Next Article in Journal
Colonization with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Promotes the Growth of Morus alba L. Seedlings under Greenhouse Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling the Potential Distribution of Picea chihuahuana Martínez, an Endangered Species at the Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2015, 6(3), 708-733;

Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012

SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Eklandagatan 86, Göteborg SE-412 61, Sweden
Stockholm Environment Institute, Box 24218, Stockholm SE-104 51, Sweden
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Kräftriket 2 B, Stockholm SE-106 91, Sweden
WSP Sverige AB, Arenavägen 7, Stockholm-Globen SE-121 88, Sweden
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Sune Linder and Eric J. Jokela
Received: 17 October 2014 / Revised: 28 February 2015 / Accepted: 6 March 2015 / Published: 16 March 2015
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [365 KB, uploaded 16 March 2015]   |  


This paper explores how climate change adaptation concerns were integrated into the Swedish forestry debate and policy process during the period of 1990–2012, and draws lessons on barriers and opportunities identified in this process. Using a framework focusing on “advocacy coalitions”, we analyze how the adaptation debate in the forestry sector evolved over the period; who the main advocates for and against adaptation were; and which main arguments and processes affected the debate and policy. The results show that academics advocating climate change adaptation, aided by outside influences, such as political pressure for adaptation responses and the negative impacts of the 2005 storm Gudrun, contributed to an increased general awareness and understanding of adaptation issues amongst forestry stakeholders. Nonetheless, the strong dominance of actors arguing for increased forest production and the limited number and relatively poor organization of adaptation advocates have acted as barriers to mainstreaming adaptation concerns into forestry policy and practice. The dominant coalitions and their values have also determined the direction of debate and policy. The main conclusions for policymakers aiming to further this integration process are the importance of stimulating adaptation coalitions and the value of creating arenas for multiple stakeholder learning about adaptation. View Full-Text
Keywords: climate change adaptation; forestry; forest policy; policy process; Sweden climate change adaptation; forestry; forest policy; policy process; Sweden

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ulmanen, J.; Swartling, Å.G.; Wallgren, O. Climate Adaptation in Swedish Forestry: Exploring the Debate and Policy Process, 1990–2012. Forests 2015, 6, 708-733.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top