Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Capital Regulation, the Cost of Financial Intermediation and Bank Profitability: Evidence from Bangladesh
Previous Article in Journal
On the Power and Size Properties of Cointegration Tests in the Light of High-Frequency Stylized Facts
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Nexus between Social Capital and Bank Risk Taking
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2017, 10(2), 8; doi:10.3390/jrfm10020008

An Empirical Study on the Impact of Basel III Standards on Banks’ Default Risk: The Case of Luxembourg

1
Economics and Research department, Banque Centrale du Luxembourg, Luxembourg, L-2983, Luxembourg
2
IPAG Business School, Paris, 75006, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Terence Tai-Leung Chong
Received: 10 February 2017 / Revised: 31 March 2017 / Accepted: 1 April 2017 / Published: 12 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financial Stability and Regulation / Basel III)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [671 KB, uploaded 13 April 2017]   |  

Abstract

We study how the Basel III regulations, namely the Capital-to-Assets Ratio (CAR), the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) and the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), are likely to impact banks’ profitability (i.e., ROA), capital levels and default. We estimate historical series of the new Basel III regulations for a panel of Luxembourgish banks for a period covering 2003q2–2011q3. We econometrically investigate whether historical LCR and NSFR components, as well as CAR positions are able to explain the variation in a measure of a bank’s default risk (approximated by Z-score) and how these effects make their way through banks’ ROA and CAR.We find that the liquidity regulations induce a decrease in average probabilities of default. We find that the liquidity regulation focusing on maturity mismatches (i.e., NSFR) induces a decrease in average probabilities of default. Conversely, the impact on banks’ profitability is less clear-cut; what seems to matter is banks’ funding structure rather than the characteristics of the portfolio of assets. Additionally, we use a model of bank behavior to simulate the banks’ optimal adjustments of their balance sheets as if they had to adhere to the regulations starting in 2003q2. Then, we predict, using our preferred econometric model and based on the simulated data, the banks’ Z-score and ROA. The simulation exercise suggests that basically all banks would have seen a decrease in their default risk during a crisis episode if they had previously adhered to Basel III. View Full-Text
Keywords: Basel III; bank default; Z-score; profitability; ROA; GMM estimator; simulation; Luxembourg Basel III; bank default; Z-score; profitability; ROA; GMM estimator; simulation; Luxembourg
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Giordana, G.A.; Schumacher, I. An Empirical Study on the Impact of Basel III Standards on Banks’ Default Risk: The Case of Luxembourg. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2017, 10, 8.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Risk Financial Manag. EISSN 1911-8074 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top