Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Comprehensive Benefit of Group-Affiliated New Energy Power Generation Enterprises for Sustainability: Based on a Combined Technique of STBI and TOPSIS
Next Article in Special Issue
Capital Cost Optimization for Prefabrication: A Factor Analysis Evaluation Model
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling Spatial Distribution of Some Contamination within the Lower Reaches of Diyala River Using IDW Interpolation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reciprocal Relations between Official Development Assistance Recipient and Donor Countries: Case of South Korean Overseas Construction Business and Southeast Asian Countries’ Economy
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010021

How Myopia Archetypes Lead to Non-Sustainability

Department of Economics and Management, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 9 November 2017 / Revised: 7 December 2017 / Accepted: 19 December 2017 / Published: 22 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management Strategies and Innovations for Sustainable Construction)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [3416 KB, uploaded 22 December 2017]   |  

Abstract

Much of the literature on sustainability has tried to define the “virtuous behaviour” of “agents” (man and his social and economic organizations) so that it respects the “sustainability constraint.” This paper provides a “mirror-image” approach, based on the idea that it is above all necessary to understand why men and organizations tend to develop, at times unconsciously and dishonestly, damaging behaviour that turns into non-sustainability. In other words, to orient man toward sustainable behaviour it is indispensable to understand the “reasons” for the behaviour that produces non-sustainable effects. Regarding sustainability problems, we shall introduce the hypothesis that non-sustainable behaviour is not irrational in an absolute sense but derives from the action of three connected “behavioural archetypes” that accurately describe the “natural” behaviour of individuals in pursuing their aims: behaving in a way that will provide evident short-term advantages, both individual and local, while ignoring the disadvantages and harm such behaviour produces in the long run, at the collective and global level. To solve the problem, we shall try to identify the “levers” that weaken the archetypes and reverse their effects, thereby requiring sacrifices which are unacceptable to some. The paper presents four emblematic cases of non-sustainable behaviour and demonstrates that sustainability must become a fundamental strategic driver. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainability; system thinking; archetypes of myopia; sustainability as a strategic driver; tragedy of the commons; waste disposal; global warming sustainability; system thinking; archetypes of myopia; sustainability as a strategic driver; tragedy of the commons; waste disposal; global warming
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Mella, P.; Pellicelli, M. How Myopia Archetypes Lead to Non-Sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 21.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top