- freely available
- re-usable
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7(11), 3954-3971; doi:10.3390/ijerph7113954
Article
Municipalities Collaborating in Public Health: The Danish Smoking Prevention and Cessation Partnership
1
Unit for Health Promotion Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
2
Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Gloucestershire, Oxstalls Campus, Oxstalls Lane, Gloucester GL2 9HW, UK
3
Centre of Maritime Health and Safety, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 October 2010; in revised form: 23 October 2010 / Accepted: 3 November 2010 / Published: 9 November 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tobacco Smoking: Public Health, Science and Policy)
Abstract: This study explored the Smoking Prevention and Cessation Partnership (SPCP) which builds upon a collaboration between two Danish municipalities targeted at the prevention of tobacco smoking. The aim of the study was to describe the processes of SPCP, to examine the difficulties this collaboration faced, and to assess how these experiences could be used to improve future partnership collaboration. We employed qualitative methodology comprising 12 semi-structured one-to-one interviews with SPCP’s stakeholders and an analysis of the partnership documents and reports. The findings suggested that the main potentials of the partnership were the personal relations between the members and stakeholders with the possibilities of the creation of new connections with other actors. Barriers to successful partnership building were the implementation of the new Local Government Reform as a competing task, and that the two municipalities were heterogenic in respect to organizational issues and working methods. Other impediments included the lack of continuity in leadership, the lack of clarity regarding the form of collaboration and roles, as well as different expectations of the stakeholders. We conclude that four factors remain critical for partnerships. The first is the clarity of the collaborative effort. Second, partnerships need to take into account the structural circumstances and culture/value systems of all stakeholders. Third is the impact of contextual factors on the development of the partnership; and the fourth factor is the bearing of personal/individual factors on the partnership e.g., personal engagement in the project. Early attention to these four factors could contribute to more effective partnership working.
Keywords: partnership; coalition; smoking cessation; Denmark; multi-site evaluation; health professions education; leadership
Article Statistics
Click here to load and display the download statistics.Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Andersen, P.T.; Ansari, W.E.; Rasmussen, H.B.; Stock, C. Municipalities Collaborating in Public Health: The Danish Smoking Prevention and Cessation Partnership. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 3954-3971.
AMA StyleAndersen PT, Ansari WE, Rasmussen HB, Stock C. Municipalities Collaborating in Public Health: The Danish Smoking Prevention and Cessation Partnership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2010; 7(11):3954-3971.
Chicago/Turabian StyleAndersen, Pernille Tanggaard; Ansari, Walid El; Rasmussen, Hanna Barbara; Stock, Christiane. 2010. "Municipalities Collaborating in Public Health: The Danish Smoking Prevention and Cessation Partnership." Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 7, no. 11: 3954-3971.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
EISSN 1660-4601
Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland
RSS
E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
