytics, Artificial intelligence
25What are the latest alternatives and limitations for CO2 reduction and what are future technologies to overcome those limitations?이산화탄소 (carbon dioxide), CO2, 절감 (reduction)Climate change and natural disasterInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Wearable device, Nanomaterial, New renewable energy, Greenhouse gas reduction
26What is the energy policy to compensate for the damage caused by the environmental impacts between countries?국가간 (cross-country), 환경 영향 (environmental effect), 피해 보상 (compensation for loss)Crisis in biodiversityInternet of things, Big data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Nanomaterial, New renewable energy
27What is the future energy technology, which is needed to solve nuclear safety issues?원자력 (nuclear energy), 안전 (safety)Nuclear energyGreenhouse gas reduction, New renewable energy, Nuclear energy, Space exploration

References

  1. Liu, J.; Mooney, H.; Hull, V.; Davis, S.J.; Gaskell, J.; Hertel, T.; Lubchenco, J.; Seto, K.C.; Gleick, P.; Kremen, C.; et al. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science 2015, 347, 1258832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hoppe, T.; Coenen, F.; van den Berg, M. Illustrating the use of concepts from the discipline of policy studies in energy research: An explorative literature review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2016, 21, 12–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sovacool, B.K. Diversity: Energy studies need social science. Nature 2014, 511, 529–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Holm, P.; Winiwarter, V. Climate change studies and the human sciences. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2017, 156, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dressel, G.; Heimerl, K.; Berger, W.; Winiwarter, V. Interdisziplinäres und transdisziplinäres Forschen organisieren. In Interdisziplinär und Transdisziplinär Forschen; Praktiken und Methoden: Bielefeld, Germany, 2014; pp. 207–212. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sovacool, B.K. What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2014, 1, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Reichardt, K.; Negro, S.O.; Rogge, K.S.; Hekkert, M.P. Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: The case of offshore wind in Germany. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 2016, 106, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gallagher, K.S.; Holdren, J.P.; Sagar, A.D. Energy-Technology Innovation. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2006, 31, 193–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gallagher, K.S.; Grübler, A.; Kuhl, L.; Nemet, G.; Wilson, C. The Energy Technology Innovation System. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2012, 37, 137–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Long, T.B.; Blok, V.; Coninx, I. Barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture in Europe: Evidence from The Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Eriksen, S.H.; Nightingale, A.J.; Eakin, H. Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2015, 35, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mardani, A.; Jusoh, A.; Zavadskas, E.; Cavallaro, F.; Khalifah, Z. Sustainable and Renewable Energy: An Overview of the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques and Approaches. Sustainability 2015, 7, 13947–13984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schaper-Rinkel, P. The role of future-oriented technology analysis in the governance of emerging technologies: The example of nanotechnology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 2013, 80, 444–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Geels, F.W.; Berkhout, F.; van Vuuren, D.P. Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 6, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Y.J.; Abakr, Y.A.; Qi, Q.; You, X.K.; Zhou, J.P. Energy efficiency assessment of fixed asset investment projects—A case study of a Shenzhen combined-cycle power plant. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 59, 1195–1208. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yu, B.Y.; Zhang, J.Y.; Fujiwara, A. Evaluating the direct and indirect rebound effects in household energy consumption behavior: A case study of Beijing. Energy Policy 2013, 57, 441–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nik, V.M. Making energy simulation easier for future climate—Synthesizing typical and extreme weather data sets out of regional climate models (RCMs). Appl. Energy 2016, 177, 204–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hagenmeyer, V.; Cakmak, H.K.; Dupmeier, C.; Faulwasser, T.; Isele, J.; Keller, H.B.; Kohlhepp, P.; Kuhnapfel, U.; Stucky, U.; Waczowicz, S.; et al. Information and Communication Technology in Energy Lab 2.0: Smart Energies System Simulation and Control Center with an Open-Street-Map-Based Power Flow Simulation Example. Energy Technol. 2016, 4, 145–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Roshan, G.R.; Orosa, J.A.; Nasrabadi, T. Simulation of climate change impact on energy consumption in buildings, case study of Iran. Energy Policy 2012, 49, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Azam, M.; Khan, A.Q.; Zafeiriou, E.; Arabatzis, G. Socio-economic determinants of energy consumption: An empirical survey for Greece. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 57, 1556–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Al Irsyad, M.I.; Nepal, R. A survey based approach to estimating the benefits of energy efficiency improvements in street lighting systems in Indonesia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 1569–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, J.; Xin, Y.J.; Tong, D.D. Energy consumption quota of public buildings based on statistical analysis. Energy Policy 2012, 43, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, X.J.; Liu, D.D. Comparative Study of Hybrid Models Based on a Series of Optimization Algorithms and Their Application in Energy System Forecasting. Energies 2016, 9, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schade, J.; Wallstrom, P.; Olofsson, T.; Lagerqvist, O. A comparative study of the design and construction process of energy efficient buildings in Germany and Sweden. Energy Policy 2013, 58, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kratochvil, P.; Tichy, L. EU and Russian discourse on energy relations. Energy Policy 2013, 56, 391–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Van de Velde, L.; Verbeke, W.; Popp, M.; Van Huylenbroeck, G. The importance of message framing for providing information about sustainability and environmental aspects of energy. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 5541–5549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schaefer, M.S.; Lloyd, B.; Stephenson, J.R. The suitability of a feed-in tariff for wind energy in New Zealand-A study based on stakeholders’ perspectives. Energy Policy 2012, 43, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nfah, E.M.; Ngundam, J.M. Identification of stakeholders for sustainable renewable energy applications in Cameroon. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 4661–4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. O’Neill, B.C.; Kriegler, E.; Ebi, K.L.; Kemp-Benedict, E.; Riahi, K.; Rothman, D.S.; van Ruijven, B.J.; van Vuuren, D.P.; Birkmann, J.; Kok, K.; et al. The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2017, 42, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. O’Neill, B.C.; Kriegler, E.; Riahi, K.; Ebi, K.L.; Hallegatte, S.; Carter, T.R.; Mathur, R.; van Vuuren, D.P. A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Clim. Chang. 2014, 122, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Varho, V.; Tapio, P. Combining the qualitative and quantitative with the Q2 scenario technique—The case of transport and climate. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 2013, 80, 611–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sharifi, A.; Yamagata, Y. Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: A literature review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 60, 1654–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Murugesan, L.K.; Hoda, R.; Salcic, Z. Design criteria for visualization of energy consumption: A systematic literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2015, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kumar, A.; Sah, B.; Singh, A.R.; Deng, Y.; He, X.; Kumar, P.; Bansal, R.C. A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 596–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hailu, Y.G. Measuring and monitoring energy access: Decision-support tools for policy makers in Africa. Energy Policy 2012, 47, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jefferson, M. Global Energy Assessment: Towards a Sustainable Future. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 2013, 80, 559–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nishiguchi, S.; Tabata, T. Assessment of social, economic, and environmental aspects of woody biomass energy utilization: Direct burning and wood pellets. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 57, 1279–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chuang, M.C.; Ma, H.W. An assessment of Taiwan’s energy policy using multi-dimensional energy security indicators. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 17, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Garcia-Gusano, D.; Espegren, K.; Lind, A.; Kirkengen, M. The role of the discount rates in energy systems optimisation models. Renew. Sustain. EnergyRev. 2016, 59, 56–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Calcagnini, G.; Giombini, G.; Travaglini, G. Modelling energy intensity, pollution per capita and productivity in Italy: A structural VAR approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 59, 1482–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, K.L.; Yang, S.L. Understanding household energy consumption behavior: The contribution of energy big data analytics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 810–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chou, J.S.; Ngo, N.T. Time series analytics using sliding window metaheuristic optimization-based machine learning system for identifying building energy consumption patterns. Appl. Energy 2016, 177, 751–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Marques, A.C.; Fuinhas, J.A. Is renewable energy effective in promoting growth? Energy Policy 2012, 46, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, X.; Nathwani, J.; Wu, C. Visualization of International Energy Policy Research. Energies 2016, 9, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shi, Q.; Lai, X.D. Identifying the underpin of green and low carbon technology innovation research: A literature review from 1994 to 2010. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 2013, 80, 839–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bauer, F.; Coenen, L.; Hansen, T.; McCormick, K.; Palgan, Y.V. Technological innovation systems for biorefineries: A review of the literature. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2017, 11, 534–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mardani, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Khalifah, Z.; Zakuan, N.; Jusoh, A.; Nor, K.M.; Khoshnoudi, M. A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 71, 216–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Haegeman, K.; Marinelli, E.; Scapolo, F.; Ricci, A.; Sokolov, A. Quantitative and qualitative approaches in Future-oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): From combination to integration? Technol. Forecast. Soc. 2013, 80, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kowalski, K.; Stagl, S.; Madlener, R.; Omann, I. Sustainable energy futures: Methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 197, 1063–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pouw, N.; Gupta, J. Inclusive development: A multi-disciplinary approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2017, 24, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Suh, J.H. Forecasting the daily outbreak of topic-level political risk from social media using hidden Markov model-based techniques. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 2015, 94, 115–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The proposed methodology.
Figure 1. The proposed methodology.
Sustainability 10 03709 g001
Figure 2. Investigating future issues and future technologies that are relevant to energy.
Figure 2. Investigating future issues and future technologies that are relevant to energy.
Sustainability 10 03709 g002
Figure 3. Identifying topics for the multidisciplinary group discussions using text-mining techniques.
Figure 3. Identifying topics for the multidisciplinary group discussions using text-mining techniques.
Sustainability 10 03709 g003
Figure 4. Identifying and inviting experts to multidisciplinary group discussions by visualizing strategic maps.
Figure 4. Identifying and inviting experts to multidisciplinary group discussions by visualizing strategic maps.
Sustainability 10 03709 g004
Figure 5. An example of a strategic map for inviting experts of the target discipline, di.
Figure 5. An example of a strategic map for inviting experts of the target discipline, di.
Sustainability 10 03709 g005
Figure 6. Generating future-oriented energy policies and technologies (EP&Ts) from the multidisciplinary perspectives.
Figure 6. Generating future-oriented energy policies and technologies (EP&Ts) from the multidisciplinary perspectives.
Sustainability 10 03709 g006
Figure 7. Evaluating the priorities among the future-oriented EP&Ts.
Figure 7. Evaluating the priorities among the future-oriented EP&Ts.
Sustainability 10 03709 g007
Figure 8. The constructed strategic maps. (a) 27 authors of the economic discipline, d1; (b) 28 authors of the social sciences discipline, d2; (c) 15 authors of the humanities discipline, d3; (d) 28 authors of the arts discipline, d4.
Figure 8. The constructed strategic maps. (a) 27 authors of the economic discipline, d1; (b) 28 authors of the social sciences discipline, d2; (c) 15 authors of the humanities discipline, d3; (d) 28 authors of the arts discipline, d4.
Sustainability 10 03709 g008aSustainability 10 03709 g008b
Table 1. Energy-specific future trends, eij and the selected one as the keynote topic for each discipline.
Table 1. Energy-specific future trends, eij and the selected one as the keynote topic for each discipline.
Target Discipline, diEnergy-Specific Future Trends, eijDescriptionKeywords in Korean (English) 1trendscoreijKeynote Topic for di
d1e1,1Expanding the cooperation of the international community for low carbon, energy diversification and security에네지 (energy), 협력 (cooperation), 공동체 (community), 저탄소 (low carbon), 다양화 (diversification), 안보 (security)0.2353
e1,2Increasing importance of energy economy에너지 (energy), 경제 (economy), 전력요금 (electricity rate)0.4128√ (e1,* = e1,2)
e1,3Promotion of new energy industry신에너지 (new energy), 산업 (industry), 촉진 (promotion)0.2353
d2e2,1Expansion of eco-friendly, low-energy and well-being residential environment친환경 (eco-friendly), 저에너지 (low-energy), 웰빙 (well-being), 주거환경 (residential environment)0.1176
e2,2Transition to sustainable civil society지속 가능한 (sustainable), 시민사회 (civil society), 전환 (transition)0.1429
e2,3The advent of energy saving and energy production by using clothes에너지 (energy), 절약 (saving), 생산 (production), 의류 (clothes)0.0857
e2,4Inducing energy saving through consumption behavior analysis and educations based on cultural contents에너지 (energy), 보전 (conservation), 소비 (consumption), 행위 분석 (behavior analysis), 교육 (education)0.2571√ (e2,* = e2,4)
d3e3,1Increasing importance of procedural democracy in the formulation and enforcement of energy policy절차적 민주주의 (procedural democracy), 정책 (policy), 생성 (formulation), 집행 (enforcement)0.2000
e3,2Increasing importance of energy resource development reflecting local specialty지역 특수성 (local specialty), 에너지 (energy), 자원 (resource), 개발 (development)0.3143√ (e3,* = e3,2)
e3,3Making an issue of fair distribution of energy resources공정 분배 (fair distribution), 에너지 (energy), 자원 (resource)0.1471
e3,4The growth and education of energy citizenship에너지 시민권 (energy citizenship), 에너지 권리 (energy right), 미래사회 (future society)0.2941
d4e4,1Expansion of eco-friendly and low-energy indoor and outdoor design친환경 (eco-friendly), 저에너지 (low-energy), 실내 디자인 (indoor design), 실외 디자인 (outdoor design)0.1765
e4,2Increased use of design for energy conservation, energy reduction and the induction of environment-friendly behavior디자인 (design), 에너지 (energy), 보전 (conservation), 감축 (reduction), 환경친화적 행동 (environment-friendly behavior), 재생에너지 시설 (renewable energy facilities)0.1765
e4,3Generalization of green products and green package designs녹색 (green), 제품 (product), 친환경 (eco-friendly), 포장 디자인 (package design), 리사이클 (recycle), 업사이클 (upcycle)0.2059√ (e4,* = e4,3)
Notes: 1 Synonyms of keywords were taken into account and the number of keywords for eij is set less than m = 5 in this study.
Table 2. The list of questions for energy-specific future trends, eij.
Table 2. The list of questions for energy-specific future trends, eij.
Target Discipline, diEnergy-Specific Future Trend, eijNo.Question
d1e1,11What are the changes in the international energy environment?
2What is the way for South Korea to secure energy security?
3What is the future task required to bring about the active cooperation of the East Asian community in relation to the energy policy of such as climate change?
4Is South Korea’s energy diversification possible?
e1,25What is the cost of paying for renewable energy?
6How can we activate energy prosumers?
7What is needed to realize electricity rates?
e1,38What is the field of nurturing new energy industry?
9What is needed to nurture new energy industries?
d2e2,110What are the interior characteristics that influence on the energy use of urban residents?
11What is the residential environment for being eco-friendly, low-energy consumption and well-being in the future society?
e2,212What are the ways in which citizens can put their interests about sustainability into practice?
13What is a sustainable strategy, proper for local governments?
14What kind of assistance is needed to transform the East Asia into the more energy-secure region?
e2,315What is the technology that does not require air conditioning only by wearing clothes?
16What is the current technological and ethical state related to harvesting energy from the body temperature or activity?
e2,417Can the cultural contents about the conservation and reduction of energy cause energy saving actions?
18What are ways to encourage energy consumers to save energy?
19How can we activate energy saving according to energy consumption behavior?
20What are the technology trends and social issues, relevant to energy?
d3e3,121How should the decision-making process be structured to establish the organic relationship between central government and municipalities in relation to energy policy?
22What should be considered to facilitate the voluntary participation of citizens in the process of establishing and enforcing energy policies?
23How are policymakers and citizens different in their views on energy?
24What do citizens think about the current government energy policies?
e3,225What are the examples of energy sources that have been developed by reflecting the geopolitical, geographical and socio-cultural characteristics of local communities?
26What would be the case if the energy source, unique and specific to each community, can be developed in the future society?
27How can we reinterpret and introduce the traditional methods of energy generation and energy utilization, which have already been used in local communities, to be newly created and developed in modern society?
28What is required to resolve the rebellion and conflict of the local community in establishing and enforcing energy policies for new energy resources?
29What are the attributes that new energy sources, such as renewable energy, should have in order to be accepted in the community?
30What institutional support is required to ensure that new energy resources are effectively accepted in the community?
e3,331How can we systematically overcome the polarization problem of energy resources?
32What decision-making procedures and institutions are required to reflect the public interest, community and fair distribution in the process of establishing energy policies?
33What are the public issues and tasks, required to establish an institutional framework for the fair distribution of energy resources?
e3,434What are the new entities that are being discussed in relation to energy and environmental policy and how are domestic laws and international legal rights guaranteed?
35What are the energy policy issues that future generations’ rights should be positively reflected in energy policy?
36What policy alternatives should be made in order for NGOs and the other forms of civic movements to have a significant impact on energy policy?
37What is the effective education in response to the climate change?
38What are the expected effects of climate change educations and what are the related overseas cases?
d4e4,139What is the most technically or socially difficult problem in interior and exterior designs?
40What is the strategy for converting current indoor and outdoor designs into eco-friendly and low-energy designs?
41For the quality of life, what should be the focus of eco-friendly and low-energy indoor and outdoor designs?
e4,242What are the new ways of energy saving through design and what are the necessary future research for those new ways?
43How can energy saving by using designs help individual persons improve their happiness and the quality of life?
44How can the design of renewable energy generation facilities be aligned with renewable energy generation?
45How can we improve the ability of renewable energy generation in design?
e4,346Which area, for example, consumer electronics, needs green products and green package designs most?
47The most innovative technologies for the green product and package designs, for example, rotting coatings?
48What are the ideas about the green product and package designs, needed to improve the quality of life’?
49How does recycling and up-cycle designs help solve energy problems and improve the quality of life?
50What are the limitations of current recycling and up-cycle designs and in what direction the further progress should be made?
Table 3. The list of conclusions, which were obtained after the multidisciplinary group discussion of the target discipline, di.
Table 3. The list of conclusions, which were obtained after the multidisciplinary group discussion of the target discipline, di.
Target Discipline, diNo.Conclusion
d11Energy security is difficult to resolve with only US leadership.
2The future energy paradigm, ‘The Great Transition’, has the greatest impact on the Northeast Asia.
3The Eurasian initiative of South Korea is difficult among China, Russia and the US.
4We need to establish the cooperation system for securing a supply of natural gas in Asia.
5Economic measures are expected to be most effective on increasing the acceptance of renewable energy.
6Greenhouse gas reduction and environmental protection are the main purposes of renewable energy.
7The accurate and consistent policy implementation is required based on sharing and communications.
8Realization of electric rates is necessary for new energy industry and the improvement of market-oriented system.
9The convergence of new energy industry and financial industry should be made for the diffusion of renewable energy and government-led financial supports are necessary as well.
d210Human temperature adaptability needs to be improved.
11There is an urgent need for preparing data about energy consumptions by types of usages.
12Energy-saving methods, which consider the quality of life, are necessary for one-person households and vulnerable social groups.
13The social perception of energy saving is a key driver to cause social changes in energy consumption.
14Psychological and emotional approaches also need be adopted to lead social changes in energy consumption.
15Urban areas need to be the first subject for the EP&Ts, while the strategies for local areas should be modified according to local characteristics.
16A system should be developed to enable the civil society’s participation in building the EP&Ts.
17Effective ways are needed to change energy consumption behaviors and improve the recognition of the importance of energy saving.
18The ways to make people conscious about energy saving needs to be made and the energy saving need to be actuated by the consciousness, growing into a habit.
d319South Korea needs to purse the degrowth to get out of consumerism.
20Practical efforts in respond to the postwar era and the conversion into renewable energy are required.
21Democratic process and foundation should be prepared for establishing energy policy establishment.
22Energy welfare needs to be integrated with other welfare projects through collaboration among the relevant government ministries.
23Energy welfare policy should also be local government-centered.
24Reasonable policies rather than using the political-patronage tactic are necessary.
25Energy services are needed instead of energy itself.
26People’s basic energy rights need to be guaranteed based on energy inflection point.
27Regulations need to be strengthened to improve energy efficiency.
28Political leadership, mature persons with reflective thinking and civil society are required.
d429The energy conservation approach is needed rather than working to an infinitely increasing energy demand.
30The energy technology should be designed to be sustainable in the end.
31Design can be used to increase the awareness on of actual energy usages.
32The design of renewable energy technology should be suitable for lifestyle and regional characteristics.
33Ordinary citizens also need to be induced to participate in the design process for green energy products.
Table 4. The list of future-oriented EP&Ts and corresponding questions and conclusions as reasons for suggestion.
Table 4. The list of future-oriented EP&Ts and corresponding questions and conclusions as reasons for suggestion.
Target Discipline, diFuture-Oriented EP&T, fijDescriptionTypeReasons for Suggestion
PolicyTechnologyQuestions (No.)Conclusions (No.)
d1f1,1Integrated new governance for energy 21, 2, 3
f1,2The construction of Asian natural gas cooperation system 22, 4
f1,3Pioneering the Arctic Route for transporting energy, as well as for producing energy23
f1,4Establishing the governance for the East Asian nuclear power plants32
f1,5Real-time plan for electricity usage6, 95, 6
f1,6Purchase system, specialized for green energy products6, 95, 6
f1,7Combining carbon capture and storage (CSS) technology to the thermal power generation86
f1,8Expanding new and renewable power generation, combined with smart grid and energy storage system (ESS)86
f1,9Permission for the private sector to do the business of power transmission and distribution98
f1,10Preparing a policy to support new energy industry that considers the realization of electricity rate, the linkage to electric power market, market leadership and job quality 98
f1,11The activation of energy investment and finance 99
d2f2,1The design of living space in urban area, which guarantees the eco-friendly and low-energy well-being and the commercialization of the design 10, 11, 1412
f2,2Artificial intelligence that can consult humans for energy saving by using internet of things and consumption behavior analysis 19, 20, 1711
f2,3Establishing the organization for the East Asia sustainable community 1216
f2,4Cooperative association for sustainability, which provides information on energy consumption behavior, participates in each residential space design and ensures that the residential space is proper for the eco-friendly and low-energy well-being by joint purchase10, 19, 1211, 16
f2,5Business on manufacturing, selling and maintaining apparel that can save and produce energy12, 15, 1610
f2,6Donating self-produced energy12, 13, 1612, 13, 14, 18
f2,7Games that encourage the saving and reduction of energy 1814, 18
d3f3,1Social media-based energy policy portal22, 23, 24, 28, 32, 3321, 24, 25, 28
f3,2Interactive infographics that shows energy-related localities and their appropriate energy policies21, 25, 26, 2728
f3,3Virtual reality simulation of future energy society24, 28, 35, 3728
f3,4Open and collective intelligence to solve the polarized energy consumption problem31, 32, 3326
f3,5Evaluating the contribution of energy technology to solving the polarized energy consumption problem31, 32, 3326
d4f4,1Expert system designing the eco-friendly and low-energy indoor and outdoor designs4129, 33
f4,2Energy saving system based on the internet of things 40, 4229
f4,3Material technology that enables green products and green package designs 4730
f4,4Enhancing design in terms of both aesthetic effect and power generation productivity 44, 4533
f4,5Recycling and upcycling design to support the online-to-offline strategy by small and medium-sized business49-
Table 5. The question-based relationships between future-oriented EP&Ts and energy-specific future trends, identified by referring to Table 2 and Table 4.
Table 5. The question-based relationships between future-oriented EP&Ts and energy-specific future trends, identified by referring to Table 2 and Table 4.
Future-Oriented EP&T, fijRelated Energy-Specific Future Trend, eij
f1,1e1,1
f1,2e1,1
f1,3e1,1
f1,4e1,1
f1,5e1,2, e1,3
f1,6e1,2, e1,3
f1,7e1,3
f1,8e1,3
f1,9e1,3
f1,10e1,3
f1,11e1,3
f2,1e2,1, e2,2
f2,2e2,4
f2,3e2,2
f2,4e2,1, e2,4, e2,2
f2,5e2,2, e2,3
f2,6e2,2, e2,3
f2,7e2,4
f3,1e3,1
f3,2e3,1, e3,2
f3,3e3,1, e3,2, e3,4
f3,4e3,3
f3,5e3,3
f4,1e4,1
f4,2e4,1, e4,2
f4,3e4,3
f4,4e4,1, e4,2
f4,5e4,3
Table 6. The list of core energy-specific future trends, selected according to Table 5.
Table 6. The list of core energy-specific future trends, selected according to Table 5.
Energy-Specific Future Trend, eijRelated Future-Oriented EP&T, fijCore Energy-Specific Future Trend for a Target Discipline
e1,1f1,1, f1,2, f1,3, f1,4
e1,2f1,5, f1,6
e1,3f1,5, f1,6, f1,7, f1,8, f1,9, f1,10, f1,11√ (e1,core = e1,3)
e2,1f2,1, f2,4
e2,2f2,1, f2,3, f2,4, f2,5, f2,6√ (e2,core = e2,2)
e2,3f2,5, f2,6
e2,4f2,2, f2,4, f2,7
e3,1f3,1, f3,2, f3,3√ (e3,core = e3,1)
e3,2f3,2, f3,3
e3,3f3,4, f3,5
e3,4f3,3
e4,1f4,1, f4,2, f4,4√ (e4,core = e4,1)
e4,2f4,2, f4,4
e4,3f4,3, f4,5
Table 7. The future-oriented EP&Ts of core energy-specific future trends according to Table 6 and top-priority one among them for each discipline.
Table 7. The future-oriented EP&Ts of core energy-specific future trends according to Table 6 and top-priority one among them for each discipline.
Target Discipline, diFuture-Oriented EP&T, fijThree Values to Evaluate the Priorities among the Future-Oriented EP&Ts of Each DisciplinePriority Value 2Is a Top Priority in a Target Discipline?
Is Linked to Any Core Energy-Specific Future Trend? 1Number of Related QuestionsNumber of Related Conclusions
d1f1,10130.3056
f1,20120.2222
f1,30110.1389
f1,40110.1389
f1,51220.6111
f1,61220.6111
f1,71110.4722
f1,81110.4722
f1,91110.4722
f1,101110.4722
f1,111110.4722
d2f2,11310.5833
f2,20310.2500
f2,31110.4722
f2,41320.6667
f2,51310.5833
f2,61320.6667
f2,70120.2222
d3f3,11641.0000
f3,21410.6389
f3,31410.6389
f3,40310.2500
f3,50310.2500
d4f4,11120.5556
f4,21210.5278
f4,30110.1389
f4,41110.4722
f4,50100.0556
Notes: 1 If a future-oriented EP&T is linked to any core energy-specific future trend, eicore, according to Table 6, its value is 1; otherwise, 0. 2 Here, the weights are set equal, that is, w1 = 1/3, w2 = 1/3 and w3 = 1/3.
Table 8. Comparisons of this study to the pervious energy research works.
Table 8. Comparisons of this study to the pervious energy research works.
Previous WorkIs Future-OrientedIs MultidisciplinaryType of Focus 1Type of Approach 2
F1F2F3A1A2A3
[2]
[6]
[7]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[20]
[21]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[34]
[37]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
This study
Notes:1 Research focus (F): energy policy (F1), energy technology (F2) and both (F3). 2 Research approach (A): qualitative approach (A1), quantitative approach (A2) and combined (A3).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suh, J.H. Generating Future-Oriented Energy Policies and Technologies from the Multidisciplinary Group Discussions by Text-Mining-Based Identification of Topics and Experts. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3709. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103709

AMA Style

Suh JH. Generating Future-Oriented Energy Policies and Technologies from the Multidisciplinary Group Discussions by Text-Mining-Based Identification of Topics and Experts. Sustainability. 2018; 10(10):3709. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suh, Jong Hwan. 2018. "Generating Future-Oriented Energy Policies and Technologies from the Multidisciplinary Group Discussions by Text-Mining-Based Identification of Topics and Experts" Sustainability 10, no. 10: 3709. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop