Next Article in Journal
Phase-Inductance-Based Position Estimation Method for Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Electromagnetic and Triboelectric Nanogenerators with Multi-Impact for Wideband Frequency Energy Harvesting
Article Menu
Issue 12 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2017, 10(12), 1996; doi:10.3390/en10121996

Assessment of Energy Performance and Emission Control Using Alternative Fuels in Cement Industry through a Process Model

School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 11 October 2017 / Revised: 20 November 2017 / Accepted: 27 November 2017 / Published: 1 December 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [3131 KB, uploaded 1 December 2017]   |  

Abstract

Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy intensive processes and is accountable for substantial pollutant emissions. Increasing energy costs compel stakeholders and researchers to search for alternative options to improve energy performance and reduce CO2 emissions. Alternative fuels offer a realistic solution towards the reduction of the usage of fossil fuels and the mitigation of pollutant emissions. This paper developed a process model of a precalciner kiln system in the cement industry using Aspen Plus software to simulate the effect of five alternative fuels on pollutant emissions and energy performance. The alternatives fuels used were tyre, municipal solid waste (MSW), meat and bone meal (MBM), plastic waste and sugarcane bagasse. The model was developed on the basis of energy and mass balance of the system and was validated against data from a reference cement plant. This study also investigated the effect of these alternative fuels on the quality of the clinker. The results indicated that up to a 4.4% reduction in CO2 emissions and up to a 6.4% reduction in thermal energy requirement could be achieved using these alternative fuels with 20% mix in coal. It was also found that the alternative fuels had minimum influence on the clinker quality except in the case of MSW. Overall, MBM was found to be a better option as it is capable on reducing energy requirement and CO2 emissions more than others. The outcomes of the study offer better understanding of the effects of solid alternative fuels to achieve higher energy performance and on mitigating pollutant emissions in cement industry. View Full-Text
Keywords: cement; alternative fuel; energy performance; emission; process modelling cement; alternative fuel; energy performance; emission; process modelling
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahman, A.; Rasul, M.G.; Khan, M.; Sharma, S.C. Assessment of Energy Performance and Emission Control Using Alternative Fuels in Cement Industry through a Process Model. Energies 2017, 10, 1996.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top