Open Access
This article is

- freely available
- re-usable

*Materials*
**2016**,
*9*(8),
703;
doi:10.3390/ma9080703

Article

A New Superhard Phase and Physical Properties of ZrB

_{3}from First-Principles Calculations^{1}

College of Physics and Optoelectronics Technology, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721016, China

^{2}

College of Mathematics and Information Science, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721013, China

^{3}

School of Science, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Zigong 643000, China

*

Correspondence: Tel.: +86-813-550-5662

Academic Editor:
Martin O. Steinhauser

Received: 25 July 2016 / Accepted: 15 August 2016 / Published: 22 August 2016

## Abstract

**:**

Using the first-principles particle swarm optimization algorithm for crystal structural prediction, we have predicted a novel monoclinic C2/m structure for ZrB

_{3}, which is more energetically favorable than the previously proposed FeB_{3}-, TcP_{3}-, MoB_{3}-, WB_{3}-, and OsB_{3}-type structures in the considered pressure range. The new phase is mechanically and dynamically stable, as confirmed by the calculations of its elastic constants and phonon dispersion curve. The calculated large shear modulus (227 GPa) and high hardness (42.2 GPa) show that ZrB_{3}within the monoclinic phase is a potentially superhard material. The analyses of the electronic density of states and chemical bonding reveal that the strong B–B and B–Zr covalent bonds are attributed to its high hardness. By the quasi-harmonic Debye model, the heat capacity, thermal expansion coefficient and Grüneisen parameter of ZrB_{3}are also systemically investigated.Keywords:

ZrB_{3}; structure prediction; superhard material; thermodynamic properties

PACS:

61.66.Fn; 61.50.Ah; 62.20.de## 1. Introduction

Superhard materials are considerably used in various industrial applications due to their superior properties of low compressibility, thermal conductivity, refractive index, chemical inertness, and high hardness. Previously, it was generally accepted that the superhard materials are strong covalently bonded compounds formed by light atoms B, C, N, and O, such as diamond [1], c-BN [2], B

_{6}O [3], etc. These materials are expensive and rare, for they can be synthesized only under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions. Recently, it has been reported that the incorporation of light atoms (B, C, N and O) into heavy transition metals (TMs) with high valence electron densities provides a good candidate for designing new hard materials. The compounds formed by TM and light atoms usually possess high valence electron density and directional covalent bonds, and these covalent bonds are strong enough to inhibit creation and movement of dislocations, which greatly improve their mechanical properties and create high hardness. Based on this design criterion, the recent design of new intrinsically potential superhard materials has focused on TM borides, e.g., ReB_{2}[4], OsB_{2}[5], WB_{4}[6,7], CrB_{4}[8] and so on. The obtained results exhibit that these materials all have large bulk and shear moduli. Moreover, TM borides can be synthesized under ambient pressure, which results in a low-cost synthesis condition and is beneficial to their application. Thereby, these pioneering studies open up a new route for pursuing new superhard materials.Up to now, in the Zr-B system, three binary phases [9,10], i.e., ZrB, ZrB

_{2}, and ZrB_{12}, have been synthesized experimentally. Among them, ZrB with the NaCl-type cubic structure has a high melting point and thermal conductivity, and its thermal stability is in the temperature range from 1073 to 1523 K [9]. ZrB_{2}is an AlB_{2}-type hexagonal structure and has properties of both ceramics and metals, and its melting temperature has been reported to be either 3313 [9] or 3523 K [11,12]. Meanwhile, ZrB_{2}also possesses high hardness, electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, and chemical corrosion resistance [13,14]. ZrB_{2}ceramic products have been considerably used in making high-temperature structural and functional materials [15,16]. ZrB_{12}with an UB_{12}-type cubic structure was formed by the peritectic reaction at T = 2303 K [11], and it presents a wide range of interesting characteristics such as high temperature resistance, superconductivity, and large hardness. The crystal structure and related physical properties of ZrB, ZrB_{2}, and ZrB_{12}have been investigated theoretically [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. By using the first-principles calypso algorithm for crystal structure prediction, Zhang et al. [27] predicted two orthorhombic Cmcm and Amm2 structures of ZrB_{4}, and they also showed that these two phases are potentially superhard materials because of large shear modulus (229 and 236 GPa) and high hardness (42.8 and 42.6 GPa). Very recently, Chen et al. [28] systemically investigated the elasticity, hardness, and thermal properties of ZrB_{n}(n = 1, 2, 12) by using the first-principles calculations of plane-wave ultra-soft pseudo-potential technology based on the density functional theory. However, there is no experimental report on the synthesis of zirconium triborides; besides, the theoretical research works of zirconium triborides are also few so far.In this work, the crystal structures of ZrB

_{3}are extensively investigated by the first-principles particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) on crystal structural prediction [29,30,31]. A stable monoclinic C2/m structure has been uncovered for ZrB_{3}, which is much more energetically preferable than the earlier proposed FeB_{3}-, TcP_{3}-, MoB_{3}-, WB_{3}-, and OsB_{3}-type structures in the pressure range of 0–100 GPa. The lattice parameters, total energy, formation enthalpy, phonon frequency, phase stability, elastic properties, density of states, and electronic localization function are then performed to study this novel monoclinic phase by using the first-principles calculations. To further study ZrB_{3}, the thermodynamic properties are also investigated by the quasi-harmonic Debye model.## 2. Computational Methods

To search for potential structure, the PSO technique in crystal structure analysis using the CALYPSO code [32] has been implemented at 0 GPa with one to four formula units (f.u.) in each simulation cell. The underlying ab initio calculations are performed using density functional theory within the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of the exchange-correlation energy, as implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) [33]. The all-electron projector augmented wave (PAW) method [34] is employed with 2s

^{2}2p^{1}and 4s^{2}4p^{6}4d^{2}5s^{2}treated as the valence electrons for B and Zr, respectively. Geometry optimization is performed using the conjugate gradient algorithm method with a plane-wave cutoff energy of 520 eV. The calculations are conducted with 11 × 7 × 4, 9 × 11 × 6, 3 × 11 × 10, 8 × 8 × 4, 8 × 8 × 5, and 13 × 13 × 7 for the predicted C2/m-ZrB_{3}structure and considered FeB_{3}-type (No, 11, P2_{1}/m), TcP_{3}-type (No, 62, Pnma), MoB_{3}-type (No, 166, R-3m), WB_{3}-type (No, 194, P6_{3}/mmc), and OsB_{3}-type (No, 187, P-6m2) structures. For hexagonal structures, Γ-centered k mesh is used, and for other structures, appropriate Monkhorst-Pack k meshes [35] are used to ensure that all the total energy calculations are well converged to better than 1 meV/atom. The phonon calculation is carried out by using a supercell approach as implemented in the PHONOPY code [36,37]. Single-crystal elastic constants are calculated by a strain-energy approach, i.e., applying a small strain to the equilibrium lattice and fitting the dependence of the resulting change in energy on the strain. The bulk modulus, shear modulus, Young’s modulus, and Poisson’s ratio are derived from the Voigt–Reuss–Hill approximation [38]. The theoretical Vickers hardness is estimated by the empirical formula proposed by Chen et al. [39]. Moreover, the quasi-harmonic Debye model [40], which is constructed from the Helmholtz free energy at the temperature below the melting point in the quasi-harmonic approximation, is used to obtain thermodynamic properties of ZrB_{3}.## 3. Results and Discussion

Through the PSO technique, we perform a variable-cell structure prediction simulation for ZrB

_{3}including 1–4 f.u. in the simulation cell at 0 GPa, and we successfully predict a novel monoclinic structure with space group C2/m, as depicted in Figure 1. For the monoclinic C2/m structure, it contains four ZrB_{3}in a unit cell with the equilibrium lattice parameters of a = 3.163 Å, b = 5.440 Å, c = 8.773 Å, α = γ = 90°, and β = 93.633°, in which three inequivalent Zr, B1, and B2 atoms occupy the Wyckoff 4i (0.4677, 0, 0.2994), 8j (0.8915, 0.1694, 0.0932), and 4h (0, 0.1668, 0.5) sites, respectively. Figure 1a presents the polyhedral view for the predicted C2/m structure, which shows an intriguing B–Zr–B sandwich stacking order along the crystallographic c-axis. In this structure, B atoms form parallel hexagonal planes, and each Zr atom is coordinated by 12 neighboring B atoms, forming edge-shared ZrB_{12}hexagonal columns which are connected by boron hexagonal planes. For each ZrB_{12}, the calculated B–B distances are 1.809 (×4), 1.844 (×2), 1.822 (×4), and 1.816 (×2) Å, while the calculated Zr–B distances are 2.729 (×2), 2.563 (×2), 2.434 (×2), 2.472 (×2), 2.528 (×2), and 2.599 (×2) Å.At zero temperature, a stable crystalline structure requires all phonon frequencies to be positive. Therefore, we calculate the phonon dispersion curves for the predicted C2/m-ZrB

_{3}at 0 and 100 GPa, respectively. As shown in Figure 2, no imaginary phonon frequency appears in the whole Brillouin zone, indicating its dynamic stability at ambient pressure and high pressure. It is well known that the thermodynamic stability of a compound can be indicated by the energy of its most stable phase. Thus, we calculate the total energy per f.u. as a function of the volume for the predicted C2/m structure, as shown in Figure 3a. For comparison, the previously known five structures of FeB_{3}, TcP_{3}, MoB_{3}, WB_{3}, and OsB_{3}are also considered for ZrB_{3}. As seen from Figure 3a, our predicted C2/m structure for ZrB_{3}has a lower energy minimum than the FeB_{3}-, TcP_{3}-, MoB_{3}-, WB_{3}-, and OsB_{3}-type structures. This implies that the predicted C2/m structure is the ground-state phase at 0 GPa. Figure 3b shows the enthalpy curves of ZrB_{3}with six different structures relative to the FeB_{3}-ZrB_{3}phase. One can see clearly that the predicted C2/m phase is much more energetically favorable than the previously proposed FeB_{3}-, TcP_{3}-, MoB_{3}-, WB_{3}-, and OsB_{3}-type structures in the whole pressure range.We also calculate the formation enthalpies of the considered structural candidates of ZrB

_{3}in the pressure range of 0–100 GPa. The formation enthalpy of ZrB_{3}with respect to the separate phases can be examined by following the reaction route $\Delta H={H}_{{\text{ZrB}}_{3}}-{H}_{\text{Zr}}-3{H}_{\mathrm{B}}$, where ∆H represents the formation enthalpy and the hexagonal Zr and α-B are chosen as the reference phases. Figure 4a presents the calculated formation enthalpies of ZrB_{3}with different structures under pressure. It can be clearly seen from this figure that the predicted C2/m structure is the most stable phase of all the considered structures up to 100 GPa. All the considered structures are thermodynamically stable with a negative value of the formation enthalpy below 100 GPa. Among them, the predicted C2/m phase has the lowest formation enthalpy of −2.715 eV at 0 GPa. Therefore, the C2/m phase is more easily synthesized at ambient conditions, and meanwhile this also indicates that the predicted C2/m phase is more stable than the reference phase mentioned above. Figure 4b presents the relative enthalpy-pressure curves of C2/m-ZrB_{3}and its respective competing phases with respect to elemental Zr and B. Here we choose ZrB, ZrB_{2}, and ZrB_{12}as the competing phases because they have been synthesized in experiments and are thermodynamically stable. From Figure 4b, the predicted C2/m-ZrB_{3}is much more energetically stable for decomposing into elements (Zr + B), compounds ZrB + B and ZrB_{12}+ Zr in the pressure range from 0 to 100 GPa, whereas the competing phase ZrB_{2}+ B is the most stable phase within the given pressure range. It is noteworthy that the relative enthalpy difference between the C2/m-ZrB_{3}and ZrB_{2}+ B becomes smaller and smaller with the increasing pressure. This indicates that the ZrB_{3}may be the most stable phase against which to decompose into compounds ZrB_{2}+ B when the pressure exceeds 100 GPa.Mechanical stability is a necessary condition for the existence of a crystal, and the mechanical properties (elastic constants and elastic moduli) are important for potential technological and industrial applications. Accurate elastic constants help to understand the mechanical properties and also provide useful information for estimating the hardness of a material. By using a strain-energy method, we obtain the zero-pressure elastic constants (C

_{ij}) of the C2/m-ZrB_{3}. The calculated elastic constants are listed in Table 1 along with the theoretical values and available experimental data of other zirconium borides, MoB_{3}, WB_{3}, RuB_{3}, and OsB_{3}. For a stable monoclinic crystal, the independent elastic stiffness tensor consists of 13 components, C_{11}, C_{22}, C_{33}, C_{44}, C_{55}, C_{66}, C_{12}, C_{13}, C_{23}, C_{15}, C_{25}, C_{35}, and C_{46}, and its mechanical stability criteria can be given by:
$$\begin{array}{c}{C}_{11}>0,{C}_{22}>0,{C}_{33}>0,{C}_{44}>0,{C}_{55}>0,{C}_{66}>0,\left[{C}_{11}+{C}_{22}+{C}_{33}+2\left({C}_{12}+{C}_{13}+{C}_{23}\right)\right]>0,\\ ({C}_{33}{C}_{55}-{C}_{35}^{2})>0,({C}_{44}{C}_{66}-{C}_{46}^{2})>0,({C}_{22}+{C}_{33}-2{C}_{23})>0,\\ [{C}_{22}({C}_{33}{C}_{55}-{C}_{35}^{2})+2{C}_{23}{C}_{25}{C}_{35}-{C}_{23}^{2}{C}_{55}-{C}_{25}^{2}{C}_{33}]>0,\\ g={C}_{11}{C}_{22}{C}_{33}-{C}_{11}{C}_{23}^{2}-{C}_{22}{C}_{13}^{2}-{C}_{33}{C}_{12}^{2}+2{C}_{12}{C}_{13}{C}_{23},\\ \{2[{C}_{15}{C}_{25}\left({C}_{33}{C}_{12}-{C}_{13}{C}_{23}\right)+{C}_{15}{C}_{35}\left({C}_{22}{C}_{13}-{C}_{12}{C}_{23}\right)+{C}_{25}{C}_{35}\left({C}_{11}{C}_{23}-{C}_{12}{C}_{13}\right)]-\\ [{C}_{15}^{2}({C}_{22}{C}_{33}-{C}_{23}^{2})+{C}_{25}^{2}({C}_{11}{C}_{33}-{C}_{13}^{2})+{C}_{35}^{2}({C}_{11}{C}_{22}-{C}_{12}^{2})]+{C}_{55}g\}>0.\end{array}$$

As shown in Table 1, the elastic constants of the predicted C2/m-ZrB

_{3}completely fulfill the elastic stability criteria for a monoclinic crystal, indicating that it is mechanically stable at ambient conditions. The values of C_{11}, C_{22}, and C_{33}for the new phase are all larger than 400 GPa, suggesting its strong incompressibility along the a, b, and c axis, respectively. Additionally, the values of C_{11}and C_{22}of the predicted C2/m phase are much higher than that of C_{33}, which reflects that the bond strengths along the [100] and [010] directions are much stronger than that of the [001] direction. This is because the covalence of the B–B bond is higher than that of the Zr–B bond, as indicated by Figure 8. Thus, the relatively small C_{33}with regard to C_{11}and C_{12}is understandable. C_{44}is an important indicator for the hardness of a material. The large C_{44}value (207 GPa) of the predicted C2/m-ZrB_{3}indicates its relatively strong strength against the shear deformation. Using the obtained elastic constants, the polycrystalline bulk modulus B and shear modulus G are thus determined by the Voigt–Reuss–Hill approximation. The Young’s modulus E and Poisson’s ratio v are derived by the following formulas: E = 9BG/(3B + G) and v = (3B − 2G)/(6B + 2G). The calculated bulk modulus, shear modulus, Young’s modulus, and Poisson’s ratio of the C2/m phase together with the reference materials mentioned above are listed in Table 1. As seen from Table 1, the predicted C2/m phase has a larger bulk modulus of 238 GPa, which is larger than those of ZrB [17,18,19,28,41] and ZrB_{12}[26,28,43] but comparable to those of ZrB_{2}[17,20,21,28,42], ZrB_{4}[27], and other TMB_{3}(TM = Mo, W, Ru, Os) [45,46,47,48]. This indicates that the C2/m phase is difficult to compress. Moreover, the bulk modulus (B = 238 GPa) for C2/m-ZrB_{3}agrees well with that directly obtained from the fitting results (B_{0}= 237 GPa) of the third-order Birch-Murnaghan equation of states, which further verifies the reliability of our elastic calculations. To compare the incompressibility of the C2/m-ZrB_{3}, other zirconium borides, c-BN, and diamond under pressure, the volume compressions as a function of pressure are shown in Figure 5. Clearly, all the considered zirconium borides except for ZrB have almost the same incompressibility due to their very close bulk moduli, but their incompressibility is lower than those of c-BN and diamond. The shear modulus of a material is a measure of the ability to resist shape change at a constant volume and it plays an important role in hardness compared with the bulk modulus. Interestingly, the shear modulus of the predicted C2/m-ZrB_{3}is almost the same as those of ZrB_{2}[17,20,21,28,42] and ZrB_{4}[27], suggesting that it is a potential superhard material. Except the bulk modulus and shear modulus, the Young’s modulus can also provide a good measure of the stiffness of materials. Generally speaking, the larger the Young’s modulus a material has, the harder it is to deform. Since the Young’s modulus of the C2/m-ZrB_{3}is similar to those of the ZrB_{2}[17,20,21,28,42] and ZrB_{4}[27], it is conceivable that the C2/m-ZrB_{3}is a superhard material. Further, Poisson’s ratio v is a crucial parameter to describe the degree of directionality for the covalent bonding. From Table 1, the v value of the C2/m-ZrB_{3}(0.14) is a little larger than that of ZrB_{2}[42], the same as ZrB_{4}[27], and much smaller than those of the other TM borides mentioned above [45,46,47,48], which means there is a strong degree of covalent bonding due to the presence of the planar six-membered ring boron network. To describe the brittleness or ductility of materials, Pugh [49] proposed an experimental criterion by the ratio G/B. The critical value which separates ductile and brittle materials is about 0.57. If G/B < 0.57, the material behaves in a ductile manner; otherwise, the material behaves in a brittle way. It can be seen from Table 1 that the G/B value for the predicted phase is 0.95, implying it is rather brittle nature. All the results strongly support that the C2/m-ZrB_{3}is a potential candidate for an ultra-incompressible and superhard material.The Debye temperature is a very important parameter of materials, and it is closely related to many physical properties such as specific heat, elastic constants, melting temperature, hardness and so on [50]. It is used to differentiate between high- and low-temperature regions for a solid. If the temperature T > Θ
where h is Planck’s constant, k is Boltzmann’s constant, N
where v

_{D}, all modes are expected to have the energy of k_{B}T; if T < Θ_{D}, the high-frequency modes are expected to be frozen, namely the vibrational excitations originate only from the acoustic vibrations. The Debye temperature Θ_{D}for our studied C2/m-ZrB_{3}is estimated from the average sound velocity (v_{m}) by the following expression:
$${\mathrm{\Theta}}_{\mathrm{D}}=\frac{h}{k}{\left[\frac{3n}{4\mathsf{\pi}}\left(\frac{\mathsf{\rho}{N}_{A}}{M}\right)\right]}^{\frac{1}{3}}{v}_{m}$$

_{A}is Avogadro’s number, n is the number of atoms per formula unit, M is the molecular mass per f.u., and ρ is the density. The average sound velocity v_{m}is given by:
$${v}_{m}={\left[\frac{1}{3}\left(\frac{2}{{v}_{t}^{3}}+\frac{1}{{v}_{l}^{3}}\right)\right]}^{-\frac{1}{3}}$$

_{t}and v_{l}are the transverse and longitudinal elastic wave velocities of the polycrystalline material, which is determined by Anderson’s method [51]. Figure 6 presents the dependence of the Debye temperatures of the C2/m-ZrB_{3}on the pressure. At zero pressure and zero temperature, our calculated Debye temperature is 998 K for the C2/m-ZrB_{3}, which is much larger than the values of the known ultra-incompressible RuB_{2}(780 K) [52], ReN_{2}(735 K) [53], ReO_{2}(850 K) [54], and ReB_{2}(858.3 K) [55]. Generally, the higher the Debye temperature materials possess, the larger their microhardness. Clearly, the Debye temperature becomes greater with increasing the pressure. This indicates that the pressure is in favor of the improvement of the hardness for the C2/m-ZrB_{3}.Due to the high bulk and shear moduli as well as the large Debye temperature for the predicted C2/m-ZrB
where G is the shear modulus and K = G/B is the Pugh modulus ratio. Using this model, the estimated Vickers hardness of the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}, the hardness calculation is of great importance. The hardness of a material is the intrinsic resistance to deformation when a force is loaded, which depends upon the loading force and the sample quality. The Vickers hardness of a material is estimated by [39]:
$${H}_{v}=2{({K}^{2}G)}^{0.585}-3$$

_{3}is 42.2 GPa, which exceeds the lower limit of superhard materials (40 GPa) and is comparable to the known superhard materials B_{6}O (45 GPa) [3] and c-BN (48 GPa) [56]. Therefore, the C2/m-ZrB_{3}is considered to be a superhard material.The electronic structure and chemical bonding are key factors to further understand the origin of the mechanical properties of the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}. For this purpose, the density of states (DOS) and bond characteristics are calculated, and the corresponding results are analyzed here. Figure 7a presents the total and partial density of states of the C2/m-ZrB_{3}at 0 GPa, where the vertical dashed line denotes the Fermi level (E_{F}). As seen from this figure, the C2/m-ZrB_{3}shows a metallic behavior because of the finite electronic DOS at the Fermi level. From the partial DOS, it exhibits that the peaks below −11 eV are mainly attributed to B-s and B-p states with slight contributions from Zr-s, Zr-p, and Zr-d states. The states above −11 eV largely come from Zr-d and B-p orbitals with small contributions of B-s, Zr-s, and Zr-p. Moreover, the partial DOS profiles of Zr-d and B-p have a very similar shape in the range from −11 to 0 eV, which indicates the significant hybridization between these two orbitals. This hybridization also reflects a strong covalent interaction between the Zr and B atoms. On the other hand, the DOS profile near E_{F}mainly originates from the 4d state of Zr. Another typical feature of DOS is that there is a deep valley, namely the pseudogap around E_{F}, which is regarded as the borderline between the bonding and antibonding states [57,58,59]. Significantly, the pseudogap appears below the E_{F}in the C2/m-ZrB_{3}, indicating the s-p and p-d bonding states started to be saturated. The nearly full occupation of the bonding states, and without filling the antibonding states, results in the high bulk modulus, large shear modulus, and small Poisson’s ratio, and also increases the structural stability of the C2/m-ZrB_{3}. To further understand the changes of the total and partial DOS under pressure, Figure 7b–d present the total and partial DOS of the C2/m-ZrB_{3}at 20, 50, and 100 GPa, respectively. Compared with the case for 0 GPa (see Figure 7a), the shapes of the total and partial DOS are slightly changed with the increase of the pressure. This indicates that the C2/m-ZrB_{3}structure is still stable under pressure up to 100 GPa. Traditionally, the stability of a solid is closely associated with the DOS at the Fermi energy. According to our calculations, the DOS values at the Fermi level are 0.294 eV for 0 GPa, 0.263 eV for 20 GPa, 0.227 eV for 50 GPa, and 0.186 eV for 100 GPa. Therefore, the DOS value at the Fermi level decreases with increasing the pressure. Based on the previous reference report [60], there is a principle stating that the DOS at the Fermi level would be hopefully smaller in an energetically-favored structure. This means that the applied pressure is in favor of the stability of ZrB_{3}. In addition, one can see from Figure 7 that the total DOS reveals a slight broadening with the enhancement of the pressure. All these results may be explained by the variations of the spacing between atoms.To gain deeper insight into the bonding character of the predicted C2/m-ZrB

_{3}, we calculate the electronic localization function (ELF), which is based upon a topological analysis related to the Pauli exclusion principle. The ELF is a contour plot in real space, in which different contours have values from 0 to 1. The upper limit ELF = 1 shows the perfect localization property of covalent bonds or lone pairs (filled core levels), whereas the lower limit ELF = 0 is typical for a vacuum (no electron density) or areas between atomic orbitals. ELF = 0.5 corresponds to the perfect free-electron gas, with values of this order meaning regions with bonding of a metallic character. Note that ELF is not a measure of electron density but a measure of the Pauli principle, and it is used to distinguish metallic, covalent, and ionic bonding. Figure 8 presents the calculated ELF contours of the predicted C2/m-ZrB_{3}phase on the (001) and (102) planes. Because of the high ELF value between the two adjacent B and B atoms, as shown in Figure 8a, there is the existence of a strong covalent B–B bonding within the planar six-membered ring unit. Meanwhile, one can see from Figure 8b that the large ELF value between the Zr and B atoms implies the partially B–Zr covalent bonding interaction in the C2/m-ZrB_{3}phase. Therefore, the strong covalent interaction between B–B bonds and B–Zr bonds is the major reason for its high hardness and stability.The investigation on the thermodynamic properties of solids at high temperature and high pressure is an interesting topic in materials science. Therefore, we investigate the thermodynamic properties of the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}in the temperature range from 0 to 1500 K, where the quasi-harmonic model remains fully valid and the pressure effect is also investigated in the pressure range from 0 to 100 GPa. By applying this model, we can get the variations of the lattice heat capacity C_{V}or C_{P}, the thermal expansion coefficient α, and Grüneisen parameter γ with temperature and pressure. Figure 9 presents the temperature dependences of the heat capacity at constant volume C_{V}and the heat capacity at constant pressure C_{P}at different pressures, respectively. As seen from Figure 9, when the temperature is lower than 400 K, the difference of between C_{V}and C_{P}is very small. This can be explained by the relation between C_{P}and C_{V}, i.e., C_{P}= C_{V}+ TVBα^{2}[61], since the difference between the C_{P}and C_{V}is mainly determined by α^{2}for the case of low temperature. Therefore, when the thermal expansion coefficient α becomes small, e.g., the temperature T decreases and the pressure P increases, the C_{P}-C_{V}difference also becomes small. On the other hand, the C_{V}and C_{P}increase rapidly with the temperature at low temperature. This rapid increase is simply due to the exponentially increased number of excited phonon modes. However, when the applied temperature is considerably high, due to the anharmonic effect, the C_{P}is different from the C_{V}. The former is proportional to T at high temperature, while the latter reaches a constant value which is the so-called Dulong-Petit limit (C_{V}(T) ~ 3R for monoatomic solids). Moreover, as the pressure keeps constant, the C_{V}and C_{P}increase with the temperature. As the temperature keeps constant, C_{V}and C_{P}decrease with the pressure. This shows that the temperature has a more significant influence on the heat capacity than the pressure.Figure 10 plots the changes of the thermal expansion coefficient α for the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}with temperature and pressure. As shown in Figure 10a, the thermal expansion coefficient α increases sharply at low temperatures, especially for the case of 0 GPa, and then gradually approaches a linear increase at high temperature, finally becomes moderate at much higher temperature. In terms of α ~ C_{V}/B [61], the fast increase of α at low temperature is mainly due to that of C_{V}, and the linear increase of α at high temperature is attributed to that of bulk modulus B (C_{V}is saturated to the Dulong-Petit limit at high temperature). In addition, the effect of the pressure on α is very small for the case of low temperature, whereas the effect is clearly enhanced at sufficiently high temperature. When the pressure increases, α reduces drastically for a given temperature and the effect of the temperature on it becomes unnoticeable. From Figure 10b, one can see clearly that α is almost close to a constant value at high temperature and pressure. All these results are in good agreement with those of many kinds of materials by applying the Debye theory, such as OsB_{4}, FeB_{4}, and TcN [62,63,64].The Grüneisen parameter γ can describe the anharmonic effects in the vibration of a crystal lattice, and it is commonly used to characterize and explore the thermodynamic behavior of a material at high temperature and high pressure, such as the thermal expansion coefficient and the temperature dependence of phonon frequencies and line-widths. For this purpose, we investigate the dependences of the Grüneisen parameter γ for the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}with the temperature and pressure, and the corresponding results are given in Figure 11. As seen from Figure 11a, for a given pressure, γ almost remains the same at the low temperature of ≤300 K. As the applied temperature is higher than 300 K, γ tonelessly increases with temperature for the given pressure. In addition, one can find from Figure 11b that γ decreases nearly exponentially with the pressure for a given temperature. As the applied pressure increases, the temperature has a much weaker influence on γ than the pressure.## 4. Conclusions

In summary, a novel monoclinic C2/m structure is unraveled to be the ground-state structure for ZrB

_{3}via the PSO algorithm combined with first-principles calculations. The phonon dispersion and elastic constant calculations have verified that the C2/m-ZrB_{3}is dynamically and mechanically stable. The formation enthalpy-pressure relationship shows that this new phase is energetically superior to the previously proposed FeB_{3}-, TcP_{3}-, MoB_{3}-, WB_{3}-, and OsB_{3}-type structures within the pressure range of 0–100 GPa. In addition, the high bulk modulus, large shear modulus, and small Poisson’s ratio of the predicted C2/m phase indicate that it is a promising low-compressibility material. Based on the calculated Vickers hardness (42.2 GPa) for the C2/m phase, it is a potential superhard material. The more detailed analyses of the electronic structure and electronic localization function have further demonstrated that the strong covalent B–B bonding and B–Zr bonding are the main driving force for the incompressibility and hardness for C2/m-ZrB_{3}. By using the quasi-harmonic Debye model, some fundamental thermodynamic properties, such as the heat capacity, thermal expansion coefficient, and Grüneisen parameter are estimated in the pressure range of 0–100 GPa and the temperature range of 0–1500 K. We hope that the present theoretical work will stimulate further experimental research on this material in the future.## Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Science Foundation of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences of China (Grant Nos. ZK16069 and ZK11135), the Natural Science Foundation of the Education Committee of Shaanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2013JK0637), the Natural Science Basic Research plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2016JM1012), and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11404008).

## Author Contributions

Gangtai Zhang and Yanfei Hu designed the project; Gangtai Zhang and Tingting Bai performed the calculations; Gangtai Zhang and Tingting Bai wrote the manuscript; Yaru Zhao and Yanfei Hu revised the paper and coordinated the work; all authors discussed results.

## Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## References

- Occelli, F.; Farber, D.L.; Toullec, R.L. Properties of diamond under hydrostatic pressures up to 140 GPa. Nat. Mater.
**2003**, 2, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Zhang, Y.; Sun, H.; Chen, C.F. Structural deformation, strength and instability of cubic BN compared to diamond: A first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B
**2006**, 73, 144115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - He, D.W.; Zhao, Y.S.; Daemen, L.; Qian, J.; Shen, T.D.; Zerda, T.W. Boron suboxide: As hard as cubic boron nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett.
**2002**, 81, 643–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chung, H.Y.; Weinberger, M.B.; Levine, J.B.; Kavner, A.; Yang, J.M.; Tolbert, S.H.; Kaner, R.B. Synthesis of ultra-incompressible superhard rhenium diboride at ambient pressure. Science
**2007**, 316, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Cumberland, R.W.; Weinberger, M.B.; Gilman, J.J.; Clark, S.M.; Tolbert, S.H.; Kaner, R.B. Osmium diboride, an ultra-incompressible, hard material. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
**2005**, 127, 7264–7265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Gu, Q.F.; Krauss, G.; Steurer, W. Transition metal borides: Superhard versus ultra-incompressible. Adv. Mater.
**2008**, 20, 3620–3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, R.F.; Legut, D.; Lin, Z.J.; Zhao, Y.S.; Mao, H.K.; Veprek, S. Stability and strength of transition-metal tetraborides and triborides. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2012**, 108, 255502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Gou, H.Y.; Li, Z.P.; Niu, H.; Gao, F.M.; Zhang, J.W.; Rodney, C.E.; Lian, J. Unusual rigidity and ideal strength of CrB
_{4}and MnB_{4}. Appl. Phys. Lett.**2012**, 100, 111907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Glaser, F.W.; Post, B. Phase diagram zirconium–boron. Trans. AIME
**1953**, 197, 1117–1118. [Google Scholar] - Nowotny, H.; Rudy, E.; Benesovsky, F. Untersuchungen in den systemen: Zirkonium-bor-kohlenstoff und zirkonium-bor-stickstoff. Mh. Chem.
**1960**, 91, 963–974. (In Germany) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Portnoi, K.I.; Romashov, V.M.; Burobina, L.N. Constitution diagram of the system zirconium-boron. Sov. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram.
**1970**, 9, 577–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tokunaga, T.; Terashima, K.; Ohtani, H.; Hasebe, M. Thermodynamic analysis of the phase equilibria in the Fe-Zr-B system. Mater. Trans.
**2008**, 49, 2534–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Opeka, M.M.; Talmy, I.G.; Wuchina, E.J.; Zaykoski, J.A.; Causey, S.J. Mechanical, thermal, and oxidation properties of refractory hafnium and zirconium compounds. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
**1999**, 19, 2405–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, Y.G.; Liu, W.; Cheng, L.F.; Zhang, L.T. Preparation and properties of 2D C/ZrB
_{2}-SiC ultra high temperature ceramic. Mater. Sci. Eng. A**2009**, 524, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cheng, Y.M.; Gadalla, A.M. Synthesis and analysis of ZrB
_{2}-based composites. Mater. Manuf. Process.**1996**, 11, 575–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Martinez, M.; Rodriguez, D. Characterisation and high temperature mechanical properties of zirconium boride-based materials. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
**2002**, 22, 2543–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, H.; Zhang, L.T.; Zeng, Q.F.; Wang, J.J.; Cheng, L.F.; Ren, H.T.; Guan, K. Crystal structure and elastic properties of ZrB compared with ZrB
_{2}: A first-principles study. Comput. Mater. Sci.**2010**, 49, 814–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, Y.; Chen, W.; Chen, X.; Liu, H.Y.; Ding, Z.H.; Ma, Y.M.; Wang, X.D.; Cao, Q.P.; Jiang, J.Z. Crystal structures, stability, electronic and elastic properties of 4d and 5d transition metal monoborides: First-principles calculations. J. Alloys Compd.
**2012**, 538, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Huang, B.; Duan, Y.H.; Hu, W.C.; Sun, Y.; Chen, S. Structural, anisotropic elastic and thermal properties of MB (M = Ti, Zr and Hf) monoborides. Ceram. Int.
**2015**, 41, 6831–6843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Okamoto, N.L.; Kusakari, M.; Tanaka, K.; Inui, H.; Yamaguchi, M.; Otani, S. Temperature dependence of thermal expansion and elastic constants of single crystals of ZrB
_{2}and the suitability of ZrB_{2}as a substrate for GaN film. J. Appl. Phys.**2003**, 93, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, X.H.; Luo, X.G.; Han, J.C.; Li, J.P.; Han, W.B. Electronic structure, elasticity and hardness of diborides of zirconium and hafnium: First principles calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci.
**2008**, 44, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, X.H.; Luo, X.G.; Li, J.P.; Han, J.C.; Han, W.B.; Hong, C.Q. Structure and bonding features of ZrB
_{2}(0001) surface. Comput. Mater. Sci.**2009**, 46, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Okamoto, N.L.; Kusakari, M.; Tanaka, K.; Inui, H.; Otani, S. Anisotropic elastic constants and thermal expansivities in monocrystal CrB
_{2}, TiB_{2}, and ZrB_{2}. Acta Mater.**2010**, 58, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jäger, B.; Paluch, S.; Żogal, O.J.; Wolf, W.; Herzig, P.; Filippov, V.B.; Shitsevalova, N.; Paderno, Y. Characterization of the electronic properties of YB
_{12}, ZrB_{12}, and LuB_{12}using^{11}B NMR and first-principles calculations. J. Phys. Condens. Matter**2006**, 18, 2525–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Korozlu, N.; Colakoglu, K.; Deligoz, E.; Aydin, S. The elastic and mechanical properties of MB
_{12}(M = Zr, Hf, Y, Lu) as a function of pressure. J. Alloys Compd.**2013**, 546, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ai, B.C.; Luo, X.G.; Yu, J.J.; Miao, W.B.; Hu, P. Theoretical elastic stiffness and thermodynamic properties of zirconium dodecaboride from first principles calculation. Comput. Mater. Sci.
**2014**, 82, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, X.Y.; Qin, J.Q.; Sun, X.W.; Xue, Y.N.; Ma, M.Z.; Liu, R.P. First-principles structural design of superhard material of ZrB
_{4}. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.**2013**, 15, 20894–20899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Chen, Z.Q.; Peng, Y.S.; Hu, M.; Li, C.M.; Luo, Y.T. Elasticity, hardness, and thermal properties of ZrB
_{n}(n = 1, 2, 12). Ceram. Int.**2016**, 42, 6624–6631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, Y.C.; Lv, J.; Zhu, L.; Ma, Y.M. Crystal structure prediction via particle-swarm optimization. Phys. Rev. B
**2010**, 82, 094116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, Y.C.; Lv, J.; Zhu, L.; Ma, Y.M. CALYPSO: A method for crystal structure prediction. Comput. Phys. Commun.
**2012**, 183, 2063–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, H.; Wang, Y.C.; Lv, J.; Li, Q.; Zhang, L.J.; Ma, Y.M. CALYPSO structure prediction method and its wide application. Comput. Mater. Sci.
**2016**, 112, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ma, Y.M.; Wang, Y.C.; Lv, J.; Zhu, L. CALYPSO (Crystal Structure AnaLYsis by Particle Swarm Optimization). Available online: http://www.calypso.cn (accessed on 18 August 2016).
- Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B
**1996**, 54, 11169–11186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B
**1999**, 59, 1758–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Monkhorst, H.J.; Pack, J.D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B
**1976**, 13, 5188–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Togo, A.; Oba, F.; Tanaka, I. First-principles calculations of the ferroelastic transition between rutile-type and CaCl
_{2}-type SiO_{2}at high pressures. Phys. Rev. B**2008**, 78, 134106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Togo, A.; Tanaka, I. First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scr. Mater.
**2015**, 108, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hill, R. The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate. Proc. Phys. Soc.
**1952**, 65, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, X.Q.; Niu, H.; Li, D.; Li, Y. Modeling hardness of polycrystalline materials and bulk metallic glasses. Intermetallics
**2011**, 19, 1275–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Blanco, M.A.; Francisco, E.; Luaña, V. GIBBS: Isothermal-isobaric thermodynamics of solids from energy curves using a quasi-harmonic Debye model. Comput. Phys. Commun.
**2004**, 158, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fahrenholtz, G.W.; Hilmas, G.E. Refractory diborides of zirconium and hafnium. J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
**2007**, 90, 1347–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wiley, D.E.; Manning, W.R.; Hunter, O. Elastic properties of polycrystalline TiB
_{2}, ZrB_{2}and HfB_{2}from room temperature to 1300 K. J. Less Common Met.**1969**, 18, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Grechnev, G.E.; Baranovskiy, A.E.; Fil, V.D.; Ignatova, T.V.; Kolobov, I.G.; Logosha, A.V.; Shitsevalova, N.Y.; Filippov, V.B.; Eriksson, O. Electronic structure and bulk properties of MB
_{6}and MB_{12}borides. Low. Temp. Phys.**2008**, 34, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kim, K.H.; Shim, K.B. The effect of lanthanum on the fabrication of ZrB
_{2}–ZrC composites by spark plasma sintering. Mater. Charact.**2003**, 50, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, Y.C.; Yao, T.K.; Wang, L.M.; Yao, J.L.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.W.; Gou, H.Y. Structural and relative stabilities, electronic properties and possible reactive routing of osmium and ruthenium borides from first-principles calculations. Dalton Trans.
**2013**, 42, 7041–7050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Zhang, M.G.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.B.; Cui, T.; Ma, Y.M. Structural modifications and mechanical properties of molybdenum borides from first principles. J. Phys. Chem. C
**2010**, 114, 6722–6725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liang, Y.C.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, W.Q. Thermodynamic identification of tungsten borides. Phys. Rev. B
**2011**, 83, 220102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ji, Z.W.; Hu, C.H.; Wang, D.H.; Zhong, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhang, W.Q.; Zhou, H.Y. Mechanical properties and chemical bonding of the Os–B system: A first-principles study. Acta Mater.
**2012**, 60, 4208–4217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pugh, S.F. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals. Philos. Mag.
**1954**, 45, 823–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ravindran, P.; Fast, L.; Korzhavyi, P.A.; Johansson, B.; Wills, J.; Eriksson, O. Density functional theory for calculation of elastic properties of orthorhombic crystals: Application to TiSi
_{2}. J. Appl. Phys.**1998**, 84, 4891–4904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Anderson, O.L. A simplified method for calculating the Debye temperature from elastic constants. J. Phys. Chem. Solids
**1963**, 24, 909–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hao, X.F.; Xu, Y.H.; Wu, Z.J.; Zhou, D.F.; Liu, X.J.; Meng, J. Elastic anisotropy of OsB
_{2}and RuB_{2}from first-principles study. J. Alloys Compd.**2008**, 453, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, Y.L.; Zeng, Z. New potential super-incompressible phase of ReN
_{2}. Chem. Phys. Lett.**2009**, 474, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, Y.L.; Zeng, Z. Structural, elastic and electronic properties of ReO
_{2}. Chin. Phys. Lett.**2008**, 25, 4086–4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hao, X.F.; Xu, Y.H.; Wu, Z.J.; Zhou, D.F.; Liu, X.J.; Cao, X.Q.; Meng, J. Low-compressibility and hard materials ReB
_{2}and WB_{2}: Prediction from first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B**2006**, 74, 224112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sung, C.M.; Sung, M. Carbon nitride and other speculative superhard materials. Mater. Chem. Phys.
**1996**, 43, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xu, J.H.; Freeman, A.J. Phase stability and electronic structure of ScA
_{13}and ZrA_{13}and of Sc-stabilized cubic ZrA_{13}precipitates. Phys. Rev. B**1990**, 41, 12553–12561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Grechnev, G.E.; Ushakova, N.V.; Kervalishvili, P.D.; Kvachantiradze, G.G.; Kharebov, K.S. Electron structure of diborides of 3d metals. Low Temp. Phys.
**1997**, 23, 217–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vajeeston, P.; Ravindran, P.; Ravi, C.; Asokamani, R. Electronic structure, bonding, and ground-state properties of AlB
_{2}-type transition-metal diborides. Phys. Rev. B**2001**, 63, 045115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Imai, Y.; Mukaida, M.; Tsunoda, T. Comparison of density of states of transition metal disilicides and their related compounds systematically calculated by a first-principle pseudopotential method using plane-wave basis. Intermetallics
**2000**, 8, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Huang, L.F.; Lu, X.Z.; Tennessen, E.; Rondinelli, J.M. An efficient ab-initio quasiharmonic approach for the thermodynamics of solids. Comput. Mater. Sci.
**2016**, 120, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yan, H.Y.; Zhang, M.G.; Huang, D.H.; Wei, Q. First-principles study of elastic and thermodynamic properties of orthorhombic OsB
_{4}under high pressure. Solid State Sci.**2013**, 18, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, X.Y.; Qin, J.Q.; Ning, J.L.; Sun, X.W.; Li, X.T.; Ma, M.Z.; Liu, R.P. First principle study of elastic and thermodynamic properties of FeB
_{4}under high pressure. J. Appl. Phys.**2013**, 114, 183517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhao, Y.R.; Zhang, G.T.; Yan, H.Y.; Bai, T.T.; Zheng, B.B.; Yuan, Y.Q. First-principles investigations of the structure and physical properties for new TcN crystal structure. Mol. Phys.
**2016**, 114, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**Crystal structure of the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}phases. Large and small spheres represent Zr and B atoms, respectively. (

**a**) Polyhedral view of the C2/m phase; (

**b**) ZrB

_{12}.

**Figure 3.**(

**a**) Total energy versus f.u. volume for ZrB

_{3}with six different structures; (

**b**) Enthalpies of ZrB

_{3}with six different structures relative to FeB

_{3}-ZrB

_{3}phase as a function of pressure.

**Figure 4.**(

**a**) The formation enthalpy-pressure curves for ZrB

_{3}with six different structures; (

**b**) The relative enthalpy-pressure curve of the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}and its respective competing phases with respect to elemental Zr and B.

**Figure 5.**The calculated volume compression as a function of pressure for the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}in contrast to ZrB, ZrB

_{2}, ZrB

_{4}, c-BN, and diamond.

**Figure 7.**Total and partial density of states of the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}: (

**a**) 0 GPa; (

**b**) 20 GPa; (

**c**) 50 GPa; and (

**d**) 100 GPa. The vertical dashed line denotes the Fermi level E

_{F}.

**Figure 9.**The temperature dependences of the heat capacity at constant volume C

_{V}and heat capacity at constant pressure C

_{P}at different pressures for the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}: (

**a**) C

_{V}contours; (

**b**) C

_{V}-T; (

**c**) C

_{P}contours and (

**d**) C

_{P}-T, respectively.

**Figure 10.**Temperature (

**a**) and pressure (

**b**) dependence of the thermal expansion coefficient α for the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}.

**Figure 11.**Temperature (

**a**) and pressure (

**b**) dependence of the Grüneisen parameter γ for the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}.

**Table 1.**The calculated elastic constants C

_{ij}(GPa), bulk modulus B (GPa), EOS fitted bulk modulus B

_{0}(GPa), shear modulus G (GPa), Young’s modulus E (GPa), G/B ratio, Poisson’s ratio v, Debye temperature Θ

_{D}(K), and hardness H

_{v}(GPa) for the C2/m-ZrB

_{3}.

Structure | Work | C_{11} | C_{22} | C_{33} | C_{44} | C_{55} | C_{66} | C_{12} | C_{13} | C_{23} | B | B_{0} | G | E | G/B | ν | Θ_{D} | H_{v} |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

C2/m-ZrB_{3} | this work | 576 | 564 | 466 | 207 | 244 | 250 | 45 | 115 | 109 | 238 | 237 | 227 | 517 | 0.95 | 0.14 | 998 | 42.2 |

Fm-3m-ZrB | this work | 363 | - | - | 60 | - | - | 60 | - | - | 161 | 160 | 88 | 223 | 0.55 | 0.27 | 529 | 10.5 |

theory [17] | 282 | - | - | 111 | - | - | 100 | - | - | 161 | - | 103 | 254 | - | 0.24 | - | - | |

theory [18] | 350 | - | - | 43 | - | - | 70 | - | - | 163 | - | 71 | 186 | - | 0.31 | - | 5.5 | |

theory [19] | 353 | - | - | 51 | - | - | 64 | - | - | 160 | - | 78 | 202 | - | 0.29 | - | 11.8 | |

theory [28] | 274 | - | - | 42 | - | - | 51 | - | - | 125 | - | 63 | 162 | 0.50 | 0.28 | 450 | 7.9 | |

experiment [41] | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 148 | - | - | 244 | - | 0.23 | - | - | |

P6/mmm-ZrB_{2} | this work | 565 | - | 432 | 252 | - | 255 | 54 | 121 | - | 239 | 238 | 233 | 527 | 0.98 | 0.13 | 930 | 44.1 |

theory [17] | 504 | - | 427 | 241 | - | - | 91 | 112 | - | 229 | - | 211 | 484 | - | 0.15 | - | - | |

theory [21] | 551 | - | 436 | 252 | - | - | 65 | 121 | - | 239 | - | 229 | 520 | - | 0.14 | 921 | - | |

theory [28] | 502 | - | 374 | 225 | - | 229 | 43 | 85 | - | 199 | - | 211 | 468 | 1.06 | 0.11 | 884 | 43.5 | |

experiment [20] | 581 | - | 445 | 240 | - | 261 | 55 | 121 | - | 245 | - | 243 | 554 | - | - | - | - | |

experiment [42] | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 220 | - | 225 | 502 | - | 0.11 | 910 | ||

Amm2-ZrB_{4} | theory [27] | 554 | 576 | 454 | 223 | 243 | 254 | 50 | 122 | 113 | 241 | - | 229 | 522 | 0.95 | 0.14 ^{a} | - | 42.6 |

Fm-3m-ZrB_{12} | this work | 412 | - | - | 251 | - | - | 144 | - | - | 233 | 233 | 195 | 458 | 0.84 | 0.17 | 933 | 32.5 |

theory [26] | 413 | - | - | 244 | - | - | 141 | - | - | 232 | - | 193 | 453 | 0.83 | 0.174 | 1206 | - | |

theory [28] | 420 | - | - | 249 | - | - | 123 | - | - | 222 | - | 202 | 466 | 0.91 | 0.15 | 1231 | 35.4 | |

experiment [43] | 443 | - | - | 265 | - | - | 129 | - | - | 234 | - | - | - | - | 0.23 | 1260 | - | |

experiment [44] | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1260 | - | |||

Pnma-RuB_{3} | theory [45] | 497 | 462 | 471 | 224 | 219 | 187 | 111 | 229 | - | 267 | 185 | 451 | 0.69 | 0.219 | - | 26.3 | |

R-3m-MoB_{3} | theory [46] | 602 | - | 420 | 247 | - | - | 106 | 166 | - | 276 | 277 | 222 | 526 | 0.80 | 0.18 | - | 31.8 |

P6_{3}/mmc-WB_{3} | theory [47] | 656 | - | 479 | 277 | - | - | - | - | - | 291 | - | 252 | 588 | - | 0.168 | - | 42 |

P-6m2-OsB_{3} | theory [48] | 525 | - | 751 | 186 | - | - | 125 | 221 | - | 317 | - | 195 | 485 | 0.62 | 0.245 | 36.9 | |

P2_{1}/m-OsB_{3} | theory [45] | 674 | 525 | 584 | 135 | 291 | 128 | 97 | 247 | - | 303 | - | 186 | 463 | 0.61 | 0.245 | 25.1 |

^{a}Our calculated result from Reference [27] on the basis of v = (3B − 2G)/(6B + 2G).

© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).