Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
A Semi-Preemptive Computational Service System with Limited Resources and Dynamic Resource Ranking
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Visualization, Band Ordering and Compression of Hyperspectral Images
Algorithms 2012, 5(1), 98-112; doi:10.3390/a5010098

Successive Standardization of Rectangular Arrays

1,2,3,*  and 3,4,5,*
1 Department of Health Research and Policy—Biostatistics, HRP Redwood Building, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5405, USA 2 Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Packard Electrical Engineering Building, 350 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 3 Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Sequoia Hall, 390 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-4065, USA 4 Department of Environmental Earth System Science, Yang and Yamazaki Environment & Energy Building, 473 Via Ortega, Suite 140 Stanford, CA 94305, USA 5 The Woods Institute for the Environment, Jerry Yang & Akiko Yamazaki Environment & Energy Building—MC 4205, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
* Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 17 November 2011 / Revised: 20 February 2012 / Accepted: 20 February 2012 / Published: 29 February 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data Compression, Communication and Processing)
Download PDF [804 KB, uploaded 29 February 2012]


In this note we illustrate and develop further with mathematics and examples, the work on successive standardization (or normalization) that is studied earlier by the same authors in [1] and [2]. Thus, we deal with successive iterations applied to rectangular arrays of numbers, where to avoid technical difficulties an array has at least three rows and at least three columns. Without loss, an iteration begins with operations on columns: first subtract the mean of each column; then divide by its standard deviation. The iteration continues with the same two operations done successively for rows. These four operations applied in sequence completes one iteration. One then iterates again, and again, and again, ... In [1] it was argued that if arrays are made up of real numbers, then the set for which convergence of these successive iterations fails has Lebesgue measure 0. The limiting array has row and column means 0, row and column standard deviations 1. A basic result on convergence given in [1] is true, though the argument in [1] is faulty. The result is stated in the form of a theorem here, and the argument for the theorem is correct. Moreover, many graphics given in [1] suggest that except for a set of entries of any array with Lebesgue measure 0, convergence is very rapid, eventually exponentially fast in the number of iterations. Because we learned this set of rules from Bradley Efron, we call it “Efron’s algorithm”. More importantly, the rapidity of convergence is illustrated by numerical examples.
Keywords: rectangular arrays; successive iterations; exponentially fast convergence rectangular arrays; successive iterations; exponentially fast convergence
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Share & Cite This Article

Further Mendeley | CiteULike
Export to BibTeX |
MDPI and ACS Style

Olshen, R.A.; Rajaratnam, B. Successive Standardization of Rectangular Arrays. Algorithms 2012, 5, 98-112.

View more citation formats

Article Metrics

For more information on the journal, click here


Cited By

[Return to top]
Algorithms EISSN 1999-4893 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert