Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Legionella Air Contamination in Healthcare Facilities by Different Sampling Methods: An Italian Multicenter Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Efficacy of Dog Assisted Therapy in Detained Drug Users: A Pilot Study in an Italian Attenuated Custody Institute
Previous Article in Journal
Toxicity of Naphthalene and Benzene on Tribollium castaneum Herbst
Previous Article in Special Issue
Attachment Style Is Related to Quality of Life for Assistance Dog Owners
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(7), 669; doi:10.3390/ijerph14070669

Animal-Assisted Interventions in the Classroom—A Systematic Review

1
School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, Lincolnshire LN6 7TS, UK
2
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Fredonia, NY 14063, USA
3
WALTHAM™ Centre for Pet Nutrition, Waltham-on-the-Wolds, Melton Mowbray, Leicstershire LE14 4RT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 25 April 2017 / Revised: 11 June 2017 / Accepted: 14 June 2017 / Published: 22 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animal Assisted Interventions and Activities for Health and Wellbeing)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [804 KB, uploaded 28 June 2017]   |  

Abstract

The inclusion of animals in educational practice is becoming increasingly popular, but it is unclear how solid the evidence for this type of intervention is. The aim of this systematic review is to scrutinise the empirical research literature relating to animal-assisted interventions conducted in educational settings. The review included 25 papers; 21 from peer-reviewed journals and 4 obtained using grey literature databases. Most studies reported significant benefits of animal-assisted interventions in the school setting. Despite this, studies vary greatly in methods and design, in intervention types, measures, and sample sizes, and in the length of time exposed to an animal. Furthermore, a worrying lack of reference to risk assessment and animal welfare must be highlighted. Taken together, the results of this review show promising findings and emerging evidence suggestive of potential benefits related to animals in school settings. The review also indicates the need for a larger and more robust evidence base driven by thorough and strict protocols. The review further emphasises the need for safeguarding for all involved—welfare and safety are paramount. View Full-Text
Keywords: animal-assisted intervention; dog; classroom; school; children; learning animal-assisted intervention; dog; classroom; school; children; learning
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Brelsford, V.L.; Meints, K.; Gee, N.R.; Pfeffer, K. Animal-Assisted Interventions in the Classroom—A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 669.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top