Next Article in Journal
Trends in the Cumulative Incidence of Vocational Rehabilitation Indicators in Brazil, 2007–2016
Next Article in Special Issue
Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
The Relationship between Annual Airborne Pollen Levels and Occurrence of All Cancers, and Lung, Stomach, Colorectal, Pancreatic and Breast Cancers: A Retrospective Study from the National Registry Database of Cancer Incidence in Japan, 1975–2015
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Frontline Intraperitoneal versus Dose-Dense Platinum/Paclitaxel Chemotherapy without Bevacizumab
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 11
10.3390/ijerph17113951
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Functional Gene Clusters in Global Pathogenesis of Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Ovary Discovered by Integrated Analysis of Transcriptomes

by
Yueh-Han Hsu
1,2,
Peng-Hui Wang
1,2,3,4,5 and
Chia-Ming Chang
1,2,*
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan
2
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
3
Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
4
Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 440, Taiwan
5
Female Cancer Foundation, Taipei 104, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(11), 3951; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113951
Submission received: 27 April 2020 / Revised: 23 May 2020 / Accepted: 31 May 2020 / Published: 2 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gynecological Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC)) is one epithelial ovarian carcinoma that is known to have a poor prognosis and a tendency for being refractory to treatment due to unclear pathogenesis. Published investigations of OCCC have mainly focused only on individual genes and lack of systematic integrated research to analyze the pathogenesis of OCCC in a genome-wide perspective. Thus, we conducted an integrated analysis using transcriptome datasets from a public domain database to determine genes that may be implicated in the pathogenesis involved in OCCC carcinogenesis. We used the data obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) DataSets. We found six interactive functional gene clusters in the pathogenesis network of OCCC, including ribosomal protein, eukaryotic translation initiation factors, lactate, prostaglandin, proteasome, and insulin-like growth factor. This finding from our integrated analysis affords us a global understanding of the interactive network of OCCC pathogenesis.

1. Introduction

Approximately 85–90% cases of ovarian cancers are those of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and the majority of them occurred in the postmenopausal women with a peak incidence at age of 56–60 years [1,2,3]. Traditionally, ovarian cancer has been considered a “silent killer” that is asymptomatic until it reaches a far advanced stage, which presents various obvious symptoms or signs secondary to massive ascites and wide-spread intraperitoneal carcinomatosis [4]. There are several histologic types of EOC, including serous, endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous transitional, and undifferentiated carcinomas. In clear cell type about 50% of patients were classified as the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I disease [5]. However, it is the most chemo-resistant and is associated with a poor prognosis among those subtypes [6,7].
Besides an early stage being the defining characteristic of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC)), OCCC often occurs in younger women and shows worse prognosis compared to the similar stage of other histotypes of EOC, such as high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) [8,9,10]. This is primarily attributable to the relative resistance of OCCC to platinum drugs. Platinum-based chemotherapy presents an efficacy of 70–80% for HGSC but 20–50% for OCCC [8].
Although the mechanisms underlying the chemoresistance and carcinogenicity of OCCC remain unclear, the genetic changes that may be involved in the pathways of OCCC have been extensively studied. For example, Zhou et al. discovered that OCCC has 199 significantly different expression genes compared with HGSOC (p < 0.05); they also discovered those genes to be associated with functions such as apoptosis, cell cycle, repair of DNA damage, and the PI3K pathway. In particular, they noted that within the PI3K pathway, there were 164 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) [9]. Another study demonstrated the different pathways in the suppression of the proliferation of OCCC- and HGSC-derived cells, with the former being mediated by inhibition of the calcium-dependent protein copine 8 (CPNE8) and the latter being mediated by inhibition of the transcription factor basic helix-loop-helix family member e 41 (BHLHE41) [11]. Additionally, the cause of molecular changes in OCCC is often associated with AT-rich active domain 1A (ARID1A) mutations [12,13,14]. Another frequent gene change in OCCC is an activation of mutations of the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-diphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) gene, suggesting that the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway can be a potential targeting site [15,16].
However, there was no integrated analysis of OCCC with transcriptomes currently. Currently, research of OCCC is based on DNA microarrays as the main research method used to identify DEGs, but usually the case numbers of these studies were limited, which has resulted in few statistically significant genes being found with statistical significance and did not identify the overall pathophysiology of OCCC. Therefore, we conducted an integrated analysis with the transcriptome datasets downloaded from the public domain database for analyzing the pathogenesis of OCCC to find out the differences in gene expression between OCCC and normal ovarian tissues.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microarray Datasets Gene Set Definition and Data Processing

We used the keyword of “ovarian clear cell carcinoma” and “ovary” to search for all available microarray gene expression profiles in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database comprehensively, and the transcriptome datasets of human OCCC and normal ovarian tissue using the Simple Omnibus Format in Text (SOFT) format were downloaded, and the detailed information of this method has been extensively reported in our previous publications [17,18,19,20,21].
The selected datasets were limited to the primary site of the ovarian tissue that had a definite diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma and normal ovarian tissue. In addition, we also excluded the gene expression profile if any missing data had been found. Based on the Human Genome Organization (HUGO) Human Genome Organization Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) gene symbols approved in 2013, we performed the data analysis. After an identification of the corresponding gene symbol information in the annotation table, the microarray gene expression datasets were used. The current study included the common genes and the corresponding gene expression profiles among all datasets. If the number of the common genes became less than 8000 during intersecting with other datasets as well as the number of gene elements in the gene set was less the 3, the datasets were discarded.

2.2. Detection of Differentially Expressed Genes in OCCC

To discover the DEGs (differentially expressed genes) for each of the OCCC, the aforementioned DNA microarray datasets were analyzed. We transformed and rescaled to cumulative proportion values from 0 (lowest expression) to 1 (highest expression) with an R package YuGene (version 1.1.5, downloaded from the CRAN, https://cran.r-project.org/index.html) before an integration in the gene expression levels of all samples in each dataset [22]. A linear model computed with empirical Bayes analysis by the functions “lmFit” and “eBayes” provided by the R package “limna” (version 3.26.9, downloaded from the CRAN, https://cran.r-project.org/index.html) was used to identify the DEGs.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

We performed the Mann–Whitney U test to evaluate the gene expression fold differences of the OCCC and the control groups and we corrected the results through multiple hypotheses testing using false discovery rate (Benjamini–Hochberg procedure). The significance was defined when the p value was < 0.01.

3. Results

3.1. Transcriptome Datasets and Gene Sets

One hundred and eighty samples were initially collected from the GEO database, including 80 OCCC and 100 normal control samples (Figure 1). A total of 34 datasets containing five DNA microarray platforms with no missing data were integrated into the current study. Table 1 summarizes information of the samples collected. The information of the samples, including their DNA microarray platform, data set series, and accession numbers, is detailed in Table S1.

3.2. Workflow

Please refer to Figure 1.

3.3. The Most Significant DEGs

We identified 10,448 common genes among the five DNA microarray platforms used to detect the DEGs between the OCCC and normal ovarian control groups. Due to the large number of cases as a result of our integration of 32 datasets, 10,363 genes were found at statistical significance (adjusted p < 0.01).
As listed in Table 2, the top 20 DEGs ranked by their statistical significance were RPL24, EIF3F, RPS13, EIF3L, RPS11, ITM2B, RPL27, RPL17, RPS15, RPL5, PLS3, RPS3A, RPL39, RPS27L, RPL23, RPL36AL, RPL34, ALDH9A1, RPL3, and RPL21. To protect against Akt or Myc-driven cancers in mice, partial loss of large ribosomal subunit protein 24 (RPL24) function was noted [23]. It may be partly mediated through the translational inhibition of a subset of cap-eIF4E-dependently translated mRNAs [23]. According to the function, most of these top 20 DEGs were ribosomal proteins (RPs) and eukaryotic translation initiation factors (EIFs). These two groups of genes play an important role in cancer; they are related to each other and were also largest in number in our data.

3.4. Summarizing the Genes Involved in OCCC Pathogenesis

The genes exhibited considerable functional commonality. Based on their statistical significance and functional commonality, we summarized the top 500 DEGs to six functional gene clusters including ribosomal proteins (RP), eukaryotic translation initiation factors (EIFs), proteasome, lactate, prostaglandin, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) as shown in Figure 1.
The six functional gene clusters are listed in Table 3. For a more comprehensive understanding of OCCC, we reconstructed the pathogenesis network based on the six gene clusters and gene interaction database, as detailed in the Discussion section.

4. Discussion

In this integrated analysis, OCCC exhibited an extensive range of genetic changes and indicated its polygenic nature. These DEGs exhibited highly overlapped functionality, and they could be classified into six gene clusters. We further connected the evidence from published researches and gene interactions to reconstruct the pathogenesis network of OCCC.

4.1. Ribosomal Proteins Related Genes

In our data, there were 61 genes associated with ribosomal protein, which was the largest group in our classification. Most of those genes were upregulated. In addition to being involved in the processes of ribosome assembly and protein translation, ribosomal proteins were key players in regulation of apoptosis, arrest of cell cycle, cell migration and invasion, cell proliferation, and the repair of DNA damage. They also relate to tumorigenesis, immune signaling, tumor suppressors, and oncogenic signals [24].
Xu et al. discovered the tumor suppressive function of RPs, including RPS14 and RPL10; these RPs were down-regulated in our results [44]. RPS14 was reported to active TAp73, the p53 homologue, and to induce apoptosis [44]. Furthermore, RPS14 can suppress oncoproteins, such as c-Myc [24,45]. RPL10 was identified with a mutation that can function as tumor suppressor [46]. In contrast, oncogenic signals frequently promote cell growth mediated by enhancing ribosome biogenesis [47]. RPS27, RPS3A, RPL8, RPS13, RPSA, and RPL23 play different roles in relation to oncogenic signals [24,48], and the genes of these ribosomal proteins were all upregulated in our data.
The dysregulation of ribosomal proteins has already been found in some human cancers [44]. In serous epithelial ovarian cancer, low level of S4X is associated with poor prognosis [49], and L13a, L29 were noted to be upregulated in ovarian cancer [50,51]. A study indicated ribosomal protein genes play a critical role in OCCC, suggesting that these proteins could be good candidates as potential tumor markers in OCCC [52].

4.2. Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factors (eIFs) Related Genes

Our data had 38 genes associated with eukaryotic translation initiation factors. All of the genes were upregulated compared with normal ovarian tissue, except for eIF3f, which exhibited down-regulation in the tissue of ovarian clear cell carcinoma.
Eukaryotic translation initiation factors were associated with the initiation phase of eukaryotic translation, cell growth, and cell cycle regulation [25]. They were reported to have an association with some diseases, such as eIF2B was noted to have involvement in neurodegenerative disease [53].
eIF4E was upregulated in breast cancer, colon cancer, head and neck cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and ovarian carcinoma, and was associated with the increasing grade of a disease [26,27]. The overexpressed cellular phenotype of eIF4E tends to have a more spindle-like appearance, and it can reduce cell cycle time from 20 h to 16 h. In addition, it also can induce upregulation of VEGF [25,54]. Mitogenic activity is intermediated by Ras activation [55], and c-Myc can activate eIF4E transcription [56]. Our data show agreement of the aforementioned reports, eIF4E was also upregulated in OCCC.
In melanoma and pancreatic cancer, eIF3f was down-regulated, and the overexpression of eIF3f was noted to be associated with an inhibition of proliferation and an increased apoptosis in both pancreatic cancer and melanoma cell lines [57,58]. eIF3f can also interact with heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) and induce rRNA degeneration, which can inhibit protein translation [59]. Furthermore, eIF3f can suppress Akt and ERK signaling, as well as stabilize p53 [60] In our data, eIF3f was also down-regulated, as is the case in melanoma and pancreatic cancer.

4.3. Lactate Related Genes

Our data had four genes associated with lactate, all of which were upregulated. Some studies have demonstrated that OCCC cell lines have an increased accumulation of lactate [30,31]. Many studies have suggested that lactate has a critical role in cancer growth [28]. Furthermore, a common phenomenon in cancer cells is the Warburg effect, which is the increased uptake of glucose and accumulation of lactate [29]. Transcription factors hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), c-Myc oncogene, and the repression of tumor suppression factor p53 increase the expression and translocation of glucose transporters GLUT, which can enhance glucose uptake [61]. These factors increase the expression and enhance the activity of glycolytic enzymes, especially lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), thereby accelerating glycolysis. The downregulation of p53 also reduces mitochondrial function. Those conditions may increase lactate accumulation, and the upregulation of the monocarboxylate transporters MTC1 and MCT4 facilitate lactate exchange in candidate cancer cells. These features potentially increase the growth, proliferation, and metastasis of cancer cells [61].
Lactate can stimulate cell migration and promote metastasis. In addition, lactate can induce tumor-associated fibroblasts to secrete hyaluronan [62], a key component of the extracellular matrix (ECM), which involves the healing process [63,64,65] and also promotes metastasis of cancer cells [62]. The secretion of VEGF is induced by lactate to stand in angiogenesis [66]. There is also contribution of lactate to immune escape by interference of monocyte (inhibit the differentiation of monocytes to dendritic cells) [67,68,69], T-cell (to reduce the proliferation of T cell) [67,70], natural killercell (reduce the ability of cytolysis) [67,71], and macrophage (increase the expression of M2 macrophage) [67,72].

4.4. Prostaglandin Related Genes

In our data, there were six genes related to prostaglandin, most of which were upregulated. Chronic inflammation is commonly believed to contribute to the development of malignancies. It has been reported to show the strong correlation between chronic inflammation caused by infections or autoimmune diseases and cancers [73]. For example, hepatitis B virus infection may increase the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma [74,75], and high-risky types of Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection are associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer [76,77]. Patients with autoimmune diseases also have a higher incidence of malignancies, such as scleroderma and myositis [73].
Prostaglandin E2 was found to inhibit apoptosis and promote cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis [33]. In most human malignancies, the pathways of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [34] and COX-2 [36,37] are commonly activated. In colorectal cancer cells, it was reported that PGE2 could transactivate EGFR, which can induce cell migration and invasion by elevating PI3K-Akt signaling [78]. In addition, PGE2 can transactivate PPAR delta through PI3K-Akt pathway to inhibit apoptosis of cancer cells [79]. The expression of antiapoptotic proteins, such as Bcl-2 [80], can be induced by PGE2, and to elevate NF-kB transcriptional activity [81]. PGE2 activates Ras/Raf/MEK/ERKs pathway, which in turn increases COX-2 expression to promote cell proliferation [82]. Upregulation of IL-10 [83] and the decay accelerating factor (DAF) [84] are triggered by PGE2 to cause immunosuppression. Some studies have also demonstrated that PGE2 increases the expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and VEGF expression to promote angiogenesis [85].
The relation between inflammation and cancer suggests the antineoplastic activity of anti-inflammatory drugs, particularly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [86]. As such, recent studies have demonstrated that the long-term use of NSAIDs reduces the incidence of some malignancies, including colorectal, esophageal, breast, lung, and bladder cancers [33]. Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), which is caused by adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene defects, can be treated with celecoxib (a type of COX-2 inhibitor) [87], and it can reduce the level of cancer-associated proteins, such as β-catenin, cyclin D1 [88], MMP-2, MMP-9 [89], and VEGF [90], to increase survival rate and reduce the incidence of liver metastasis.

4.5. Proteasome Related Genes

Proteasome is a protein complex that is responsible for the degradation of unneeded or damaged proteins. Our data had 37 genes related to proteasome, all of which were upregulated compared with normal ovarian tissue. The ubiquitin–proteasome pathway for protein degradation plays a crucial role in intracellular protein turnover. According to current studies, proteasome as a target for cancer therapy has been announced [32]. For example, bortezomib is a kind of proteasome inhibitor, which has been used to treat mantle cell lymphoma [91] and multiple myeloma [92]. The target of bortezomib is NF-κB pathway. In most cells, nuclear factor-κB (NF-kB) exists in the cytoplasm in an inactive complex bound to IkB. Cell signaling may be induced by growth factors, viruses, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, which induce the phosphorylation and proteasomal degradation of IκB by proteasome. From such cell signaling, the transcription factor NF-κB is translocated to the nucleus to activate gene transcription and promote cell proliferation, as well as the expression of cytokines, cell adhesion molecules, and antiapoptotic proteins. Bortezomib inhibits NF-kB activity mediated through the blockage of the proteasomal degradation of inhibitor of IkB [93].
The MDM2-p53 pathway is a tumor-suppressor pathway that is often disrupted in malignancies. MDM2 is a p53-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase, which inhibits the p53 growth-suppressive function in unstressed cells. MDM2 constantly binds to p53, thereby enabling the degradation of p53 by proteasomes [94,95]. Proteasome inhibition may prevent the degradation of p53, thus activating apoptosis in cancer cells [96].
Currently, there are some molecular targets of proteasome inhibitors. In addition to NF-kB and p53, there are also the targets of p21, p27, Bax, p44/42 MAPK, tBid, and Smac/Diablo [97].

4.6. Insulin-Like Growth Factor Related Genes

A lot of cancers were associated with abnormal IGF signaling, such as childhood malignancies, colon cancer, melanoma, osteosarcoma, pancreatic cancer, and prostate cancer [25]. Some studies have also determined an increased IGF-1R activity to be implicated in cancer cell invasion, migration, and proliferation [42,43]. Our data had nine genes related to IGF, most of which were upregulated compared with normal ovarian tissue. Bioavailability of IGF-1 and IGF-2 is modulated by a family of IGFBPs. IGF-1R binding with either IGF-1 or IGF-2 will undergo receptor autophosphorylation and cross-linking, and then the signals activate both PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathways to enhance tumor progression [97].
In addition, it is reported that for ovarian cancer treated with either cisplatin alone or combining with paclitaxel in vitro, the development of drug resistance may be mediated through the upregulation of IGH-IGF-1R signaling pathway [98]. One study also showed the increased IGF-1R expression in ovarian cancer patients who had been treated with 3–4 cycles of the combination of platinum and paclitaxel regimen [98]. Further dissection of underlying mechanisms using a gene microarray study to evaluate 28 patients with ovarian HGSC who showed the relatively resistant to platinum chemotherapy and results had demonstrated that lots of genes involving IGF-1/PI3K/NF-kB/ERK pathway have been activated when compared to those patients who remained sensitive to the platinum-based chemotherapy [99]. In another xenograft model of ovarian HGSC, the transient knockdown of IGF-2 was noted as being able to restore paclitaxel sensitivity [100]. Ganitumab, a human monoclonal antibody to IGF-1R can enhance the therapeutic effect of platinum-based chemotherapy passing through the inhibition of the IGF-2-dependent tumor growth [101]. However, the blocking of IGF-1R cannot counteract paclitaxel resistance [76], suggesting that the development of chemo-resistance of cisplatin and paclitaxel may involve the different mechanisms.

4.7. Summarizing the Six Functional Gene Clusters

Figure 2 illustrates our reconstructed network of the functional gene clusters underlying the pathogenesis of OCCC.
PI3K/Akt/mTOR is often activated in malignancies, and the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway is enhanced in pancreatic cancer [102], colon cancer [103], and thyroid cancer [104]. Furthermore, Ras activates PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling [105], Akt enhances the phosphorylation of MDM2 to promote p53 degradation [106], and Akt also causes phosphorylation of IkB to enable NF-κB to translocate into the nucleus to activate genes transcription [107]. In addition, mTOR induces the release of eIF4E to begin translation initiation [108]. eIF4b also promotes c-Myc translation [109], and the release of eIF4E is elevated by c-Myc [56]. The expression of VEGF is stimulated by eIF4E [25,54], and VEGF can activate Ras to induce PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway [110]. NF-kB is also affected by eIF1a [25]. Phosphorylation of eIF4E is promoted by ERK to activate translation initiation [25].
Upregulation of RPS3A, RPS27, and RPL8 can activate NF-kB [24]. Downregulation of RPS14 improves the expression of c-Myc [24,45] and reduces TAp73, the p53 homologue [44]. Proteasome aids in the degradation of p53 [94,95] and activation of NF-kB [93]. IGF and PGE2 can activate PI3K/Akt/mTOR, either directly or through Ras signaling [97]. PGE2 activates the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERKs pathway, which, in turn, increases COX-2 expression to promote cell proliferation. ERK increases COX-2 expression to induce the release of PGE2 [89], which stimulates VEGF expression and causes immune suppression [85]. Lactate is able to influence the NF-kB pathway, specifically in increasing VEGF [66] and inducing immune escape [79,80,81,82,83]. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), c-Myc oncogene, and p53 increase the accumulation of lactate [61].
These networks are illustrated in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5, where some events associated with carcinogenesis can be seen in the figures, such as angiogenesis, cell proliferation, decreased apoptosis, and immune escape. Finally, from our data, we selected some genes that are potentially related to these pathways.

5. Conclusions

OCCC is a chemoresistant subtype that is associated with poor prognosis. Therefore we tried to determine the associated mechanism in the hope that we can find a better treatments. We used integrated analysis, and based on the commonality and current studies, we selected six functional gene clusters that may be involved in the pathogenesis of OCCC, including ribosomal protein, eukaryotic translation initiation factors, lactate, prostaglandin, proteasome, and insulin-like growth factor. Based on the close interaction among these clusters, and in conjunction with findings in the literature, we further reconstructed the network of OCCC pathogenesis. According to the results, we may provide insight or targets for therapeutic strategies in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3951/s1, Table S1: Sample number and mean of gene set regularity index for each group.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-H.H. and C.-M.C.; Data curation, Y.-H.H. and C.-M.C.; Formal analysis, Y.-H.H. and C.-M.C.; Investigation, Y.-H.H. and C.-M.C.; Methodology, Y.-H.H., P.-H.W. and C.-M.C.; Project administration, C.-M.C.; Resources, C.-M.C.; Supervision, P.-H.W. and C.-M.C.; Writing—original draft, Y.-H.H.; Writing—review and editing, C.-M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the Taipei Veterans General Hospital (V108C-085, V109C-108, and V109E-005-5) and from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan (MOST: 106-2314-B-075-061-MY3), Taipei, Taiwan. The authors appreciate the financial support from the Female Cancer Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, W.L.; Wang, P.H. Aberrant sialylation in ovarian cancers. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2020, 83, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, C.Y.; Cheng, M.; Lee, N.R.; Huang, H.Y.; Lee, W.L.; Chang, W.H.; Wang, P.H. Comparing paclitaxel-carboplatin with paclitaxel-cisplatin as the front-line chemotherapy for patients with FIGO IIIC serous-type tubo-ovarian cancer. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Cheng, M.; Lee, H.H.; Chang, W.H.; Leem, N.R.; Huang, H.Y.; Chen, Y.J.; Horng, H.C.; Lee, W.L.; Wang, P.H. Weekly dose-dense paclitaxel and twiweekly low-dose cisplatin: A well-tolerated and effective chemotherapeutic regimen for first-line treatment of advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Desai, A.; Xu, J.; Aysola, K.; Qin, Y.; Okoli, C.; Hariprasad, R.; Chinemerem, U.; Gates, C.; Reddy, A.; Danner, O.; et al. Epithelial ovarian cancer: An overview. World J. Transl. Med. 2014, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chang, H.T.; Chiu, M.L.; Wang, T.Y.; Chen, T.C.; Chang, C.L.; Su, T.H.; Wang, K.G.; Wang, K.L.; Yang, Y.C.; Chen, J.R. Effect of chemotherapy, laparoscopy, and cytology on stage IC ovarian clear cell carcinoma: A long-term, single-center study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Pectasides, D.; Pectasides, E.; Psyrri, A.; Economopoulos, T. Treatment issues in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: A different entity? Oncologist 2006, 11, 1089–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sung, P.L.; Wen, K.C.; Horng, H.C.; Chang, C.M.; Chen, Y.J.; Lee, W.L.; Wang, P.H. The role ofα2,3-linked sialylation on clear cell type epithelial ovarian cancer. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 57, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tang, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Guan, L.; Chen, W.; Jiang, H.; Lu, Y. Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: Clinicopathologic features and outcomes in a Chinese cohort. Medicine 2018, 97, e10881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, H.; Liu, Q.; Shi, X.; Liu, Y.; Cao, D.; Yang, J. Distinct gene expression profiles associated with clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. J. Ovarian Res. 2020, 13, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sao, C.H.; Lai, W.A.; Lin, S.C.; Chang, C.M.; Chen, Y.J.; Wang, P.H. Endometriosis-associated epithelial ovarian cancer: Primary synchronous different cellular type on each ovary. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 59, 460–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tan, T.Z.; Ye, J.; Yee, C.V.; Lim, D.; Ngoi, N.Y.L.; Tan, D.S.P.; Huang, R.Y. Analysis of gene expression signatures identifies prognostic and functionally distinct ovarian clear cell carcinoma subtypes. EBioMedicine 2019, 50, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Berns, K.; Caumanns, J.J.; Hijmans, E.M.; Gennissen, A.M.C.; Severson, T.M.; Evers, B.; Wisman, G.B.A.; Jan Meersma, G.; Lieftink, C.; Beijersbergen, R.L.; et al. ARID1A mutation sensitizes most ovarian clear cell carcinomas to BET inhibitors. Oncogene 2018, 37, 4611–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Caumanns, J.J.; Wisman, G.B.A.; Berns, K.; van der Zee, A.G.J.; de Jong, S. ARID1A mutant ovarian clear cell carcinoma: A clear target for synthetic lethal strategies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2018, 1870, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Wiegand, K.C.; Shah, S.P.; Al-Agha, O.M.; Zhao, Y.; Tse, K.; Zeng, T.; Senz, J.; McConechy, M.K.; Anglesio, M.S.; Kalloger, S.E.; et al. ARID1A mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 1532–1543. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Oishi, T.; Itamochi, H.; Kudoh, A.; Nonaka, M.; Kato, M.; Nishimura, M.; Oumi, N.; Sato, S.; Naniwa, J.; Sato, S.; et al. The PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 reduces the growth of ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2014, 32, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Matsumoto, T.; Yamazaki, M.; Takahashi, H.; Kajita, S.; Suzuki, E.; Tsuruta, T.; Saegusa, M. Distinct beta-catenin and PIK3CA mutation profiles in endometriosis-associated ovarian endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2015, 144, 452–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Su, K.M.; Lin, T.W.; Liu, L.C.; Yang, Y.P.; Wang, M.L.; Tsai, P.H.; Wang, P.H.; Yu, M.H.; Chang, C.M.; Chang, C.C. The potential role of complement system in the progression of ovarian clear cell carcinoma inferred from the gene ontology-based immunofunctionome analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2824. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chang, C.C.; Su, K.M.; Lu, K.H.; Lin, C.K.; Wang, P.H.; Li, H.Y.; Wang, M.L.; Lin, C.K.; Yu, M.H.; Chang, C.M. Key immunological functions involved in the progression of epithelial ovarian serous carcinoma discovered by the gene ontology-based immunofunctionome analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chang, C.M.; Yang, Y.P.; Chuang, J.H.; Chuang, C.M.; Lin, T.W.; Wang, P.H.; Yu, M.H.; Chang, C.C. Discovering the deregulated molecular functions involved in malignant transformation of endometriosis to endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma using a data-driven, function-based analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chang, C.M.; Wang, P.H.; Horng, H.C. Gene set-based analysis of mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 56, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chang, C.M.; Chiou, S.H.; Yang, M.J.; Yen, M.S.; Wang, P.H. Gene set-based integrative analysis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 55, 552–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Lê Cao, K.A.; Rohart, F.; McHugh, L.; Korn, O.; Wells, C.A. YuGene: A simple approach to scale gene expression data derived from different platforms for integrated analyses. Genomics 2014, 103, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wilson-Edell, K.A.; Kehasse, A.; Scott, G.K.; Yau, C.; Rothschild, D.E.; Schilling, B.; Gabriel, B.S.; Yevtushenko, M.A.; Hanson, I.M.; Held, J.M.; et al. RPL24: A potential therapeutic target whose depletion or acetylation inhibits polysome assembly and cancer cell growth. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 5165–5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Zhou, X.; Liao, W.J.; Liao, J.M.; Liao, P.; Lu, H. Ribosomal proteins: Functions beyond the ribosome. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 7, 92–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Spilka, R.; Ernst, C.; Meht, A.K.; Haybaeck, J. Eukaryotic translation initiation factors in cancer development and progression. Cancer Lett. 2013, 340, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Berkel, H.J.; Turbat-Herrera, E.A.; Shi, R.; de Benedetti, A. Expression of the translation initiation factor eIF4E in the polyp-cancer sequence in the colon. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2001, 10, 663–666. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hsieh, A.C.; Ruggero, D. Targeting eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 4914–4920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hirschhaeuser, F.; Sattler, U.G.; Mueller-Klieser, W. Lactate: A metabolic key player in cancer. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 6921–6925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Liberti, M.V.; Locasale, J.W. The Warburg effect: How does it benefit cancer Cells? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016, 41, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Okamoto, T.; Mandai, M.; Matsumura, N.; Yamaguchi, K.; Kondoh, H.; Amano, Y.; Baba, T.; Hamanishi, J.; Abiko, K.; Kosaka, K.; et al. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1β (HNF-1β) promotes glucose uptake and glycolytic activity in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Mol. Carcinog. 2015, 54, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Amano, Y.; Mandai, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Matsumura, N.; Kharma, B.; Baba, T.; Abiko, K.; Hamanishi, J.; Yoshioka, Y.; Konishi, I. Metabolic alterations caused by HNF1β expression in ovarian clear cell carcinoma contribute to cell survival. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 26002–26017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Kaplan, G.S.; Torcun, C.C.; Grune, T.; Ozer, N.K.; Karademir, B. Proteasome inhibitors in cancer therapy: Treatment regimen and peripheral neuropathy as a side effect. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017, 103, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, D.; Dubois, R.N. Prostaglandins and cancer. Gut 2006, 55, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sigismund, S.; Avanzato, D.; Lanzetti, L. Emerging functions of the EGFR in cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2018, 12, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wen, K.C.; Sung, P.L.; Hsieh, S.L.; Chou, Y.T.; Lee, O.K.; Wu, C.W.; Wang, P.H. α2,3-sialyltransferase type I regulates migration and peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 29013–29027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, C.J.; Sung, P.L.; Kuo, M.H.; Tsai, M.H.; Wang, C.K.; Pan, S.T.; Chen, Y.J.; Wang, P.H.; Wen, K.C.; Chou, Y.T. Crosstalk between SOX2 and cytokine signaling in endometrial carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, B.; Qu, L.; Yang, S. Cyclooxygenase-2 promotes tumor growth and suppresses tumor immunity. Cancer Cell. Int. 2015, 15, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, P.H.; Horng, H.C.; Chen, Y.J.; Hsieh, S.L.; Chao, H.T.; Yuan, C.C. Effect of a selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, celecoxib, on the reproductive function of female mice. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2007, 70, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chou, Y.C.; Chen, Y.J.; Lai, C.R.; Wang, P.H.; Hsin-Chan; Yuan, C.C. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is higher in ovarian cancer tissue adjacent to endometriosis than in ovarian cancer without comorbid endometriosis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2006, 124, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, Y.J.; Wang, L.S.; Wang, P.H.; Lai, C.R.; Yen, M.S.; Ng, H.T.; Yuan, C.C. High cyclooxygenase-2 expression in cervical adenocarcinomas. Gynecol. Oncol. 2003, 88, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Denduluri, S.K.; Idowu, O.; Wang, Z.; Liao, Z.; Yan, Z.; Mohammed, M.K.; Ye, J.; Wei, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhao, L.; et al. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling in tumorigenesis and the development of cancer drug resistance. Genes Dis. 2015, 2, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Sachdev, D.; Yee, D. Disrupting insulin-like growth factor signaling as a potential cancer therapy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Pollak, M.N.; Schernhammer, E.S.; Hankinson, S.E. Insulin-like growth factors and neoplasia. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xu, X.; Xiong, X.; Sun, Y. The role of ribosomal proteins in the regulation of cell proliferation, tumorigenesis, and genomic integrity. Sci. China Life Sci. 2016, 59, 656–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhou, X.; Hao, Q.; Liao, J.M.; Liao, P.; Lu, H. Ribosomal protein S14 negatively regulates c-Myc activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 21793–21801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Sulima, S.O.; Kampen, K.R.; Vereecke, S.; Pepe, D.; Fancello, L.; Verbeeck, J.; Dinman, J.D.; De Keersmaecker, K. Ribosomal lesions promote oncogenic mutagenesis. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Van Riggelen, J.; Yetil, A.; Felsher, D.W. MYC as a regulator of ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lim, K.H.; Kim, K.H.; Choi, S.I.; Park, E.S.; Park, S.H.; Ryu, K.; Park, Y.K.; Kwon, S.Y.; Yang, S.I.; Lee, H.C.; et al. RPS3a over-expressed in HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma enhances the HBx-induced NF-kappaB signaling via its novel chaperoning function. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tsofack, S.P.; Meunier, L.; Sanchez, L.; Madore, J.; Provencher, D.; Mes-Masson, A.M.; Lebel, M. Low expression of the X-linked ribosomal protein S4 in human serous epithelial ovarian cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Bian, Z.; Yu, Y.; Quan, C.; Guan, R.; Jin, Y.; Wu, J.; Xu, L.; Chen, F.; Bai, J.; Sun, W.; et al. RPL13A as a reference gene for normalizing mRNA transcription of ovarian cancer cells with paclitaxel and 10-hydroxycamptothecin treatments. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 11, 3188–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Y.L.; Ye, F.; Hu, Y.; Lu, W.G.; Xie, X. Identification of suitable reference genes for gene expression studies of human serous ovarian cancer by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Anal. Biochem. 2009, 394, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liu, J.; Wang, H.L.; Ma, F.M.; Guo, H.P.; Fang, N.N.; Wang, S.S.; Li, X.H. Systematic module approach identifies altered genes and pathways in four types of ovarian cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 7907–7914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Fogli, A.; Boespflug-Tanguy, O. The large spectrum of eIF2B-related diseases. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006, 34, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kevil, C.G.; De Benedetti, A.; Payne, D.K.; Coe, L.L.; Laroux, F.S.; Alexander, J.S. Translational regulation of vascular permeability factor by eukaryotic initiation factor 4E: Implications for tumor angiogenesis. Int. J. Cancer 1996, 65, 785–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lazaris-Karatzas, A.; Smith, M.R.; Frederickson, R.M.; Jaramillo, M.L.; Liu, Y.L.; Kung, H.F.; Sonenberg, N. Ras mediates translation initiation factor 4E-induced malignant transformation. Genes Dev. 1992, 6, 1631–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Rosenwald, I.B.; Chen, J.J.; Wang, S.; Savas, L.; London, I.M.; Pullman, J. Upregulation of protein synthesis initiation factor eIF-4E is an early event during colon carcinogenesis. Oncogene 1999, 18, 2507–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Doldan, A.; Chandramouli, A.; Shanas, R.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Cunningham, J.T.; Nelson, M.A.; Shi, J. Loss of the eukaryotic initiation factor 3f in pancreatic cancer. Mol. Carcinog. 2008, 47, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Doldan, A.; Chandramouli, A.; Shanas, R.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Leong, S.P.; Nelson, M.A.; Shi, J. Loss of the eukaryotic initiation factor 3f in melanoma. Mol. Carcinog. 2008, 47, 806–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Wen, F.; Zhou, R.; Shen, A.; Choi, A.; Uribe, D.; Shi, J. The tumor suppressive role of eIF3f and its function in translation inhibition and rRNA degradation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, J.Y.; Kim, H.J.; Rho, S.B.; Lee, S.H. eIF3f reduces tumor growth by directly interrupting clusterin with anti-apoptotic property in cancer cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 18541–18557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. San-Millan, I.; Brooks, G.A. Reexamining cancer metabolism: Lactate production for carcinogenesis could be the purpose and explanation of the Warburg effect. Carcinogenesis 2017, 38, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Stern, R. Hyaluronidases in cancer biology. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2008, 18, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Huang, C.Y.; Chang, W.H.; Cheng, M.; Huang, H.Y.; Horng, H.C.; Chen, Y.J.; Lee, W.L.; Wang, P.H. Crosslinked hyaluronic acid gels for the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after a hysteroscopic myomectomy in women with submucosal myomas: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Life 2020, 10, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, P.H.; Huang, B.S.; Horng, H.C.; Yeh, C.C.; Chen, Y.J. Wound Healing. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2018, 81, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Horng, H.C.; Chang, W.H.; Yeh, C.C.; Huang, B.S.; Chang, C.P.; Chen, Y.J.; Tsui, K.H.; Wang, P.H. Estrogen effects on wound healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Beckert, S.; Farrahi, F.; Aslam, R.S.; Scheuenstuhl, H.; Königsrainer, A.; Hussain, M.Z.; Hunt, T.K. Lactate stimulates endothelial cell migration. Wound Repair Regen. 2006, 14, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lee, W.L.; Wang, P.H. Immunology and ovarian cancers. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2020, 83, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Goetze, K.; Walenta, S.; Ksiazkiewicz, M.; Kunz-Schughart, L.A.; Mueller-Klieser, W. Lactate enhances motility of tumor cells and inhibits monocyte migration and cytokine release. Int. J. Oncol. 2011, 39, 453–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gottfried, E.; Kunz-Schughart, L.A.; Ebner, S.; Mueller-Klieser, W.; Hoves, S.; Andreesen, R.; Mackensen, A.; Kreutz, M. Tumor-derived lactic acid modulates dendritic cell activation and antigen expression. Blood 2006, 107, 2013–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fischer, K.; Hoffmann, P.; Voelkl, S.; Meidenbauer, N.; Ammer, J.; Edinger, M.; Gottfried, E.; Schwarz, S.; Rothe, G.; Hoves, S.; et al. Inhibitory effect of tumor cell-derived lactic acid on human T cells. Blood 2007, 109, 3812–3819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Scott, K.E.; Cleveland, J.L. Lactate wreaks havoc on tumor-infiltrating T and NK cells. Cell Metab. 2016, 24, 649–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Ohashi, T.; Aoki, M.; Tomita, H.; Akazawa, T.; Sato, K.; Kuze, B.; Mizuta, K.; Hara, A.; Nagaoka, H.; Inoue, N.; et al. M2-like macrophage polarization in high lactic acid-producing head and neck cancer. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Giat, E.; Ehrenfeld, M.; Shoenfeld, Y. Cancer and autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2017, 16, 1049–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, C.; Ren, Q.; Chang, W. Epidemiological features and risk factors for acquiring hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and syphilis in HIV-infected patients in Shaanxi Province, Northwest China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Li, M.R.; Zheng, H.W.; Ma, S.M.; Liu, Y.Y.; Qie, L.X.; Li, J.Q.; Wang, D.H.; Sun, X.L.; Ren, G.F.; Zheng, Y.H.; et al. Correlations between serum hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B core antibody titers and liver fibrosis in yreatment-naïve CHB patients. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2018, 81, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kim, M.S.; Lee, E.H.; Park, M.I.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, K.; Roh, M.S.; Lee, H.W. Utility of human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Nutthachote, P.; Oranratanaphan, S.; Termrungruanglert, W.; Triratanachat, S.; Chaiwongkot, A.; Baedyananda, F.; Bhattarakosol, P. Comparison of detection rate of high risk HPV infection between self-collected HPV testing and clinician-collected HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 58, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pai, R.; Soreghan, B.; Szabo, I.L.; Pavelka, M.; Baatar, D.; Tarnawski, A.S. Prostaglandin E2 transactivates EGF receptor: A novel mechanism for promoting colon cancer growth and gastrointestinal hypertrophy. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, D.; Wang, H.; Shi, Q.; Katkuri, S.; Walhi, W.; Desvergne, B.; Das, S.K.; Dey, S.K.; DuBois, R.N. Prostaglandin E(2) promotes colorectal adenoma growth via transactivation of the nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta. Cancer Cell 2004, 6, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Sheng, H.; Shao, J.; Morrow, J.D.; Beauchamp, R.D.; DuBois, R.N. Modulation of apoptosis and Bcl-2 expression by prostaglandin E2 in human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 362–366. [Google Scholar]
  81. Poligone, B.; Baldwin, A.S. Positive and negative regulation of NF-kappaB by COX-2: Roles of different prostaglandins. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 38658–38664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Wang, D.; Buchanan, F.G.; Wang, H.; Dey, S.K.; DuBois, R.N. Prostaglandin E2 enhances intestinal adenoma growth via activation of the Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 1822–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Shreedhar, V.; Giese, T.; Sung, V.W.; Ullrich, S.E. A cytokine cascade including prostaglandin E2, IL-4, and IL-10 is responsible for UV-induced systemic immune suppression. J. Immunol. 1998, 160, 3783–3789. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Holla, V.R.; Wang, D.; Brown, J.R.; Mann, J.R.; Katkuri, S.; DuBois, R.N. Prostaglandin E2 regulates the complement inhibitor CD55/decay-accelerating factor in colorectal cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 28, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Pai, R.; Szabo, I.L.; Soreghan, B.A.; Atay, S.; Kawanaka, H.; Tarnawski, A.S. PGE(2) stimulates VEGF expression in endothelial cells via ERK2/JNK1 signaling pathways. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 28, 923–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Allaj, V.; Guo, C.; Nie, D. Non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, prostaglandins, and cancer. Cell Biosci. 2013, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Steinbach, G.; Lynch, P.M.; Phillips, R.K.; Wallace, M.H.; Hawk, E.; Gordon, G.B.; Wakabayashi, N.; Saunders, B.; Shen, Y.; Fujimura, T.; et al. The effect of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in familial adenomatous polyposis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 342, 1946–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Li, W.; Jiang, H.R.; Xu, X.L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, M.L.; Zhai, L.Y. Cyclin D1 expression and the inhibitory effect of celecoxib on ovarian tumor growth in vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 3999–4013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, W.W.; Long, G.X.; Liu, D.B.; Mei, Q.; Wang, J.F.; Hu, G.Y.; Jiang, J.Z.; Sun, W.; Gan, L.; Hu, G.Q. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib suppresses invasion and migration of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines through a decrease in matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 activity. Pharmazie 2014, 69, 132–137. [Google Scholar]
  90. Wei, D.; Wang, L.; He, Y.; Xiong, H.Q.; Abbruzzese, J.L.; Xie, K. Celecoxib inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor expression in and reduces angiogenesis and metastasis of human pancreatic cancer via suppression of Sp1 transcription factor activity. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 2030–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Kane, R.C.; Dagher, R.; Farrell, A.; Ko, C.W.; Sridhara, R.; Justice, R.; Pazdur, R. Bortezomib for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 5291–5294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Field-Smith, A.; Morgan, G.J.; Davies, F.E. Bortezomib (Velcadetrade mark) in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2006, 2, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Hideshima, T.; Ikeda, H.; Chauhan, D.; Okawa, Y.; Raje, N.; Podar, K.; Mitsiades, C.; Munshi, N.C.; Richardson, P.G.; Carrasco, R.D.; et al. Bortezomib induces canonical nuclear factor-kappaB activation in multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2009, 114, 1046–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Shangary, S.; Wang, S. Targeting the MDM2-p53 interaction for cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 5318–5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Kulikov, R.; Letienne, J.; Kaur, M.; Grossman, S.R.; Arts, J.; Blattner, C. Mdm2 facilitates the association of p53 with the proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 10038–10043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Voorhees, P.M.; Dees, E.C.; O’Neil, B.; Orlowski, R.Z. The proteasome as a target for cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 6316–6325. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Zha, J.; Lackner, M.R. Targeting the insulin-like growth factor receptor-1R pathway for cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 2512–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Singh, R.K.; Gaikwad, S.M.; Jinager, A.; Chaudhury, S.; Maheshwari, A.; Ray, P. IGF-1R inhibition potentiates cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents in early stages of chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2014, 354, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Koti, M.; Gooding, R.J.; Nuin, P.; Haslehurst, A.; Crane, C.; Weberpals, J.; Childs, T.; Bryson, P.; Dharsee, M.; Evans, K.; et al. Identification of the IGF1/PI3K/NF κB/ERK gene signalling networks associated with chemotherapy resistance and treatment response in high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Brouwer-Visser, J.; Lee, J.; McCullagh, K.; Cossio, M.J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, G.S. Insulin-like growth factor 2 silencing restores taxol sensitivity in drug resistant ovarian cancer. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Beltran, P.J.; Calzone, F.J.; Mitchell, P.; Chung, Y.A.; Cajulis, E.; Moody, G.; Belmontes, B.; Li, C.M.; Vonderfecht, S.; Velculescu, V.E.; et al. Ganitumab (AMG 479) inhibits IGF-II–dependent ovarian cancer growth and potentiates platinum-based chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 2947–2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Logsdon, C.D.; Lu, W. The significance of Ras activity in pancreatic cancer initiation. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 12, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. McNew, K.L.; Whipple, W.J.; Mehta, A.K.; Grant, T.J.; Ray, L.; Kenny, C.; Singh, A. MEK and TAK1 Regulate Apoptosis in Colon Cancer cells with KRAS-dependent activation of proinflammatory signaling. Mol. Cancer Res. 2016, 14, 1204–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Espinosa, A.V.; Porchia, L.; Ringel, M.D. Targeting BRAF in thyroid cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2007, 96, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Asati, V.; Mahapatra, D.K.; Bharti, S.K. PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathways inhibitors as anticancer agents: Structural and pharmacological perspectives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 109, 314–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Abraham, A.G.; O’Neill, E. PI3K/Akt-mediated regulation of p53 in cancer. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014, 42, 798–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Bai, D.; Ueno, L.; Vogt, P.K. Akt-mediated regulation of NFkappaB and the essentialness of NFkappaB for the oncogenicity of PI3K and Akt. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 125, 2863–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Showkat, M.; Beigh, M.A.; Andrabi, K.I. mTOR signaling in protein translation regulation: Implications in cancer genesis and therapeutic interventions. Mol. Biol. Int. 2014, 2014, 686984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Csibi, A.; Lee, G.; Yoon, S.O.; Tong, H.; Ilter, D.; Elia, I.; Fendt, S.M.; Roberts, T.M.; Blenis, J. The mTORC1/S6K1 pathway regulates glutamine metabolism through the eIF4B-dependent control of c-Myc translation. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 2274–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Karar, J.; Maity, A. PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in angiogenesis. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2011, 4, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 17 03951 g001 550
Figure 1. Workflow for selecting the six functional gene clusters. RP: ribosomal protein; EIF: eukaryotic translation initiation factor; IGF: Insulin-like growth factor.
Figure 1. Workflow for selecting the six functional gene clusters. RP: ribosomal protein; EIF: eukaryotic translation initiation factor; IGF: Insulin-like growth factor.
Ijerph 17 03951 g001
Ijerph 17 03951 g002 550
Figure 2. Associations between ribosomal proteins, eukaryotic translation initiation factors, lactate, prostaglandin, proteasome, and insulin-like growth factors, as detailed in the Discussion section.
Figure 2. Associations between ribosomal proteins, eukaryotic translation initiation factors, lactate, prostaglandin, proteasome, and insulin-like growth factors, as detailed in the Discussion section.
Ijerph 17 03951 g002
Ijerph 17 03951 g003 550
Figure 3. Some events associated with carcinogenesis: angiogenesis, cell proliferation, decrease of apoptosis, and immune escape; these appear to match some of the conditions necessary for carcinogenesis.
Figure 3. Some events associated with carcinogenesis: angiogenesis, cell proliferation, decrease of apoptosis, and immune escape; these appear to match some of the conditions necessary for carcinogenesis.
Ijerph 17 03951 g003
Ijerph 17 03951 g004 550
Figure 4. We identified the commonality (Figure 2) based on the six functional gene clusters. Using findings from the literature, we selected several genes in each functional gene cluster that are more likely to be related to the carcinogenesis of OCCC.
Figure 4. We identified the commonality (Figure 2) based on the six functional gene clusters. Using findings from the literature, we selected several genes in each functional gene cluster that are more likely to be related to the carcinogenesis of OCCC.
Ijerph 17 03951 g004
Ijerph 17 03951 g005 550
Figure 5. Relationships between ribosomal proteins, eukaryotic translation initiation factors, lactate, prostaglandin, proteasome, and insulin-like growth factors.
Figure 5. Relationships between ribosomal proteins, eukaryotic translation initiation factors, lactate, prostaglandin, proteasome, and insulin-like growth factors.
Ijerph 17 03951 g005
Table
Table 1. Microarray platforms in our samples.
Table 1. Microarray platforms in our samples.
Microarry. PlateformCase Numbers of OCCC
(Homo Sapiens)		Case Numbers of Normal Ovarian Cell
(Homo Sapiens)
GPL 5704995
GPL 6244120
GPL 96110
GPL 694755
GPL 726430
Total numbers80100
Table
Table 2. Top 20 DEGs in our data.
Table 2. Top 20 DEGs in our data.
Top 20 DEGsp-Value
1. RPL241.23 ×10−109
2. EIF3F7.35 × 10−109
3. RPS139.3 × 10−102
4. EIF3L1.52 × 10−101
5. RPS111.71 × 10−98
6. ITM2B6.57 × 10−98
7. RPL277.35 × 10−98
8. RPL175.33 × 10−97
9. RPS152.73 × 10−94
10. RPL52.97 × 10−92
11. PLS31.17 × 10−91
12. RPS3A1.42 × 10−91
13. RPL397.65 × 10−91
14. RPS27L7.68 × 10−90
15. RPL239.84 × 10−90
16. RPL36AL1.60 × 10−89
17. RPL341.98×10−89
18. ALDH9A12.31 × 10−89
19. RPL36.82 × 10−89
20. RPL219.70 × 10−89
Table
Table 3. Six functional gene clusters identified in our data: ribosomal protein (RP), eukaryotic translation initiation factors (EIFs), lactate, proteasome, prostaglandin, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF).
Table 3. Six functional gene clusters identified in our data: ribosomal protein (RP), eukaryotic translation initiation factors (EIFs), lactate, proteasome, prostaglandin, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF).
Gene GroupGenesp-ValueFunction of the Genes
  • Ribosomal protein (RP)
RPL24, RPS13, RPS11, RPL27, RPL17, RPS15, RPL5, RPS3A, RPL39, RPS27L, RPL23, RPL36AL, RPL34,RPL3, RPL21, RPL36, RPL30, RPL6, RPL32, RPL31, RPS16, RPL13A, RPS20, RPS12, RPL41, RPS4X, RPSA, RPL18, RPS24, RPL35A, RPS17, RPL13, RPL10A, RPS27, RPS6, RPS18, RPL27A, RPS27A, RPL23A, RPS28, RPS26, RPS2, RPLP2, RPL35, RPS21, RPL8, RPS5, RPL11, RPL10, RPL7, RPS14, RPL7A, RPL14, RPL37, RPL26, RPN2, RPL26L1, RPS6KA2, RPRD2, RPS6KC1, RPRM, RPL10L, RPP40, RPIA, RPP14, RPS6KA3, RPS6KB1, RPP38, RPP25, RPS6KA5, RPP30, RPS6KA6, RPS6KB2, RPL39L, RPS4Y1, RPL3L, RPS6KA1, RPS6KA4 1.23 × 10−109 ~ 2.85 × 10−16
  • Protein translation.
  • Regulation of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, cell proliferation, cell migration and invasion, DNA damage repair.
  • Tumorigenesis, immune signaling, tumor suppressors, and oncogenic signals [24].
2.
eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIF)
EIF3F, EIF3L, EIF3E, EIF1, EIF4B, EIF4A2, EIF2S3, EIF4H, EID1, EIF3G, EIF3M, EIF3K, EIF4A3, EIF5, EIF3A, EIF5A, EIF2AK1, EIF1AX, EIF3C, EIF2S2, EIF24, EIF3B, EIF2B1, EIF2B2, EIF6, EIF4EBP2, EIF2B4, EIF5B, EIF2S1, EIF2AK2, EIF4ENIF1, EIF3J, EIF2B5, EIF4G3, EIF4EBP1, EIF5A2, EIF2AK3, EIF1AY 1.52 × 10−101 ~ 0.00412202
  • Initiation phase of eukaryotic translation, cell growth and cell cycle regulation [25].
  • In some malignancies: up-regulation of eIF4e.
  • Associate with increasing grade of disease [26,27].
3.
Lactate
LDHA, LDHB, LDOC1, LDLRAP1, LDLR, LDHC, LDHAL6B1.38 × 10−72 ~ 9.07 × 10−06
  • Cancerous growth [28]
  • Warburg effect [29]
  • Increases accumulation of lactate in OCCC cell line [30,31].
4.
Proteasome
PSMB4, PSMG2, PSMC1, PSMB6, PSMA4, PSMB5, PSME1, PSMD4, PSMC2, PSMD14, PSMB3, PSMB7, PSMA5, PSMC5, PSMC6, PSMD1, PSMD10, PSMB2, PSMA2, PSMD5, PSMD9, PSMD8, PSMD12, PSME4, PSMA3, PSMD6, PSMD7, PSME3, PSMB8, PSMB9, PSMC4, PSMD11, PSMB10, PSMF1, PSMD13, PSMC3IP, PSMD33.30 × 10−70 ~ 1.59 × 10−18Degradation of unneeded or damaged proteins.
Ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: intracellular protein turnover.
  • As a target for cancer therapy [32].
5.
Prostaglandin
PTGIS, PTGES3, PTGS1, PTGER4, PTGDS, PTGES, PTGER2, PTGES2, PTGIR, PTGDR, PTGS2, PTGFR, PTGER3, PTGER1 1.60 × 10−66 ~ 1.80 × 10−13
  • Prostaglandin E2 promotes cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis, and inhibition of apoptosis [33].
  • In most human malignancies: epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [34,35,36] and COX-2 [37,38,39,40] are activated commonly.
6.
Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)
IGFBP3, IGFBP6, IGFBP5, IGFBP2, IGFALS, IGFBP12.72 × 10−57 ~ 5.00 × 10−08
  • Numerous human cancers abnormal IGF signaling [38].
  • Increased IGF-1R activity: cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion [41,42,43].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hsu, Y.-H.; Wang, P.-H.; Chang, C.-M. Functional Gene Clusters in Global Pathogenesis of Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Ovary Discovered by Integrated Analysis of Transcriptomes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113951

AMA Style

Hsu Y-H, Wang P-H, Chang C-M. Functional Gene Clusters in Global Pathogenesis of Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Ovary Discovered by Integrated Analysis of Transcriptomes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(11):3951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113951

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hsu, Yueh-Han, Peng-Hui Wang, and Chia-Ming Chang. 2020. "Functional Gene Clusters in Global Pathogenesis of Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Ovary Discovered by Integrated Analysis of Transcriptomes" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 11: 3951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113951

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop