Next Article in Journal
Removal of Sulfamethoxazole, Sulfathiazole and Sulfamethazine in their Mixed Solution by UV/H2O2 Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Associated Factors of Drinking Prior to Recognising Pregnancy and Risky Drinking among New Zealand Women Aged 18 to 35 Years
Previous Article in Journal
Trends in Suicide Mortality by Method from 1979 to 2016 in Japan
Previous Article in Special Issue
National Evaluation of Canadian Multi-Service FASD Prevention Programs: Interim Findings from the Co-Creating Evidence Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Community Perceptions of Alcohol Exposed Pregnancy Prevention Program for American Indian and Alaska Native Teens

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(10), 1795; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101795
by Umit Shrestha 1,*, Jessica Hanson 2, Tess Weber 2 and Karen Ingersoll 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(10), 1795; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101795
Submission received: 12 April 2019 / Revised: 16 May 2019 / Accepted: 18 May 2019 / Published: 21 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD))

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The informative study benefits the prevention of FASDs by outlining a series of components prioritized by community members in creating a culturally-relevant and age-appropriate AEP prevention program and providing community perceptions of AEP prevention for the teens. For the results, the authors should add a table or scheme graphics to summarize the content. 

Author Response

Please see the letter attached here with for a detailed response to the reviewers.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Editor,

Thank you for the opportunity to review the manuscript titled "Community perceptions of Alcohol Exposed Pregnancy prevention program for American Indian and Alaska Native teens." I read the manuscript with much interest and enthusiasm. I find the study interesting and a useful piece of formative research. I herewith submit my review comments to improve the quality of the manuscript. Hope the authors will find the same helpful.

 

Thanking you,

 

Best regards,

Kavitha

 

 

Reviewer's Comments:

1.      The introduction could be reduced and could be focussed to the prevalence and enlighten the importance of such a study. In the present form, the section appears to be fluid and less focussed.

2.      The Methodology needs to be strengthened on:

1.      How transcripts were coded and analysed

2.      Theory used to explain these concepts and make sense of the transcripts

3.      When there were discrepancies between the two coders and analysers how this was resolved.

3.      A summary of the major findings at the end of results would be good to relate the same to the discussion.

4.      Discussion section could focus only on the important results from the study and the rest could be deleted. In fact this section should contain the potential interventions identified from the FGDs and a discussion on the feasibility.

5.      The manuscript could be beneficial to the readers with these inputs.


Author Response

Please see the letter attached here with for a detailed response to the reviewers.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

May be accepted.

Back to TopTop