A Systematic Review of Reliability Studies on Composite Power Systems: A Coherent Taxonomy Motivations, Open Challenges, Recommendations, and New Research Directions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Method
2.1. Information Sources
2.2. Study Selection
2.3. Search
2.4. Data Collection
3. Results
3.1. Investigation Studies
3.2. Planning and Optimization Studies
3.3. Studies on Evaluation Efficiency and Systems
3.4. Review Articles
4. Discussion
4.1. Motivations
4.1.1. Motivations Related to Matching Reality
4.1.2. Motivations Related to New Technology
4.1.3. Motivations Related to Reliability Enhancement
4.1.4. Motivations Related to Power System Development
4.1.5. Motivations Related to the Needs of Customers, Planners, and Decision Makers
4.2. Challenges
4.2.1. Challenges Related to Realistic Evaluation
4.2.2. Challenges Related to Computational Cost
4.2.3. Challenges Related to the Economic Aspect
4.2.4. Challenges Related to System Deficiency
4.3. Recommendations
4.3.1. Recommendations to Researchers
4.3.2. Recommendations to Planners and Operators
4.3.3. Recommendations to Decision Makers and Authorities
5. Conclusions
5.1. Synthesis of Findings
5.2. Limitation
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Nomenclature
SLR | Systematic Literature Review |
MCS | Monte Carlo Simulation |
HL | Hierarchical Level |
DSM | Demand-Side Management |
DTR | Dynamic Thermal Rating |
FACTS | Flexible AC Transmission Systems |
WoS | Web of Science |
SD | Science Direct |
Q | Reactive power |
V | Voltage |
MG | Microgrid |
WAMS | Wide-Area Measurement System |
IEC | International Electrotechnical Commission |
UPFC | Unified Power Flow Controller |
DR | Demand Response |
DC | Direct Current |
AC | Alternating Current |
HVDC | High-Voltage Direct Current |
DFIG | Doubly-Fed Induction Generator |
IPFC | Interline Power-Flow Controller |
VSC | Voltage Source Converter |
SCADA | Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition |
WORRIS | Web Based Online Daily Time Interval Reliability Integrated Information System |
NDLM | Network-Driven Load Management |
WTG | Wind Turbine Generator |
EENS | Expected Energy Not Supplied |
OPF | Optimal Power Flow |
RTS | Reliability Test System |
References
- Kumar, T.B.; Sekhar, O.C.; Ramamoorty, M.; Lalitha, S.V.N.L. Evaluation of Power Capacity Availability at Load Bus in a Composite Power System. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2016, 4, 1324–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Billinton, R. Composite System Reliability Evaluation. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 1969, PAS-88, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Billinton, R.; Allan, R. Reliability Evaluation of Engineering Systems Concepts and Techniques; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2013; ISBN 1489906851. [Google Scholar]
- Veliz, F.F.C.; Borges, C.L.T.; Rei, A.M. A Comparison of Load Models for Composite Reliability Evaluation by Nonsequential Monte Carlo Simulation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2010, 25, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, K.; Jia, H.; Xu, X.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, Y. A Continuous Time Markov Chain Based Sequential Analytical Approach for Composite Power System Reliability Assessment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2016, 31, 738–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lotero, R.C.; Contreras, J. Distribution system planning with reliability. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2011, 26, 2552–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Guo, C.; Wu, Q.H. A Cross-Entropy-Based Three-Stage Sequential Importance Sampling for Composite Power System Short-Term Reliability Evaluation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2013, 28, 4254–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mori, H.; Kakuta, H. Modified SPEA2 for Probabilistic Reliability Assessment in Smart Grids. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2011, 6, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Silva, A.M.L.; Violin, A.; Ferreira, C.; Machado, Z.S. Probabilistic Evaluation of Substation Criticality Based on Static and Dynamic System Performances. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2014, 29, 1410–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-lacañina, P.J.; De La Villa-jaén, A.; Martínez-ramos, J.L. Hybrid procedure including subtransmission systems and substations for reliability assessment. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2013, 7, 1461–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Billinton, R.; Li, W. Reliability Assessment of Electric Power Systems Using Monte Carlo Methods; Physics of Solids and Liquids; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1994; ISBN 9780306447815. [Google Scholar]
- Kadhem, A.A.; Wahab, N.I.A.; Aris, I.; Jasni, J.; Abdalla, A.N. Computational techniques for assessing the reliability and sustainability of electrical power systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 80, 1175–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Singh, C. Population-based intelligent search in reliability evaluation of generation systems with wind power penetration. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2008, 23, 1336–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Billinton, R.; Gao, Y. Multistate Wind Energy Conversion System Models for Adequacy Assessment of Generating Systems Incorporating Wind Energy. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2008, 23, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakkiyaraj, R.A.; Kumarappan, N. Optimal reliability planning for a composite electric power system based on Monte Carlo simulation using particle swarm optimization. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2013, 47, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, P.; Jin, R.Y.; Fan, L.W. Reliability and economic evaluation of power system with renewables: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, Z.; Jirutitijaroen, P.; da Silva, A.M.L.; Singh, C. Accelerated State Evaluation and Latin Hypercube Sequential Sampling for Composite System Reliability Assessment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2014, 29, 1692–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenwood, D.M.; Taylor, P.C. Investigating the Impact of Real-Time Thermal Ratings on Power Network Reliability. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2014, 29, 2460–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amaral, T.S.; Borges, C.L.T.; Rei, A.M. Composite system well-being evaluation based on non-sequential Monte Carlo simulation. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2010, 80, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teh, J.; Lai, C.M.; Cheng, Y.H. Impact of the Real-Time Thermal Loading on the Bulk Electric System Reliability. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2017, 66, 1110–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jabir, H.J.; Teh, J.; Ishak, D.; Abunima, H. Impacts of Demand-Side Management on Electrical Power Systems: A Review. Energies 2018, 11, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, K.; Singh, C. New Models and Concepts for Power System Reliability Evaluation Including Protection System Failures. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2011, 26, 1845–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sefidgaran, M.; Mirzaie, M.; Ebrahimzadeh, A. Reliability model of the power transformer with {ONAF} cooling. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2012, 35, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, R.; Singh, C.; Cheng, L.; Sun, Y. Short-term reliability evaluation using control variable based dagger sampling method. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2010, 80, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pindoriya, N.M.; Jirutitijaroen, P.; Srinivasan, D.; Singh, C. Composite Reliability Evaluation Using Monte Carlo Simulation and Least Squares Support Vector Classifier. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2011, 26, 2483–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorostkar-Ghamsari, M.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Aminifar, F.; Safdarian, A.; Lehtonen, M. Optimal distributed static series compensator placement for enhancing power system loadability and reliability. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2015, 9, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosadeghy, M.; Yan, R.; Saha, T.K. A Time-Dependent Approach to Evaluate Capacity Value of Wind and Solar PV Generation. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2016, 7, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benidris, M.; Mitra, J. Reliability and sensitivity analysis of composite power systems considering voltage and reactive power constraints. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2015, 9, 1245–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zobaa, A.F.; Huang, C.; Chen, C. Day-ahead allocation of operation reserve in composite power systems with large-scale centralized wind farms. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2016, 4, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sulaeman, S.; Tian, Y.; Benidris, M.; Mitra, J. Quantification of Storage Necessary to Firm Up Wind Generation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2017, 53, 3228–3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, Y.; McCalley, J.D.; Ni, M. Coordinating Large-Scale Wind Integration and Transmission Planning. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2012, 3, 652–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghofrani, M.; Arabali, A.; Etezadi-Amoli, M.; Fadali, M.S. Energy Storage Application for Performance Enhancement of Wind Integration. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2013, 28, 4803–4811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Sun, Y.; Kirschen, D.S.; Singh, C.; Cheng, L. State-space partitioning method for composite power system reliability assessment. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2010, 4, 780–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goel, L.; Low, L.S. Incorporating generator scheduling in composite power system well-being analysis. In Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Power Tech Proceedings, Porto, Portugal, 10–13 September 2001; Volume 3, p. 6. [Google Scholar]
- Nel, W.P.; Cooper, C.J. Implications of fossil fuel constraints on economic growth and global warming. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 166–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lund, H. Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development. Energy 2007, 32, 912–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jones, L.E. Renewable Energy Integration: Practical Management of Variability, Uncertainty, and Flexibility in Power Grids; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Abunima, H.; Jabir, H.; Teh, J. An Investigation of Reactive-Active Power Control approach for Grid-Connected PV Arrays in A Low Voltage Distribution System. In 10th International Conference on Robotics, Vision, Signal Processing & Power Applications; Springer: Penang, Malaysia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, P.; Li, W.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, W. Reliability assessment of photovoltaic power systems: Review of current status and future perspectives. Appl. Energy 2013, 104, 822–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, T.-C.; Lu, K.-H.; Huang, C.-J. Improvement of transient stability in a hybrid power multi-system using a designed NIDC (Novel Intelligent Damping Controller). Energies 2017, 10, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dasgupta, S.; Sahoo, S.K.; Panda, S.K. Single-phase inverter control techniques for interfacing renewable energy sources with microgrid—Part I: Parallel-connected inverter topology with active and reactive power flow control along with grid current shaping. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2011, 26, 717–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suberu, M.Y.; Mustafa, M.W.; Bashir, N. Energy storage systems for renewable energy power sector integration and mitigation of intermittency. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 35, 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Billinton, R.; Singh, G. Application of adverse and extreme adverse weather: Modelling in transmission and distribution system reliability evaluation. IEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2006, 153, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehrtash, A.; Wang, P.; Goel, L. Reliability evaluation of generation system incorporating renewable generators in a spot power market. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Detroit, MI, USA, 24–29 July 2011; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Da Silva, A.M.L.; Manso, L.A.F.; Flávio, S.A.; da Rosa, M.A.; Resende, L.C. Composite reliability assessment of power systems with large penetration of renewable sources. In Reliability and Risk Evaluation of Wind Integrated Power Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 107–128. [Google Scholar]
- Gungor, V.C.; Lu, B.; Hancke, G.P. Opportunities and challenges of wireless sensor networks in smart grid. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2010, 57, 3557–3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jabir, H.J.; Teh, J.; Ishak, D.; Abunima, H. Impact of Demand-Side Management on the Reliability of Generation Systems. Energies 2018, 11, 2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, D.; Billinton, R. Effects of Load Sector Demand Side Management Applications in Generating Capacity Adequacy Assessment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2012, 27, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diewvilai, R.; Nidhiritdhikrai, R.; Eua-arporn, B. Demand side management worth evaluation under generation system planning framework. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), Phetchaburi, Thailand, 16–18 May 2012; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Teh, J.; Cotton, I. Risk assessment of dynamic thermal rating system. In Proceedings of the IET International Conference on Resilience of Transmission and Distribution Networks (RTDN), Birmingham, UK, 22–24 September 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Rahim, A.A.; Abidin, I.Z.; Tarlochan, F.; Hashim, M.F. Thermal rating monitoring of the TNB overhead transmission line using line ground clearance measurement and weather monitoring techniques. In Proceedings of the 2010 4th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO), Shah Alam, Malaysia, 23–24 June 2010; pp. 274–280. [Google Scholar]
- Teh, J.; Lai, C.-M.; Cheng, Y.-H. Composite reliability evaluation for transmission network planning. AIMS Energy 2018, 6, 170–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamora, R.; Srivastava, A.K. Controls for microgrids with storage: Review, challenges, and research needs. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 2009–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilo, A. “Link”—The smart grid paradigm for a secure decentralized operation architecture. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2016, 131, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, A.; Kaushal, J.; Basak, P. A review on microgrid central controller. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, T.-C. Ground fault current analysis with a direct building algorithm for microgrid distribution. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2013, 53, 867–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, T.-C.; Hong, C.-M. Dynamic operation and control of microgrid hybrid power systems. Energy 2014, 66, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, T.-C. A novel unsymmetrical faults analysis for microgrid distribution systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2012, 43, 1017–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravindranath, B.; Chander, M. Power System Protection and Switchgear; New Age International: New Delhi, India, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Prasad, A.; Edward, J.B. Application of wavelet technique for fault classification in transmission systems. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016, 92, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaitan, S.K.; Gupta, A. High Performance Computing in Power and Energy Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Seifi, H.; Sepasian, M.S. Electric Power System Planning: Issues, Algorithms and Solutions; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Chatterjee, D.; Webb, J.; Gao, Q.; Vaiman, M.Y.; Vaiman, M.M.; Povolotskiy, M. N-1-1 AC contingency analysis as a part of NERC compliance studies at midwest ISO. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, 19–22 April 2010; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Yas, Q.M.; Zaidan, A.A.; Zaidan, B.B.; Hashim, M.; Lim, C.K. A systematic review on smartphone skin Cancer apps: Coherent taxonomy, motivations, open challenges and recommendations, and new research direction. J. Circuits Syst. Comput. 2018, 27, 1830003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Guo, C.; Wu, Q.; Dong, S. Adaptive sequential importance sampling technique for short-term composite power system adequacy evaluation. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2014, 8, 730–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miryousefi Aval, S.M.; Ahadi, A.; Hayati, H. A novel method for reliability and risk evaluation of wind energy conversion systems considering wind speed correlation. Front. Energy 2016, 10, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Chowdhury, A.A.; Koval, D.O. Probabilistic Wind Energy Modeling in Electric Generation System Reliability Assessment. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2011, 47, 1507–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salehi-Dobakhshari, A.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. Integration of large-scale wind farm projects including system reliability analysis. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2011, 5, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, D.; Billinton, R. Effects of Wind Power on Bulk System Adequacy Evaluation Using the Well-Being Analysis Framework. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2009, 24, 1232–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Magalhaes Carvalho, L.; da Rosa, M.A.; da Silva, A.M.L.; Miranda, V. Probabilistic Analysis for Maximizing the Grid Integration of Wind Power Generation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2012, 27, 2323–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zadkhast, S.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Aminifar, F.; Billinton, R.; Faried, S.O.; Edris, A.A. Reliability Evaluation of an HVDC Transmission System Tapped by a VSC Station. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2010, 25, 1962–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Singh, C. Studying the Reliability Implications of Line Switching Operations. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2017, 32, 4614–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moghadasi, S.M.; Kazemi, A.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Edris, A.A. Composite System Reliability Assessment Incorporating an Interline Power-Flow Controller. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2008, 23, 1191–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorostkar-Ghamsari, M.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Aminifar, F. Probabilistic Worth Assessment of Distributed Static Series Compensators. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2011, 26, 1734–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaker, H.; Zareipour, H.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. Reliability Modeling of Dynamic Thermal Rating. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2013, 28, 1600–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, L. Power System Reliability Assessment Incorporating Cyber Attacks Against Wind Farm Energy Management Systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2017, 8, 2343–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, H.; Singh, C. Non-Sequential Monte Carlo Simulation for Cyber-Induced Dependent Failures in Composite Power System Reliability Evaluation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2017, 32, 1064–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, H.; Singh, C. Power system reliability evaluation considering cyber-malfunctions in substations. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2015, 129, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aminifar, F.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Shahidehpour, M.; Safdarian, A. Impact of WAMS Malfunction on Power System Reliability Assessment. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2012, 3, 1302–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Singh, C. A Methodology for Evaluation of Hurricane Impact on Composite Power System Reliability. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2011, 26, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benidris, M.; Mitra, J. Reliability and Sensitivity Analysis of Composite Power Systems Under Emission Constraints. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2014, 29, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Billinton, R.; Huang, D. Effects of load forecast uncertainty on bulk electric system reliability evaluation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2008, 23, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, H.; Singh, C.; Sprintson, A. Reliability Modeling and Analysis of IEC 61850 Based Substation Protection Systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2014, 5, 2194–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eliassi, M.; Seifi, H.; Haghifam, M.R. Incorporation of protection system failures into bulk power system reliability assessment by Bayesian networks. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2015, 9, 1226–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Zhou, J.; Xie, K.; Xiong, X. Power System Risk Assessment Using a Hybrid Method of Fuzzy Set and Monte Carlo Simulation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2008, 23, 336–343. [Google Scholar]
- Moshari, A.; Ebrahimi, A.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. Short-Term Impacts of DR Programs on Reliability of Wind Integrated Power Systems Considering Demand-Side Uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2016, 31, 2481–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Lim, J.; Lee, K.Y. DSM Considered Probabilistic Reliability Evaluation and an Information System for Power Systems Including Wind Turbine Generators. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2013, 4, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes, V.S.; Borges, C.L.T. Impact of the Combined Integration of Wind Generation and Small Hydropower Plants on the System Reliability. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2015, 6, 1169–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borges, C.L.T.; Dias, J.A.S. A Model to Represent Correlated Time Series in Reliability Evaluation by Non-Sequential Monte Carlo Simulation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2017, 32, 1511–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehrtash, A.; Wang, P.; Goel, L. Reliability evaluation of restructured power systems using a novel optimal power-flow-based approach. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2013, 7, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, Z.; Li, W.; Xiong, X. Incorporating multiple correlations among wind speeds, photovoltaic powers and bus loads in composite system reliability evaluation. Appl. Energy 2013, 110, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Singh, C. Power System Reliability Impact of Energy Storage Integration With Intelligent Operation Strategy. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2014, 5, 1129–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teh, J.; Cotton, I. Reliability Impact of Dynamic Thermal Rating System in Wind Power Integrated Network. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2016, 65, 1081–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rei, A.M.; Schilling, M.T. Reliability Assessment of the Brazilian Power System Using Enumeration and Monte Carlo. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2008, 23, 1480–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edimu, M.; Gaunt, C.T.; Herman, R. Using probability distribution functions in reliability analyses. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2011, 81, 915–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benidris, M.; Mitra, J.; Singh, C. Integrated Evaluation of Reliability and Stability of Power Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2017, 32, 4131–4139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamoud, G.A. Assessment of Spare Breaker Requirements for High Voltage Transmission Stations. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2013, 28, 4789–4795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Silva, A.M.L.; Jardim, J.L.; de Lima, L.R.; Machado, Z.S. A Method for Ranking Critical Nodes in Power Networks Including Load Uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2016, 31, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setreus, J.; Hilber, P.; Arnborg, S.; Taylor, N. Identifying Critical Components for Transmission System Reliability. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2012, 27, 2106–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhavein, A.; Firuzabad, M.F. A heuristic-based approach for reliability importance assessment of energy producers. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 1562–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajabi-Ghahnavieh, A.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Shahidehpour, M.; Feuillet, R. UPFC for Enhancing Power System Reliability. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2010, 25, 2881–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baboli, P.T.; Moghaddam, M.P. Allocation of Network-Driven Load-Management Measures Using Multiattribute Decision Making. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2010, 25, 1839–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaefari-Nokandi, M.; Monsef, H. Scheduling of Spinning Reserve Considering Customer Choice on Reliability. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2009, 24, 1780–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Silva, A.M.L.; Castro, J.F.C.; González-Fernández, R.A. Spinning Reserve Assessment Under Transmission Constraints Based on Cross-Entropy Method. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2016, 31, 1624–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Billinton, R.; Gao, Y.; Karki, R. Application of a Joint Deterministic-Probabilistic Criterion to Wind Integrated Bulk Power System Planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2010, 25, 1384–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro, M.; Pudjianto, D.; Djapic, P.; Strbac, G. Reliability-driven transmission investment in systems with wind generation. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2011, 5, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Silva, A.M.L.; Manso, L.A.d.F.; Sales, W.d.S.; Flavio, S.A.; Anders, G.J.; de Resende, L.C. Chronological Power Flow for Planning Transmission Systems Considering Intermittent Sources. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2012, 27, 2314–2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, F.; Chang, C.S. Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization of Maintenance Schedules and Extents for Composite Power Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2009, 24, 1694–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, F.; Chang, C.S. Optimisation of maintenance schedules and extents for composite power systems using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2009, 3, 930–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbasghorbani, M.; Mashhadi, H.R. Circuit breakers maintenance planning for composite power systems. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2013, 7, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghorani, R.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Dehghanian, P.; Li, W. Identifying critical components for reliability centred maintenance management of deregulated power systems. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2015, 9, 828–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awadallah, S.K.E.; Milanović, J.V.; Jarman, P.N. Reliability Based Framework for Cost-Effective Replacement of Power Transmission Equipment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2014, 29, 2549–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajabi-Ghahnavieh, A.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Shahidehpour, M.; Feuillet, R. Optimal Allocation of Available Transfer Capability in Operating Horizon. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2009, 24, 967–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhu, S.; Chowdhury, A.A. Reliability Modeling and Control Schemes of Composite Energy Storage and Wind Generation System With Adequate Transmission Upgrades. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2011, 2, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lami, B.; Bhattacharya, K. Clustering Technique Applied to Nodal Reliability Indices for Optimal Planning of Energy Resources. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2016, 31, 4679–4690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jadidoleslam, M.; Ebrahimi, A.; Latify, M.A. Probabilistic transmission expansion planning to maximize the integration of wind power. Renew. Energy 2017, 114, 866–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javadi, M.S.; Saniei, M.; Mashhadi, H.R.; Gutierrez-Alcaraz, G. Multi-objective expansion planning approach: Distant wind farms and limited energy resources integration. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2013, 7, 652–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moeini-Aghtaie, M.; Abbaspour, A.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. Incorporating Large-Scale Distant Wind Farms in Probabilistic Transmission Expansion Planning—Part I: Theory and Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2012, 27, 1585–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Park, J.; Cho, K.; Jeon, D.; Cha, J.; Lee, H.; Lee, K.Y. Reliability-Based Grid Expansion Planning of Power Systems Considering Wind Turbine Generators. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2011, 44, 11701–11706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alizadeh, B.; Jadid, S. A dynamic model for coordination of generation and transmission expansion planning in power systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2015, 65, 408–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moshari, A.; Ebrahimi, A. Reliability-based nodal evaluation and prioritization of demand response programs. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 2015, 25, 3384–3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javadi, M.S.; Saniei, M.; Mashhadi, H.R. An augmented NSGA—II technique with virtual database to solve the composite generation and transmission expansion planning problem. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 2014, 26, 211–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Silva, A.L.; Resende, L.C.D.; da Fonseca Manso, L.A.; Miranda, V. Well-being analysis for composite generation and transmission systems based on pattern recognition techniques. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2008, 2, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Y.-Y.; Lee, L.-H. Reliability assessment of generation and transmission systems using fault-tree analysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 2009, 50, 2810–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, R.C.; Wang, L.; Alam, M.; Singh, C. Intelligent state space pruning for Monte Carlo simulation with applications in composite power system reliability. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2013, 26, 1707–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benidris, M.; Elsaiah, S.; Mitra, J. Power system reliability evaluation using a state space classification technique and particle swarm optimisation search method. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2015, 9, 1865–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bordeerath, B.; Jirutitijaroen, P. Techniques for improving precision and construction efficiency of a pattern classifier in composite system reliability assessment. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2012, 88, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, T.B.; Sekhar, O.C.; Ramamoorty, M. Composite power system reliability evaluation using modified minimal cut set approach. Alexandria Eng. J. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Singh, C. Reliability Evaluation of Composite Power Systems Using Markov Cut-Set Method. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2010, 25, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yongji, G.; Yongjian, X.; Kai, X.; Huiyi, Y. Composite system reliability evaluation based on Monte-Carlo simulation combined with outages screening. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 1999, 14, 785–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tómasson, E.; Söder, L. Improved Importance Sampling for Reliability Evaluation of Composite Power Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2017, 32, 2426–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safdarian, A.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Aminifar, F.; Lehtonen, M. A new formulation for power system reliability assessment with AC constraints. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2014, 56, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eliassi, M.; Dashtaki, A.K.; Seifi, H.; Haghifam, M.R.; Singh, C. Application of Bayesian networks in composite power system reliability assessment and reliability-based analysis. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2015, 9, 1755–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Cheng, R.; Xu, Y.; Liu, Z. Fast reliability evaluation method for composite power system based on the improved EDA and double cross linked list. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2017, 11, 3835–3842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Mili, L. Composite Power System Vulnerability Evaluation to Cascading Failures Using Importance Sampling and Antithetic Variates. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2013, 28, 2321–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, Y.; Wang, X.; Guo, J. Quasi Monte Carlo method for reliability evaluation of power system based on Dimension Importance Sorting. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 2017, 27, e2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhavein, A.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Billinton, R.; Farokhzad, D. Adequacy equivalent development of composite generation and transmission systems using network screening. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2011, 5, 1141–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, B.; Bie, Z.; Liu, C.; Li, G.; Wang, X. Eliminating Redundant Line Flow Constraints in Composite System Reliability Evaluation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2013, 28, 3490–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Bucklew, J.A.; Dobson, I. Splitting Method for Speedy Simulation of Cascading Blackouts. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2013, 28, 3010–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, B.; Bie, Z.; Au, S.-K.; Li, W.; Wang, X. Extracting Rare Failure Events in Composite System Reliability Evaluation Via Subset Simulation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2015, 30, 753–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhavein, A.; Porkar, B. A composite generation and transmission reliability test system for research purposes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 75, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhavein, A.; Firuzabad, M.F.; Billinton, R.; Farokhzad, D. Review of reduction techniques in the determination of composite system adequacy equivalents. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2010, 80, 1385–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Billinton, R.; Karki, R.; Gao, Y.; Huang, D.; Hu, P.; Wangdee, W. Adequacy Assessment Considerations in Wind Integrated Power Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2012, 27, 2297–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Fernández, R.A.; da Silva, A.M.L.; Resende, L.C.; Schilling, M.T. Composite Systems Reliability Evaluation Based on Monte Carlo Simulation and Cross-Entropy Methods. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2013, 28, 4598–4606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Billinton, R. IEEE Reliability Test System. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 1979, PAS-98, 2047–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Billinton, R.; Kumar, S.; Chowdhury, N.; Chu, K.; Goel, L.; Khan, E.; Kos, P.; Nourbakhsh, G.; Oteng-Adjei, J. A reliability test system for educational purposes-basic results. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 1990, 5, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xia, Y.; Wan, H.; Huang, Y.; Xu, C. Stochastic modeling and quality evaluation of component-based software systems. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC 2006), Beijing, China, 27–28 October 2006; pp. 377–384. [Google Scholar]
- Sridhar, S.; Hahn, A.; Govindarasu, M. Cyber Physical System Security for the Electric Power Grid. Proc. IEEE 2012, 100, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Cheng, L.; Kirschen, D.S.; Sun, Y. Optimising the balance between security and economy on a probabilistic basis. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2010, 4, 1275–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Tran, T.; El-Keib, A.A.; Thomas, R.; Oh, H.; Billinton, R. A method for transmission system expansion planning considering probabilistic reliability criteria. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2005, 20, 1606–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaun, A.; Rechberger, G.; Renner, H.; Lehtonen, M. Enumeration based reliability assessment algorithm considering nodal uncertainties. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 25–29 July 2010; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Karki, R.; Hu, P.; Billinton, R. A simplified wind power generation model for reliability evaluation. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2006, 21, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koval, D.O.; Chowdhury, A.A. Assessment of Transmission-Line Common-Mode, Station-Originated, and Fault-Type Forced-Outage Rates. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2010, 46, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Computational Burden | Accuracy | Computational Burden and Accuracy |
---|---|---|
Mori 2011 [8] | Bordeerath 2012 [127] | Shu 2014 [17] |
Amaral 2010 [19] | - | Pindoriya 2011 [25] |
Sun 2010 [24] | - | Mosadeghy 2016 [27] |
Wang 2014 [65] | - | He 2010 [33] |
Green 2013 [125] | - | Safdarian 2014 [132] |
Benidris 2015 [126] | - | Eliassi 2015 [133] |
Yongji 1999 [130] | - | Liu 2017 [134] |
Chen 2013 [135] | - | Hou 2017 [136] |
Akhavein 2011 [137] | - | - |
Tómasson 2017 [131] | - | - |
Hua 2013 [138] | - | - |
Kim 2013 [139] | - | - |
Hua 2015 [140] | - | - |
Silva 2008 [123] | - | - |
Hong 2009 [124] | - | - |
Liu 2010 [129] | - | - |
Hou 2016 [5] | - | - |
Kumar 2017 [128] | - | - |
Source | Category | Contribution | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Effects of Wind Power on Bulk System Adequacy Evaluation Using the Well-Being Analysis Framework. | [69] | Investigation studies | wind power generation | Obtained a framework to study the impacts of wind power, load forecast uncertainty and their interactive effects on system reliability in HLII using the Well-Being Analysis |
Integration of large-scale wind farm projects including system reliability analysis. | [68] | developed a comprehensive procedure to investigate the impact of a wind farm project considering transmission system losses cost, load delivery point interruption cost and operating cost of conventional generating units | ||
Probabilistic Wind Energy Modeling in Electric Generation System Reliability Assessment. | [67] | Proposed several models of wind resources integration and presented approach to investigating the impact of these models on composite power system reliability. | ||
Probabilistic Analysis for Maximizing the Grid Integration of Wind Power Generation. | [70] | Presented a Sequential MCS algorithm to evaluate the reliability indices of a wind power integrated system, in addition to characterize wind power curtailment events. | ||
A novel method for reliability and risk evaluation of wind energy conversion systems considering wind speed correlation. | [66] | Proposed a new methodology based on Weibull-Markov method to evaluate reliability of bulk power systems incorporating large-scale wind generation system, considering DFIG wind turbines, wind speed correlation and wind turbine outage. | ||
Composite System Reliability Assessment Incorporating an Interline Power-Flow Controller. | [73] | Transmission system, FACTS, DTR | Proposed an approach to investigate the impact of an Interline Power-Flow Controller(IPFC) on composite power system. | |
Reliability Evaluation of an HVDC Transmission System Tapped by a VSC Station. | [71] | Presented evaluation a methodology to investigate the reliability of an HVDC transmission system with a VSC tapping station. | ||
Probabilistic Worth Assessment of Distributed Static Series Compensators. | [74] | Developed a reliability model for Distributed Static Series Compensators and investigates their impacts on composite power system reliability. | ||
Reliability Modeling of Dynamic Thermal Rating. | [75] | Proposed an approach based on Markov model for reliability studies on power lines equipped with DTR system. | ||
Studying the Reliability Implications of Line Switching Operations. | [72] | Proposed a method to investigate the implications of line switching operations on composite power system reliability. | ||
Impact of the Real-Time Thermal Loading on the Bulk Electric System Reliability. | [20] | Proposed a methodology to investigate the impact of high loading of power lines equipped with DTR system on composite power system reliability. | ||
A Methodology for Evaluation of Hurricane Impact on Composite Power System Reliability. | [80] | Weather condition and environment constraints | Proposed a methodology that combines fuzzy clustering technique with regional weather model in order to investigate the impact of hurricane on power system reliability. It modelled the relationship between transmission line failure rate and hurricane parameters. | |
Reliability and Sensitivity Analysis of Composite Power Systems Under Emission Constraints. | [81] | Presented a methodology to consider emission allowances as additional constraints in reliability evaluation of composite power systems. | ||
Impact of WAMS Malfunction on Power System Reliability Assessment. | [79] | Cyber and monitoring system | Improved a methodology to incorporate WAMS, as monitoring/control infrastructure, in reliability evaluation studies. | |
Power system reliability evaluation considering cyber-malfunctions in substations. | [78] | Proposed a methodology to investigate the impact of cyber-malfunctions in substation on composite power system reliability. | ||
Power System Reliability Assessment Incorporating Cyber Attacks Against Wind Farm Energy Management Systems. | [76] | Investigated the impact of various cyber-attacks scenarios against SCADA/EMS system of wind farm on reliability of wind integrated power system. | ||
Non-Sequential Monte Carlo Simulation for Cyber-Induced Dependent Failures in Composite Power System Reliability Evaluation. | [77] | A methodology was proposed to consider cyber-induced dependent failures in reliability studies and investigate their impacts on composite power system. | ||
Reliability and sensitivity analysis of composite power systems considering voltage and reactive power constraints. | [28] | Q and V constraints | Investigated the effects of the voltage and reactive power constraints on composite power system reliability. | |
Effects of load forecast uncertainty on bulk electric system reliability evaluation. | [82] | Load | Presented a methodology to examine the effects of load forecast uncertainty on composite power system reliability incorporating changes in system composition, topology, load curtailment policies and bus load correlation level | |
Hybrid procedure including subtransmission systems and substations for reliability assessment. | [10] | Substations | Presented a new methodology to include the configuration of substations in the reliability assessment. Thus, the critical load points and indices at these points can be accurately determined. | |
Reliability Modeling and Analysis of IEC 61850 Based Substation Protection Systems. | [83] | Protection System | Developed a methodology for modeling and analysis of IEC 61850 based substation protection systems. | |
New Models and Concepts for Power System Reliability Evaluation Including Protection System Failures. | [22] | Developed a technique to incorporate the effect of multiple component outages resulting from the protection failures into power system reliability evaluation. | ||
Incorporation of protection system failures into bulk power system reliability assessment by Bayesian networks. | [84] | Proposed a Bayesian network based methodology for modelling and investigating the impact of protection system failures on bulk power system reliability. | ||
Power System Risk Assessment Using a Hybrid Method of Fuzzy Set and Monte Carlo Simulation. | [85] | Combination | Proposed a hybrid method of fuzzy set and Monte Carlo simulation for modeling system component outage parameters and load curves. | |
DSM Considered Probabilistic Reliability Evaluation and an Information System for Power Systems Including Wind Turbine Generators. | [87] | Developed a methodology for reliability evaluation of wind integrated power system considering DSM and A web based online daily time interval reliability integrated information system (WORRIS). | ||
Incorporating multiple correlations among wind speeds, photovoltaic powers and bus loads in composite system reliability evaluation. | [91] | Proposed a methodology for reliability evaluation of wind-PV power integrated system incorporating multiple correlations among solar radiation, wind speeds, and the bus/regional loads. | ||
Power System Reliability Impact of Energy Storage Integration With Intelligent Operation Strategy. | [92] | Investigated the impacts of installing energy storage system in wind power integrated system. | ||
Impact of the Combined Integration of Wind Generation and Small Hydropower Plants on the System Reliability. | [88] | Assessed the impacts of integrating wind power system together with small hydropower plants on the reliability of composite power system. | ||
Short-Term Impacts of DR Programs on Reliability of Wind Integrated Power Systems Considering Demand-Side Uncertainties. | [86] | Investigated the impact of DSM programs on short-term reliability of wind-integrated power systems. | ||
Reliability Impact of Dynamic Thermal Rating System in Wind Power Integrated Network. | [93] | Proposed a methodology to investigate the impact of adopting DTR system in a wind integrated power system. | ||
A Model to Represent Correlated Time Series in Reliability Evaluation by Non-Sequential Monte Carlo Simulation. | [89] | Proposed a new stochastic model to investigate the impacts of time-varying elements such as loads, wind power generation, and water inflows on composite power system reliability. | ||
Using probability distribution functions in reliability analyses. | [95] | Other investigation studies | Verified the importance of considering probability distribution functions in reliability analyses | |
Integrated Evaluation of Reliability and Stability of Power Systems. | [96] | Investigated the impacts of considering transient stability on composite power system reliability. It introduced three stability indices to assess both robustness and system vulnerability against fault events. | ||
Reliability Assessment of the Brazilian Power System Using Enumeration and Monte Carlo. | [94] | Presented a comparison between actual results of contingency enumeration and MCS techniques. | ||
A Comparison of Load Models for Composite Reliability Evaluation by Nonsequential Monte Carlo Simulation. | [4] | Studied a comparison of three Markov load models for composite reliability evaluation by non-sequential MCS. | ||
A heuristic-based approach for reliability importance assessment of energy producers. | [100] | Planning and optimization studies | Spares and components criticality | Proposed a method to evaluate the reliability importance of generation buses in a composite power system. |
Identifying Critical Components for Transmission System Reliability. | [99] | Developed a method for separately ranking transmission system components by their importance for composite power system reliability under different load scenarios. | ||
Assessment of Spare Breaker Requirements for High Voltage Transmission Stations. | [97] | Described a probabilistic method for determining the optimal number of spare breakers required for a group of similar high voltage breakers used at transformer stations. | ||
Probabilistic Evaluation of Substation Criticality Based on Static and Dynamic System Performances. | [9] | Proposed a new methodology to assess the criticality of substations taking into consideration their possible operating states, and the static and dynamic consequences of their equipment outages in the system. | ||
A Method for Ranking Critical Nodes in Power Networks Including Load Uncertainties. | [98] | Proposed an approach for ranking nodes or substations in power system by their importance considering load uncertainties. Thus, planners can easily identify those facilities with more urgent investment needs. | ||
Chronological Power Flow for Planning Transmission Systems Considering Intermittent Sources. | [107] | Proposed a new methodology for determining the main transmission branches that restrict power flow of the renewable power resources penetrated into a grid. | ||
UPFC for Enhancing Power System Reliability. | [101] | Device settings and control | Determined the optimal control mode and settings of UPFCs in order to improve the reliability of a composite power system. | |
Allocation of Network-Driven Load-Management Measures Using Multiattribute Decision Making. | [102] | Proposed a multiattribute decision-making approach for allocating network-driven load-management (NDLM) measures in order to improve the composite power system reliability. | ||
Optimal reliability planning for a composite electric power system based on Monte Carlo simulation using particle swarm optimization. | [15] | Presented a methodology for determining the optimal reliability indices of system components for a composite power system. | ||
Scheduling of Spinning Reserve Considering Customer Choice on Reliability. | [103] | assessing capacity availability or reserve | Presented a new procedure for allocating spinning reserve based on the desired reliability level of customers. | |
Application of a Joint Deterministic-Probabilistic Criterion to Wind Integrated Bulk Power System Planning. | [105] | Discussed the application of joint deterministic-probabilistic criteria to be utilized for planning wind-integrated power system. | ||
Reliability-driven transmission investment in systems with wind generation. | [106] | Presented a methodology for determining the adequacy of thetransmission network adequacy in composite power systems with large scale wind power penetration. | ||
Spinning Reserve Assessment Under Transmission Constraints Based on Cross-Entropy Method. | [104] | Proposed a methodology to assess the spinning reserve of generating system, taking into consideration capacity constraints and failures of the transmission network | ||
Evaluation of Power Capacity Availability at Load Bus in a Composite Power System. | [1] | Described a methodology for assessing the power capacity availability at different load bus in a composite power system | ||
Day-ahead allocation of operation reserve in composite power systems with large-scale centralized wind farms. | [29] | Proposed a methodology for day-ahead allocation of operation reserve, taking into consideration transmission constraints and wind power prediction error in a composite power system with centralized wind power farms. | ||
Circuit breakers maintenance planning for composite power systems. | [110] | Maintenance schedule | Proposed an optimization methodology to find the optimal maintenance schedule for the circuit breakers considering their locations in the power system. | |
Optimisation of maintenance schedules and extents for composite power systems using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. | [109] | Proposed an integrated methodology for scheduling preventive maintenance for all components in a substation through optimizing three objectives; maintenance, reliability, and failure costs. | ||
Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization of Maintenance Schedules and Extents for Composite Power Systems. | [108] | Proposed a methodology for scheduling preventive maintenance for all components in a composite power system. The methodology aimed to optimize three objectives; maintenance, reliability, and failure costs. | ||
Reliability Based Framework for Cost-Effective Replacement of Power Transmission Equipment. | [112] | Presented a framework for replacement planning of aging power equipment. Identified the critical components for system reliability in terms of aging to improve decision making process. | ||
Identifying critical components for reliability centred maintenance management of deregulated power systems. | [111] | Proposed a computationally efficient approach for identifying the criticality of system components considering the additional long-term system costs imposed when they fail. | ||
Optimal Allocation of Available Transfer Capability in Operating Horizon. | [113] | Location and size | Proposed an approach for identifying the optimal allocation of Available Transfer Capability | |
Energy Storage Application for Performance Enhancement of Wind Integration. | [32] | Developed a generic algorithm-based approach for optimizing sizes, places and schedules of storage systems installed into a wind integrated power system. Thus, reliability of the system can be enhanced using optimal setting of the energy storage system. | ||
Optimal distributed static series compensator placement for enhancing power system loadability and reliability. | [26] | Proposed an approach for optimizing the locations of distributed static series compensators in order to enhance the system reliability and loadability. | ||
Clustering Technique Applied to Nodal Reliability Indices for Optimal Planning of Energy Resources. | [115] | Presented a clustering technique-based methodology for identifying the optimal size, location, and year of installing energy resources into a system. | ||
Quantification of Storage Necessary to Firm Up Wind Generation. | [30] | Proposed a method to identify the optimal sizes of the energy storage system in order to mitigate the negative impact of penetrating wind energy into power systems. The method takes into consideration failures of Wind Turbine Generators, the wind power uncertainty, wind speed temporal resolution, and correlation with the load. | ||
Reliability Modeling and Control Schemes of Composite Energy Storage and Wind Generation System With Adequate Transmission Upgrades. | [114] | Expansion planning | Proposed a methodology for determining the adequate transmission system upgrades and size of the energy storage which are required for delivery of the wind generation. | |
Reliability-Based Grid Expansion Planning of Power Systems Considering Wind Turbine Generators. | [119] | Presented a reliability-based methodology for grid expansion planning of wind power integrated system considering the uncertainties of lines and generators, and power output of WTG. | ||
Incorporating Large-Scale Distant Wind Farms in Probabilistic Transmission Expansion Planning | [118] | Presented a theory and algorithm for a Transmission Expansion Planning method aiming to mitigate the negative impact of wind farms on the congestion cost and risk costs of a power system. | ||
Reliability evaluation of restructured power systems using a novel optimal power-flow-based approach. | [90] | Proposed an approach to evaluate load point reliability in restricted power systems taking into consideration the effect of wind power integration. Developed equivalent multistate models generation and transmission system. | ||
Multi-objective expansion planning approach: distant wind farms and limited energy resources integration. | [117] | Proposed a multi-objective framework for expansion planning of power system integrated with distant wind farms and hydropower generation facilities. | ||
An augmented NSGA- II technique with virtual database to solve the composite generation and transmission expansion planning problem. | [122] | Proposed a computationally efficient technique for expansion planning of power systems. A multi-objective framework was proposed to determine the optimal capacity additions based on cost and reliability preferences. The first objective is to minimize EENS, whereas the total system cost, embraces annual operational and investment costs, is considered as the second objective function. | ||
Reliability-based nodal evaluation and prioritization of demand response programs. | [121] | Presents a new viewpoint for reliability-based planning of DR programs based on nodal evaluation and prioritization of combinational programs. It showed the effectiveness of nodal evaluation of DR programs in improving system reliability. | ||
A dynamic model for coordination of generation and transmission expansion planning in power systems. | [120] | Proposed a new approach for simultaneous generation and transmission expansion planning in a dynamic context. | ||
Probabilistic transmission expansion planning to maximize the integration of wind power. | [116] | Developed a framework for transmission and wind power expansion planning which is formulated as a bi-level optimization model. Furthermore, it showed the role of a proper expansion planning strategy in attraction of private investment for wind power. | ||
Well-being analysis for composite generation and transmission systems based on pattern recognition techniques. | [123] | Studies on evaluation efficiency and systems | Evaluation efficiency | Proposed a computationally efficient methodology for well-being analysis of a composite generation and transmission system. It provides the evaluation process with an intelligent memory to speed up the simulation of the operating states. |
Composite system well-being evaluation based on non-sequential Monte Carlo simulation. | [19] | Improved computational efficiency of composite system well-being evaluation through proposing a new method based on non-sequential MCS. The computational effort was reduced by the use of the conditional probability method allied with the non-sequential MCS. | ||
Reliability assessment of generation and transmission systems using fault-tree analysis. | [124] | Proposed a methodology for improving the computational efficiency of reliability evaluation through incorporating deterministic approach with the fault-tree analysis. | ||
Short-term reliability evaluation using control variable based dagger sampling method. | [24] | Proposed a new variance reduction method for improving computational ability of composite power system reliability. The proposed method is based on control variable and dagger sampling techniques. | ||
State-space partitioning method for composite power system reliability assessment. | [33] | Proposed a new method that compliments Variance Reduction Techniques for further acceleration of sampling low probability states. It can be combined with DC or AC power flow or other analysis tool. | ||
Reliability Evaluation of Composite Power Systems Using Markov Cut-Set Method. | [129] | Proposed a DC-OPF Markov cut-set method for accelerating the evaluation of composite power system reliability taking into consideration the dependence of components introduced by fluctuating weather. | ||
Composite power system reliability evaluation using modified minimal cut set approach. | [128] | Improved the computational efficiency through developing a new minimal cut set method. It demonstrated high applicability in large scale systems and less computational effort. | ||
Composite Reliability Evaluation Using Monte Carlo Simulation and Least Squares Support Vector Classifier. | [25] | Explored a hybrid computationally efficient method by combining MCS and the least squares support vector machine classifier. It can pre-classify the system states into success or failure states. Thus, the computational effort can be reduced by performing the adequacy analysis for the failure states only. | ||
Adequacy equivalent development of composite generation and transmission systems using network screening. | [137] | Presented an approach to develop an adequacy equivalent of a composite system using network screening. It determines the adequacy equivalent of the external area in order to facilitate extensive reliability studies in the study area. | ||
Modified SPEA2 for Probabilistic Reliability Assessment in Smart Grids. | [8] | Proposed a new multi-objective meta-heuristics method for improving the efficiency of probabilistic reliability evaluation. The proposed method showed superiority in reducing computational effort and satisfying the accuracy. | ||
Techniques for improving precision and construction efficiency of a pattern classifier in composite system reliability assessment. | [127] | Presented a new technique for improving the precision and construction efficiency of a classifier utilized in reliability evaluation which can be used to improve computational efficiency. | ||
Composite Power System Vulnerability Evaluation to Cascading Failures Using Importance Sampling and Antithetic Variates. | [135] | Proposed a new method based on Importance Sampling and Antithetic Variates techniques to evaluate cascading failures in a composite system reliability. The number of samples is noticeably reduce. | ||
Composite Systems Reliability Evaluation Based on Monte Carlo Simulation and Cross-Entropy Methods. | [144] | Proposed a new methodology that combines a Cross-Entropy technique and MCS in order to accelerating the evaluation of composite power system reliability. | ||
Eliminating Redundant Line Flow Constraints in Composite System Reliability Evaluation. | [138] | Developed a methodology to eliminate redundant line flow constraints in order to simplify optimal power flow conducted for the failure states. Thus, the evaluation of failure states can be accelerated | ||
Splitting Method for Speedy Simulation of Cascading Blackouts. | [139] | Developed a simulation technique based on the splitting method for improving the simulation of cascading blackouts. It enables rapid and practical computation of large blackout probabilities. | ||
A Cross-Entropy-Based Three-Stage Sequential Importance Sampling for Composite Power System Short-Term Reliability Evaluation. | [7] | Proposed a novel cross-entropy-based three-stage sequential importance sampling method. It handles the deficiency of sequential composite short-term reliability resulting from the low rate of component state transition | ||
Intelligent state space pruning for Monte Carlo simulation with applications in composite power system reliability. | [125] | Developed a new algorithmic method for improving computational efficiency of MCS by intelligently and efficiently pruning the state space. | ||
Adaptive sequential importance sampling technique for short-term composite power system adequacy evaluation. | [65] | Proposed a novel adaptive importance sampling technique for accelerating the short-term sequential reliability evaluation of composite power systems. | ||
Accelerated State Evaluation and Latin Hypercube Sequential Sampling for Composite System Reliability Assessment. | [17] | Improved the computational efficiency of sequential MCS while retaining all of the aforementioned advantages of sequential simulation. The state evaluation process was facilitated to avoid the time-consuming mainly due to optimal power flow computations. | ||
A new formulation for power system reliability assessment with AC constraints. | [132] | Approximated the AC power flow to formulate a linear power flow model which is capable of taking both active and reactive powers into account in reliability evaluation of composite power systems. | ||
Extracting Rare Failure Events in Composite System Reliability Evaluation Via Subset Simulation. | [140] | Proposed a framework for reliability evaluation of composite power systems with subset simulation. The states with significant contribution to reliability indices were extracted to accelerate the simulation. | ||
Power system reliability evaluation using a state space classification technique and particle swarm optimisation search method. | [126] | Introduced a new state space classification technique based on intelligent particle swarm optimization. It aims to speeding up the reliability evaluation through classifying the system states into success, failure, and unclassified subspaces without performing power flow analysis. | ||
Application of Bayesian networks in composite power system reliability assessment and reliability-based analysis. | [133] | Proposed a new computationally efficient methodology to apply Bayesian Networks to composite power system reliability studies. | ||
A Time-Dependent Approach to Evaluate Capacity Value of Wind and Solar PV Generation. | [27] | Improved the computational efficiency of the reliability evaluation by applying Fuzzy C-mean clustering algorithm to create a time-dependent model for wind power, solar generation, exchanged electricity, and load data. | ||
A Continuous Time Markov Chain Based Sequential Analytical Approach for Composite Power System Reliability Assessment. | [5] | Reduced the computational effort of reliability evaluation by improving a continuous time Markov chain based sequential analytical approach. The new approach merges all high order contingencies into a single state, which can then be analyzed by MCS. | ||
Improved Importance Sampling for Reliability Evaluation of Composite Power Systems. | [131] | Improved the computational efficiency of reliability evaluation through introducing Cross- Entropy based Monte Carlo simulation. This systematic method aims to find an optimal way of sampling load states, generation, and transmission line outages in order to minimize the computational effort. | ||
Fast reliability evaluation method for composite power system based on the improved EDA and double cross linked list | [134] | Improved a new MCS approach in terms of computation and accuracy. The state pruning was accelerated by the improved estimation of distribution algorithm and double cross linked list. | ||
Quasi Monte Carlo method for reliability evaluation of power system based on Dimension Importance Sorting. | [136] | Presented a non-sequential quasi MCS approach based on Dimension Importance Sorting. The proposed approach demonstrated computational efficiency and accurate indices. | ||
A composite generation and transmission reliability test system for research purposes. | [141] | Evaluation test systems | Presents a reliability test system for research purpose. It is developed based on a real HV network in a province located in Iran. | |
Review of reduction techniques in the determination of composite system adequacy equivalents. | [142] | Review articles | Computation | Presented a review of the reduction techniques which are directly or indirectly related to the reliability evaluation of composite power systems. |
Adequacy Assessment Considerations in Wind Integrated Power Systems. | [143] | Modeling approaches | Presented some of important factors and procedures that need to be considered when conducting reliability evaluation of wind power integrated system. It reviewed the considerations regarding wind speed data models, selecting the required data, wind energy conversion system models and their application. |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Abunima, H.; Teh, J.; Lai, C.-M.; Jabir, H.J. A Systematic Review of Reliability Studies on Composite Power Systems: A Coherent Taxonomy Motivations, Open Challenges, Recommendations, and New Research Directions. Energies 2018, 11, 2417. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092417
Abunima H, Teh J, Lai C-M, Jabir HJ. A Systematic Review of Reliability Studies on Composite Power Systems: A Coherent Taxonomy Motivations, Open Challenges, Recommendations, and New Research Directions. Energies. 2018; 11(9):2417. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092417
Chicago/Turabian StyleAbunima, Hamza, Jiashen Teh, Ching-Ming Lai, and Hussein Jumma Jabir. 2018. "A Systematic Review of Reliability Studies on Composite Power Systems: A Coherent Taxonomy Motivations, Open Challenges, Recommendations, and New Research Directions" Energies 11, no. 9: 2417. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092417