Next Article in Journal
1-Benzyl-3-cetyl-2-methylimidazolium Iodide (NH125) Is a Broad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Virus Entry with Lysosomotropic Features
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Won-Kyung Cho; et al. Epimedium Koreanum Nakai Displays Broad Spectrum of Antiviral Activity In Vitro and In Vivo by Inducing Cellular Antiviral State. Viruses 2015, 7, 352–377
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/v10060305
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Factor 5 Interacts with the NS3 Protein and Promotes Classical Swine Fever Virus Replication

by
Huifang Lv
1,2,†,
Wang Dong
1,3,†,
Kangkang Guo
1,
Mingxing Jin
1,
Xiaomeng Li
4,
Cunfa Li
2 and
Yanming Zhang
1,*
1
College of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
2
College of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, Zhengzhou 450046, China
3
College of Veterinary Medicine, Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, Zhengzhou 450046, China
4
Ningbo Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Ningbo 315000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2018, 10(6), 305; https://doi.org/10.3390/v10060305
Submission received: 13 May 2018 / Revised: 28 May 2018 / Accepted: 30 May 2018 / Published: 5 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Viruses)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Classical swine fever, caused by classical swine fever virus (CSFV), is a highly contagious and high-mortality viral disease, causing huge economic losses in the swine industry worldwide. CSFV non-structural protein 3 (NS3), a multifunctional protein, plays crucial roles in viral replication. However, how NS3 exactly exerts these functions is currently unknown. Here, we identified tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 5 (TRAF5) as a novel binding partner of the NS3 protein via yeast two-hybrid, co-immunoprecipitation and glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays. Furthermore, we observed that TRAF5 promoted CSFV replication in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs). Additionally, CSFV infection or NS3 expression upregulated TRAF5 expression, implying that CSFV may exploit TRAF5 via NS3 for better growth. Moreover, CSFV infection and TRAF5 expression activated p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity, and inhibition of p38 MAPK activation by the SB203580 inhibitor suppressed CSFV replication. Notably, TRAF5 overexpression did not promote CSFV replication following inhibition of p38 MAPK activation. Our findings reveal that TRAF5 promotes CSFV replication via p38 MAPK activation. This work provides a novel insight into the role of TRAF5 in CSFV replication capacity.

1. Introduction

Classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is the etiological agent of classical swine fever, which is a highly contagious and high-mortality viral disease, causing huge economic losses in the swine industry worldwide. CSFV is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus, within the genus Pestivirus of the family Flaviviridae [1]. The 12.3-kb genome of CSFV encodes a single polyprotein, which is further processed into 12 mature proteins, including four structural proteins (C, Erns, E1 and E2) and eight non-structural (NS) proteins (Npro, p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A and NS5B) [2]. CSFV NS3 is a multifunctional non-structural protein, which plays an essential role in viral replication. NS3 possesses helicase, nucleotide triphosphatase (NTPase) and serine protease activities [3,4,5]. NS3 interacts with NS5B and enhances RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity of NS5B [6,7]. NS3 is also an internal ribosome-entry site (IRES)-binding protein that increases IRES-dependent translation [8]. Additionally, NS3 expression results in the cytopathic effect of PK-15 cells [9].
In our previous study, we screened 26 cellular partners interacting with NS3 by the yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) system, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 5 and TRAF6. In addition, we showed that TRAF6 inhibits CSFV replication by activating the NF-κB signaling pathway [10]. TRAFs, cytoplasmic adaptor proteins, link cell-surface receptors to intracellular signaling pathways that play major roles in many biological processes, such as immune regulation, inflammatory responses and apoptosis [11,12]. TRAF5, is composed of an N-terminal Really Interesting New Gene (RING) finger domain, a zinc finger motif, leucine-zipper domain (TRAF-N) and a C-terminal receptor binding domain (TRAF-C) [13,14]. TRAF5, the downstream target of MAVS, mediates the activation of downstream nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways [15,16,17].
MAPK, a serine/threonine kinase, is an important molecular that receives receptor signal and transfers it into the nucleus. It plays a key role in gene expression regulation, cell proliferation and cell death [18,19,20]. p38 MAPK, one of the MAPK family, is mainly involved in immune regulation, inflammatory response and apoptosis under stress conditions [21,22,23]. The p38 MAPK signaling pathway also participates in macrophage and neutrophil functional response, including chemotaxis and adhesion [24,25]. It has been reported that TRAF5 is involved in the regulation of MAPK phosphorylation in the melanoma A375 and B16F10 cells [26]. TRAF5 engages in glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (GITR)-induced activation of p38 MAPK [27]. In addition, TRAF5 expression induces p38 MAPK activation in HeLa cells [28]. TRAF5 activates p38 MAPK to induce human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) gene expression in monocytes/macrophages [29]. Activation of TRAF5 negatively regulates the latent replication origin of epstein-barr virus through p38 MAPK [28].
TRAF5 mediates the activation of the p38 MAPK signaling pathway, and we have found that TRAF5 is also a potential binding partner of CSFV NS3 and that TRAF6 is shown to be relevant for CSFV infection. Thus, we hypothesise that TRAF5 may influence CSFV replication through p38 MAPK activation. Here, we demonstrated that CSFV NS3 interacted with TRAF5 and promoted TRAF5 expression, which in turn promoted CSFV replication via activating p38 MAPK.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cells and Virus

Porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) (American Type Culture Collection; CRL-2845) were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Gibco, Grand Island, UK). Human embryonic kidney (HEK293T; ATCC; CRL-11268) cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM) (Gibco, UK) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Biowest, Loire Valley, France). CSFV (Shimen strain) was purchased from the Control Institute of Veterinary Bio-products and Pharmaceuticals (Beijing, China). CSFV titers in culture supernatant were determined by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) as described previously [10,30].

2.2. Plasmid Construction

CSFV NS3 was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and cloned into pGBKT7 (BD), pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1 with a Flag-tag, pEGFP-N1 and pGEX-6P-1 to generate BD-NS3, CMV-NS3/NS3-Flag, NS3-GFP and GST-NS3, respectively. Red fluorescent protein (RFP) gene was amplified and cloned into pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1 with a Flag-tag to generate RFP-Flag. These vectors were constructed and preserved in our laboratory [10]. The full-length TRAF5 was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from PAMs cDNA and cloned into pGADT7 (AD), pGEX-6P-1 and pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1 with a Flag-tag to generate AD-TRAF5, GST-TRAF5 and CMV-TRAF5/TRAF5-Flag, respectively. Three pairs of shRNAs targeting TRAF5 were designed (http://rnaidesigner.thermofisher.com/), and the annealing fragments were cloned into pCDH-U6-MCS-EF1-GreenPuro to create TRAF5-sh1, TRAF5-sh2, TRAF5-sh3, respectively. Negative control vector shN was conserved in our laboratory [10]. All primers are listed in Table 1.

2.3. Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qRCR)

The relative mRNA expression of TRAF5 and CSFV genome RNA was tested by RT-qPCR using specific primers (Table 1). Total cellular RNA was extracted from PAMs using TRIzol, and the cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription with the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Gene expression was quantified via a Bio-Rad iQ5 Multicolor Real-Time PCR Detection System with GoTaq® Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The housekeeping gene, β-actin, served to normalize the relative expression of each gene. Relative transcript levels were analyzed using the ΔΔCt method with β-actin as the internal control by the manufacturer [31].

2.4. Western Blot

Protein samples were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (catalog no. ISEQ00010; Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk at room temperature for 2 h, followed by incubation with indicated primary antibodies at room temperature for 2 h; for example, rabbit anti-TRAF5 polyclonal antibody (pAb) (catalog no. orb186283; Biorbyt, Cambridgeshire, UK), rabbit anti-MAPK14 (p38 MAPK) pAb (catalog no. CSB-PA003661; Cusabio, Wuhan, China), rabbit anti-phospho-MAPK14 (T180/Y182) pAb (catalog no. CSB-PA000647; Cusabio, China), mouse anti-GFP monoclonal antibody (mAb) (catalog no. KM8009; SUNGENE BIOTECH, Tianjin, China), mouse anti-Flag mAb (catalog no. CW0287; CWBIO, Beijing, China), and mouse anti-GST mAb (catalog no. CW0291; CWBIO, China). After incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (or mouse) IgG secondary antibody (catalog no. LK2001 or LK2003; SUNGENE BIOTECH, China), the signal was visualized using an image analysis system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.5. Yeast Two-Hybrid Screening

To confirm the interaction between NS3 and TRAF5 by yeast two-hybrid assay, a Matchmaker Gold Yeast Two-Hybrid system (Clontech, Fremont, CA, USA) was applied as described previously [30]. Y2HGold was cotransformed with BD-NS3 or BD and the full-length TRAF5 (AD-TRAF5). The transformants were plated on double-dropout plates lacking Leu and Trp (DDO) and quadruple-dropout plates lacking His, Leu, Trp, Ade (QDO) and QDO containing X-alpha-galactosidase and aureobasidin A (QDO/X/Aba) plates. Cotransformations with BD/AD, BD-Lam (human lamin C protein)/AD-T and BD-p53/AD-T (simian virus 40 large T antigen) served as blank, negative and positive controls, respectively.

2.6. Co-Immunoprecipitation Assays

For co-IP assays, exogenous expression and endogenous verification were performed. For exogenous verification, PAMs in 6-well pates (105 cells) were co-transfected with 2 μg of NS3-GFP and 2 μg of TRAF5-Flag plasmids, co-transfection with NS3-GFP and RFP-Flag as negative control. The 20% of cell lysates were subjected to an input experiment, and the immunoprecipitation experiments were carried out with ANTI-FLAG M2 Affinity Gel (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) with the rest of cell lysates according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The washed resins were analyzed by Western blot with a mouse anti-GFP mAb. For endogenous verification, PAMs (105 cells) were transfected with 4 μg of NS3-Flag or RFP-Flag plasmids as control, and the washed resins were analyzed by Western blot with a rabbit anti-TRAF5 pAb.

2.7. GST Pull-Down Experiment

A GST pull-down experiment was carried out as described previously [10]. Briefly, GST-NS3 was expressed in Escherichia coli (E. coli) Rosetta cells, and TRAF5-Flag was expressed in HEK293T cells. The Pierce® GST Protein Interaction Pull-Down Kit (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, GST or GST-NS3 protein expressed in E. coli was treated with pull-down lysis buffer and immobilized on equilibrated glutathione agarose resin for 2 h at 4 °C. After five washes with a wash solution, the TRAF5-Flag protein in HEK293T lysates was added and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After another five washes, protein samples were eluted with glutathione elution buffer. Western blot detected the eluted proteins with an anti-Flag mAb. Furthermore, GST-TRAF5 expressed in E. coli and NS3-Flag expressed in HEK293T cells were also subjected to GST pull-down experiments to further verify the interaction between NS3 and TRAF5 as described above.

2.8. Cell Viability Assay

To evaluate the effects of SB203580 (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) on the growth of PAMs, cell viability was measured by the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8; Beyotime, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test using the SPSS software (version 18.0, International Business Machines Corporation, NY, USA). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. CSFV NS3 Interacts with TRAF5

In previous studies, we reported that there are 26 cellular proteins interacting with the CSFV NS3 protein, including TRAF5 [10]. To further explore the function of NS3, TRAF5 was selected to study the relationship between NS3, TRAF5 and CSFV replication. First, the prey vector containing full-length TRAF5 was constructed, and the TRAF5-NS3 interaction was verified by the Y2H system. The yeast strain Y2HGold was cotransformed with the prey plasmid AD-TRAF5 and the bait plasmid BD-NS3 or BD. The results showed that the cotransformations with BD-NS3/AD-TRAF5 and BD-p53/AD-T were grown on the QDO/X/A plates, indicating the interaction of TRAF5 and NS3 (Figure 1A).
To further validate the TRAF5-NS3 interaction, exogenous co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) experiments were performed by co-expressing NS3-GFP and TRAF5-Flag. After incubation with ANTI-FLAG M2 Affinity Gel, TRAF5-Flag successfully precipitated NS3-GFP (Figure 1B). Endogenous co-IP experiments were also carried out by expressing NS3-Flag, and the result showed that NS3-Flag precipitated endogenous TRAF5 (Figure 1C). Glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down experiments were carried out for verifying the TRAF5-NS3 interaction in vitro. GST-NS3 expressed in E. coli Rosetta cells and TRAF5-Flag expressed in HEK293T cells were subjected to the Pierce spin column immobilised with glutathione agarose. After elution, TRAF5-Flag was captured by GST-NS3 rather than by GST (Figure 1D). Inversely, GST-TRAF5 expressed in E. coli Rosetta cells and NS3-Flag protein expressed in HEK293T cells were subjected to the GST pull-down assay. Expectedly, NS3-Flag was captured by GST-TRAF5 rather than by GST (Figure 1E), suggesting the specificity of the TRAF5-NS3 interaction. These results, along with the previous Y2H system and co-IP results, demonstrated the interaction of TRAF5 and NS3.

3.2. TRAF5 Knockdown Inhibits CSFV Replication

To detect the relationship between TRAF5 and CSFV replication, we determined CSFV replication in TRAF5 knockdown PAMs. Three shRNA-mediated TRAF5 knockdown vectors were designed and the knockdown efficiency was detected. As shown in Figure 2A, TRAF5-sh2 revealed the highest knockdown efficiency (83.37%). Thus, the knockdown cell line (TRAF5-sh2) targeting TRAF5 was constructed using the TRAF5-sh2 vector via lentivirus infection in PAMs according to the methods described previously [10,30]. The cell line stably expressing shN (shN) was treated equally as a negative control. The green fluorescence in shN and TRAF5-sh2 cells was visible under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Figure 2B). The stable cell lines were infected with CSFV at an MOI of 0.1, and CSFV genome RNA and viral titers of the infectious progeny were determined in cell lysates and culture supernatant, respectively, at 24 and 48 h post infection (hpi). The results demonstrated that CSFV genome RNA levels and viral titers of the infectious progeny in TRAF5-sh2 knockdown cells were significantly decreased at 24 and 48 hpi, respectively, compared to those in shN cells (Figure 2C,D), suggesting that TRAF5 knockdown inhibited CSFV replication.

3.3. TRAF5 Overexpression Promotes CSFV Replication

To further verify the effect of TRAF5 on CSFV replication, a cell line stably overexpressing TRAF5 (CMV-TRAF5) was constructed via lentivirus infection in PAMs, with PAMs stably expressing the empty vector CMV (CMV) as a negative control. As shown in Figure 2E, the green fluorescence in CMV and CMV-TRAF5 cells was visible under an inverted fluorescence microscope. Additionally, TRAF5 overexpression was confirmed by Western blot with a rabbit anti-TRAF5 pAb (Figure 2F). Following CSFV infection at an MOI of 0.1, the cell lysates and supernatant were collected to detect CSFV genome RNA and viral titers, respectively. The results showed that CSFV genome RNA and viral titers of the infectious progeny in CMV-TRAF5 cells were significantly increased at 24 and 48 hpi compared with those in CMV cells (Figure 2G,H), indicating that TRAF5 positively regulated CSFV replication in PAMs.

3.4. CSFV or NS3 Promotes TRAF5 Expression

After the verification of positive effects of TRAF5 on CSFV replication, we investigated the effect of CSFV infection on TRAF5 expression. TRAF5 mRNA and protein levels were analyzed in CSFV-infected and mock-infected PAMs by RT-qPCR and Western blot at 24 and 48 hpi. We observed that TRAF5 mRNA and protein levels were significantly increased in CSFV-infected PAMs than that in mock-infected cells at 24 and 48 hpi (Figure 3A,B). Because of the interaction of TRAF5 and NS3, the effect of CSFV NS3 on TRAF5 expression was investigated. As shown in Figure 3C,D, TRAF5 mRNA and protein expression was increased in PAMs expressing NS3. These results revealed that CSFV or NS3 increased cellular TRAF5 expression. Together with the fact that TRAF5 promotes CSFV propagation, these data imply that CSFV may exploit TRAF5 via NS3 for better growth and that TRAF5 plays an important role during CSFV infection.

3.5. CSFV Infection Promotes p38 MAPK Activation in PAMs

We have verified that TRAF5 promoted CSFV propagation and that TRAF5 may play an important role during CSFV infection. It has been reported that TRAF5 induces HIV-1 gene expression via activation of p38 MAPK in monocytes/macrophages [29]. To explore the mechanism of enhancement of CSFV propagation by TRAF5, we first investigated the effect of CSFV on the activation of p38 MAPK. PAMs were mock-infected or CSFV-infected at an MOI of 0.1 and the cell lysates were prepared for detection of total p38 MAPK (p38) and phosphorylated p38 MAPK (p-p38) levels at 24 and 48 hpi. The results showed that CSFV infection increased p38 MAPK phosphorylation and had no effects on total p38 MAPK levels at 24 and 48 hpi (Figure 4A,B). These data suggest that CSFV infection promotes p38 MAPK activation in PAMs.

3.6. TRAF5 Promotes p38 MAPK Activation in PAMs

Having validated the activation of p38 MAPK during CSFV infection, we investigated the effect of TRAF5 on p38 MAPK activation. In stable TRAF5-overexpressing cells, we observed higher levels of p-p38 and unchanged p38 levels (Figure 5A). In CSFV-infected stable TRAF5-knockdown cells, the p-p38 level was reduced compared with that in CSFV-infected shN cells (Figure 5B), indicating that TRAF5 knockdown reduced p38 MAPK activation induced by CSFV. These data demonstrated that TRAF5 promotes p38 MAPK activation in PAMs.

3.7. Inhibition of p38 MAPK Activation Suppresses CSFV Replication in PAMs

To confirm whether p38 MAPK is involved in the regulation of CSFV replication, we detected the CSFV genome RNA and viral titers in CSFV-infected PAMs with p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 treatment. DMSO treatment was used as a control. Firstly, the optimal concentration of SB203580 was selected. The results showed that the concentration of SB203580 of up to 10 μM had no effects on cell viability (Figure 6A), and SB203580 at 10 μM completely inhibited p38 MAPK activation following CSFV infection (Figure 6B). Thus, the concentration of SB203580 of 10 μM was used in the following experiments. In SB203580-treated CSFV-infected PAMs, CSFV genome RNA (Figure 6C) and viral titers in the supernatant (Figure 6D) were decreased compared with those in DMSO-treated PAMs at 24 and 48 hpi. The results indicate that inhibition of p38 MAPK activation suppresses CSFV replication.

3.8. TRAF5 Does not Promote CSFV Replication Following Inhibition of p38 MAPK Activation

Having demonstrating that TRAF5 promotes CSFV replication and p38 MAPK activation and that p38 MAPK activation is involved in CSFV propagation, we investigated whether TRAF5 promoted CSFV replication via p38 MAPK activation. In CMV and CMV-TRAF5 cells, we blocked p38 MAPK activation by SB203580 and examined CSFV replication at 24 and 48 hpi. After blocking the pathway, TRAF5 overexpression failed to promote viral genome RNA (Figure 7A) and viral titers (Figure 7B), indicating that TRAF5 promotes CSFV replication via p38 MAPK activation.

4. Discussion

CSFV NS3 is a multifunctional non-structural protein that plays a major role in CSFV replication [5,32,33]. Our previous study reported 26 interacting partners of CSFV NS3 (including TRAF5) by Y2H screening, and TRAF6 was verified to interact with NS3 and inhibit CSFV replication [10]. However, the roles of other proteins interacting with NS3 during CSFV infection have not been reported. Here, we further investigated the role of TRAF5 in CSFV replication. We first cloned the full-length of TRAF5 and NS3 to verify the TRAF5-NS3 interaction by the Y2H approach. In addition, co-IP and GST pull-down assays were performed to further confirm the true TRAF5-NS3 interaction. However, the interaction domain of NS3 and TRAF5 and whether NS3 interacts with other TRAFs will be further investigated in future studies.
TRAF6 interacts with CSFV NS3 and inhibits CSFV replication via NF-κB signaling pathway [10]. uS10 interacts with CSFV Npro and inhibits CSFV replication via regulating TLR3 expression [30]. In addition, Rab1A interacts with CSFV NS5A and is required for the assembly of CSFV particles [34]. Rab5 interacts with CSFV NS4B and enhances CSFV proliferation [35]. Here, we demonstrated that TRAF5 interacted with NS3 and promoted CSFV replication. In addition, CSFV and NS3 increased TRAF5 expression, indicating the synergistic effect of TRAF5 and CSFV, and the potential role of TRAF5 in CSFV replication capacity. Similarly, it has been reported that TRAF5 interacts with the HIV-1 Nef protein, and HIV-1 Nef activates TRAF5 to increase HIV-1 replication in monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) [36]. These results offer an insight into the mechanisms related to CSFV infection via TRAF5 upregulation by CSFV NS3.
TRAF5 is an intracellular protein that binds to the cytoplasmic portion of TNF receptors and mediates the activation of downstream NF-κB, IRF3 and MAPK signaling pathways, controlling cellular processes as well as immune responses [15,16]. TRAF5 negatively regulates toll-like receptor signaling in B lymphocytes [13]. It has been reported that CSFV infection activates ERK1/2, and ERK1/2 activation enhances CSFV replication [37,38]. Hepatitis C virus (HCV), belonging to the family Flaviviridae, activates p38 MAPK during HCV replication [39,40]. Here, we first demonstrated that CSFV infection and TRAF5 expression activated p38 MAPK in PAMs. Similarly, TRAF5 expression induced p38 MAPK activation in HeLa cells [30], and GITR-induced stimulation of TRAF5-deficient T cells resulted in decreased activation of p38 MAPK [27]. Whether CSFV NS3 promotes p38 MAPK activation or whether CSFV infection activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase (another family of MAPK) needs further study; however, these data demonstrate that CSFV infection activates p38 MAPK and that TRAF5 may function as a link between CSFV infection and the p38 MAPK activation.
p38 MAPK is involved in the regulation of inflammatory cytokine expression and is an inducible NO synthase, and the inhibitors of the p38 MAPK signaling pathway are severed as candidate anti-inflammatory drugs [41]. Here, we demonstrated that inhibition of p38 MAPK activation by SB203580 severely suppressed CSFV replication in PAMs, indicating that p38 MAPK is involved in CSFV efficient replication and SB203580-derived agents may be used for potential antivirals against CSFV infection. TRAF5 activation negatively regulates the latent replication origin of the Epstein-Barr virus through p38 MAPK [28]. TRAF5 induces HIV-1 gene expression via activation of p38 MAPK in monocytes/macrophages [29]. Notably, we demonstrated that TRAF5 did not promote CSFV replication following inhibition of p38 MAPK activation, indicating a possible mechanism that TRAF5 activates p38 MAPK to increase CSFV replication.
p38 MAPK is involved in interleukin-10 (IL-10) production induced by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and porcine circovirus type 2 in PAMs [42,43]. IL-10, an important anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive cytokine, inhibits cell-mediated immune responses and antigen presentation [44,45]. Many viruses induce IL-10 production, and certain viruses encode a viral IL-10 homologue to establish infection using the immunosuppressive properties of IL-10 [46]. For example, IL-10 is produced constitutively during HIV-1 infection, and is considered as an important pathway by which HIV may induce immunodeficiency [47]. In addition, foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) induces IL-10 production to mediate immunosuppression during acute FMDV infection in porcine DCs [48]. Moreover, CSFV infection induces IL-10 expression [37], and CSFV vaccination is immunosuppressed in the presence of the PRRSV vaccine, which may be due to the fact that PRRSV vaccination induces higher levels of IL-10 expression [49]. Thus, we speculate that TRAF5 may regulate IL-10 expression by activating p38 MAPK to suppress the immune response during CSFV infection and to promote CSFV replication. However, this speculation needs further investigation.
In conclusion, we show that cellular TRAF5 interacts with CSFV NS3 and enhances CSFV replication via activation of p38 MAPK. Further studies are needed to elucidate the precise molecular mechanisms of how p38 MAPK activated by TRAF5 enhances CSFV replication. However, these findings provide new insights into the mechanisms of CSFV infection, as well as potential antiviral strategies focused on attenuating CSFV replication.

Author Contributions

Data curation, H.L. and W.D.; Formal analysis, X.L.; Methodology, H.L., W.D. and M.J.; Project administration, C.L. and Y.Z.; Supervision, K.G.; Writing–original draft, H.L.; Writing–review & editing, W.D.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31472210) and Scientific Research Foundation of the Programs for Science and Technology Development of Henan Province, China (No. 162102110033).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Simmonds, P.; Becher, P.; Bukh, J.; Gould, E.A.; Meyers, G.; Monath, T.; Muerhoff, S.; Pletnev, A.; Rico-Hesse, R.; Smith, D.B.; et al. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Flaviviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tautz, N.; Tews, B.A.; Meyers, G. The molecular biology of pestiviruses. Adv. Virus Res. 2015, 93, 47–160. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Tamura, J.K.; Warrener, P.; Collett, M.S. RNA-stimulated ntpase activity associated with the p80 protein of the pestivirus bovine viral Diarrhea virus. Virology 1993, 193, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Warrener, P.; Collett, M.S. Pestivirus NS3 (p80) protein possesses RNA helicase activity. J. Virol. 1995, 69, 1720–1726. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Tautz, N.; Elbers, K.; Stoll, D.; Meyers, G.; Thiel, H.J. Serine protease of pestiviruses: Determination of cleavage sites. J. Virol. 1997, 71, 5415–5422. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, P.; Yu, J.; Wan, L.; Chen, J.; Xiao, M. Characterisation of interaction between NS3 and NS5B protein of classical swine fever virus by deletion of terminal sequences of NS5B. Virus Res. 2011, 156, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Yu, J.; Wan, L.; Chen, J.; Xiao, M. Classical swine fever virus NS3 enhances RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity by binding to NS5B. Virus Res. 2010, 148, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yu, J.; Wan, L.; Chen, J.; Xiao, M. Classical swine fever virus NS3 is an IRES-binding protein and increases IRES-dependent translation. Virus Res. 2010, 153, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Xu, H.; Hong, H.X.; Zhang, Y.M.; Guo, K.K.; Deng, X.M.; Ye, G.S.; Yang, X.Y. Cytopathic effect of classical swine fever virus NS3 protein on pk-15 cells. Intervirology 2007, 50, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lv, H.; Dong, W.; Cao, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Qian, G.; Lv, Q.; Wang, C.; Guo, K.; Zhang, Y. TRAF6 is a novel NS3-interacting protein that inhibits classical swine fever virus replication. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, P.; Reichardt, A.; Liang, H.; Aliyari, R.; Cheng, D.; Wang, Y.; Xu, F.; Cheng, G.; Liu, Y. Single amino acid substitutions confer the antiviral activity of the TRAF3 adaptor protein onto TRAF5. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5, ra81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Guo, F.; Sun, A.; Wang, W.; He, J.; Hou, J.; Zhou, P.; Chen, Z. TRAF1 is involved in the classical NF-κB activation and CD30-induced alternative activity in hodgkin’s lymphoma cells. Mol. Immunol. 2009, 46, 2441–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Buchta, C.M.; Bishop, G.A. TRAF5 negatively regulates TLR signaling in B lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Au, P.Y.; Yeh, W.C. Physiological roles and mechanisms of signaling by TRAF2 and TRAF5. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2007, 597, 32–47. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, S.; Chen, J.; Cai, X.; Wu, J.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.T.; Sun, L.; Chen, Z.J. Mavs recruits multiple ubiquitin E3 ligases to activate antiviral signaling cascades. eLife 2013, 2, e00785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, Y.; Deng, X.; Deng, J.; Zhou, J.; Ren, Y.; Liu, S.; Prusak, D.J.; Wood, T.G.; Bao, X. Functional motifs responsible for human metapneumovirus M2-2-mediated innate immune evasion. Virology 2016, 499, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Tang, E.D.; Wang, C.Y. TRAF5 is a downstream target of MAVS in antiviral innate immune signaling. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lawan, A.; Bennett, A.M. Mitogen-activated protein kinase regulation in hepatic metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 28, 868–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Selim, K.A.; Abdelrasoul, H.; Aboelmagd, M.; Tawila, A.M. The role of the MAPK signaling, topoisomerase and dietary bioactives in controlling cancer incidence. Diseases 2017, 5, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Panahi, G.; Pasalar, P.; Zare, M.; Rizzuto, R.; Meshkani, R. High glucose induces inflammatory responses in HepG2 cells via the oxidative stress-mediated activation of NF-κB, and MAPK pathways in HepG2 cells. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, Y.; Huang, G.; Wang, Z.; Qin, H.; Mo, B.; Wang, C. Elongation factor-2 kinase acts downstream of p38 MAPK to regulate proliferation, apoptosis and autophagy in human lung fibroblasts. Exp. Cell Res. 2018, 363, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, C.; Shen, G.N.; Luo, Y.H.; Piao, X.J.; Jiang, X.Y.; Meng, L.Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.R.; Wang, H.; et al. Novel 1,4-naphthoquinone derivatives induce apoptosis via ROS-mediated p38/MAPK, AKT and STAT3 signaling in human hepatoma HEP3B cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2018, 96, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nick, J.A.; Young, S.K.; Brown, K.K.; Avdi, N.J.; Arndt, P.G.; Suratt, B.T.; Janes, M.S.; Henson, P.M.; Worthen, G.S. Role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in a murine model of pulmonary inflammation. J. Immunol. 2000, 164, 2151–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nishiura, H.; Zhao, R.; Yamamoto, T. The role of the ribosomal protein S19 C-terminus in altering the chemotaxis of leucocytes by causing functional differences in the C5A receptor response. J. Biochem. 2011, 150, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Senger, K.; Pham, V.C.; Varfolomeev, E.; Hackney, J.A.; Corzo, C.A.; Collier, J.; Lau, V.W.C.; Huang, Z.; Hamidzhadeh, K.; Caplazi, P.; et al. The kinase TPL2 activates ERK and p38 signaling to promote neutrophilic inflammation. Sci. Signal. 2017, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, M.; Long, C.; Yang, G.; Luo, Y.; Du, H. MIR-26B inhibits melanoma cell proliferation and enhances apoptosis by suppressing TRAF5-mediated MAPK activation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 471, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Esparza, E.M.; Lindsten, T.; Stockhausen, J.M.; Arch, R.H. Tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 5 is a critical intermediate of costimulatory signaling pathways triggered by glucocorticoid-induced TNFR in t cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 8559–8564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Shirakata, M.; Imadome, K.I.; Okazaki, K.; Hirai, K. Activation of TRAF5 and TRAF6 signal cascades negatively regulates the latent replication origin of epstein-barr virus through p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 5059–5068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Horie, R.; Ishida, T.; Maruyama-Nagai, M.; Ito, K.; Watanabe, M.; Yoneyama, A.; Higashihara, M.; Kimura, S.; Watanabe, T. Traf activation of C/EBPβ (NF-IL6) via p38 MAPK induces HIV-1 gene expression in monocytes/macrophages. Microbes Infect 2007, 9, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lv, H.; Dong, W.; Qian, G.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Cao, Z.; Lv, Q.; Wang, C.; Guo, K.; Zhang, Y. US10, a novel NPRO-interacting protein, inhibits classical swine fever virus replication. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 1679–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lamp, B.; Riedel, C.; Wentz, E.; Tortorici, M.A.; Rumenapf, T. Autocatalytic cleavage within classical swine fever virus NS3 leads to a functional separation of protease and helicase. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 11872–11883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tautz, N.; Kaiser, A.; Thiel, H.J. NS3 serine protease of bovine viral diarrhea virus: Characterization of active site residues, NS4A cofactor domain, and protease-cofactor interactions. Virology 2000, 273, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lin, J.; Wang, C.; Liang, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Lv, H.; Dong, W.; Zhang, Y. RAB1A is required for assembly of classical swine fever virus particle. Virology 2018, 514, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lin, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Wang, T.; Zhang, J.; Liang, W.; Li, C.; Qian, G.; Ouyang, Y.; Guo, K.; et al. Rab5 enhances classical swine fever virus proliferation and interacts with viral NS4B protein to facilitate formation of NS4B related complex. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Khan, K.A.; Abbas, W.; Varin, A.; Kumar, A.; Di Martino, V.; Dichamp, I.; Herbein, G. HIV-1 NEF interacts with HCV core, recruits TRAF2, TRAF5 and TRAF6, and stimulates HIV-1 replication in macrophages. J. Innate Immun. 2013, 5, 639–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cao, Z.; Guo, K.; Zheng, M.; Ning, P.; Li, H.; Kang, K.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, C.; Liang, W.; Zhang, Y. A comparison of the impact of Shimen and C strains of classical swine fever virus on toll-like receptor expression. J. Gen. Virol. 2015, 96, 1732–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, J.; Chen, S.; Liao, Y.; Zhang, E.; Feng, S.; Yu, S.; Li, L.F.; He, W.R.; Li, Y.; Luo, Y.; et al. Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 2 (MEK2), a novel E2-interacting protein, promotes the growth of classical swine fever virus via attenuation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. J. Virol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Qadri, I.; Iwahashi, M.; Capasso, J.M.; Hopken, M.W.; Flores, S.; Schaack, J.; Simon, F.R. Induced oxidative stress and activated expression of manganese superoxide dismutase during hepatitis C virus replication: Role of JNK, p38 MAPK and AP-1. Biochem. J. 2004, 378, 919–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Waris, G.; Turkson, J.; Hassanein, T.; Siddiqui, A. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) constitutively activates STAT-3 via oxidative stress: Role of STAT-3 in HCV replication. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 1569–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kaminska, B. Mapk signalling pathways as molecular targets for anti-inflammatory therapy—From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic benefits. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1754, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Song, S.; Bi, J.; Wang, D.; Fang, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, F.; Chen, H.; Xiao, S. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection activates IL-10 production through NF-kappab and p38 MAPK pathways in porcine alveolar macrophages. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2013, 39, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Du, Q.; Huang, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Cui, B.; Li, D.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, W.; Chang, L.; et al. Porcine circovirus type 2 activates PI3K/AKT and p38 MAPK pathways to promote interleukin-10 production in macrophages via cap interaction of GC1QR. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 17492–17507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mittal, S.K.; Roche, P.A. Suppression of antigen presentation by IL-10. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2015, 34, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Conti, P.; Kempuraj, D.; Kandere, K.; Di Gioacchino, M.; Barbacane, R.C.; Castellani, M.L.; Felaco, M.; Boucher, W.; Letourneau, R.; Theoharides, T.C. IL-10, an inflammatory/inhibitory cytokine, but not always. Immunol. Lett. 2003, 86, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Redpath, S.; Ghazal, P.; Gascoigne, N.R. Hijacking and exploitation of IL-10 by intracellular pathogens. Trends Microbiol. 2001, 9, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Breen, E.C. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Pharmacol. Ther. 2002, 95, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Diaz-San Segundo, F.; Rodriguez-Calvo, T.; de Avila, A.; Sevilla, N. Immunosuppression during acute infection with foot-and-mouth disease virus in swine is mediated by IL-10. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Wang, X.; Mu, G.; Dang, R.; Yang, Z. Up-regulation of IL-10 upon PRRSV vaccination impacts on the immune response against CSFV. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 197, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Viruses 10 00305 g001 550
Figure 1. Interaction of non-structural protein 3 (NS3) with tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 5 (TRAF5). (A) Interaction of NS3 and TRAF5 by the Y2H system. The yeast strain Y2HGold was cotransformed with the full-length TRAF5 (AD-TRAF5) and the bait plasmid BD or BD-NS3. Cotransformations with BD/AD, BD-Lamin/AD-T and BD-p53/AD-T were used as blank, negative and positive controls, respectively; (B) Exogenous co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) analysis of NS3 and TRAF5 in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs). Cells were co-transfected with plasmids NS3-GFP and TRAF5-Flag; co-transfection with NS3-GFP and RFP-Flag as a negative control. In total, 20% of the cell extract was subjected to the input assay to assess GAPDH, Flag-fusion, and GFP-fusion protein levels. The rest of the extract was subjected to IP assay and precipitated proteins were detected by Western blot with a mouse anti-GFP mAb; (C) Endogenous co-IP analysis of NS3 and TRAF5 in PAMs. PAMs were transfected with plasmid NS3-Flag; transfection with RFP-Flag as a negative control. The precipitated proteins were detected by western blot with a rabbit anti-TRAF5 pAb; (D) GST-NS3 pull-down assay. The glutathione S-transferase (GST) and GST-NS3 proteins expressed in E. coli Rosetta (DE3) cells were immobilised on a glutathione agarose resin, followed by incubation of the resin with the HEK293T cell lysates containing TRAF5-Flag protein. The bound proteins were detected by Western blot using a mouse anti-Flag mAb. The expression of input proteins (TRAF5-Flag, GST or GST-NS3) was confirmed by Western blot using a mouse anti-Flag mAb and a mouse anti-GST mAb, respectively; (E) GST-TRAF5 pull-down assay. The GST and GST-TRAF5 proteins expressed in E. coli Rosetta (DE3) cells were immobilised on the glutathione agarose resin, with incubation with the HEK293T cell lysates containing the NS3-Flag protein. The eluted proteins were detected by Western blot using a mouse anti-Flag mAb.
Figure 1. Interaction of non-structural protein 3 (NS3) with tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 5 (TRAF5). (A) Interaction of NS3 and TRAF5 by the Y2H system. The yeast strain Y2HGold was cotransformed with the full-length TRAF5 (AD-TRAF5) and the bait plasmid BD or BD-NS3. Cotransformations with BD/AD, BD-Lamin/AD-T and BD-p53/AD-T were used as blank, negative and positive controls, respectively; (B) Exogenous co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) analysis of NS3 and TRAF5 in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs). Cells were co-transfected with plasmids NS3-GFP and TRAF5-Flag; co-transfection with NS3-GFP and RFP-Flag as a negative control. In total, 20% of the cell extract was subjected to the input assay to assess GAPDH, Flag-fusion, and GFP-fusion protein levels. The rest of the extract was subjected to IP assay and precipitated proteins were detected by Western blot with a mouse anti-GFP mAb; (C) Endogenous co-IP analysis of NS3 and TRAF5 in PAMs. PAMs were transfected with plasmid NS3-Flag; transfection with RFP-Flag as a negative control. The precipitated proteins were detected by western blot with a rabbit anti-TRAF5 pAb; (D) GST-NS3 pull-down assay. The glutathione S-transferase (GST) and GST-NS3 proteins expressed in E. coli Rosetta (DE3) cells were immobilised on a glutathione agarose resin, followed by incubation of the resin with the HEK293T cell lysates containing TRAF5-Flag protein. The bound proteins were detected by Western blot using a mouse anti-Flag mAb. The expression of input proteins (TRAF5-Flag, GST or GST-NS3) was confirmed by Western blot using a mouse anti-Flag mAb and a mouse anti-GST mAb, respectively; (E) GST-TRAF5 pull-down assay. The GST and GST-TRAF5 proteins expressed in E. coli Rosetta (DE3) cells were immobilised on the glutathione agarose resin, with incubation with the HEK293T cell lysates containing the NS3-Flag protein. The eluted proteins were detected by Western blot using a mouse anti-Flag mAb.
Viruses 10 00305 g001
Viruses 10 00305 g002 550
Figure 2. TRAF5 promotes CSFV replication. (A) Western blot analysis of knockdown efficiency of three TRAF5 knockdown vectors. PAMs were transfected with TRAF5-sh1, TRAF5-sh2, TRAF5-sh3, or shN. At 48 h post transfection (hpt), the cell lysates were collected and endogenous TRAF5 expression was determined by Western blot. GAPDH was used as an internal control; (B) Confirmation of TRAF5-knockdown lentivirus infection by fluorescence detection of the GFP reporter expressed in PAMs. TRAF5-knockdown PAMs were constructed via lentivirus infection. (a) Mock-infected PAMs. (b) PAMs infected with lentiviruses expressing shN. (c) PAMs infected with TRAF5-sh2 lentivirus. Scale bar = 100 μm for all the figures; (C) CSFV genome RNA in TRAF5-sh2 cells. The shN and TRAF5-sh2 cells were infected with CSFV at an MOI of 0.1. CSFV genome RNA levels were determined by RT-qPCR at 24 and 48 hpi; (D) Viral titers of infectious progeny in the supernatant from TRAF5-sh2 cells. Viral titers in the culture supernatant collected at 24 and 48 hpi were determined and expressed as TCID50/mL; (E) Confirmation of CMV-TRAF5 recombinant lentivirus infection by fluorescence detection of the GFP reporter expressed in PAMs. (a) Mock-infected PAMs. (b) PAMs infected with lentiviruses expressing CMV. (c) PAMs infected with lentiviruses expressing CMV-TRAF5. Scale bar = 100 μm for all the figures; (F) Western blot for TRAF5 expression in CMV-TRAF5 cells; (G) CSFV genome RNA in CMV-TRAF5 cells. The CMV and CMV-TRAF5 cells were infected with CSFV at an MOI of 0.1. CSFV genome RNA levels were determined by RT-qPCR at 24 and 48 hpi; (H) Infectious progeny viral titers in supernatants from CMV-TRAF5 cells. Viral titers in the culture supernatant collected at 24 and 48 hpi were determined and expressed as TCID50/mL. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. TRAF5 promotes CSFV replication. (A) Western blot analysis of knockdown efficiency of three TRAF5 knockdown vectors. PAMs were transfected with TRAF5-sh1, TRAF5-sh2, TRAF5-sh3, or shN. At 48 h post transfection (hpt), the cell lysates were collected and endogenous TRAF5 expression was determined by Western blot. GAPDH was used as an internal control; (B) Confirmation of TRAF5-knockdown lentivirus infection by fluorescence detection of the GFP reporter expressed in PAMs. TRAF5-knockdown PAMs were constructed via lentivirus infection. (a) Mock-infected PAMs. (b) PAMs infected with lentiviruses expressing shN. (c) PAMs infected with TRAF5-sh2 lentivirus. Scale bar = 100 μm for all the figures; (C) CSFV genome RNA in TRAF5-sh2 cells. The shN and TRAF5-sh2 cells were infected with CSFV at an MOI of 0.1. CSFV genome RNA levels were determined by RT-qPCR at 24 and 48 hpi; (D) Viral titers of infectious progeny in the supernatant from TRAF5-sh2 cells. Viral titers in the culture supernatant collected at 24 and 48 hpi were determined and expressed as TCID50/mL; (E) Confirmation of CMV-TRAF5 recombinant lentivirus infection by fluorescence detection of the GFP reporter expressed in PAMs. (a) Mock-infected PAMs. (b) PAMs infected with lentiviruses expressing CMV. (c) PAMs infected with lentiviruses expressing CMV-TRAF5. Scale bar = 100 μm for all the figures; (F) Western blot for TRAF5 expression in CMV-TRAF5 cells; (G) CSFV genome RNA in CMV-TRAF5 cells. The CMV and CMV-TRAF5 cells were infected with CSFV at an MOI of 0.1. CSFV genome RNA levels were determined by RT-qPCR at 24 and 48 hpi; (H) Infectious progeny viral titers in supernatants from CMV-TRAF5 cells. Viral titers in the culture supernatant collected at 24 and 48 hpi were determined and expressed as TCID50/mL. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Viruses 10 00305 g002
Viruses 10 00305 g003 550
Figure 3. CSFV or NS3 promotes TRAF5 expression. (A) TRAF5 mRNA expression in CSFV-infected PAMs. PAMs were mock-infected or CSFV-infected. TRAF5 mRNA was analyzed by RT-qPCR at 24 and 48 hpi; (B) TRAF5 protein expression in CSFV-infected PAMs. TRAF5 protein levels were analyzed by Western blot at 24 and 48 hpi. GAPDH served as an internal control. The relative levels of TRAF5 protein were estimated by histograms representing density readings of the gel bands and the ratios were calculated relative to GAPDH control; (C) TRAF5 mRNA in NS3-expressing PAMs. PAMs were transfected with CMV-NS3. TRAF5 mRNA expression was analyzed by RT-qPCR at 36 hpt; (D) TRAF5 protein expression in NS3-expressing PAM. TRAF5 protein expression was analyzed by Western blot at 36 hpt. The relative levels of the TRAF5 protein were estimated by histograms representing density readings of the gel bands and the ratios were calculated relative to GAPDH control. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 3. CSFV or NS3 promotes TRAF5 expression. (A) TRAF5 mRNA expression in CSFV-infected PAMs. PAMs were mock-infected or CSFV-infected. TRAF5 mRNA was analyzed by RT-qPCR at 24 and 48 hpi; (B) TRAF5 protein expression in CSFV-infected PAMs. TRAF5 protein levels were analyzed by Western blot at 24 and 48 hpi. GAPDH served as an internal control. The relative levels of TRAF5 protein were estimated by histograms representing density readings of the gel bands and the ratios were calculated relative to GAPDH control; (C) TRAF5 mRNA in NS3-expressing PAMs. PAMs were transfected with CMV-NS3. TRAF5 mRNA expression was analyzed by RT-qPCR at 36 hpt; (D) TRAF5 protein expression in NS3-expressing PAM. TRAF5 protein expression was analyzed by Western blot at 36 hpt. The relative levels of the TRAF5 protein were estimated by histograms representing density readings of the gel bands and the ratios were calculated relative to GAPDH control. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Viruses 10 00305 g003
Viruses 10 00305 g004 550
Figure 4. CSFV infection promotes p38 MAPK activation in PAMs. (A) Western blot analysis of p-p38 and p38 in CSFV-infected PAMs. PAMs were mock-infected or CSFV-infected at an MOI of 0.1. The cell lysates were collected at 24 and 48 hpi and used to determine p-p38 and p38 by Western blot; (B) The relative levels of p-p38 MAPK were estimated by histograms representing density readings of the gel bands and the ratios were calculated relative to GAPDH control. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 4. CSFV infection promotes p38 MAPK activation in PAMs. (A) Western blot analysis of p-p38 and p38 in CSFV-infected PAMs. PAMs were mock-infected or CSFV-infected at an MOI of 0.1. The cell lysates were collected at 24 and 48 hpi and used to determine p-p38 and p38 by Western blot; (B) The relative levels of p-p38 MAPK were estimated by histograms representing density readings of the gel bands and the ratios were calculated relative to GAPDH control. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. ***, p < 0.001.
Viruses 10 00305 g004
Viruses 10 00305 g005 550
Figure 5. TRAF5 promotes p38 MAPK activation in PAMs. (A) TRAF5 overexpression promotes p38 MAPK activation. The cell lysates were collected in CMV and CMV-TRAF5 cells, and p-p38, p38 and TRAF5 expression was detected by Western blot; (B) TRAF5 knockdown reduces p38 MAPK activation. The shN and TRAF5-sh2 cells were infected with CSFV for 24 h, and p-p38, p38 and TRAF5 expressions were detected by Western blot. The relative levels of the p-p38 protein were estimated by histograms representing density readings of the gel bands, and the ratios were calculated relative to GAPDH control. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 5. TRAF5 promotes p38 MAPK activation in PAMs. (A) TRAF5 overexpression promotes p38 MAPK activation. The cell lysates were collected in CMV and CMV-TRAF5 cells, and p-p38, p38 and TRAF5 expression was detected by Western blot; (B) TRAF5 knockdown reduces p38 MAPK activation. The shN and TRAF5-sh2 cells were infected with CSFV for 24 h, and p-p38, p38 and TRAF5 expressions were detected by Western blot. The relative levels of the p-p38 protein were estimated by histograms representing density readings of the gel bands, and the ratios were calculated relative to GAPDH control. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. ***, p < 0.001.
Viruses 10 00305 g005
Viruses 10 00305 g006 550
Figure 6. Inhibition of p38 MAPK activation suppresses CSFV replication in PAMs. (A) The cell viability in the SB203580 treatment. PAMs were treated with different concentrations of SB203580 for 1 h; then, the culture medium was replaced with fresh medium for 48 h and the cell viability was measured by the CCK-8 assay; (B) The effect of SB203580 on p38 MAPK activation. PAMs were treated with SB203580 at a concentration of 0, 2, 3, 5, or 10 μM for 1 h, followed by replacement with flesh medium and inoculation with CSFV at an MOI of 0.1. At 24 hpi, the cell lysates were subjected to Western blot to determine p-p38 and p38 expression; (C,D) SB203580 treatment suppresses CSFV replication in PAMs. PAMs were treated with SB203580 at a concentration of 10 μM for 1 h; DMSO treatment as a negative control, followed by replacement with flesh medium and inoculation with CSFV at an MOI of 0.1. CSFV genome RNA in the cell lysates (C) was analyzed by RT-qPCR, and viral titers in the supernatant (D) were assessed and expressed as TCID50/mL at 24 and 48 hpi. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.
Figure 6. Inhibition of p38 MAPK activation suppresses CSFV replication in PAMs. (A) The cell viability in the SB203580 treatment. PAMs were treated with different concentrations of SB203580 for 1 h; then, the culture medium was replaced with fresh medium for 48 h and the cell viability was measured by the CCK-8 assay; (B) The effect of SB203580 on p38 MAPK activation. PAMs were treated with SB203580 at a concentration of 0, 2, 3, 5, or 10 μM for 1 h, followed by replacement with flesh medium and inoculation with CSFV at an MOI of 0.1. At 24 hpi, the cell lysates were subjected to Western blot to determine p-p38 and p38 expression; (C,D) SB203580 treatment suppresses CSFV replication in PAMs. PAMs were treated with SB203580 at a concentration of 10 μM for 1 h; DMSO treatment as a negative control, followed by replacement with flesh medium and inoculation with CSFV at an MOI of 0.1. CSFV genome RNA in the cell lysates (C) was analyzed by RT-qPCR, and viral titers in the supernatant (D) were assessed and expressed as TCID50/mL at 24 and 48 hpi. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.
Viruses 10 00305 g006
Viruses 10 00305 g007 550
Figure 7. TRAF5 overexpression does not promote CSFV replication following inhibition of p38 MAPK activation in PAMs. (A,B) CSFV replication in SB203580-treated CMV-TRAF5 cells. CMV and CMV-TRAF5 cells were treated with SB203580 for 1 h, followed by CSFV infection. The cell lysates and the culture supernatant were subjected to determine the CSFV genome RNA (A) and viral titers (B) at 24 and 48 hpi, respectively. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ns: not significant.
Figure 7. TRAF5 overexpression does not promote CSFV replication following inhibition of p38 MAPK activation in PAMs. (A,B) CSFV replication in SB203580-treated CMV-TRAF5 cells. CMV and CMV-TRAF5 cells were treated with SB203580 for 1 h, followed by CSFV infection. The cell lysates and the culture supernatant were subjected to determine the CSFV genome RNA (A) and viral titers (B) at 24 and 48 hpi, respectively. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ns: not significant.
Viruses 10 00305 g007
Table
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
PrimersSequence (5′ → 3′)Purpose
BD-NS3-FGGAATTCCATATGCCTAAGAAAAAGCGCAAAGTTGGGCCTGCCGTTTGCAAGAAGAmplification of NS3
BD-NS3-RAACTGCAGTAGCTCCTTCAATTCTGTCTCCTTCCCCTC
NS3-GFP-FCATGCTAGCGATGGGGCCTGCCGTTTGCAAGAAGAmplification of NS3
NS3-GFP-RAACTGCAGTAGACCAACTACTTGTTTTAGTGCTCTGCC
CMV-NS3-FCTAGCTAGCATGGGGCCTGCCGTTTGCAmplification of NS3
CMV-NS3-RATAAGAATGCGGCCGCTTACTTATCGTCGTCATCCTTGTAATCTAGACCAACTACTTG
GST-NS3-FACGCGTCGACTCGGGCCTGCCGTTTGCAAmplification of NS3
GST-NS3-RATAAGAATGCGGCCGCTCATAGACCAACTACTTGTTTTAGTGC
RFP-FGGAATTCATGGTGCGCTCCTCCAAGAACAmplification of RFP
RFP-RCGGGATCCCTACTTATCGTCGTCATCCTTGTAATCCAGGAACAGGTGGTGGCGG
AD-TRAF5-FGGAATTCCATATGATGGCCTCTTCTGAGGAGCAAGAmplification of TRAF5
AD-TRAF5-RCGGGATCCTTAGAGATCCTCCAGGTCAGTTAAATCC
CMV-TRAF5-FGCTCTAGAATGGCCTCTTCTGAGGAGCAAGAmplification of TRAF5
CMV-TRAF5-RCGGGATCCGAGATCCTCCAGGTCAGTTAAATCC
GST-TRAF5-FCGGGATCCATGGCCTCTTCTGAGGAGCAAGAmplification of TRAF5
GST-TRAF5-RCCGCTCGAGTTAGAGATCCTCCAGGTCAGTTAAATCC
β-actin-FCAAGGACCTCTACGCCAACACRT-qPCR for detection of β-actin
β-actin-RTGGAGGCGCGATGATCTT
CSFV-FGATCCTCATACTGCCCACTTACRT-qPCR for detection of CSFV
RT-qPCR for detection of TRAF5
CSFV-RGTATACCCCTTCACCAGCTTG
TRAF5-FGGGGAGACTAACAAACATGATG
TRAF5-RGTAGAAGGGCTGGCTGAAGA
TRAF5-sh1-FGATCCGGTGTACGGCCAAGATCATTCTCAAGAGGAATGATCTTGGCCGTACACCTTTTTGKnockdown of TRAF5
TRAF5-sh1-RAATTCAAAAAGGTGTACGGCCAAGATCATTCCTCTTGAGAATGATCTTGGCCGTACACCG
TRAF5-sh2-FGATCCGGAAGGTGACAGACTACAAGCTCAAGAGGCTTGTAGTCTGTCACCTTCCTTTTTGKnockdown of TRAF5
TRAF5-sh2-RAATTCAAAAAGGAAGGTGACAGACTACAAGCCTCTTGAGCTTGTAGTCTGTCACCTTCCG
TRAF5-sh3-FGATCCGCACCTGTCGCTGTACTTTGTTCAAGAGACAAAGTACAGCGACAGGTGCTTTTTGKnockdown of TRAF5
TRAF5-sh3-RAATTCAAAAAGCACCTGTCGCTGTACTTTGTCTCTTGAACAAAGTACAGCGACAGGTGCG
Restriction enzyme sequences or silence sequences underlined.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lv, H.; Dong, W.; Guo, K.; Jin, M.; Li, X.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y. Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Factor 5 Interacts with the NS3 Protein and Promotes Classical Swine Fever Virus Replication. Viruses 2018, 10, 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10060305

AMA Style

Lv H, Dong W, Guo K, Jin M, Li X, Li C, Zhang Y. Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Factor 5 Interacts with the NS3 Protein and Promotes Classical Swine Fever Virus Replication. Viruses. 2018; 10(6):305. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10060305

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lv, Huifang, Wang Dong, Kangkang Guo, Mingxing Jin, Xiaomeng Li, Cunfa Li, and Yanming Zhang. 2018. "Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Factor 5 Interacts with the NS3 Protein and Promotes Classical Swine Fever Virus Replication" Viruses 10, no. 6: 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10060305

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop