Next Article in Journal
Effect of Tree Spacing on Tree Level Volume Growth, Morphology, and Wood Properties in a 25-Year-Old Pinus banksiana Plantation in the Boreal Forest of Quebec
Previous Article in Journal
Haploids in Conifer Species: Characterization and Chromosomal Integrity of a Maritime Pine Cell Line
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2016, 7(11), 275; doi:10.3390/f7110275

Wood or Laminate?—Psychological Research of Customer Expectations

1
Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz 8010, Austria
2
Human Research Institute for Health Technology and Prevention Research, Franz-Pichler-Strasse 30, Weiz 8160, Austria
3
Architekturpsychologie Kelz, Jahngasse 26, Gleisdorf 8200, Austria
4
Institute of Physiology, Medical University of Graz, Harrachgasse 21/V, Graz 8010, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Robert Evans and Tim A. Martin
Received: 23 September 2016 / Revised: 25 October 2016 / Accepted: 8 November 2016 / Published: 12 November 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1433 KB, uploaded 12 November 2016]   |  

Abstract

Wood is generally associated with being practical, aesthetic and economy-friendly. Using wood in interior settings also can be based on psychological expectations and assumptions, as wood is attributed as warmer, more homely, more relaxing and more inviting. However, when investigating psychological differences, wood is usually compared to carpets, glass, leather, stone, or plastic but is not compared to a visually similar material such as laminate. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the various psychological characteristics related to wooden and laminate materials in interior settings. The experimental design was a 2 × 2 design (material, sequence) with repeated measures for material. Forty participants were asked to evaluate a framed piece of wood floor and a framed piece of laminate floor regarding technical, practical, and psychological aspects. Further, three questions about one’s purchase decision were asked. The results show that the wooden floor was evaluated significantly better than the laminate floor regarding “materials and processing”, “atmosphere”, and “values and symbolic functions”. For the criterion “health”, a tendency in favor of wood could be found. In addition, the participants would more likely recommend and purchase wooden products and also accept more deficiencies in wooden products. View Full-Text
Keywords: floor; laminate; psychological characteristics; purchase decision; wood floor; laminate; psychological characteristics; purchase decision; wood
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiménez, P.; Dunkl, A.; Eibel, K.; Denk, E.; Grote, V.; Kelz, C.; Moser, M. Wood or Laminate?—Psychological Research of Customer Expectations. Forests 2016, 7, 275.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top