Next Article in Journal
GMDH-Based Semi-Supervised Feature Selection for Electricity Load Classification Forecasting
Next Article in Special Issue
Discourses across Scales on Forest Landscape Restoration
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Regulation, Green Innovation, and Industrial Green Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Spatial Durbin Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Integration of Climate Change and Development Strategies at Local Levels: Insights from Muheza District, Tanzania
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(1), 211; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010211

Socially Just Triple-Wins? A Framework for Evaluating the Social Justice Implications of Climate Compatible Development

Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 9 October 2017 / Revised: 22 December 2017 / Accepted: 8 January 2018 / Published: 16 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Change Adaptation, Mitigation and Development)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [444 KB, uploaded 16 January 2018]   |  

Abstract

Climate compatible development (CCD) aims to help people improve their lives in the face of climate threats without exacerbating these threats for current and future generations. It is proving an attractive concept to both academics and practitioners. However, the social justice implications of CCD have not yet been comprehensively explored and an absence of adequate evaluation frameworks has led to multiple, legitimate cross-scalar social justice claims being marginalised. This article develops a framework to guide holistic social justice evaluation of CCD initiatives across levels and scales. Underpinning this framework is a social justice approach that embraces particularism, pluralism and procedural justice. Drawing on existing research, the framework is used to explore the implications of the Clean Development Mechanism for recognition, participation and distribution in the Least Developed Countries. Findings show that achieving social justice through CCD is not a given; rather, the social justice implications of CCD differ within and between levels and scales. We conclude by suggesting ways in which our framework can be applied to augment knowledge on CCD. Understanding the processes through which social justices and injustices are created is integral to considerations of whether and how CCD should be used to underpin a new development landscape. View Full-Text
Keywords: social justice; climate change; mitigation; adaptation; equity; triple-wins; trade-offs; clean development mechanism social justice; climate change; mitigation; adaptation; equity; triple-wins; trade-offs; clean development mechanism
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Wood, B.T.; Stringer, L.C.; Dougill, A.J.; Quinn, C.H. Socially Just Triple-Wins? A Framework for Evaluating the Social Justice Implications of Climate Compatible Development. Sustainability 2018, 10, 211.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top