Next Article in Journal
Gender Specific Differences in the Pros and Cons of Smoking among Current Smokers in Eastern Kentucky: Implications for Future Smoking Cessation Interventions
Next Article in Special Issue
Food Intakes by Preschool Children in Flanders Compared with Dietary Guidelines
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Human Health Risk Assessment due to Global Warming – A Case Study of the Gulf Countries

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2008, 5(4), 213-229; doi:10.3390/ijerph5040213

Article
Pathogenic Microorganisms Associated With Childhood Diarrhea in Low-and-Middle Income Countries: Case Study of Yaoundé – Cameroon
HB Nguendo Yongsi
Department of Nursing and Human Sciences, University of Chicoutimi/555, boulevard de l'Université Chicoutimi (QC), G7H 2B1, Canada; E-Mail: Blaise_nguendo-yongsi@uqac.ca; Tel.: +1-905-817-1523
Received: 4 November 2008 / Accepted: 24 November 2008 / Published: 2 December 2008

Abstract

: Notwithstanding significant advancement in the understanding of pathogenesis and management, diarrheal illnesses remain one of the principal causes of global childhood mortality and morbidity. Infections account for most illnesses, with pathogens employing ingenious mechanisms to establish disease. In 2002, an interdisciplinary program “Populations et al. Espaces à Risques SANitaires” (PERSAN) was set up under the patronage of the Development Research Institute (IRD). Focused on health in Cameroon’s urban environment, the program mainly sought to identify diarrhea risk factors in Yaoundé. So for, a cross-sectional epidemiological study in children aged 6–59 months was carried out using a standardized protocol. The survey was initiated in 2002 and conducted during April to June in the year 2005. 3,034 stool samples were collected from children in twenty neighbourhoods in Yaoundé and examined at the Epidemiology and Public Health Laboratory of the Cameroon Pasteur Institute. About 60% of the patients were aged less than two years and 52% were male. Among the 437 patients with the diarrheal disease, 260 were found to be of infectious etiology, i.e. micro organism was detected in 59.5 % of the cases. Out of which, 10 (03.8%), 96 (36.9%), and 154 (59.2%) were respectively caused by pathogenic viruses, pathogenic bacteria and pathogenic parasites. Higher prevalence was found in overcrowded and under supply spontaneous settlement (78.4%) than in less crowded and formal residential settlement (21.5%). Etiologic data on diarrheal diseases and their spatial distribution are important tools for public health management and control strategic planning.
Keywords:
Diarrhea; pathogens; microorganisms; children; Yaoundé; Cameroon

1. Introduction

Diarrheal diseases have been described as far back as the ancient Greek civilization [1, 2]. For instance, Hippocrates’ writings (460–370 B.C.) were likely referring these diseases, describing them as “abundant liquid stool at short intervals” [3, 4]. During the Middle Ages, terms including Rheuma Gastros (running stomach) and Rheumatismus (stomach ache) used respectively by Gallien [5] and Alexandre de Tralles [6], focused on the physiopathological mechanism of the disease. In year 30, Celse revealed more clinical elements of the disease: «. . . the patient excretes blood which is usually mixed up with liquid excreta and at other times with mucus» and considered diarrhea as «an illness in which intestines are not to able to retain anything, and in which almost everything in the alimentary canal is lost as soon as it is eaten without digestion» [7]. Following Celse’s contribution, Gallien established inappropriate hygiene as the cause of diarrhea in his theory of “aqueous humour”, stating that toxic substances were present in the stomach and that diarrhea was a mechanism of evacuation. This remained as the primary etiologic theory for centuries. Towards the middle of the 17th century, Fernel classified diarrhea as an intestinal disease in the same category with intestinal blockages, gastric ulcers, and amebiasis. Like Gallien and Fernel, Grall et al. also subscribed to the view suggesting that poor food hygiene was the cause of diarrhea [8]. The first descriptions of diarrhea in developing countries date back to 1883 when Vibrio cholerae was isolated in Egypt during the third 1865 world cholera epidemic [9, 10]. It is this third great epidemic that left endemic hubs; some of which have endured to date. Unfortunately, a lack of information prevents an appreciation of the disease evolution since the discovery of the vibrion in Egypt until the middle of the 20th century. The first accurate data on the epidemiology of diarrhea date back to the 1960s. According to the WHO, a specialized team worked in seven developing countries from 1960 to 1965 and reported that the monthly prevalence rate among children less than 6 years of age was 40% [11]. Studies carried out in diverse regions of the world in order to appreciate accurately the magnitude and gravity of the problem led to the estimation that 500 million children had undergone one or more diarrhea episodes, and 4.6 million deaths had occurred from it in 1980 [12]. Thirty years later, estimates still report a high incidence and prevalence of diarrhea.

According to the World Health Organization, each year there are an estimated 4 billion cases of diarrhea. In 2007, 1.8 million people died worldwide from diarrheal diseases (including cholera), with 88% of these diarrheas being attributable to unsafe water supply, inadequate sanitation and hygiene. They were the second leading cause of disability-adjusted life years (DALY) lost and were the third leading cause of death (4% of all deaths) [13]. Presently, the risk of contracting diarrheal diseases are increased 5-fold in sub-Saharan Africa compared to developed countries (39.1% vs. 7.2%, respectively) [14]. Thus, diarrheas are an imminent threat to public health, particularly in the developing countries where it is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in children under 5 years of age (90%) [15]. In those countries, the average number of episodes of diarrhea per child per year within this age group is 3.2, and 21% of childhood mortality in children is associated with diarrhea, resulting in nearly two million deaths per year. In sub-Saharan Africa, mortality caused by acute diarrhea varies from 1.9% of all deaths in Gambia to 37% in Nigeria, with most of the deaths occurring during the first year of life [1618]. Apart from well-described enteropathogens such Shigella spp., Salmonella spp., and enterotoxigenic such Esherichia coli, there are also a wide variety of viruses and protozoa that cause diarrhea in those endemic areas. Although diarrhea are recognized as a serious public health problem in Cameroon, no comprehensive studies relating diarrhea-causing pathogens responsible for endemic diarrhea among Cameroon’s children have been reported in the medical literature. The aim of this study is to describe the main etiologic infectious agents of diarrhea in Yaoundé and their distribution within the urban space.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Location of study

This study took place in Yaoundé, the capital of Cameroon, situated in Central Africa between latitudes 3° 47′ and 3° 56′ North and 11° 10′ and 11° 45′ East (Figure 1). Yaoundé displays the classical Equatorial Guinea climate (regular and abundant rainfall of more than 1,600 mm per annum, and a fairly high average annual temperature of 23°C). Like many sub Saharan African cities, Yaoundé is currently experiencing very rapid urbanization. In 1926, date of the first population census, Yaoundé had 100,000 inhabitants. With an estimated annual growth rate of 4.5 percent since 1980, urban population has grown from 812,000 inhabitants in 1987 to 1,500,000 inhabitants in 2000, and to about 2,100,000 in 2006 [19]. However, this population growth has not been monitored by the city planners and decision makers. Consequently local authorities have failed to provide neighbourhoods with adequate utilities, services and infrastructure. Therefore, city dwellers are facing difficulties such as getting access to improved water sources, to basic sanitation, and to a relatively good personal and domestic hygiene [20].

2.2. Data collection

Definition of diarrhea and nutritional status assessment: Diarrhea is generally characterized by the frequent occurrence of watery stools. In a technical sense, however, it is more difficult to define because the suggested elements which are asymptomatic of the definition of diarrhea vary according to the objectives of each study [2124]. Following clinical signs, we have considered diarrhea as the sudden and frequent occurrence of abundant and consistently abnormal watery or mucus stools more than three times a day and more than 300 g per stool. The stools should be mixed with a phlegm-like substance or blood, and are associated with dysentery. To indicate its acute character, the episode must last for about 14 days. As far as nutritional status is concerned, it was assessed by weight for age Z-score. Severe malnutrition was defined as a weight for age Z-score < - 3, moderate malnutrition was between -3 and -2, and mild malnutrition between -2 and -1. Well-nourished children were considered when at < -1 Z-score.

Patients: To minimize the risk of confusion between the infectious diarrhea and the soft feces normally observed in babies, the survey targeted only children from 6 to 59 months. Thus, the childless household and those with children outside the age group were eliminated from the sample. In the households with several children in the survey age bracket, a table of random numbers was used to select only one of them.

Field survey: The area has two wet seasons (April to June and August to October). Because during the rainy season, many microorganisms are more prevalent and the cases of diarrhea increase, the study was conducted during the first rainy season i.e. April to June 2005. The survey used a stratified random sampling procedure based on two stages to select targeted neighborhoods. First, 20 neighborhoods were selected out of the 105 that make up the city (Figure 2a). They were representative of the six types that the city contains. Second, 3,034 households qualified for the final survey was selected (Figure 2b). In the selected neighborhoods and households, we used the quantitative method through a structured questionnaire. Under our coordination, the questionnaire was administered by a team of final year medical doctors from the Faculty of Medicine and biomedical sciences of the University of Yaoundé I. Approved by the Cameroon National Ethics Committee, this medical survey aimed (i) to examine children’s clinical history, physical signs, and previous treatments, (ii) and to detect cases of diarrhea among them. Thus, when a case of diarrhea was reported, a physician visited the home, interviewed the mother or caretaker of the child, examined the child and collected a fresh stool. The stool specimens were placed on wet ice and immediately taken to the Cameroon Pasteur Institute where they were dispatched to the bacteriological, virological and parasitological laboratories for etiological studies. Each positive sample was correlated with the neighbourhood pertaining to the household to which the infected child belonged to. According to current WHO regulations, diarrheic children were treated with oral rehydration therapy and with appropriate antihelminthics and antibiotics selected on the basis of the culture results.

Processing of samples: (1) Bacteriology: After reception, stool samples were cultured in various solid selective media and selenite broth. Plates were incubated for 18 hours at 37°C, except for Campylobacter medium which was incubated 48 hours at 42°C under microaerophilic conditions. After 24 hours of incubation, the selenite broth was subcultured onto Salmonella-Shigella agar. Colonies were identified based on morphologic characteristics. When suspected to be relevant, identification was done using the appropriate tests, followed by an API20E powered by BioMerieux laboratory. Salmonella, Shigella, and Vibrio strains were agglutinated using specific antiserum. Identification of the different diarrhagenic Escherichia coli (EPEC, ETEC, EAEC, VTEC) was done by standard methods formerly made known by Vargas et al.[25] and recently described by Moyo et al.[26] and Mandomando et al[27]. Campylobacter spp. were identified based on morphologic characteristics and on oxidase test, and confirmed by Gram staining. (2) Virology: A sample of each stool was frozen in a saline solution and tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for rotavirus antigen as presented in the Meridian Bioscience kit [28] and well described by Dennehy et al.[29]. The reagens were supplied by the Sanofi Diagnostic Pasteur collaborating center in Paris. Enteric adenovirus were investigated using SDS/EDTA-pretreated filter paper strips well described by Zlateva et al.[30]. (3) Parasitology: Each fresh stool was examined microscopically for leucocytes, trophozoites of Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia lamblia by using a saline and iodine preparation [31]. Kato and migration inhibition factor techniques were used for determination of concentrations. Cryptosporidium parvum and Cyclospora cayetanensis were detected with a modified acid-fast stain [32, 33]. Campylobacter strains were isolated and identified by standard tests and the PCR method [34]. Children with fever or having an episode of fever within the previous 24 h were tested for malaria parasites in blood.

Data management and statistical methods: All data were entered into Access database and locked after checks for internal and external consistency. Values of variables were counted and summarized in tables of frequency. The x2 test was used for the analysis of categorical variables. A P value of ≤ 0.005 was considered significant.

3. Results

Epidemiologic features: A total of 3,034 children aged up to five years were enrolled in the study. Among these, diarrhea was one of the diagnoses in 437 (14.4%) (Table 1).

Samples were collected from all of them (100%). Seventy two (16.47%) were younger than 12 months of age, and two hundred ninety eight (68.19%) were between 12 and 36 months of age (Table 2).

Co-infections were found in one hundred and twenty five children, accounting for 48.1% of the total number of positive cultures. Of these positive samples, four (3.2%) were virus/parasite co-infections, one hundred and five (84%) were bacteria/parasite, and sixteen (12.8%) were virus/bacteria/parasite co-infections. Three hundred fifty eight (81.9%) children were males, i.e. a male-to-female ratio of 1:4.5. One hundred ninety nine parents (45.5%) were thinking of seeking medical attention (hospital) for their sick children, whereas ninety five (21.7%) were thinking of resorting to street pharmacists (street medicines dealers), eighty six (19.6%) to traditional remedies, and fifty seven (13.1%) did not have any therapeutic choice. Low level of diarrhea (Fifty six, 21.5%) was identified in formal i.e. planned settlement, whereas high level of diarrhea (two hundreds and four, 78.4%) was found in children living in unplanned settlement, namely in central and sub-central spontaneous neighbourhoods (Figure 3).

Etiologic agents: On the 437 samples examined, a potential infectious pathogen was isolated from 260 (59.5%). Pathogenic viruses were isolated from 10 (3.8%) samples, bacteria from 96 (36.9%), and parasites from 106 (59.2%) (Table 3).

Those pathogens were unequally found among the children. Enteric adenovirus (02.7%), Salmonella spp. (09.6), Campylobacter spp. (08.8%), Esherichia coli - enteropathogenic (04.2%), Shigella spp. (07.3%), Ascaris lumbricoides (17.8%), Giardia lamblia (13.2%), Trichuris Trichiura (10.7%), and Entamoeba (08.4%) were the most frequently found pathogens (Table 4). Rotavirus was found in only three children, all younger than 23 months. The presence of Salmonella spp. (P < 0.005) or Campylobacter Jejuni (P < 0.003) was statistically related to age, being more frequent among children between 12 and 35 months of age; whereas Ascaris Lumbricoides (P < 0.001) and Trichuris trichiura (P < 0.003) were more frequent in children between 12–59 months of age. Though not significant, Shistosoma intercalatum was the very rare pathogen to be isolated.

Clinical features: In all children having had a microorganism isolated or not, fever and cough were the most recurrent clinical finding, whereas vomit and pains were frequently found only among children with Ascaris lumbricoides, Giardia lamblia, and E. coli (EPEC, EAEC). Persistent diarrhea i.e. diarrhea that continued for longer than 14 days occurred in 14.41% (63 of 437). These sixty three children were between 6 and 23 months of age and were infected with two or three pathogens. Analysis of fecal samples in children with diarrhea showed watery diarrhea in 72.3%, diarrhea with mucus in 20%, diarrhea with blood in 3.1% and diarrhea with mucus and blood in 1.6 % of all patients. From the two hundred and sixty children with infectious diarrhea, two hundred and two children (77.7%) were diagnosed with malaria. Only ninety seven (22.2%) children were well-nourished. Whereas sixty nine (15.8%) had severe malnutrition, one hundred and one (43.7%) had moderate malnutrition, and eighty (18.3%) had mild malnutrition. Other Clinical features included symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection (21.9%), and abdominal pain (12.5%).

4. Discussion

This study, which covered a 3-months period, was the first direct field investigation in Cameroon of pathogenic agents associated with diarrhea in children. The results found in the present study are in whole similar to those reported from other countries where diarrheal diseases are recognized as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children under five years of age [35]. Our male-to-female ratio of 1:4.5 is close to that of several studies which reported higher number of male patients as compared to female patients to have suffered from diarrhea [3638]. In this study, at least one pathogenic microorganism was isolated from 59.5% (260/437) of the stools of children with diarrhea. In spite of Mandomando and Sur [2339] who reported a low rate (42.2%), this percentage is similar to previous studies carried out and which well correspond with health realities in developing countries [4042].

It is difficult to draw conclusions about rotavirus because of the low rate of detection of this virus. However, this result is not surprising because usually during the rainy season, percentages of diarrhea due to rotavirus are lower than during the dry season [43, 44]. On the other hand, rotavirus has been associated with approximately one quarter of all diarrhea in South Africa [45]. Group A rotavirus is the most common human strain, with a worldwide distribution, whereas Groups B and C are mainly found in East and South-East Asia [46, 47]. No data on the prevalence of the different groups are not available for Cameroon. An explanation would be that cases of rotavirus either were not severe to cause diarrhea or had short duration. Thus, there’s a need for longer studies with adequate methodology in order to determine the real rotavirus prevalence in Cameroon. However, Enteric adenovirus has displayed a high prevalence compared with rotavirus. This can be due to their epidemiologic feature: notwithstanding the types, all are transmitted by direct contact, fecal-oral transmission, and occasionally waterborne transmission. Some types are capable of establishing persistent asymptomatic infections in intestines of infected hosts and infections can occur throughout the year [48]. Case of Enteric adenoviruses serotypes 40 and 41 that we isolated, mainly in stools of children between 5 and 12 months of age (57.14%).

Despite Gascon and Lindblom [49, 50] who described a low percentage of Campylobacter jejuni isolated in children, our results show a different pattern - probably because our study design has included children from one to five years, an age strata at which Campylobacter is more prevalent. The relatively lower frequency of Salmonella spp. found in our study is consistent with that of African studies in which they were isolated in less than 10% of children younger than five years of age with diarrhea [51, 52]. These salmonella are likely to adapt to domesticated cattle and all varieties of fowls and chickens. The reservoir of infection in animals constitutes the principal source of diarrhea caused by Salmonella spp. Shigella spp. has also been enteropathogens statistically related with an increased risk of diarrhea in under five years children in Yaoundé. Asymptomatic infection was common and may have arisen due to prolonged excretion of organisms [53]. Its relatively low prevalence in our study may be explained by the fact that it included severe cases requiring hospitalization. Yet, we did not investigate hospitalized children. Furthermore, Shigella spp. usually appears in outbreaks, so that in the absence of an epidemic, it is not frequently isolated [54].

As well as other enteropathogens, Diarrheagenic E. coli were frequently isolated, supporting the well-documented role of this sp. in diarrheal disease [55, 56]. The main E. coli pathotype found was Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC, 04.2%). The picture is similar to a study in Argentina, where EPEC was isolated from nine cases (04.5%) of a total of 200 diarrhea patients [57]. EPEC is a well known enteropathogen. Together with Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), they cause an important number of cases of diarrheal illnesses with dehydration [58]. However, in some studies, ETEC and EPEC strains were not related to diarrheal illnesses [59, 60] As far as Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) strains, they were first described as a putative virulence group by Nataro et al. [61]. In our study as well as in others [62, 63], EAEC was not related to diarrhea. This might be so because hosts factors like vertically acquired antibodies or breast milk could have played a role in the pathogenesis of diarrhea whether acute or persistent [64]. Another hypothesis might be an unexpectedly long period of EAEC strain excretion in feces after a diarrhea episode treated with only rehydration salt and exceeding the two weeks without diarrhea required for controls [65]. The low frequency of verotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC, 01.5%) reported in our study is consistent with others studies in low and middle income countries [66]. In those countries, prevalence of VTEC in childhood diarrhea is lower than that of ETEC, EPEC, or EAEC.

Intestinal nematodes seem to play a great role in diarrheal diseases in this area. The high rate of parasites isolated from stools samples suggests a high prevalence and even incidence of these health problems in the Yaoundé urban and rural region for children at this age. The epidemiologic data suggest that there is an age dependency in the isolation or parasites, especially in the case of Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura, both being more frequently isolated in children older than twelve months, and statistically related to diarrhea. This could be because, children older than twelve months of age are in permanent contact with soil and thus more prone to infection, and have non hygienic feeding habits. In short and as reported in Venezuelan and Brazilian children [67, 68], the high and statistically significant frequency of enteric parasites in our study is conclusive of their role in diarrheal diseases. Also, the fact that Entamoeba histolytica, Giradia lamblia, and Trichomonas intestinalis are a cause of diarrhea here is a well-documented fact [69].

Another observation from the present study is that infection with multiple pathogens was very common. This is the reflection of environmental contamination [7072], but it makes it difficult to identify which pathogen is the real causative agent of an episode of diarrhea. It might also be that multiple microorganisms act synergistically to produce diarrhea. The presence of fever in most diarrheic children could be caused by malaria, as the disease is endemic in the area and that nearly 77.70% of the children were positive with Plasmodium falciparum parasites. Vomiting was frequent in children with Giardia lamblia, Ascaris lumbricoides, Enteric Adenovirus, and E. coli. Blood noticed in the stools might be caused by Shigella spp. as its capacity to penetrate and multiply within the intestinal mucosa, causing ulceration is well known [73].

Despite the recognition of severe ill effects of the disease and mostly the enormous amount of resource being spent to control their spread [74], diarrhea still remains a serious threaten in many urban communities for a number of reasons: high incidence of malnutrition and infections, overcrowding of children in one house, lack of personal hygiene, lack of piped water and sanitation, widespread faecal contamination of the environment, and poor quality of housing [7577]. In Yaoundé, this is particular obvious in informal settlement namely in central/sub-central and Peri urban neighbourhoods’ with poorest living conditions and consequently with a higher level of diarrhea (≥ 78%). However, formal settlements such as wealthy residential neighbourhoods and housing estates provided with all the urban utilities and infrastructure [78] display a lower level of diarrheas. This finding that levels of diarrhea diseases vary from one neighbourhood to another within the urban space might be a reflection of changing patterns of urban settlement.

5. Conclusion

Diarrheal diseases are one of the main health problems in Cameroon, as in many low-and-middle income countries. Clarification of the microorganisms associated with diarrhea in Cameroon is an essential step toward the implementation of effective primary health care activities against the disease. The present etiological study is also meaningful in that it provides information on the prevalence of enteropathogens in various neighbourhoods. Thus, this study opens door to further investigations aiming at analyzing specific epidemiology and virulence of diarrhea-causing pathogens in Cameroon. Therefore, suitable and efficient local control strategies can be set up. From a methodological point of view, analysis of diarrhea-causing pathogens according to neighbourhoods is a proof that a spatial epidemiological study at urban districts scale can be relevant in developing urban settings as whole. Such study is urgently required to disaggregate urban health information into smaller and manageable districts so as to guide local decision making on urban health. The contextual level of analysis allows showing that levels of diarrhea differ across the city. For example, Figure 3 shows that diarrheal prevalence varies across the city neighbourhoods. From these intra-urban variations, the learning objective is that, contrary to the existing literature on African urban environments, all the poor are seldom at the same risks in an urban neighbourhood. In health planning, such knowledge can be useful for setting suitable and effective strategies disease and health intervention strategies that are able to adequately address neighbourhood health determinants.

Ijerph 05 00213f1 1024
Figure 1. Location of Yaoundé, Cameroon.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. Location of Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Ijerph 05 00213f1 1024
Ijerph 05 00213f2 1024
Figure 2. (a) Selected neighbourhoods. (b) Surveyed households with < 5 years Children.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 2. (a) Selected neighbourhoods. (b) Surveyed households with < 5 years Children.
Ijerph 05 00213f2 1024
Ijerph 05 00213f3 1024
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of diarrheas in Yaoundé, according to type of neighbourhoods.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 3. Spatial distribution of diarrheas in Yaoundé, according to type of neighbourhoods.
Ijerph 05 00213f3 1024
Table Table 1. Distribution of diarrheal diseases, according to gender in Yaoundé.

Click here to display table

Table 1. Distribution of diarrheal diseases, according to gender in Yaoundé.
GenderSurveyed individualsCases of diarrheas
Male1,564 (51.6%)358 (81.9%)
Female1,470 (48.4%)79 (18.1%)
Variable coverage3,034 (100.0%)437 (100.0%)

Source: PERSAN Survey/Infant diarrhea in Yaoundé, 2002 & 2005

Table Table 2. Age strata of 437 children with diarrhea in Yaoundé.

Click here to display table

Table 2. Age strata of 437 children with diarrhea in Yaoundé.
Diarrheal disease?
StrataYesNo
06 - 11 months72351
12 - 23 months178628
24 - 35 months120709
36 - 47 months43530
48 - 59 months24379
Total4372,597

Source: PERSAN Survey/Infant diarrhea in Yaoundé, 2002 & 2005

Table Table 3. Infectious agents identified in diarrheic faeces.

Click here to display table

Table 3. Infectious agents identified in diarrheic faeces.
Causative agentsGenusFrequencyPercentage
VirusesRotavirus301.1
Enteric Adenovirus702.7

BacteriaSalmonella spp.2911.2
Shigella spp.2308.8
Escherichia coli1907.3
Campylobacter jejuni2509.6

ParasitesAscaris lumbricoides4617.8
Trichuris trichiura2810.7
Entamaeba2208.4
Giardia intestinalis3413,2
Trichomonas803.2
Shistosoma501.9
Chilomastix401.5
Cryptosporidium702.6

Total260100.0

Source: PERSAN Survey/Infant diarrhea in Yaoundé, 2002 & 2005

Table Table 4. Frequency and age distribution of micro organisms isolated from fecal samples of children with diarrhea.

Click here to display table

Table 4. Frequency and age distribution of micro organisms isolated from fecal samples of children with diarrhea.
MicroorganismsPrevalence06– 11 months12–35 months36–59 monthsP value
N%N%N%N%
Rotavirus301.1133.3267.6000.0NS
Enteric adenovirus702.6457.1342.8000.0<0.008
Salmonella spp.2509.6624.01456.0520.0<0.005
Shigella spp.1907.3421.0947.3631.5<0.004
Campylobacter spp.2308.8313.01252.1834.7<0.003
E. coli-EAEC803.1562.5337.5000.0NS
E. coli-ETEC602.3350.0233.3116.6NS
E. coli –EPEC1104.2218.1872.7109.0<0.001
E.coli-VTEC401.5000.0250.0250.0NS
Ascaris lumbricoides4617.8306.51532.62860.8<0.001
Trichuris trichiura2810.7000.01967.8932.1<0.003
Entamoeba histolytica2208.4313.6940.9522.7NS
Giradia lamblia3413.11132.31441.1926.4<0.002
Trichomnas intestinalis803.1000.0337.5562.5NS
Shistosoma100.3000.0000.01100NS
Shistosoma mansoni401.5000.04100000.0NS
Chilomastix mesnili401.5000.0375.0125.0NS
Cryptosporidium702.6228.5457.1114.2<0.008

This work was supported by a grant from the Research and Development Institute (PERSAN programme) under the Centre Pasteur and Yaoundé urban Council linkage. We thank the parents and caretakers of study participants.

References

  1. Fernel, J. La pathologie ou discours des maladies; Faculté de Médecine de Paris: Paris, France, 1655. [Google Scholar]
  2. Colson, J-Cl. Essai sur la diarrhée; Faculté de Médecine de Paris: Paris, France, 1808. [Google Scholar]
  3. Vignes, P. Traité complet de la dysenterie et de la diarrhée; Rousselon: Paris, France, 1825. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dufour, A. Dissertation sur la diarrhée idiopathique; Faculté de Médecine de Paris: Paris, France, 1814. [Google Scholar]
  5. Galien (129-201). Oeuvres anatomiques, physiologiques et médicales; Tome 1. Charles Daremberg: Paris, France, 1854.
  6. Tralles, A. (de) [525-605]. De arte medicalibri XII; Éditions Johannes Günther Andernach: Bâle, Switzerland, 1566. [Google Scholar]
  7. Celse, J. [30 ap.J.C.]. Traité de Médecine; Delahays: Paris, France, 1855. [Google Scholar]
  8. Grall, C; Leger, M; Mathis, C. Traité de pathologie exotique: Diarrhées, dysenterie, hépatite endémique, abcès du foie; J.-B. Baillère et fils: Paris, France, 1920. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nguendo Yongsi, HB; Delali Dovie, BK. Diarrheal diseases in the history of public health. Arch. Med. Res 2007, 38, 159–163. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nielly, M. Eléments de pathologie exotique; Delahaye et Lecronier: Paris, France, 1881. [Google Scholar]
  11. World Health Organization. Manual for the laboratory investigations of acute enteric infections; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1983.
  12. Farthing, MJ. Diarrhoea: a significant worldwide problem. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2000, 14, 65–69. [Google Scholar]
  13. WHO. Available at https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/facts2004/en/index.html [Accessed: 23 October 2008].
  14. Schiller, LR. Management of diarrhea in clinical practice: strategies for primary care physicians. Rev. Gastroenterol. Disord 2007, 7, 27–38. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamer, DH; Simon, F; Thea, D; Keutsh, GT. Childhood diarrhea in Sub-Saharan Africa. Child. Health Res. Project 1998, 2, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  16. Huilan, S; Zhen, LG; Mathan, MM; Mathew, MM; Olarte, J; Espejo, R; Khin, MU; Ghafoor, MA; Khan, MA; Sami, Z; Sutton, RG. Etiology of acute diarrhea among children in developing countries; A multicenter study in five countries. Bull. World Health Organ 1991, 69, 549–555. [Google Scholar]
  17. Okeke, IN; Ojo, O; Lamikanra, A; Kaper, JB. Etiology of acute diarrhea in adults southeastern Nigeria. J. Clin. Microbiol 2003, 41, 4525–4530. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hanlon, P; Hanlon, L; Marsh, V; Byass, P; Shenton, F; Sanders, RC; Hassan-King, M; Greenwood, BM. Epidemiology of rotavirus in a periurban Gambian community. Ann. Trop. Paediatr 1987, 7, 238–243. [Google Scholar]
  19. National Institute of Statistics. CAVIE: Enquête sur le cadre de vie des populations de Yaoundé et Douala, Available at http://www.statistics-cameroon.org [Accessed 27 August 2008]..
  20. Nguendo Yongsi, HB. Prevalence and spatial disparities of infectious diseases with regard to the physical environment in Yaoundé - Cameroon. J. Health Dev 2007, 3, 123–145. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vargas, M; Gascon, J; Casals, C; Shellenberg, D; Urassa, H; Kahigwa, E; Ruiz, J; Vila, J. Etiology of diarrhea in children less than five years of age in Ifakara, Tanzania. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg 2004, 70, 536–539. [Google Scholar]
  22. Amador, JJ; Vicari, A; Turcios-Ruiz, RM; Melendez, DAC; Malek, M; Michel, F; Aldighieri, S; Kerin, T; Bresee, JS; Glass, RI; Andrus, JK. Outbreak of rotavirus gastroenteritis with high mortality, Nicaragua. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 2008, 23, 277–284. [Google Scholar]
  23. Carraturo, A; Catalani, V; Tega, L. Microbiological and epidemiological aspects of rotavirus and enteric adenovirus infections in hospitalized children in Italy. New Microbiol 2008, 31, 329–336. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kevin, KC; Barteluk, RL; Kelly, M T; He, X; de Hua, G; Ge, YA; Proctor, EM; Byrne, S; Stiver, HG. Etiology of childhood diarrhea in Beijing, China. J. Clin. Microbiol 1991, 29, 90–95. [Google Scholar]
  25. Vargas, M; Gascon, J; Gallardo, F; Jimenez De Anta, MT; Vila, J. Prevalence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli strains detected by PCR in patients with traveler diarrhea. Clin. Microbiol. Infect 1998, 4, 682–688. [Google Scholar]
  26. Moyo, SJ; Gro, N; Kirsti, V; Matee, MI; Kitundu, J; Maselle, SY; Langeland, N; Myrmel, H. Prevalence of enteropathogenic viruses and molecular characterization of group A rotavirus among children with diarrhea in Dar es Salaam Tanzania. BMC Public Health 2007, 27, 359–368. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mandomando, IM; Macette, EV; Ruiz, J; Sanz, S; Abacassamo, F; Valles, X; Sacarlal, J; Navia, MM; Vila, J; Alonso, PL; Gascon, J. Etiology of diarrhea in children younger than 5 years of age admitted in a rural hospital of southern Mozambique. Am.J. Trop. Med. Hyg 2007, 76, 522–527. [Google Scholar]
  28. Meridian Bioscience Inc. A Rapid immunoassay for the detection of rotavirus antigen in human stool; Catalog No. 750030 - Meridian Bioscience Inc.: Cincinnati, OH, 1988; p. 14.
  29. Dennehy, PH; Gauntlett, DR; Spangenberger, SE. Choice of reference assay for the detection of rotavirus in fecal specimens: Electron Microscopy versus Enzyme Immunoassay. J. Clin. Microbiol 1990, 28, 1280–1283. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zlateva, KT; Maes, P; Rahman, M; Van Ranst, M. Chromatography paper strip sampling for enteric adenoviruses type 40 and 41 positive stool specimens. J. Virol 2005, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  31. Guerrant, RL; Bobak, DA. Bacterial and protozoal gastroenteritis. New Engl. J. Med 1991, 325, 327–340. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bonnin, A; Dei-cas, E; Camerlynk, P. Cryptosporidium and Isospora. In Molecular and cell biology and Opportunistic Infections in Aids; Myint, S, Cann, A, Eds.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1992; pp. 123–135. [Google Scholar]
  33. Caccio, S; Pinter, E; Fantini, R; Mezzaroma, I; Pozio, E. Human infection with Cryptosporidium feli: case report and literature review. Emerg. Infect. Dis 2002, 8, 85–86. [Google Scholar]
  34. Steinhauserovà, I; Fojtkovà, K. Serotyping and identification of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli strains of human and animal origin using the PCR method. Acta Vet. Brno 1999, 68, 149–154. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hien, BT; Scheutz, F; Cam, PD; Serichantalergs, O; Huong, TT; Thu, TM; Dalsgaard, A. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Shigella strains isolated from children in a hospital case-control study in Hanoi, Vietnam. J. Clin. Microbiol 2008, 46, 996–1004. [Google Scholar]
  36. Okoh, AI; Osode, AN. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC): a recurring decimal in infants' and travelers' diarrhea. Rev. Environ. Health 2008, 23, 135–148. [Google Scholar]
  37. Levine, MM; Ferrechio, C; Prado, V; Cayazzo, M; Abrego, P; Martinez, J; Maggi, L; Baldini, MM; Martin, W; Maneval, D; Kay, B; Guers, L; Lior, H; Wasserman, SS; Nataro, JP. Epidemiologic studies of Escherichia coli diarrheal infections in a low socioeconomic level peri-urban community in Santiago, Chile. Am. J. Epidemiol 1993, 138, 849–869. [Google Scholar]
  38. Molbak, K; Wested, N; Hojling, N; Scheutz, F; Gottshau, P; Aaby, P; José da Silva, AP. The etiology of early diarrhea: a community study from Guinea-Bissau. J. Infect. Dis 1994, 169, 581–587. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sur, D; Manna, B; Deb, AK; Deen, JL; Danovaro-Holliday, MC; von Seidlein, L; Clemens, JD; Bhattacharya, SK. Factors associated with reported diarrhoea episodes and treatment-seeking in an urban slum of Kolkata, India. J. Health Popul. Nutr 2004, 22, 130–138. [Google Scholar]
  40. Maranhão, HS; Medeiros, MC; Scaletsky, IC; Fagundes-Neto, U; Morais, MB. The epidemiological and clinical characteristics and nutritional development of infants with acute diarrhoea, in north-eastern Brazil. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2008, 102, 357–365. [Google Scholar]
  41. Simpson, E; Wittet, S; Bonilla, J; Gamazina, K; Cooley, L; Winkler, JL. Use of formative research in developing a knowledge translation approach to rotavirus vaccine introduction in developing countries. BMC Public Health 2007, 7, 281–292. [Google Scholar]
  42. McMichael, AJ. The Urban Environment and Health in a World of Increasing Globalization: Issues for Developing Countries. Bull.World Health Organ 2000, 78, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bhatnagar, S; Bhan, MK; Sommerfelt, H; Sazawal, S; Kumar, R; Saini, S. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli may be a new pathogen causing acute and persistent diarrhea. Scand. J. Infect. Dis 1993, 25, 579–583. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gomes, TAT; Rassi, V; Macdonald, KL. Enteropathogens associated with acute diarrheal diseases in urban infants in Sao paulo, Brazil. J. Infect. Dis 1991, 164, 331–337. [Google Scholar]
  45. Steele, AD; Peenze, I; de Beer, MC; Pager, CT; Yeats, J; Potgieter, N; Ramsaroop, U; Page, NA; Mitchell, JO; Geyer, A; Bos, P; Alexander, JJ. Anticipating Rotavirus vaccine: epidemiology and surveillance of rotavirus in South Africa. Vaccine 2003, 21, 354–360. [Google Scholar]
  46. Samal, SK; Khuntia, HK; Nanda, PK; Satapathy, CS; Nayak, SR; Sarangi, AK; Sahoo, N; Pattnaik, SK; Chhotray, GP; Pal, BB. Incidence of bacterial enteropathogens among hospitalized diarrhea patients from Orissa, India. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis 2008, 61, 350–355. [Google Scholar]
  47. Karki, A; Tiwari, BR. Prevalence of acute diarrhoea in Kathmandu Valley. J. Nepal Assoc 2007, 46, 175–179. [Google Scholar]
  48. Foy, HM. Adenoviruses. In Viral Infections in Humans: epidemiology and control, 4th Edition; Evans, A, Kaslow, R, Eds.; Plenum: New York, 1997; pp. 119–138. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gascón, J; Vargas, M; Schellenberg, D; Urassa, H; Casals, C; Kahigwa, J; Aponte; Mshinda, H; Vila, J. Diarrhea in Children under 5 Years of Age from Ifakara, Tanzania: a Case-Control Study. J. Clin. Microbiol 2000, 38, 4459–4462. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lindblom, GB; Ahren, J; Changalucha, R; Gabone, R; Kaijser, B; Nilsson, LA; Sjögren, E; Svennerholm, AM; Temu, M. Campylobacter jejuni/coli and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in faeces from children and adults in Tanzania. Scand. J. Infect. Dis 1995, 27, 589–593. [Google Scholar]
  51. Vargas, M; Gascon, J; Gallardo, F; Jimenez De Anta, MT; Vila, J. Prevalence of diarrheagenic Esherichia coli strains detected by PCR in patients with traveler diarrhea. Clin. Microbiol. Infect 1998, 4, 682–688. [Google Scholar]
  52. Urio, EM; Collison, EK; Gashe, BA; Sebunya, TH; Mpuchane, S. Shigela and salmonella strains isolated from children under 5 years of age in Gaborone, Bostwana, and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Trop. Med. Intern. Health 2001, 6, 55–59. [Google Scholar]
  53. Meider, C; Cerf, M. Diarrhées à Shigelles, à Colibacilles entéro-invasifs entéro-hémorragiques et à Colibacilles. In Diarrhées aigues infectieuses; Doin: Paris, 1993; pp. 67–76. [Google Scholar]
  54. Oyofo, BA; Subekti, D; Tjaniadi, P; Machpud, N; Komalarini, S; Setiawan, B; Simanjuntak, C; Punjabi, N; Corwin, AL; Wasfy, M; Campbell, JR; Lesmana, M. Enteropathogens associated with acute diarrhea in community and hospital patients in Jakarta, Indonesia. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol 2002, 34, 139–146. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sansonetti, PJ. Mécanismes moléculaires et cellulaires de l’infection du tube digestif par les bactéries entéro-invasives. Des modèles cellulaires à la dysentérie. In Diarrhées aigues infectieuses; Doin: Paris, France, 1993; pp. 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gomez, HF; Cleary, TG. E. coli as cause of diarrhea in children. Semin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis 1994, 5, 175–182. [Google Scholar]
  57. Notario, R; Borda, N; Gambande, T; Sutich, E. Species and serovars of enteropathogenic agents associated with acute diarrheal disease in Rosario, Argentina. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. S. Paulo 1996, 38, 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  58. Gray, LD. Escherichia, Salmonella, Shigella and Yersina. In Manual of clinical microbiology; Murray, PR, Baron, EJ, Pfaller, MA, Tenover, FC, Yolken, RH, Eds.; American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, 1995; pp. 450–456. [Google Scholar]
  59. Adhikari, M; Coovadia, Y; Hewitt, J. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and enterotoxigenic (ETEC) related diarrhoeal disease in a neonatal unit. An. Trop. Paediatr 1995, 5, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  60. Molbak, K; Wested, N; Hojling, N; Scheutz, F; Gottshau, P; Aaby, P; José da Silva, AP. The etiology of early diarrhea: a community study from Guinea-Bissau. J. Infect. Dis 1994, 169, 581–587. [Google Scholar]
  61. Nataro, JP; Baldini, MM; Kaper, JB; Black, RE; Bravo, N; Levine, MM. Detection of an adherence factor of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli with a DNA probe. J. Infect. Dis 1985, 152, 560–565. [Google Scholar]
  62. Howard, P. Bacterial, viral and parasitic aetiology of paediatric diarrhoea in the Highlands of Papua-New Guinea. J. Trop. Pediatr 2000, 46, 10–14. [Google Scholar]
  63. Addy, PA; Antepim, G; Frimpong, EH. Prevalence of pathogenic Escherichia coli and parasites in infants with diarrhoea in Kumasi, Ghana. East Afr. Med. J 2004, 81, 353–357. [Google Scholar]
  64. Stoffel, V; Chague, F. Declared diseases, observed diseases and health priorities in a Benin rural district. Santé Publique 2001, 13, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  65. Pai, M; Kang, G; Ramakrishna, BS; Venkataraman, A; Muliyil, J. An epidemic of diarrhoea in south India caused by enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Indian J. Med. Res 1997, 106, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  66. Presterl, E; Zwick, RH; Reichmann, S; Aichelburg, A; Kremsner, PG; Winkler, S; Graninger, W. Frequency and virulence properties of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in children with diarrhea in Gabon. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg 2003, 69, 406–410. [Google Scholar]
  67. Gonzalez, R; Diaz, C; Marino, M; Cloralt, R; Pequeneze, M; Perez-Schael, I. Age-specific prevalence of Escherichia coli with localized and aggregative adherence in Venezuelan infants with acute diarrhea. J. Clin. Microbiol 1997, 35, 1103–1107. [Google Scholar]
  68. Lima, AAM; Fang, G; Schorling, JB; de Albuquerque, L; McAuliffe, JF; Mota, S; Leite, R; Guerrant, RL. Persistent diarrhea in Northeast Brazil: Etiologies and interactions with malnutrition. Acta Pediatr.Scand 1992, 381 Suppl, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kaur, R; Rawat, D; Kakkar, M; Uppal, B; Sharma, VK. Intestinal parasites in children with diarrhea in Delhi, India. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Publ. Health 2002, 33, 725–729. [Google Scholar]
  70. Tumwine, JK; Thompson, J; Katua-Katua, M; Mujwajuzi, M; Johnstone Porras, I. Diarrhea and effects of different water sources, sanitation and hygiene behavior in East Africa. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2002, 7, 750–756. [Google Scholar]
  71. Woldemicael, G. Diarrhoeal morbidity among young children in Eritrea: environmental and socio-economic determinants. J. Health Popul. Nutr 2001, 19, 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  72. Nguendo Yongsi, HB; Herrmann, MT; Lutumba Ntetu, A; Sietchiping, R; Bryant, C. Environmental Sanitation and Health Risks in Tropical Urban Settings: Case Study of Household Refuse and Diarrhea in Yaoundé-Cameroon. Int. J. Soci. Sci 2008, 3, 220–229. [Google Scholar]
  73. Remon, RA; Thomas, W; Frenck, R; Putnam, SD; Rao, MR; Savarino, SJ; Kamal, KA; Peruski, LF; Abd-El, MIA; El-Alkamy, SA; Naficy, AB; Clemens, JD. Epidemiology of shigella-associated diarrhea in rural Egyptian children. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg 2004, 71, 367–372. [Google Scholar]
  74. Shah, SB; Hanauer, SB. Treatment of diarrhea in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: concepts and cautions. Rev. Gastroenterol. Disord 2007, 7, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  75. Dennehy, PH. Transmission of rotavirus and other enteric pathogens in the home. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J 2000, 19, 103–105. [Google Scholar]
  76. Huttly, S. The Impact of Inadequate Sanitary Conditions on Health in Developing Countries; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Maternal and Child Epidemiology Unit: London, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  77. Black, M; Fawcett, B. The Last Taboo: Opening the Door on the Global Sanitation Crisis; Earthscan Publications: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  78. Nguendo Yongsi, HB. Urbanization and communicable diseases in Cameroon; University of Paris X: Nanterre, France, 2000; p. 151. [Google Scholar]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert