J. Risk Financial Manag. 2014, 7(1), 13-27; doi:10.3390/jrfm7010013
Article

Validation of the Merton Distance to the Default Model under Ambiguity

email and * email
Received: 13 December 2013; in revised form: 15 February 2014 / Accepted: 17 March 2014 / Published: 25 March 2014
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: Bharath and Shumway (2008) provide evidence that shows that it is the functional form of Merton’s (1974) distance to default (DD) model that makes it useful and important for predicting defaults. In this paper, we investigate whether the default predictability of the Merton DD model would be affected by taking investors’ ambiguity aversion into consideration. The Cox proportional hazard model is used to compare the forecasting power of Bharath and Shumway’s naive model, which retains the functional form of the Merton DD model and computes the default probability in a naive way, with our new model, which treats investors’ ambiguity aversion as additional information. We provide evidence to show that our new model performs better than Bharath and Shumway’s naive model. In addition, our empirical results show that the statistical significance of Bharath and Shumway’s naive default probability is retained in the credit default swap (CDS) spread regressions, though the sign of the coefficient is changed. However, both the sign and the statistical significance of our model are retained in the CDS spread regressions.
Keywords: Merton’s distance to default model; naive model; default probability; ambiguity aversion; consumer confidence index; statistical significance
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [2714 KB, uploaded 25 March 2014 08:57 CET]

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, W.-L.; So, L.-C. Validation of the Merton Distance to the Default Model under Ambiguity. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2014, 7, 13-27.

AMA Style

Chen W-L, So L-C. Validation of the Merton Distance to the Default Model under Ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2014; 7(1):13-27.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Wei-ling; So, Leh-chyan. 2014. "Validation of the Merton Distance to the Default Model under Ambiguity." J. Risk Financial Manag. 7, no. 1: 13-27.

J. Risk Financial Manag. EISSN 1911-8074 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert